These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

F2P Restrictions are too great

First post
Author
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#101 - 2016-12-03 22:59:53 UTC
Shallanna Yassavi wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Miha V wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
I love this game....

Lady, you are too green to claim "I love the game" - one month (since 2016/11/02 membership) is not enough to make up you mind about it and teach another ppl to love it, LOL

What?

You have your dates mixed up. February is not November lol, nor is this my only character....Straight This is just a cyno alt. Maybe dig a bit deeper. Post history and zkillboard might be good places to start.

The need for alts makes $15/month a lie.

2/3rds of the playerbase have only 1 account.

There is no 'need' for alts. It's a choice.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Salvos Rhoska
#102 - 2016-12-03 23:48:34 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
2/3rds of the playerbase have only 1 account.


I find this quite sad.
Two is so much better than one.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#103 - 2016-12-04 00:07:14 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
2/3rds of the playerbase have only 1 account.


I find this quite sad.
Two is so much better than one.


Is it better to divide your attention between two or more windows/screens than to just make friends?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Miha V
Eldest Warriors
#104 - 2016-12-04 03:11:57 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
What?

You have your dates mixed up. February is not November lol, nor is this my only character....Straight This is just a cyno alt. Maybe dig a bit deeper. Post history and zkillboard might be good places to start.

Good for you :)
I love EvE as well, but I do not accept their greedy subscription policy. They will die eventually do not keeping up to date with current games trends. I cancelled subscription to WoW, then EvE when I realized then I prefer to play another games for the weeks. It is stupid to pay for the service which I do not use. "Guild Wars", "Guild Wars 2", "The secret World" and so on use much more reasonable businesses model. It is not PAY 2 WIN, and eventually I spent more my $$$ for them buying in-game stuff and expansion packs LOL.
Regards.
Miha V
Eldest Warriors
#105 - 2016-12-04 03:20:58 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:

2/3rds of the playerbase have only 1 account.

There is no 'need' for alts. It's a choice.

Did you EVER farm at 0-s without big team support???
Who will check gates for strangers? Or you do not value your carrier or top tier battle-cruiser?
Some guy claimed here then we all are stupid if we do not spend a few hundred bucks a month for EvE. :)
I prefer to play game smart, instead of paying money for own stupidity. :D

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2016-12-04 03:27:58 UTC
Miha V wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:

2/3rds of the playerbase have only 1 account.

There is no 'need' for alts. It's a choice.

Did you EVER farm at 0-s without big team support???
Who will check gates for strangers? Or you do not value your carrier or top tier battle-cruiser?
Some guy claimed here then we all are stupid if we do not spend a few hundred bucks a month for EvE. :)
I prefer to play game smart, instead of paying money for own stupidity. :D



Did you EVER learn how to make friends? Shae is right, there is no need for alts. If you're running content that requires more than one person, then find other people to run it with.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#107 - 2016-12-04 03:29:19 UTC
Miha V wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
What?

You have your dates mixed up. February is not November lol, nor is this my only character....Straight This is just a cyno alt. Maybe dig a bit deeper. Post history and zkillboard might be good places to start.

Good for you :)
I love EvE as well, but I do not accept their greedy subscription policy. They will die eventually do not keeping up to date with current games trends. I cancelled subscription to WoW, then EvE when I realized then I prefer to play another games for the weeks. It is stupid to pay for the service which I do not use. "Guild Wars", "Guild Wars 2", "The secret World" and so on use much more reasonable businesses model. It is not PAY 2 WIN, and eventually I spent more my $$$ for them buying in-game stuff and expansion packs LOL.
Regards.


That's cute, considering EVE is only 50c a day and all of its expansions are completely free of charge.

Literally all of them.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Miha V
Eldest Warriors
#108 - 2016-12-04 03:54:50 UTC
Jotunspor wrote:
The essential parts to any game. [...skipped...]

Agreed 100%. I never understood why CPP implements useless stupid hard to develop features(like captains chapter) instead of easy to implement "first person" control of spaceship? Right now movement control of the ships is at the level of 90-s game. You should click to nowhere at 3D universe using 2D interface to allying the ship to desired direction. WASD is not implemented for the ships. It is just sample, to many glitches to name...
Miha V
Eldest Warriors
#109 - 2016-12-04 05:07:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Miha V
Remiel Pollard wrote:

That's cute, considering EVE is only 50c a day and all of its expansions are completely free of charge.
Literally all of them.


