These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: EULA Changes Coming With EVE Online: Ascension

First post First post
Author
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#441 - 2016-10-13 17:29:37 UTC
Senjiu Kanuba wrote:
Elenahina wrote:
Narku Bourgeoisie Tonisilitis wrote:
Ex-post facto punishments with rule changes--e.g., punishing IWI gamblers and dealers--isn't cool, ever; it's immoral (read: dickish) and creates an unstable economy.

Guess I'm taking another extended break from the game, though I don't foresee any big events on the horizon to draw me back in.


Maybe you should go back and actually read what happened. They aren't being punished because of changes to the rules. They're being punished for breaking rules that were already in place.

Stupidity isn't cool either. You should try and avoid it in the future.




Is that what happened? To me it looks more like they're changing the rules and stopping gambling that way. It's not about the RMT-people, it's about the other parties that also did gambling, like eve-bet for example. They didn't break any rules that were already in place (at least not to my knowledge and apparently also not to CCP's knowledge). But they will break the rules if they continue doing what they do and THAT is why they're shut down.

Yes, IWI was punished for RMT and that's okay. But I don't see why all the other 'legal' gambling services are also shut down.

On a related but different topic: Will CCP host the alliance tournament stream on all weekends again next year, like they did in the past?


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of. After all, 8 months ago the same could be said of IWI. Before that it could be said of Somer Blink.

Further, while gambling with virtual currencies from video games is probably legal in the U.S. once real money is in the picture that changes things and then all those State gambling commissions, and even the Feds can get involved. You think CCP wants a sudden visit to their U.S. offices from the FBI where their Stuff™ is boxed up and carted off?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#442 - 2016-10-13 17:33:34 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:


I didn't say they were all banned. But some were and those that were it was related to RMT,


Teckos Pech wrote:


Stop talking out of ignorance you do not know who was banned or precisely what was taken from whom. Neither do I.


2 posts on the same page contradicting yourself?

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#443 - 2016-10-13 17:34:22 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#444 - 2016-10-13 17:34:43 UTC
Bill Lane wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Bill Lane wrote:
So, let me get this straight. A mechanic that YOU allowed, CCP, was misused by a few people. You took all the bankers money and everything (including the banker that started two days ago). They now have nothing. They did nothing wrong.


Are you being deliberately stupid.* They violated the EULA. In the case of IWI they were engaged in RMT. In the case of Eve Casino several violations of the third party EULA.

You are just being deliberately obtuse.

*Note that really isn't a question...you are being deliberately stupid. Gambling for virtual currencies is not a problem, when they engage in RMT that is a problem. Now after all these problems, and given other issues with game based gambling and actual...you know things like lawsuits and government agencies getting involved CCP pulled the plug.

In short, pull you head out before you suffocate.


Haha. I know WHY those entire organizations were banned. But the fact that they completely screwed everybody involved I likened to banning an entire alliance because of two botters. 3 people were banned from what I'm hearing, the rest, even those who JUST started working for IWI got all of their money removed. I personally know one person who had been there all of about 2 weeks, had borrowed money from people to become a banker, just a couple real friends. All gone.

So please, keep your inappropriate comments to yourself. They screwed good people, and a hell of a lot of them.


Yes, that is what happens when you get involved with RMT. He may not have known it, but guess what that is the way it works and always has been.

Tends to be the way it works in RL too. You drive your buddy to the bank, you wait in the car, he comes back and tells you to go, then when you are pulled over and find out he robbed the bank...yeah, you are in deep **** too even though you had no idea.

People get lured in by their greed and desire for ISK and...well their pretend money got taken because they fell in with the wrong crowd.

BTW, why aren't you pissed at IWI and his long time cronies who set up this situation your friend wanted to join? Here you are raging at CCP which has always taken a strong stance against RMT, but nothing directed at the people who were actually engaged in wrong doing?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#445 - 2016-10-13 17:36:21 UTC
Skia Aumer wrote:
Querns wrote:
Bill Lane wrote:

Haha. I know WHY those entire organizations were banned. But the fact that they completely screwed everybody involved I likened to banning an entire alliance because of two botters. 3 people were banned from what I'm hearing, the rest, even those who JUST started working for IWI got all of their money removed. I personally know one person who had been there all of about 2 weeks, had borrowed money from people to become a banker, just a couple real friends. All gone.

So please, keep your inappropriate comments to yourself. They screwed good people, and a hell of a lot of them.

This is a hilarious story. Those poor souls! They only tried to attach themselves to a hideously flagrant RMT machine and made poor choices while doing so. Won't you think of the childrennewbies bankers?

Imaging tomorrow cops arrest your neighbor for drug dealing or smth. And they arrest you too. Because of course you knew he was a drug dealer and you didnt inform the police, so you were covering him. How does that feel?


