These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Maybe Alphas should have Cloaking I

Author
Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#81 - 2016-11-20 08:35:52 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Isn't the whole point to get people playing and then subscribing so they can get these benefits? I see that as a good reason to subscribe for an Omega, not a reason to make it more viable for staying an alpha.

I don't remember CCP declaring that as the only point, no.

If memory serves me correct (and it might not), they have stated that alphas should be a viable way for someone to play the game, regardless of subscription. I suspect that means there will be additional purchasable content coming to encourage people to spend money, even if they are not subscribed.

CCP Seagull's interview on Crossing Zebras seems to support my recollection rather than a more limited point (around the 5 minutes mark onwards and specifically at the 10:18 mark onwards):

http://crossingzebras.com/the-alpha-and-omega-executive-producer-ccp-seagull-interview/

CCP Seagull in CZ audio wrote:
...because we want it to be possible to play Eve Online as an alpha forever...

Interesting. Fair enough. Still against free accounts having any form of cloaking given the afk cloaking issues already in game.

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#82 - 2016-11-20 08:42:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Steffles wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Isn't the whole point to get people playing and then subscribing so they can get these benefits? I see that as a good reason to subscribe for an Omega, not a reason to make it more viable for staying an alpha.

I don't remember CCP declaring that as the only point, no.

If memory serves me correct (and it might not), they have stated that alphas should be a viable way for someone to play the game, regardless of subscription. I suspect that means there will be additional purchasable content coming to encourage people to spend money, even if they are not subscribed.

CCP Seagull's interview on Crossing Zebras seems to support my recollection rather than a more limited point (around the 5 minutes mark onwards and specifically at the 10:18 mark onwards):

http://crossingzebras.com/the-alpha-and-omega-executive-producer-ccp-seagull-interview/

CCP Seagull in CZ audio wrote:
...because we want it to be possible to play Eve Online as an alpha forever...

Interesting. Fair enough. Still against free accounts having any form of cloaking given the afk cloaking issues already in game.

If there was something like a civilian cloak with a normal cycle, but then a 1 minute cool down before reactivation, it wouldn't be useful for anything other than MWD/cloak trick.

That's the sort of thing Cagali was getting at on twitter. A severely gimped capability with lots of problems. Just enough to help T1 haulers through gate camps and high risk highsec systems.
Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2016-11-20 09:28:24 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Isn't the whole point to get people playing and then subscribing so they can get these benefits? I see that as a good reason to subscribe for an Omega, not a reason to make it more viable for staying an alpha.

I don't remember CCP declaring that as the only point, no.

If memory serves me correct (and it might not), they have stated that alphas should be a viable way for someone to play the game, regardless of subscription. I suspect that means there will be additional purchasable content coming to encourage people to spend money, even if they are not subscribed.

CCP Seagull's interview on Crossing Zebras seems to support my recollection rather than a more limited point (around the 5 minutes mark onwards and specifically at the 10:18 mark onwards):

http://crossingzebras.com/the-alpha-and-omega-executive-producer-ccp-seagull-interview/

CCP Seagull in CZ audio wrote:
...because we want it to be possible to play Eve Online as an alpha forever...

Interesting. Fair enough. Still against free accounts having any form of cloaking given the afk cloaking issues already in game.

If there was something like a civilian cloak with a normal cycle, but then a 1 minute cool down before reactivation, it wouldn't be useful for anything other than MWD/cloak trick.

That's the sort of thing Cagali was getting at on twitter. A severely gimped capability with lots of problems. Just enough to help T1 haulers through gate camps and high risk highsec systems.

Your underestimating EvE players. Bottings not allowed but there are clearly bots in game. Automated imputs are not allowed but there are definitely a lot of players using them in PvP - theres a player who comes into 7rm pretty much everyday in 4 inties who's been reported repeatedly and nothing is done about him.

Very simple to make a script that warps you to safes, cloaks up, warps to new safes, cloaks up, add a few random delays. If you get banned change your vpn server do it again.

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Major Xadi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#84 - 2016-11-20 14:51:19 UTC
Mephiztopheleze wrote:
While I get the OPs point..... I really do.

Malcanis' Law will kick in hard, especially for J-Space dwellers. A personal army of 50, free Astero flying, probing alts?