"50c a day" only if you pay $180 for the year, otherwise $20/month . It is OK if you play the only EvE game and do not have RL! :)
I play at PC also: GW2, World of Warships, TSW, RIFT, Wargame Red Dragon, Warframe... and more. BTW every single developer wants to be payed for his/her job. I am OK with it.
At RL I have to pay for my RC models(MAAC insurance + club) ~$280+/year, bike insurance ~$1000/year, downhill skiing/snowboarding $100+/day per person. Then mortgage, bills, taxes, blah-blah-blah...
BUT most important - IT IS our limited time, 24h/day which we have to split between our hobbies/work/family.
So, IMHO SUBSCRIPTION model for the games is outdated business model.
Yes, 50c a day is much less then I spend to the beer, but beer with the friends is much more fun for me. LOL
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#110 - 2016-12-04 05:12:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
Miha V wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

That's cute, considering EVE is only 50c a day and all of its expansions are completely free of charge.
Literally all of them.


"50c a day" only if you pay $180 for the year, otherwise $20/month . It is OK if you play the only EvE game and do not have RL! :)
I play at PC also: GW2, World of Warships, TSW, RIFT, Wargame Red Dragon, Warframe... and more. BTW every single developer wants to be payed for his/her job. I am OK with it.
At RL I have to pay for my RC models(MAAC insurance + club) ~$280+/year, bike insurance ~$1000/year, downhill skiing/snowboarding $100+/day per person. Then mortgage, bills, taxes, blah-blah-blah...
BUT most important - IT IS our limited time, 24h/day which we have to split between our hobbies/work/family.
So, IMHO SUBSCRIPTION model for the games is outdated business model.
Yes, 50c a day is much less then I spend to the beer, but beer with the friends is much more fun for me. LOL

You know a yearly subscription is just over $130 right and a monthly is $14.95?

I'm beginning to sense you have a problem with figures, which explains a lot about your problems with EvE.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Grymmstorm
Kings of Groth
#111 - 2016-12-04 05:55:46 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
let's say you spend 15 hours/month playing, which for most people is very conservative. A subscription is $12/month. That's $0.80 per hour. If you can't afford $0.80/hour for entertainment, you really should be looking for a better job instead of playing video games.


This is of course true. It's definitely true for me. I calculate that one day of EVE Online game time costs me 1 minute of work (2 hours of working pays the subs for my 4 accounts for a month). 1 minute of work for 1410 hours of game access. That one minute of work gets me more game time than I could reasonably use (because I like sleeping and i have to work lol).

EVE is 50 cents a day to play in my countries currency, most people can dig 50 cents out of their couch cushions or pick up loose change in a Walmart parking lot and have enough money to sub EVE Online forever.

So when I've come to these forum and see people complaining 1st about the isk cost of PLEX (ridicules, even at it's height a plex = a couple high sec missions or null sec anomalies per day) and now how "EVE F2P is not F enough", I just shake my head. People are literally on this forum crying about pennies.

But we know why, and it's why I love to link this picture. CCP has to deal with this reality (thus this F2P stuff) rather than sit back and rely on the very few rational people who understand value and know that 50 cents isn't a lot of money anywhere except maybe Zimbabwe lol.


First, if you make $30/hour, your opinion doesn't really mean jack to anyone, because you are in the upper 15% of the country in terms of income. Being one of the wealthy people means the subscription price isn't that much for you, imagine that.

Second, "a couple" high sec missions won't cover the cost of a PLEX over the course of a month, or at least it never used to. I used to run missions all the time. Had level 4 missions, average of around ~5m/mission or so. If you did 3 missions per day for a month that's 450m ISK, and the PLEX is much more than that. You be looking at running about 7-8 missions a day, every day, in order to pay for a PLEX. Missions are really not a great way to do it.

Third, I would love to see a few more options opened up for Alpha players. Namely the the ability to use all the tech 1 sub-capitals along with all the tech 1 guns/missles for them. I do not see a problem with allowing them the use of tech 1 battleships and guns. It wouldn't be game-breaking.

