These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Thoughts on improving the game

First post
Author
Black Pedro
Mine.
#441 - 2016-11-08 08:56:29 UTC
Steffles wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:

CCP has a vision for Eve Online, and the best they can do is stay true to that vision. Arguably, and forgive me for drifting into personal opinion here, the changes that have caused the most problems for the game have been ones where CCP has strayed too from that original vision of a PvP sandbox in pursuit of more mainstream appeal, although certainly the have also made mistakes in execution of many core ideas along the way.

They have indeed strayed too far from the original vision - glad we agree.


I don't think that post you keep linking means what you think it means. It is referring to 'piracy', which in Eve is the profession of taking other people's stuff for a living, not 'non-consensual PvP' as you seem to be extrapolating it as.

CCP Oveur said you were should "[not] complain that you can't pirate easily in 0.6, you aren't suppose to do it easily." CCP kept to that vision and over the next few years made multiple changes that made piracy in highsec more difficult. They buffed the CONCORD response, buffed EHP of industrial ships, and these nerfs to highsec piracy culminated with the insurance removal for pirates which made highsec piracy all-but-extinct. It is now extremely difficult to make a living as a pirate with only bling-fit mission runners/miners and overloaded haulers existing as viable targets, none of which are viable targets for solo pirates, and there are only a small number of players left who have organized, and are grouping up to do it.

This is perfectly fine with me. There are good reasons to have a safer space where there is no financial incentive (actually, strong financial and other disincentives) to shoot the other players. This prevents most wanton violence and give space for new, solo and casual players to live, as well as other players a place to conduct trade and regroup if beaten out of the other spaces. You should be able to make yourself mostly safe in highsec if you take precautions, and that is exactly what we have now where if you fit and haul responsibly, there is no game reason for anyone to shoot you. But there still are consequences for imprudence and game decisions which is what keeps Eve a competitive game rather than just an exercise in building a spreadsheet to calculate max yield and then AFKing your way to riches.

Eve is a PvP sandbox however, and one designed with player-player 'griefing' as the central vision of the game:
Torfi Frans Ólafsson wrote:
“Eve is very dark,” confirms creative director Torfi Frans Ólafsson. “It’s harsh. It is supposed to be unforgiving. The original designers played a lot of Ultima Online, which was a fantastic sandbox game, and it allowed you to be very devious and very immoral in the way that you played. What they loved about it is that player killers, the griefers – people who just went around and killed other people – became so unpopular that other people banded together. Good started fighting evil, and without true evil you can’t have true good. So you had these bands of righteous people chasing player killers, and those player killers were the original Eve designers; they created a game about that mechanic.”
Highsec is not suppose to be immune from this non-consensual PvP. While much of it has been nerfed from the game to give more safety to highsec, there are still wars and suicide ganking, both which have been confirmed many times, by multiple CCP developers in many places to be intended and integral parts of their vision of the game.

So while CCP has strayed from their original vision at times, the current amount of safety in highsec is not one of those cases. Highsec is not safesec, and appears to be working exactly as CCP intended all those years ago. In fact, highsec is mechanically safer than it ever has been in the long history of the game.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#442 - 2016-11-08 09:17:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Ima Wreckyou
Steffles wrote:

We can then safely conclude that killing people in highsec was supposed to be difficult (not easy), that highsec was supposed to be noticeably safe and that the whole point of highsec was to be a place that was quite safe and not easy to pirate in - a place for carebears to exist in while 0.4 and lower, and null was for pirates and others.

Get that into you :)

I don't agree with your sentiment that Highsec is not already safe enough. More safety means more complacent carebears and fatter Freighters, this we already have and it will only get worse from here.

Gankers have to organize quite a lot to make their activity even viable. It is true that we have found workarounds for the NPC responses etc. But if you think making even more ridiculous mechanics for even more safety will change something you are completely delusional. The system will always balance itself out. The more safer the carebears feel the bigger the Freighters will get and the more reward is in it for a corp which organizes on a level they can overcome the barriers against piracy in Highsec. There are already only two alliances left which can do that on a regular basis. Small entities are completely locked out by now.

