Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Whenever challenged about your point of view or data you cry off topic posting or ad hominem and report the post.
Yet you were the one who initially brought this aspect into the discussion.

Living in and moving through are two completely different things.
In your Opinion.

It does when you have to consider that non AFK cloaking requires different kinds of logistical planning than a standard command burst.

You seem to willfully ignore the repercussions of what will happen if AFK cloaking is nerfed.
Your claim that more ships will be destroyed is a half truth, even then you have provided no evidence to support that other than your opinion.

Any changes to cloaking devices will need an appropriate change the local chat channel.

I agree 100%. Given you've made your point clear and want CCP to decide, it's logical that you don't need to reply to this thread any more, assuming you're serious about wanting CCP and not players to review what you said.

I appreciate your contributions. It's unfortunate that you can't reply any more, given you are leaving it up to CCP instead of us at this point.

It's been good chatting. Message me in game if you want to keep talking on this subject. I'll stick to this thread and send you a message in game if anything new comes up.

Constant scanning is the result not having real time information from local.

Scouting relies on 3rd party applications and any real time information is not universally available to individual players.

Local is not a good way to provide individual players with real time information. The Beta map is on the right track and could ideally evolve to supplement or replace other ways of making real time information universally available to individual players.

I am sure CCP will figure something out and will figure something out in a way that does not render afk cloaky camping redundant (to drift back on topic).

You cannot just drop the qualifiers and pretend my position is something it is not. Reported.

You can use the client just fine to do that. Third party apps might make it easier, but they are not required. In fact, that is how intel channels shared by alliances work. It is a channel in game where hostiles are reported.



Which is why it should be replaced. Finally.

Wait, so he was actually reporting people every time he said that? I assumed all along he was just saying it to try and get on our nerves

Scouting only requires the eve client and a knowledgeable player. No third party tools are required.

If you cannot scout without a 3rd party program, you are doing the wrong job. All you need is your eyes, your ship, comms and a fleet. Wormhole-space works because of the work that players do together. Nullsec could learn a thing or 2 how things are done in w-space. Less soloing and more working together to make it safer for all.

EDIT: if you really need, you can do it with just text, but it's slower.

You're really grasping at straws here. Show me a single nullsec alliance that can function ATM without out of game comms, message boards, requests for hauling, pings for fleets, etc. What you're talking about is already a requirement for nullsec, so you really have absolutely no leg to stand on.

Be careful when you pull BS arguments out, when they blatantly work against you like this. Or do what you said you would and wait for CCP to make a decision about AFK cloaking. You've made your point and said you want to wait to hear that, so why are you still replying? Were you lying when you said you would wait for CCP?

I hope the irony of your last statement isn't lost here, and have some respect for ISD, they are volunteers and aren't paid enough to handle you reporting people just to annoy us.