Feels like a poor analogy to me, but w/e.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#446 - 2016-10-13 17:41:19 UTC
Skia Aumer wrote:
Querns wrote:
This is a very poor analogy. A banker, in this scenario, is analogous to the drug dealer's courier. They directly aid and abet the RMT machine.

Courier? Maybe driver? Or a gardener? Or maybe just a neighbor still?
I dont know how much bankers were involved in RMT, and I dont think you do either. I mean it's pretty obvious you dont know each and every banker. Yet, you assume they are all ~criminals~. Presumption of innocence and personal responsibility are two major cornerstones of justice and you just deny them.


Look, if I knew my neighbor was a drug dealer and did nothing about it that is not really a crime.

Now, if I was laundering his money for him...well, now I'm in the soup too.

And spare us this "presumption of innocence" that is something for criminal offenses, not something like this. CCP is well within their rights via their EULA which you signed. At best this would be a civil issue where the standards of "guilt" are much lower.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#447 - 2016-10-13 17:42:32 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


They weren't punished.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#448 - 2016-10-13 17:43:33 UTC
Areen Sassel wrote:
Aelavaine wrote:
Well maybe it's because of some laws in the UK and US. I don't live there so I don't care.


Unfortunately the US has rather a habit of assuming its jurisdiction extends outside its own borders. I've no idea how credible a threat this is, but _if_ CCP think the US might decide EVE is gambling-by-proxy, they would have to take that seriously. They might be in Iceland (although they're not entirely, anyway) but their customers aren't.


CCP has U.S. based officers.

CCP uses/relies on U.S. based credit cards.

So the threat is not that the U.S. is going to invade Iceland, but that they might do something like stop CCP from processing U.S. based credit cards--i.e. cut off the U.S. player base.

Seriously, why is this hard to figure out?

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#449 - 2016-10-13 17:50:43 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:


Look, if I knew my neighbor was a drug dealer and did nothing about it that is not really a crime.

That may not be technically true.
In some jurisdictions (and it seems to vary by crime as well) you can be charged with aiding and abetting if you have material knowledge of a crime or a plan to commit a crime and you fail to report it.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#450 - 2016-10-13 17:51:27 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


Because gambling with virtual game currencies while legal become dubious when RL currencies become involved.

Seriously, go read the stuff about Valve/Steam and the skins gambling.

So there is a RISK with leaving other gambling sites active. You never know if or when they'll go RMT. Monitoring that has costs.

If CCP does not want to incur those costs to avoid that risk....that is not necessarily unreasonable. Especially if these cases start to build up and then they impose various regulatory requirements on companies that allow gambling of their game currencies and items. And those can be costly. I know I work in the utility business and regulations make us do things no other company ever does. We spend quite a bit of time and resources trying to figure out our marginal cost. No unregulated company in the country does that ever. We have dozens of people who work on it to varying degrees. People who have pretty high salaries, pension/retirement and health benefits. It probably costs a couple of million dollars. Since it is a regulatory requirement and since we are regulated monopoly it isn't so bad for us. But for a smaller company that faces competition....

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#451 - 2016-10-13 17:52:26 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:

Seriously, why is this hard to figure out?


It's not. It's just easier to run around in a panic flapping your arms like a deranged chicken and slinging poop in random directions.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#452 - 2016-10-13 18:11:40 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


I didn't say they were all banned. But some were and those that were it was related to RMT,


Teckos Pech wrote:


Stop talking out of ignorance you do not know who was banned or precisely what was taken from whom. Neither do I.


2 posts on the same page contradicting yourself?


We know bans were issued. We don't know exactly who was banned. That implies we don't know who was involved and not banned as well. Same thing for the ISK.

Both of my statements are consistent with this.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#453 - 2016-10-13 18:18:49 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?

CCP wouldn't have, if they had a choice. Gambling provided CCP with a nontrivial boost to their bottom line. This whole shebang is pretty much CCP sawing off their foot to get out of the way of the industry-wide gambling backlash freight train coming their way.

Shame that eve-bet got caught up in it, but so it goes.

In the future, I'd recommend that you and yours display some adaptability, and learn proper risk assessment.

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

Dornier Pfeil
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#454 - 2016-10-13 18:53:55 UTC
Toobo wrote:
Making example by punishing the innocent? You think that's good management?


You are not innocent. If you sleep with dogs you get fleas. None of the rest of us want your fleas in the game. Good riddance.
Nomistrav
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#455 - 2016-10-13 19:05:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Nomistrav
Having been on the CPM for Dust 514, I know that a lot of backend considerations are made that are never revealed to the public. I know that it's important not to jump the gun with assumptions and try to read between the lines. I try not to make assumptions without facts, and I don't take baseless accusations lightly.