CCP has to shut down Highsec aggression completely if you want to prevent Highsec piracy which is obviously what you want. This on the other hand will completely devalue all resources found in Highsec because AFK gameplay will be the norm and everyone would be stupid not to mine in a faction fitted mining ship or move as much as they like without any risk at all in cargo expanded Freighter.

td:dr:
- More security means more reward to big alliances where the small pirate is completely locked out.
- Perfect security means complete devaluation of Highsec resources.
Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#443 - 2016-11-08 10:00:36 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:

CCP has a vision for Eve Online, and the best they can do is stay true to that vision. Arguably, and forgive me for drifting into personal opinion here, the changes that have caused the most problems for the game have been oneswhere CCP has strayed too from that original vision of a PvP sandbox in pursuit of more mainstream appeal, although certainly the have also made mistakes in execution of many core ideas along the way.

They have indeed strayed too far from the original vision - glad we agree.


I don't think that post you keep linking means what you think it means. It is referring to 'piracy', which in Eve is the profession of taking other people's stuff for a living, not 'non-consensual PvP' as you seem to be extrapolating it as.

CCP Oveur said you were should "[not] complain that you can't pirate easily in 0.6, you aren't suppose to do it easily." CCP kept to that vision and over the next few years made multiple changes that made piracy in highsec more difficult. They buffed the CONCORD response, buffed EHP of industrial ships, and these nerfs to highsec piracy culminated with the insurance removal for pirates which made highsec piracy all-but-extinct. It is now extremely difficult to make a living as a pirate with only bling-fit mission runners/miners and overloaded haulers existing as viable targets, none of which are viable targets for solo pirates, and there are only a small number of players left who have organized, and are grouping up to do it

Wow you're getting desperate now. Spin it like its going out of fashion :)

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#444 - 2016-11-08 10:06:05 UTC
Steffles wrote:
Wow you're getting desperate now. Spin it like its going out of fashion :)

Ah, nothing left but plain trolling. Looks like Pedro clearly won that argument.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#445 - 2016-11-08 10:39:56 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

CCP has to shut down Highsec aggression completely if you want to prevent Highsec piracy which is obviously what you want. This on the other hand will completely devalue all resources found in Highsec because AFK gameplay will be the norm and everyone would be stupid not to mine in a faction fitted mining ship or move as much as they like without any risk at all in cargo expanded Freighter.
Indeed. And CCP just let it be known that in the context of Alpha clones, they can lock the safety setting to 'green' with no problem at all. Clearly, the game is working how CCP want it to work, and if they wanted a safe highsec, they could make a safe highsec by changing a single line of code.

Face it friends, non-consensual PvP in highsec is here to stay, as was intended from the beginning. EVE is built on the core principle that you are never 100% safe, no matter where you go or what you do*. Highsec is as much of a part of that competitive game as anywhere else as it has always been, just like there have always been forum threads complaining about it.


Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#446 - 2016-11-08 10:45:59 UTC
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#447 - 2016-11-08 11:14:24 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#448 - 2016-11-08 11:39:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you



guess you dont look at killboards huh

Edit: whats a real eve player? i forget

but you still havent answered the question, why dont you play sisi? it was a genuine question not a question you answer with another question

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#449 - 2016-11-08 11:48:52 UTC
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you

Wow, such rage.

Don't you think it is a bit ironic to pretend we want to keep the current state of the game because we "suck" while at the same time you cry for changes to the mechanics in your favor?
Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#450 - 2016-11-08 12:02:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Steffles
Lan Wang wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you



guess you dont look at killboards huh

Edit: whats a real eve player? i forget

but you still havent answered the question, why dont you play sisi? it was a genuine question not a question you answer with another question

A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Ganking is not fightin, a fight is a condition in which you use player skill or assets to defeat another player, or where another player defeats you. Hiding behind Concord, sitting in your crappy little newb destroyer with your crappy little fit and shooting an industrial ship while your ship melts to a 10 million damage npc is not fighting.

Of all the carebearism I've witnessed in my 13 to 14 years of EvE, from the Lofty Scam, to the Zombie zone exploits, your style of not playing is the most laughable and pitiful non-play I've witnessed.

But then it would be since your all alts of Indy chars hiding in bubble fekked dead ends out there in your empty boring null sec farming systems.

The phrase, CODE always wins is complete crap, CODE already lost, that's why CODE exists, CODE is the result of people who can't win figuring out a way to kill people while losing.

CODE and gankers in general always leave in a pod. So bad you pod yourselves.