Fourth, well, I appreciate CCP even allowing people to login without paying, but honestly there is nothing that can be done on an Alpha Clone that will keep people interested for more than a couple days.
Nicholas K Severasse
Severasse Trading LLC
#112 - 2016-12-04 05:59:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicholas K Severasse
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:

5) Wealthy players in eve make it possible for you to play for free. I buy a six pack of plex sell it on the market to poor people. They get to play the same as me with the same access as me and enjoy the game like me because i pay for their account. And in return they grind isk for me, so i can spend my time pew pewing or whelping ships, or blinging out my ride, or whatever.



Just because there are bad F2P models out there doesn't mean there aren't any good ones. Possibly unnoticed by you, that point right there is what you have to consider when talking about F2P. That is why F2P works, because whales spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars when they can, which itself supports to game for other people to play for free if they so choose. What is wrong with this model exactly? These F2P players don't HAVE to pay anything if they don't want. Only bad F2P models provide an insurmountable paywall blocking content. They may not be the strongest player in the game by spending no money, but in general that isn't what they want anyways, they just want to play... for free. Games are still fun without being #1 in the world on the leaderboards.
Grymmstorm
Kings of Groth
#113 - 2016-12-04 06:26:23 UTC
Nicholas K Severasse wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:

5) Wealthy players in eve make it possible for you to play for free. I buy a six pack of plex sell it on the market to poor people. They get to play the same as me with the same access as me and enjoy the game like me because i pay for their account. And in return they grind isk for me, so i can spend my time pew pewing or whelping ships, or blinging out my ride, or whatever.



Just because there are bad F2P models out there doesn't mean there aren't any good ones. Possibly unnoticed by you, that point right there is what you have to consider when talking about F2P. That is why F2P works, because whales spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars when they can, which itself supports to game for other people to play for free if they so choose. What is wrong with this model exactly? These F2P players don't HAVE to pay anything if they don't want. Only bad F2P models provide an insurmountable paywall blocking content. They may not be the strongest player in the game by spending no money, but in general that isn't what they want anyways, they just want to play... for free. Games are still fun without being #1 in the world on the leaderboards.



Funny enough, one of the games that seems to be regarded with derision on these forums is one of the games that actually manages to balance F2P with actually making money. World of Tanks you can go your entire game career and never spend a penny. You can play every single non-Premium tank in the game, from tier 1 to tier 10. You can even get the premium tanks by winning contests or completing missions. Paying them does not result any ANY benefit in terms of actually winning games. It makes the grind less of a pain, but you are still put in the same tanks in the same battles whether you are a guy who has spent $5000 or a guy who has spent $0. You want to know their secret to making money? "Let's paint our T34 black and charge people $60 for a T34 Shadow Edition!" "Dafuq? People actually bought that? Let's make an IS-6 Shadow Edition!" They literally paint their tanks with a special camouflage (T26E5 Patriot?!) and people spend money to get them. For a free game, I've spent more money on World of Tanks than I'd like to admit. Hell, I even donated $100 to a streamer who was doing tank giveaways so he could keep giving people free stuff (Also gave a few tanks away myself, to people I met in the game. Gave an IS-6 to an ex-Clan Commander, and it became his most played tank within a month, lol...Also donated gold to an EVE player over there so he could get premium time so we could platoon up (At the time, as a non-premium player you could only platoon with 1 other person) it was funny because I wasn't even running premium account myself because I didn't have any need for it, but when we wanted to platoon with three people I decided to give him the gold for it because I figured he would make better use out of premium time than I would)

I'm not saying that EVE has to model themselves after World of Tanks. Far from it. I love EVE how it is. I am just saying that the people who think you can't do an F2P game without making it either unprofitable or a P2W are wrong. World of Tanks does it admirably. And yes, older gamers do pay for "bling" and aesthetic stuff.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#114 - 2016-12-04 06:53:20 UTC
Miha V wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

That's cute, considering EVE is only 50c a day and all of its expansions are completely free of charge.
Literally all of them.


