These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can we have ISBOX back ?

First post
Author
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#21 - 2016-12-02 13:37:13 UTC
Rroff wrote:
The drop in numbers around that time wasn't just about ISBoxer/input broadcasting but the almost scorched earth approach to changing some things in the game which hit heavily on people who were using the same feature but unrelated to the problem with that feature and instead of trying to find a happy balance (which often existed) CCP often just swung a bat at it. Surprise surprise a lot of people quit.


Well having experienced ISK gambling roller coaster, I can kind of understand this.

The ISBoxers that I knew who were making crazy ISK, the reason why they quit, as I see it, is like this - maybe there were other changes leading up to that point or around that time that they were not happy with, but when you have means to make 100b/ month or more (or whatever seems good enough for you, more or less) easily and reliably, and you you are very familiar with using such method to the extent it's almost the second nature and synonymous to 'eve' to you, then you could always say 'well fock I hate this change but I can make a few hundred bil easily anyway so I'll just roll with it'

The thing is, when ISK can be made so easily and reliably (although it may have required some investment in set up or some hours needed for grinding or whatever), you can roll with many things that you are not happy with, because you can just use the familiar method to print the ISK.

But when the very core method of making that ISK, the ISK printing machine, gets taken away from you, and you find yourself 'back to ground zero', that's when people think about 'quitting'. My mate who ran HS incursions by himself had hundreds of billions of ISK (or maybe even more than a trillion) when he quit. There were many other things he could do with the ISK he already had, but nothing that could match the ISK he was making per hour (at least not on solo scale without ISBoxer) and not in a way that was extremely familar to him. He could have taken other challenges which could in long term net him much ISK, but he just felt like 'man I don't want to bother with this game anymore'. There were previously other things and patches in EVE he didn't like and we discussed, but it was taking away the ISK printing means that made him quit.

I felt similar for a while after ISK gambling got banned. I mean I hit at least a few jackpots per month every month (don't ask me how, just ridiculous streak of luck that never ended and just kept on coming again when I - and other people - thought I couldn't possibly win big again), many of them over 100b + ISK, and there was a crazy week where I hit multiple mega jackpots in a same week and cashed out 800b+ in a single week. There were like 3 slots running up in that week all going up over 200b JP, and I somehow won them all in the same week.

It was ridiculous. 800b ISK made in one week. It was so much ISK so quick and so easy (well not easy but lucky). But luckily (hah) it was after I experienced hitting 240b jackpot in the previous month and spending ALL OF IT in 2 days on gambling again (so yes, I lost 240b in two days, on gambling), so I knew better at the time to manage the ISK I won (thank god I have something left over now).

But when IWI got banned, I was like back to EVE, and erm... what do I do to make the ISK I used to make from gambling? Nothing could compete ISK wise. I was gambling (both winning and losing) regularly with around 20b on a single evening. Sometimes I ended up with zero ISK sometimes I ended up with multiple times 20b - from a single night. What else could I do 'in game' that could match with this level of ISK winnings?

TBH, I still don't know the answer. I found nothing again that had as much potential winnings (and losses lol) as gambling did. Some people quit because they lost everything they had, because their wallets got zeroed unfairly by CCP, so the rage is extremely understandable, when you log on to game to find that CCP has zeroed your wallet while you have never RMTed yourself, I would have quit too if that happened to me. But some people, I know, they quit, because they couldn't find anything else that could match the rush & the potentials of gambling within EVE.

As I experienced it, there were many things EVE during my gambling days that I could have complained about - but I didn't care because I was winning billions and billions left and right on regular basis. Whatever, let me just drop 100b on an experiment, let me just sponsor that dude 20b for his project, let me buy this for lulz, whatever.

But when gambling got taken away, and I get back to market trading again, and see the numbers and the margins, it's just 'lol what is with all this low figures'. It's like going from running high class WH sites back to high sec level 1 missions. All perspectives get distorted and it's very hard to settle back to the reality/balanced figures in EVE. It will sound offensive, but lot of things feel 'too petty' after you experience the distorted life.