The hard line between Alpha and Omega had to be drawn somewhere. I think Cloaks and Cynos is a pretty good place to draw it.


While a personal army could do the job just as easily in T1 explo frigs, they won't be able to do it in Asteros because they can't cross train. But geeez, the logging in and out. Ugh

Josef Djugashvilis
#85 - 2016-11-20 15:05:10 UTC
7/10 for trolling.

Hell, and I like cloaky campers, especially the afk ones who strike fear into the heart of tough guy null sec folk :)

This is not a signature.

Iria Ahrens
Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
#86 - 2016-11-20 15:50:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Iria Ahrens
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
7/10 for trolling.

Hell, and I like cloaky campers, especially the afk ones who strike fear into the heart of tough guy null sec folk :)


Not all controversial topics are trolls. I was definitely more interested in discussion. You know, people have a starting position, then modify their position based on the comments made by others. And reading through the thread, that's what I got. Only one person responded with insult, there were a couple monosyllabic responses, but most replies have been serious and thoughtful. While I'd like to think the tone of the op determined the tone of the thread, maybe I just lucked out this time.

Obviously, my intention was to bring others to my point of view, but that hasn't happened much. More, I found myself modifying my own stance. That is btw required for any discussion. It is useless to expect or hope for others to change their position, if you are unwilling to change your own. I edited the op to include the idea to make cloaks require fuel, but that was not my idea, it came from Eternus8lux8lucis down thread. Also, the idea to make a cloak only good for 1 minute came up in thread, which would be good for getting past gate camps, but not much else. This was another idea that came up in thread and not from me.

So I am happy with where this thread has gone so far but not because I was trolling.

My choice of pronouns is based on your avatar. Even if I know what is behind the avatar.

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#87 - 2016-11-20 21:03:08 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Aaron wrote:
I know of pilots who can scan down your location within the time it takes to safe log off, when I logged in an hour later I found a bubble and a small fleet waiting at my safe spot.

There are counters to cloaking, you have to be skilled enough to execute them.

You can dscan for probes while safe logging btw.


Yes for sure.

I'm just responding to folks who think there is no counter to cloaking. I know what I speak of is time consuming but very rewarding if you can pull it off.

If the cloaker does see a probe on dscan he will have to warp to another safe and recloak and then attempt safe logoff when there are no probes on dscan. It seems the best one can do is stop a cloaker logging off or possibly kill him when he logs back in if he really has to go afk.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#88 - 2016-11-20 21:10:56 UTC
Iria Ahrens wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
7/10 for trolling.

Hell, and I like cloaky campers, especially the afk ones who strike fear into the heart of tough guy null sec folk :)


Not all controversial topics are trolls. I was definitely more interested in discussion. You know, people have a starting position, then modify their position based on the comments made by others. And reading through the thread, that's what I got. Only one person responded with insult, there were a couple monosyllabic responses, but most replies have been serious and thoughtful. While I'd like to think the tone of the op determined the tone of the thread, maybe I just lucked out this time.

Obviously, my intention was to bring others to my point of view, but that hasn't happened much. More, I found myself modifying my own stance. That is btw required for any discussion. It is useless to expect or hope for others to change their position, if you are unwilling to change your own. I edited the op to include the idea to make cloaks require fuel, but that was not my idea, it came from Eternus8lux8lucis down thread. Also, the idea to make a cloak only good for 1 minute came up in thread, which would be good for getting past gate camps, but not much else. This was another idea that came up in thread and not from me.

So I am happy with where this thread has gone so far but not because I was trolling.


If alphas did have cloaking It would make the game better imo, I know many people would create new accounts just so they could put a cloaky in their enemies systems. More people logged into the game means more pvp opportunities.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Jennifer Sarah Connelly
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#89 - 2016-11-21 01:16:43 UTC
I played Eve for 2 months about a year ago. I really didn't like the subscription based model. I was used to the Freemium model in World of Tanks. I basically spent my time toodling around in WH space and Null using a cloaked ship. I got gate camped once and for careless once while opening a site. I noted that Eve had opened up the pay wall and so I created an alpha thinking I could do exploration as it is the most interesting PVE (in my limited experience). Then I read that you can't use cloaks and was disappointed. But then I have had a change of heart and think I will just try exploration again without the cloak. It will just keep me on my toes more. I am a bit worried that I won't have the skill set to be able to open the containers though. I seem to remember that you needed quite a lot of skills to be able to do it with reliability.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#90 - 2016-11-21 01:35:02 UTC
Rin Vocaloid2 wrote:
I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for way to grief their null-sec foes.