I have a very distinct and sure feeling that that won't be continuing much longer though :) Enjoy while you still can

I'm on Sisi more than I'm on Tranq btw.

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#451 - 2016-11-08 12:10:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you



guess you dont look at killboards huh

Edit: whats a real eve player? i forget

but you still havent answered the question, why dont you play sisi? it was a genuine question not a question you answer with another question

A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Ganking is not fightin, a fight is a condition in which you use player skill or assets to defeat another player, or where another player defeats you. Hiding behind Concord, sitting in your crappy little newb destroyer with your crappy little fit and shooting an industrial ship while your ship melts to a 10 million damage npc is not fighting.

Of all the carebearism I've witnessed in my 13 to 14 years of EvE, from the Lofty Scam, to the Zombie zone exploits, your style of not playing is the most laughable and pitiful non-play I've witnessed.

But then it would be since your all alts of Indy chars hiding in bubble fekked dead ends out there in your empty boring null sec farming systems.

The phrase, CODE always wins is complete crap, CODE already lost, that's why CODE exists, CODE is the result of people who can't win figuring out a way to kill people while losing.

I have a very distinct and sure feeling that that won't be continuing much longer though :) Enjoy while you still can





are you being ignorant on purpose or do you not care to do any research before opening your mouth and letting your belly rumble?

Edit: so you want highsec to be full of non "real eve" players because without the risk you are just a fake player, gg nerd

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Keno Skir
#452 - 2016-11-08 12:20:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Keno Skir
Steffles wrote:
A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Ganking is not fightin, a fight is a condition in which you use player skill or assets to defeat another player, or where another player defeats you. Hiding behind Concord, sitting in your crappy little newb destroyer with your crappy little fit and shooting an industrial ship while your ship melts to a 10 million damage npc is not fighting.

Of all the carebearism I've witnessed in my 13 to 14 years of EvE, from the Lofty Scam, to the Zombie zone exploits, your style of not playing is the most laughable and pitiful non-play I've witnessed.

But then it would be since your all alts of Indy chars hiding in bubble fekked dead ends out there in your empty boring null sec farming systems.

The phrase, CODE always wins is complete crap, CODE already lost, that's why CODE exists, CODE is the result of people who can't win figuring out a way to kill people while losing.

CODE and gankers in general always leave in a pod. So bad you pod yourselves.

I have a very distinct and sure feeling that that won't be continuing much longer though :) Enjoy while you still can

I'm on Sisi more than I'm on Tranq btw.


You sound unbelievably butt-hurt. By your logic a cruise missile launched at a target of importance "is not fighting". In actual fact that is an excellent example of fighting. Wars are not fought with honor, the side that takes the least risk while doing the most damage has the best strategy. People who invoke the "you aren't real pvp'ers because you don't take risks" understand nothing of combat. The only thing that matters is who's left standing at the end, not how much faux bravado / honor you did it with.

I like to make fun of CODE as much as the next guy believe me :) But they organized to accomplish something that got repeatedly nerfed and for that they are kinda keeping with the spirit of EvE.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#453 - 2016-11-08 12:24:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Steffles wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?

Or why the carebear ganking whingers who are all about "omg ccpleassse don't make us red", "give us tagggs ccplease", "omg cccplease I saw someone mining without a tanks!!!!111" play this game at all.

Its obviously too difficult for you all. This is EVE, you don't like fighting people who shoot back, you don't like losing ships in fights, you don't like going out to low sec or null because you get wtfpwned by actuall pvp players, you're too scared of this and that and lose and risk.

Fek off and play something else, real EVE players don't like you, don't want you, despise you and feel sorry for you.

Thank you



guess you dont look at killboards huh

Edit: whats a real eve player? i forget

but you still havent answered the question, why dont you play sisi? it was a genuine question not a question you answer with another question

A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Ganking is not fightin, a fight is a condition in which you use player skill or assets to defeat another player, or where another player defeats you. Hiding behind Concord, sitting in your crappy little newb destroyer with your crappy little fit and shooting an industrial ship while your ship melts to a 10 million damage npc is not fighting.

Of all the carebearism I've witnessed in my 13 to 14 years of EvE, from the Lofty Scam, to the Zombie zone exploits, your style of not playing is the most laughable and pitiful non-play I've witnessed.

But then it would be since your all alts of Indy chars hiding in bubble fekked dead ends out there in your empty boring null sec farming systems.