So anyways, I stuck around, because I still have some ISK to play around and some other long term in-game commitments, and after all, I played for many years without gambling and had fun in EVE before I ever gambled with ISK, so I just kinda looked back and put my feet back on the ground again so to say, and I have corp mates that I have been with for like 7+ years, so that helped me to stick around. But for some, I can totally understand why they chose to quit, and I would have quit too if circumstances were even a little different.

So personally, ISK printing machines, when people find them and start using them, are very hard to shake off. You can ignore many other things in the game while you have them, and just roll with the changes you are not happy with. But when the machine itself gets taken away, then suddenly you feel the whole game may not be worth playing anymore.






Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#22 - 2016-12-02 13:40:11 UTC
tl;dr - based on my experiences and other thigns I've seen, no matter how terrirbad CCP make the null sov mechanics or bring bad balance changes to the game, if you they don't touch the ISK faucet they will not see quitting en masse, yes people will rage hard on forums, but many of them are likely to adapt and stay. Nerf the income source and they will start to see people really quit/unsub from the game, even if those people probably have enough buffer ISK in their wallet.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#23 - 2016-12-02 13:46:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Rroff
Toobo wrote:
tl;dr - based on my experiences and other thigns I've seen, no matter how terrirbad CCP make the null sov mechanics or bring bad balance changes to the game, if you they don't touch the ISK faucet they will not see quitting en masse, yes people will rage hard on forums, but many of them are likely to adapt and stay. Nerf the income source and they will start to see people really quit/unsub from the game, even if those people probably have enough buffer ISK in their wallet.


Not disagreeing with a lot quitting over just ISBoxer BTW - but the big drop in numbers was also propelled by a number of changes that hit especially people running their own multi account setup (who often were doing their own things, sometimes of an esoteric nature) who weren't necessarily using input broadcasting. If it was any other game then there might be an aspect of it not being so unexpected if you were affected by changes while doing something a bit different to the crowd but eve is a game that ostensibly hypes the long game and/or thinking outside the box, etc. so penalising people for doing just that doesn't sit well with those that got into the game on that angle.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#24 - 2016-12-02 13:54:29 UTC
Rroff wrote:
Toobo wrote:
tl;dr - based on my experiences and other thigns I've seen, no matter how terrirbad CCP make the null sov mechanics or bring bad balance changes to the game, if you they don't touch the ISK faucet they will not see quitting en masse, yes people will rage hard on forums, but many of them are likely to adapt and stay. Nerf the income source and they will start to see people really quit/unsub from the game, even if those people probably have enough buffer ISK in their wallet.


Not disagreeing with a lot quitting over just ISBoxer BTW - but the big drop in numbers was also propelled by a number of changes that hit especially people running their own multi account setup (who often were doing their own things, sometimes of an esoteric nature) who weren't necessarily using input broadcasting. If it was any other game then there might be an aspect of it not being so unexpected but eve is a game that ostensibly hypes the long game and/or thinking outside the box, etc. so penalising people for doing just that doesn't sit well with those that got into the game on that angle.


yeah I see what you mean. Actually I too used ISBoxer quite a bit running multiple accounts although I've never used key broadcasting (wouldn't have worked anyway because most of my screens showed toons in different spaces and ships). I mean the way you could lay out the screen could be so different from vanilla eve, that just coming back to normal eve client could feel like an interface culture shock. :p

It is draconian to penalise and threaten to ban people who fiddle with windows/interface lay outs (technically, you can still use ISBoxer to do this as long as you do not use key broadcasting, but CCP will never confirm it's okay for you to use it, which means they can ban you for it any time on a whim).

Having said that, although gambling is obviously ISK related, not just cosmetics, I also felt same way about ban on gambling and wider interpretations of new EULA and the CCP responses I received on them - that CCP was killing the out of box thinking. I mean I had multiple projects under construction, some quite far into the development stage and some still at conceptual stage, that did NOT involve any game of chance, but after new EULA changes, according to CCP response I got from support tickets, such sites would not be allowed.

That felt pretty sick to me. Especially considering that some existing sites and third party apps already do facilitate similar functions. It made it very clear to me that CCP can and will interpret their own EULA anyway they want and they can ban you and zero your wallet on a whim in a way that is totally inconsistent with the way they have treated some other cases that are technically the same.