That being said, I'm not going to lie, a cursory look at these new EULA changes cropping up after The Imperium gets roflstomped and The Mittani makes a complaint - even going so far as to use "the children" as an appeal to emotion - reeks of suspicion. Flashbacks to the War Dec Alliance changes, actually.

EDIT: Lemme clarify something - I try not to get wrapped up in the whole "Goon-illuminati" thing too much, because the very notion is, frankly, laughable. But it does seem that CCP makes a lot of changes after something happens to them. Maybe they're a bit more vocal about it, maybe their notoriety grants them a bit more attention; I dunno, I won't speculate. I just think it's interesting - beyond reasonable coincidence - that IWantISK, which has been around as early as 2013, is now getting this sort of controversy so soon after the events mentioned above.

"As long as space endures,

as long as sentient beings exist,

until then, may I too remain

and dispel the miseries of the world."

~ Vremaja Idama

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#456 - 2016-10-13 19:13:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Teckos Pech wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


Because gambling with virtual game currencies while legal become dubious when RL currencies become involved.




So, no RMTing then, why make a new rule for that?

Look any legit site was operating within the law because there was no conversion to real money, it was all just 0's and 1's somewhere.

So you ban and destroy the sites that break the law and you leave the sites alone that operate within the rules.

You know, like a normal sane person would do.

EDIT: Like honestly, does it not feel really damn dumb that EOH poker takes a hit in this? Its been here since here was here.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#457 - 2016-10-13 19:23:01 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


Because gambling with virtual game currencies while legal become dubious when RL currencies become involved.




So, no RMTing then, why make a new rule for that?

Look any legit site was operating within the law because there was no conversion to real money, it was all just 0's and 1's somewhere.

So you ban and destroy the sites that break the law and you leave the sites alone that operate within the rules.

You know, like a normal sane person would do.

EDIT: Like honestly, does it not feel really damn dumb that EOH poker takes a hit in this? Its been here since here was here.


Well technically these days lots of RL money is just 0's and 1's too. But putting that aside...

Did you not read anything about the problems with just going after the ones engaged in RMT?

Are you 100% absolutely positive that Eve-Bet has NOT and NEVER will engage in RMT? If the answer is no, then there is risk associated with keeping them around.

And you know very damn well that governments do not always do the sensible and/or sane thing. The government (State and/or Federal) could decide that instead of going after every gambling site it is easier to go after the common denominator that is facilitating the gambling.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Urziel99
Multiplex Gaming
Tactical Narcotics Team
#458 - 2016-10-13 19:27:04 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


Because gambling with virtual game currencies while legal become dubious when RL currencies become involved.




So, no RMTing then, why make a new rule for that?

Look any legit site was operating within the law because there was no conversion to real money, it was all just 0's and 1's somewhere.

So you ban and destroy the sites that break the law and you leave the sites alone that operate within the rules.

You know, like a normal sane person would do.

EDIT: Like honestly, does it not feel really damn dumb that EOH poker takes a hit in this? Its been here since here was here.


Well technically these days lots of RL money is just 0's and 1's too. But putting that aside...

Did you not read anything about the problems with just going after the ones engaged in RMT?

Are you 100% absolutely positive that Eve-Bet has NOT and NEVER will engage in RMT? If the answer is no, then there is risk associated with keeping them around.

And you know very damn well that governments do not always do the sensible and/or sane thing. The government (State and/or Federal) could decide that instead of going after every gambling site it is easier to go after the common denominator that is facilitating the gambling.


With the Valve cases ongoing from CS:GO and the UK going after the FIFA gambling sites. I am not surprised that CCP is trying to kill it before they get dragged into a court somewhere.
Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#459 - 2016-10-13 19:29:58 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Eve Bet didn't break any rules that we know of.


So why punish them?


Because gambling with virtual game currencies while legal become dubious when RL currencies become involved.




So, no RMTing then, why make a new rule for that?

Look any legit site was operating within the law because there was no conversion to real money, it was all just 0's and 1's somewhere.

So you ban and destroy the sites that break the law and you leave the sites alone that operate within the rules.

You know, like a normal sane person would do.

EDIT: Like honestly, does it not feel really damn dumb that EOH poker takes a hit in this? Its been here since here was here.


Honestly, what either you or I want doesn't matter, here. CCP isn't going to allow gambling sites to continue to exist, because they value their ability to do business in the United States more than whatever bullshit justifications you're spewing. Please, for your own sake, move on.

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#460 - 2016-10-13 19:30:45 UTC
Urziel99 wrote:


With the Valve cases ongoing from CS:GO and the UK going after the FIFA gambling sites. I am not surprised that CCP is trying to kill it before they get dragged into a court somewhere.


Exactly.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online