"50c a day" only if you pay $180 for the year, otherwise $20/month . It is OK if you play the only EvE game and do not have RL! :)
I play at PC also: GW2, World of Warships, TSW, RIFT, Wargame Red Dragon, Warframe... and more. BTW every single developer wants to be payed for his/her job. I am OK with it.
At RL I have to pay for my RC models(MAAC insurance + club) ~$280+/year, bike insurance ~$1000/year, downhill skiing/snowboarding $100+/day per person. Then mortgage, bills, taxes, blah-blah-blah...
BUT most important - IT IS our limited time, 24h/day which we have to split between our hobbies/work/family.
So, IMHO SUBSCRIPTION model for the games is outdated business model.
Yes, 50c a day is much less then I spend to the beer, but beer with the friends is much more fun for me. LOL


I have a real life. What part of "I play EVE" causes your tiny little mind to jump to the conclusion that I have no life as a result? It still costs me 50c a day or less, whether I'm playing or not. You spend more money on junk food per year than you do on EVE Online, I guarantee it. It's not expensive at all, you just don't want to pay. Which is fine, don't. But don't pretend it's any objective measure of overpriced.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#115 - 2016-12-04 06:55:42 UTC
Grymmstorm wrote:

I'm not saying that EVE has to model themselves after World of Tanks. Far from it. I love EVE how it is. I am just saying that the people who think you can't do an F2P game without making it either unprofitable or a P2W are wrong. World of Tanks does it admirably. And yes, older gamers do pay for "bling" and aesthetic stuff.



all of those games where designed as F2P from the core up.

EVE was not.

but what was given makes complete sense.

I've not heard one real new player whine about it, nothing but whining vets expecting to be able to fly everything they've already trrained up when they where subbed.

I've honestly heard vets saying things like i've payed to play for years, i should be able to use what i payed for already.

little silly stunts who probably believe that bus ticket they bought last year should still allow them to use the bus when they like for free. they did after all pay for thet bus service for 8 years solid and deserve more.. lol

get the boat, you can post shite like a boss for a year and a day you will not get full access for free just because you feel you should and will if you post enough bollox talk on the subject.

it's real simple,,,,, people can pay and support CCP and have full access or play for free on the limeted alphas and be happy with their lot.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#116 - 2016-12-04 06:56:13 UTC
Grymmstorm wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
let's say you spend 15 hours/month playing, which for most people is very conservative. A subscription is $12/month. That's $0.80 per hour. If you can't afford $0.80/hour for entertainment, you really should be looking for a better job instead of playing video games.


This is of course true. It's definitely true for me. I calculate that one day of EVE Online game time costs me 1 minute of work (2 hours of working pays the subs for my 4 accounts for a month). 1 minute of work for 1410 hours of game access. That one minute of work gets me more game time than I could reasonably use (because I like sleeping and i have to work lol).

EVE is 50 cents a day to play in my countries currency, most people can dig 50 cents out of their couch cushions or pick up loose change in a Walmart parking lot and have enough money to sub EVE Online forever.

So when I've come to these forum and see people complaining 1st about the isk cost of PLEX (ridicules, even at it's height a plex = a couple high sec missions or null sec anomalies per day) and now how "EVE F2P is not F enough", I just shake my head. People are literally on this forum crying about pennies.

But we know why, and it's why I love to link this picture. CCP has to deal with this reality (thus this F2P stuff) rather than sit back and rely on the very few rational people who understand value and know that 50 cents isn't a lot of money anywhere except maybe Zimbabwe lol.


First, if you make $30/hour, your opinion doesn't really mean jack to anyone, because you are in the upper 15% of the country in terms of income. Being one of the wealthy people means the subscription price isn't that much for you, imagine that.


And on that same note, being poor doesn't mean any company anywhere is under any obligation to cater to your personal financial problems by lowering their prices. CCP have families to feed too. But check this out, right? EVE costs 50c or less per day of a subscription. I could make more than that begging on the street. People, you all need to stop pretending you can't afford this game. You can. If you are paying an ISP for internet access to access this forum, you can afford EVE Online.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#117 - 2016-12-04 06:59:21 UTC
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:

little silly stunts who probably believe that bus ticket they bought last year should still allow them to use the bus when they like for free. they did after all pay for thet bus service for 8 years solid and deserve more.. lol