Oh man I better not get started on this again lol. Toobo out now, bu thanks for the good points. ;)

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Prince Kobol
#25 - 2016-12-02 14:01:20 UTC
Jason Coralin wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:

Group activities should be done by a group of people, not one person with his own fleet that they control with infinite ease.


Why? Serious question.

Why are group players morally superior to solo players in your eyes?

Some people, for numerous and varied reasons, don't want to group up.

ISBoxer allowed the solo minded player to compete with the groups. Why is that a bad thing? Why leave the solo players out in the cold and not let them play in the sandbox?

Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

P.S. You probably don't really know how ISBoxer worked if you are saying it was with "infinite ease".


I never said they were morally superior.

I been around Eve a very long time and played solo for quite a while, nothing wrong with it as at the time it was what I wanted. I am slowly making my comeback after a long time out and am playing solo because I choose to.

However I do not expect or demand to perform activities which are clearly designed with the group in mind, i.e Incursions, Bomber Fleets etc solo

Neither do I expect being able to command a fleet of ships in any activity solo with the ease which 3rd party tools such as ISBoxer allowed me and others to do.

I have already said I used ISboxer. I know how it works and yes, it was with ease. It took me about 2 days to get everything just so for my needs which was running 3 passive fit tengus doing lvl5 missions.

Hell there are enough step by step guides on how to setup ISBoxer specifically for Eve. When I first started to use it I found many people on the ISBoxer forum who were very helpful in getting it setup.

So yes, it was easy.

I will ask you a question, what gives you or anybody the right to demand to take part in activates that are clearly designed for group play, solo?
Marcus Blackthorn
Royal Assassins Guild
Chained Reactions
#26 - 2016-12-02 14:03:08 UTC
Damn, I must be on the wrong server then, I've been seeing 25-30K accounts online.
Zachri
The Darwin Foundation
#27 - 2016-12-02 14:05:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Zachri
2Sonas1Cup wrote:
It's been awhile now and we could see the drastic decline in players numbers since ISBOX was banned.

I think it's time for CCP to reconsider the option to allow us key broadcasting and let us have fun in your game for once.


I hope these couple years have shown you how much better it is for everyone including CCP and eve online, when key broadcasting is part of this game.

The "dying" patterns we have come used to see in eve with 15k players online at peak times, compared to when ISBOX was allowed with 40k+ players online at all times, are proof enough that removing the ability to key broadcasting in eve isn't so smart, and actually kills the game for MANY people, not only the ones that do it but also everyone else that would be involved in whatever activity provided by ISBOX.

Maybe just maybe it's time to stop and rethink about how much more content, events, situations and general activity in eve, key broadcasting can provide to everyone, together with happiness and enjoyment, bringing this game back alive again.

Thanks for reading.


How about no.

Seriously, why not learn to work for a living Cool And if that is too much to ask, do you know you can grab a ton of Alpha kids and have them do grand things with (for) you?

CCP's equivalent of child labour isn't just legal here, it's immensely profitable. And fun. Seriously, just get out there, adopt an Alpha.
Hrist Harkonnen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2016-12-02 14:10:54 UTC
The question is why CCP ever allowed botting in the first place with that program.
Serafiel
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2016-12-02 14:18:58 UTC
2Sonas1Cup wrote:
It's been awhile now and we could see the drastic decline in players numbers since BOTS were banned.



And its a good thing. Next please.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#30 - 2016-12-02 14:20:33 UTC
Hm I'm not sure whether it is strictly 'botting'. Broadcasting can be seen as a form of automation but it is not same as running other automation programs that let you go afk for the whole day while the program plays the game for you. ISBoxer made things very easy but at least by itself it didn't run/farm the contents for you. You had to grind yourself, with reduced keystrokes.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Keno Skir
#31 - 2016-12-02 14:22:54 UTC
2Sonas1Cup wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
2Sonas1Cup wrote:
It's been awhile now and we could see the drastic decline in players numbers since ISBOX was banned.

I think it's time for CCP to reconsider the option to allow us key broadcasting and let us have fun in your game for once.


I hope these couple years have shown you how much better it is for everyone including CCP and eve online, when key broadcasting is part of this game.