PS: Pardon my response. When I see any idea presented by any player, my first thought is "how can I exploit this?"



Considering you can't log in more than one....not sure this will happen. Especially with cloaking 1. They'll have a ship with a prototype cloak and that is about it.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Mark Marconi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#91 - 2016-11-21 01:43:17 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rin Vocaloid2 wrote:
I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for way to grief their null-sec foes.

PS: Pardon my response. When I see any idea presented by any player, my first thought is "how can I exploit this?"



Considering you can't log in more than one....not sure this will happen. Especially with cloaking 1. They'll have a ship with a prototype cloak and that is about it.

You cant log in more than one on a single computer. Its not that hard to whip up some cheap computers that don't have to do much other than log in and display local.

Plus I am sure there are ways around it on a single computer, that someone will find if there is that kind of benefit.

The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.

After all we are not just players, we are customers.

Time for the CSM to be disbanded.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#92 - 2016-11-21 01:57:32 UTC
Mark Marconi wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rin Vocaloid2 wrote:
I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for way to grief their null-sec foes.

PS: Pardon my response. When I see any idea presented by any player, my first thought is "how can I exploit this?"



Considering you can't log in more than one....not sure this will happen. Especially with cloaking 1. They'll have a ship with a prototype cloak and that is about it.

You cant log in more than one on a single computer. Its not that hard to whip up some cheap computers that don't have to do much other than log in and display local.

Plus I am sure there are ways around it on a single computer, that someone will find if there is that kind of benefit.


Right, and lots of people are going to make cheap computers just to AFK cloaky camp...I'll believe it when I see it (on a widespread basis and not just some chump doing it because).

And if people do find a work around and log in more than one Alpha on one computer...Hello Exploit and Permaban. Nice knowing you.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2016-11-21 02:02:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Steffles
Teckos Pech wrote:
Mark Marconi wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rin Vocaloid2 wrote:
I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for way to grief their null-sec foes.

PS: Pardon my response. When I see any idea presented by any player, my first thought is "how can I exploit this?"



Considering you can't log in more than one....not sure this will happen. Especially with cloaking 1. They'll have a ship with a prototype cloak and that is about it.

You cant log in more than one on a single computer. Its not that hard to whip up some cheap computers that don't have to do much other than log in and display local.

Plus I am sure there are ways around it on a single computer, that someone will find if there is that kind of benefit.


Right, and lots of people are going to make cheap computers just to AFK cloaky camp...I'll believe it when I see it (on a widespread basis and not just some chump doing it because).

And if people do find a work around and log in more than one Alpha on one computer...Hello Exploit and Permaban. Nice knowing you.

I wont' say how you can do it because its not allowed in terms of exploits but there is a very simple way to make eve clients think they're on their own pc when they're actually running on the same machine. Sure most people know about that already in any case.

As for permabanning. It takes no time at all to train cloaking level 1 for your ibis and getting a free account banned means nothing.

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Mark Marconi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#94 - 2016-11-21 02:04:04 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Mark Marconi wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rin Vocaloid2 wrote:
I think you're asking for a **** ton of AFK Cloaky Alpha Alts in null-sec space by account holder who are very likely to be Eve veterans who are looking for way to grief their null-sec foes.

PS: Pardon my response. When I see any idea presented by any player, my first thought is "how can I exploit this?"



Considering you can't log in more than one....not sure this will happen. Especially with cloaking 1. They'll have a ship with a prototype cloak and that is about it.

You cant log in more than one on a single computer. Its not that hard to whip up some cheap computers that don't have to do much other than log in and display local.

Plus I am sure there are ways around it on a single computer, that someone will find if there is that kind of benefit.


Right, and lots of people are going to make cheap computers just to AFK cloaky camp...I'll believe it when I see it (on a widespread basis and not just some chump doing it because).

And if people do find a work around and log in more than one Alpha on one computer...Hello Exploit and Permaban. Nice knowing you.