Like those 'mates' that you offer a beer when they come around, and they think that means they can help themselves to another one from the fridge when they're done. Amirite?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#118 - 2016-12-04 07:16:09 UTC  |  Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx
Remiel Pollard wrote:
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:

little silly stunts who probably believe that bus ticket they bought last year should still allow them to use the bus when they like for free. they did after all pay for thet bus service for 8 years solid and deserve more.. lol



Like those 'mates' that you offer a beer when they come around, and they think that means they can help themselves to another one from the fridge when they're done. Amirite?


the ones that think,, wow,,, free beer here all the time, nice one Shocked arrive the next time with no beer again and when they don't get free beer they leave a lot sooner than expected and don't return again unti that free beer flows again.
yup i know the type very well.

they tend to get the cheap ass beer that's going for 24 bottles for 10 bucks (alpha state) and ya know what,, they can like it or get the feck out!

if the very same persons where to tell me hey, I've come here for years and now you hand me this cheap ass beer. yea i think we all know what would happen next Roll lol

and this bull of not being able to afford EVE, yea,, them feckers need to get off the internet and figure out why their income is so bad that they cannot afford 50 cent a day to waste on whatever. them feckers need to sort their life out, i mean the last thing they should be doing is wasting time in a game when they are so ass broke.
Expendable Unit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#119 - 2016-12-04 08:16:50 UTC
Lunavera Poxicon wrote:
Just throwing out my opinion here.

I was so excited to hear about clone states and EVE going F2P. I knew there would be some restrictions as most MMOs that were once paid subs going F2P take that route. I missed playing this game and couldn't wait to log in again.

Right away it was clear the restrictions were heavy. Not being able to use ships I already had as well as equipment or even mining drones. I decided to give it a shot regardless and just play with what was available to see what kind of experience I could still get as an alpha state.

In my opinion, it is already too limiting after only 15 days of play.

Subs in gaming are going away. It was a great model 10 years ago, but now that players don't want to sink all of their time into a single game, play multiple genres, game with friends who have migrated to other games, don't have the money or even simply don't see the value in spending $10-15 per month on an item when they have choices that are one time purchases of $30-60.

Clearly EVE took a step in the right direction. My account is 5 years old and I haven't been playing for several years; now I am. The question is will I be playing in a month or two and my current feeling is no I probably will not be.

Players will spend money on vanity items. Ship skins. Avatar items. Immediate unlocks. Spell effects or in this case projectile/laser effects. If a player just started and they want a ship bad enough, they will drop the $2.99 you are selling it for rather than saving money up. They will spend the $.99 you are charging to quick train a skill that takes days otherwise. Other successful games offer that without a single limitation to the game and have more than 25,0000 players logged in at any given time.

The other option is to sell the game in its entirety up front with a trial available. Once it is purchased, no limitation. This model works very well too.

The current clone state offer is okay, but by no means enough to bring a player like me here for a long period of time. Which, I acknowledge that is just my opinion and only 1 of thousands. Maybe the current model works for EVE and you achieved exactly what you wanted.

You have a really great game, but the way I see it, for me, I already spent 4-5 months as a subscriber here years ago and eventually it wasn't worth the monthly cost. Putting limitations on the game as heavy as you did ensures players like me won't be here long.

Enjoying the game regardless, just disappointed in the heavy limitations.


Alpha clones are useless, but yet free.
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#120 - 2016-12-04 08:52:17 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
This is a kind of ignorant statement I can see come up a lot. 15 bucks a month is a lot of money for many people, and just willy-nilly finding a better job is not exactly a trivial task in many places of the world. Yes, 15 bucks is pocket change for many people in the states or the better off parts of europe, but we first world rich guys aren't the only people on this oblate space spheroid we call earth.

However, all this doesn't change the fact that CCP need money to operate, and truly "free to play" MMOGs are always an illusion. They simply cost money to make and maintain. And as much as I would like to see more people gain full access to the game by not being hit with a price tag they can't afford to pay, I'm afraid it's ultimately not possible.


Video games are a luxury. Not a necessity. I spent years working full time while putting myself through school at night (averaging 80-90 hour weeks total) to prove I deserved a decent job to an employer. I played zero video games during that time, for obvious reasons. You won't find much sympathy from me.


What about countries where minimum wages are far below those of places like the US, or western Europe? Do people in poorer countries not deserve entertainment because they are poor? How utterly ignorant of you.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.