The "dying" patterns we have come used to see in eve with 15k players online at peak times, compared to when ISBOX was allowed with 40k+ players online at all times, are proof enough that removing the ability to key broadcasting in eve isn't so smart, and actually kills the game for MANY people, not only the ones that do it but also everyone else that would be involved in whatever activity provided by ISBOX.

Maybe just maybe it's time to stop and rethink about how much more content, events, situations and general activity in eve, key broadcasting can provide to everyone, together with happiness and enjoyment, bringing this game back alive again.

Thanks for reading.


As a former ISBox user.. nope

The advantage it gave was pretty obscene. I used it primary to run 3 passive tengus running LvL5 missions. The amount of isk I earned with such little effort was ridiculous.

It was abused so much.

From running huge mining fleets to Incursion fleets.

I enjoyed it whiled it lasted but its a good thing its gone.



The advantage or not advantage isnt part of the equation any longer.

When you speak about advantage but I speak about in game activity, thriving and everyones enjoyment, that advantage you speak of becomes a positive in the equation and not a negative like you are trying to imply.

As I said, all what key broadcasting does is to provide life to EVE and everyone, and money too ccp.

Or is it better to have 15k players online, 10k of them docked rather than 40k and thriving in game content?


I really hope CCP realise that eve is much better game to everyone with key broadcasting, advantage or not isnt the case here, but the fun, the content and activity.


You have literally 0 clue what you're talking about.

And no.
Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#32 - 2016-12-02 14:25:00 UTC
Hrist Harkonnen wrote:
The question is why CCP ever allowed botting in the first place with that program.


From what I recall ISBoxer started as a "helper" program for organising/working more efficiently manually with multiple clients it was only later really that it became more useful for automation type functionality.
Keno Skir
#33 - 2016-12-02 14:29:18 UTC
Jason Coralin wrote:
I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.


See you said "solo minded players" instead of "players who want to fly an entire fleet solo, breaking the game in many ways". If you used the correct statement you'd understand just fine.

Straw man much?
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#34 - 2016-12-02 14:38:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Toobo
While I do play in a corp (always have) and enjoy group activities, I can understand the appeal of 'flying an entire fleet solo, breaking the game in many ways'. Some people (including me), just like pushing the limits of what can be done solo in a MMO. For some, that means strictly on a single account/single ship/single character or whatever, but for others, it means running army of alts all 100% under your own control. Take away the key broadcasting of ISBoxer, and you have a neat program that allows you to manage windows lay outs so you can do this in much more convenient ways (but you have to click so many things yourself one at a time).

I do not agree with OP about 'bring back key broadcasting', but if you are not using key broadcasting, ISBoxer isn't really a game breaking tool. But CCP is very vague about the use of such programs. While on paper it sounds like they just don't want people key broadcasting, on other parts of the EULA and their comments over the years they also have an issue with people fiddling with the 'appearance of the game' to some extent, e.g., using ISBOxer so that overview of your gate/hole scouting alt is conveniently displayed on its own exactly where you want it.

Key broadcasting I do not agree with, but interface/windows fiddling for me is something quite cool/fun/creative, but CCP and some players don't like them. :p

EDIT: Just to add, I run up to 6 accounts at times. I usually have them on a single or dual screen scattered in 1024x768 resolution windows each (so many of them are overlapping). I'm familiar enough with this set up to do what I want with them at ok standard, but EVE, for a game that has such good multiboxing potentials, should really offer more flexible options to manage multiple accounts.

Just to add a bit more - I specifically asked CCP if I can use ISBoxer ONLY for windows layouts and changing screen resolutions to display all my clients in the resoultion I want, and predictably they will not confirm that this is okay. I could do it, because they did not say I cannot do it, but they did say that I can be banned for doing it, without me realising what rules I am breaking)

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Jason Coralin
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2016-12-02 14:42:36 UTC
Toobo wrote:


Key broadcasting I do not agree with, but interface/windows fiddling for me is something quite cool/fun/creative, but CCP and some players don't like them. :p


Video FX and DXNothing is also not allowed, so ISBoxer doesn't really give you much of anything under the new rules.