Considering you could build a computer for less than a 1 month sub to EvE and get a cloaky camper for ever, yes a lot of people would do it. All you need is one of those cheap second hand/recycling places and your set.

As to permabans possibly but people always have used expolits/bots in the past and I am sure some still do. Giving a free account cloaking is just asking for trouble.

The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.

After all we are not just players, we are customers.

Time for the CSM to be disbanded.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#95 - 2016-11-21 18:07:59 UTC
Steffles wrote:

I wont' say how you can do it because its not allowed in terms of exploits but there is a very simple way to make eve clients think they're on their own pc when they're actually running on the same machine. Sure most people know about that already in any case.

As for permabanning. It takes no time at all to train cloaking level 1 for your ibis and getting a free account banned means nothing.


Right, CCP is just going to let that kind of thing go. Sure. Yeah, don't think so. My guess is once they find your OMG accounts those will be gone too. But hey, what do I know. How about you literally go do this and test it for us.

I love how people come up with the most convoluted approach to literally cheat and then justify it as well.

And seriously, you are going to be scared of an ibis with a prototype cloak? HTFU.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#96 - 2016-11-21 18:15:37 UTC
Mark Marconi wrote:

Considering you could build a computer for less than a 1 month sub to EvE and get a cloaky camper for ever, yes a lot of people would do it. All you need is one of those cheap second hand/recycling places and your set.

As to permabans possibly but people always have used expolits/bots in the past and I am sure some still do. Giving a free account cloaking is just asking for trouble.


It is amazing how many Eve players understand opportunity cost when it comes to minerals, but completely fail in applying it anywhere else. Yes, I am going to spend my time building and money a 1-2 dozen el-cheapo PCs simply to cloaky camp systems in an t1 frig with a prototype cloak. And in fact dozens and even hundreds of people are going to do this because they have literally nothing better to do with that money or their time. Sure.

This is the type of reasoning behind every single instance where people light their hair on fire over minor changes.

Oh, and I presume if this change were to go in to effect you'll be one of the people doing it. Right?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#97 - 2016-11-21 18:55:19 UTC
The general impression that I have gotten from playing an Alpha for a while is that it isn't meant to fill many of the roles that traditional alts do.

Scouting? Nope. (At least not real-time.)
Hauling? Nada. (At least not efficiently.)
Cyno? Fuggaboutit!

Cloaking falls pretty squarely into those roles.


Now, if CCP ends up offering intermediate clone states between Alpha and Omega (which, coincidentally, are the beginning and end of the Greek alphabet, so there's plenty of room in between), I'd see a case for cloaking. But not for Alpha. Alpha is the bare minimum to play. It should be limited in what it can do.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2016-11-21 19:10:11 UTC
I'm paying for the opportunity to use a claoking device.

Alphas are extended Trial accounts. If you REALLY get into Eve you will make a subscription. If not why devaluate the omega accounts? Every extra abilitie for non paying players devaluates my omega account and causes multiple other problems.

IMHO CCP has almost hit the sweet spot to make Alphas viable playing chars while limiting them so that you will be longing for an Omega account after a short time. Eve doesn't have any micropayment (except for skins) so the income from alpha accounts is rather limited while they cost the same as omega accounts. Even if you give CCP a hefty margin of 50% for developement + and profit they are still loosing 6$ per Alpha/month.

Alphas are good as they are! Try to convince some Alphas to subsribe instead of making Alphas so good that omegas start to think about going to Alpha!
Josef Djugashvilis
#99 - 2016-11-21 19:44:09 UTC
Dear Iria, do you have any idea how many 'cloaky' threads there are?

Just think of a crazy number, then double it.

It was not my intention to insult you, sorry if came across that way.

This is not a signature.

Iria Ahrens
Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
#100 - 2016-11-21 19:45:44 UTC
Geronimo McVain wrote:


Alphas are good as they are! Try to convince some Alphas to subsribe instead of making Alphas so good that omegas start to think about going to Alpha!



Ok, this thread is definitely not about "making alphas so good that omegas start to think about going alpha." The idea is to give alphas a very limited cloak so it is easier for them to get in-and-out of lowsec/null. That's pretty much it.

My choice of pronouns is based on your avatar. Even if I know what is behind the avatar.