The phrase, CODE always wins is complete crap, CODE already lost, that's why CODE exists, CODE is the result of people who can't win figuring out a way to kill people while losing.

CODE and gankers in general always leave in a pod. So bad you pod yourselves.

I have a very distinct and sure feeling that that won't be continuing much longer though :) Enjoy while you still can

I'm on Sisi more than I'm on Tranq btw.
You didn't look at his killboard did you?

That is quite an elaborate space Bushido code you have made up for yourself. Unfortunately, it bears little resemblance to the game play CCP has intentionally built into the game.

Eve is not a space samurai simulator designed to produce "gud fights". It is living, breathing universe where everyone is vs. everyone and players have maximal freedom to interact with each other and create emergence. CCP has spent countless developer hours designing, building, and implementing criminal game play into Eve so that players are not safe anywhere. It would have been much easier to just lock out weapons in highsec from the beginning if they were trying to develop some sort of balanced, e-honour space combat simulator.

That's fine though, Eve is a sandbox and you can play it anyway you want. You can self-identify as space samurai like you, or you can play as a pacifist, a dutiful line grunt, a scumbag pirate, or a righteous soldier of James 315. Do try not to lose yourself in the role though - that's not healthy. This is just a video game and you are not a noble space warrior. You are just a regular, motorcycle-riding Joe who is playing a character in a virtual universe whose design and mechanics you don't seem to fully understand.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#454 - 2016-11-08 12:29:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Steffles wrote:
A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Which begs the question, why do you scream in favour of carebears so much if you don't even consider them to be real EvE players?
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#455 - 2016-11-08 12:47:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Ima Wreckyou
It's like he is some kind of merge between an internet tough guy and a grunt expecting a stand off shooting because he thinks he is playing a spaceship combat simulator. And then he comes crying to the forums because he was standing there all alone and someone just dropped a nuke in his face "without risk".

EVE is actually more like a strategy game and not a bushido space hero combat simulator. If you play this game for 13-14 years and still don't get it and have to come to the forums to cry about it that really says something about you.
Anne Dieu-le-veut
Natl Assn for the Advancement of Criminal People
#456 - 2016-11-08 14:19:35 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?


Can't PLEX their accounts on Sisi
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#457 - 2016-11-08 14:20:25 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Which begs the question, why do you scream in favour of carebears so much if you don't even consider them to be real EvE players?


Lol I always love it when they cry because we fly cheap.

"I'm talking about REAL risk!" they wail "Not your 2 mil catalysts!!!1!" (They think we all fly 2 mil cats) Lololol
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#458 - 2016-11-08 14:20:32 UTC
Anne Dieu-le-veut wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
it makes me wonder why the solo bears that cry for absolute safety in highsec dont just play on sisi, they dont care for interaction with other players nor do they care to fight, so why dont they use sisi which is exactly what they want?


Can't PLEX their accounts on Sisi


thank you thats the sort of answer i was looking for, never thought of that

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Steffles
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#459 - 2016-11-08 15:08:06 UTC
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Which begs the question, why do you scream in favour of carebears so much if you don't even consider them to be real EvE players?


Lol I always love it when they cry because we fly cheap.

"I'm talking about REAL risk!" they wail "Not your 2 mil catalysts!!!1!" (They think we all fly 2 mil cats) Lololol

I think you're all about to become extinct.

Hey CPP - Time we put highsec back to how it was originally designed - http://i.imgur.com/GT0T0oS.jpg

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#460 - 2016-11-08 15:12:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Steffles wrote:
Galaxy Duck wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Steffles wrote:
A real EvE player is somebody that undocks in a non-newb ship and fights other players, or undocks in a battleship or a barge. Real EvE players risk assets.

Which begs the question, why do you scream in favour of carebears so much if you don't even consider them to be real EvE players?


Lol I always love it when they cry because we fly cheap.

"I'm talking about REAL risk!" they wail "Not your 2 mil catalysts!!!1!" (They think we all fly 2 mil cats) Lololol

I think you're all about to become extinct.


doubt it, the flow of alpha clones will keep gankers and carebears occupied for life.

But tbh you are not actually answering any questions you are asked here, all you are doing is ranting and crying and calling doomsday on gankers while you think ccp will change the game to favour your gameplay just so you can plex your accounts.

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*