I could even potentially be OK with not have broadcasting if they allowed the use of Video FX and DXNothing, but nope, no love for solo players, all love for groups.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#36 - 2016-12-02 14:45:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Toobo
Jason Coralin wrote:
Toobo wrote:


Key broadcasting I do not agree with, but interface/windows fiddling for me is something quite cool/fun/creative, but CCP and some players don't like them. :p


Video FX and DXNothing is also not allowed, so ISBoxer doesn't really give you much of anything under the new rules.

I could even potentially be OK with not have broadcasting if they allowed the use of Video FX and DXNothing, but nope, no love for solo players, all love for groups.


yeah you wrote that as I was adding on to my previous posts. This is something I'm not too happy with. :p I mean VideoFX and DXNothing can be just really useful cosmetic tool or for customising layouts, but even that's not allowed...

to clarify on what I asked CCP - I wasn't even asking about using DXNothing, I did clearly say that I will dispaly the whole screen of each client, but just wanted to use ISBoxer to display them at resoultions that EVE Client does not natively let me choose. But the answer still is no. :p

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Nalia White
Tencus
#37 - 2016-12-02 14:50:35 UTC
Toobo wrote:
I tend to be playing the game (or at least hang out with people who do) in the way CCP doesn't want. :p Last month I 'raged' about ban on gambling and many people I hung out on daily basis quit EVE. :(

Oh man, now you bring back the ISBoxer topic, yes, I did lose some EVE friends over that too, who rage quit when it got banned. It was obscene what you could do/earn with it but personally I didn't do it and I didn't think it was an issue, but CCP thought it was. It was also obscene what you could make from ISK gambling but I didn't think it was an issue, but CCP thought it was.

Oh well.


gambling addicts and isboxers... dare i say you have the wrong friends :)

Syndicate - K5-JRD

Home to few, graveyard for many

My biggest achievement

Jason Coralin
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#38 - 2016-12-02 14:51:28 UTC
Toobo wrote:
Jason Coralin wrote:
Toobo wrote:


Key broadcasting I do not agree with, but interface/windows fiddling for me is something quite cool/fun/creative, but CCP and some players don't like them. :p


Video FX and DXNothing is also not allowed, so ISBoxer doesn't really give you much of anything under the new rules.

I could even potentially be OK with not have broadcasting if they allowed the use of Video FX and DXNothing, but nope, no love for solo players, all love for groups.


yeah you wrote that as I was adding on to my previous posts. This is something I'm not too happy with. :p I mean VideoFX and DXNothing can be just really useful cosmetic tool or for customising layouts, but even that's not allowed...

to clarify on what I asked CCP - I wasn't even asking about using DXNothing, I did clearly say that I will dispaly the whole screen of each client, but just wanted to use ISBoxer to display them at resoultions that EVE Client does not natively let me choose. But the answer still is no. :p


Yep, nothing useful is allowed. Using duct tape on two mice isn't even allowed. We wouldn't want the solo players to be able to compete with the groups would we.
Jennifer Starblaze
Fury Transport
#39 - 2016-12-02 15:01:44 UTC
Hell no.

I rather play with 20k legit players who do not use 3rd party software than 40k players, where half of them are at the same level as aimbotters.

If you can not contol x chars without the help of cheating software, then don´t run x accounts. And if you only have fun in eve when you are allowed to cheat, maybe you should think about if you actually really like the game.

Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#40 - 2016-12-02 15:03:51 UTC
Toobo wrote:
I tend to be playing the game (or at least hang out with people who do) in the way CCP doesn't want. :p Last month I 'raged' about ban on gambling and many people I hung out on daily basis quit EVE. :(

Oh man, now you bring back the ISBoxer topic, yes, I did lose some EVE friends over that too, who rage quit when it got banned. It was obscene what you could do/earn with it but personally I didn't do it and I didn't think it was an issue, but CCP thought it was. It was also obscene what you could make from ISK gambling but I didn't think it was an issue, but CCP thought it was.

Oh well.


The obscenity was that players were using ISK gambling to make € and $.
And it only takes a few bad apples to litigate the whole...


Good riddance to both RMT gambling ('cause that's what it was) and broadcasting.

--Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."