These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: EULA Changes Coming With EVE Online: Ascension

First post First post
Author
Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#141 - 2016-10-12 18:21:07 UTC
Prt Scr wrote:
Have i read the new EULA correctly?

I can set up and run a 'eve online gambling site' just like the ones that are running or where running before closed for RMT, providing that it is a scam and the only 'winner 'is me?



No. This has already been covered in the EULA. A while back There were common scams with people using API to "show wallet transactions" to prove they were legit isk doublers. CCP banned using external sites for scamming at that point as they were getting too many service tickets blaming the API. Your suggestion would fall into the same category.
Jew Jew Binks
Doomheim
#142 - 2016-10-12 18:23:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Jew Jew Binks
Kaoraku Shayiskhun wrote:
Toobo wrote:
Chribba's onto something here. There are many 'services' people pay for with ISK, such as TS hosting and websites, etc. What's up with all those?


You really can't read? Paying ISK for a service (especially for an ingame service) is not a gambling. Paying ISK for hosting a website not a gambling either.


it's RMT
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#143 - 2016-10-12 18:25:35 UTC
Well, I never got involved with the various 3rd party gambling services and I didn't care if they operated using in-game assets / ISK.

However this latest change to the EULA / TOS seems like a knee-jerk reaction than a fully thought out decision based on factual information. Even if it is, the main thing I see happening here is CCP becoming more fascist.

CCP's Eve Online = The New Fatherland.



DMC
Kaoraku Shayiskhun
Simple Designs
#144 - 2016-10-12 18:25:38 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
A raffle is gambling.


Sssssh dude, that was irony, I wanted to hear the answer from her Ugh
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#145 - 2016-10-12 18:29:52 UTC
Kaoraku Shayiskhun wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
A raffle is gambling.


Sssssh dude, that was irony, I wanted to hear the answer from her Ugh


Dammit...sorry. Oops

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Dex Cordell
EVE University
Ivy League
#146 - 2016-10-12 18:33:54 UTC
Urziel99 wrote:
Of course then you have to prove that there is a minor competing in the tournament. Good luck with that.


sure, and where is the proof that any minors that need protecting are playing on EveBet or similar sites? same thing :)
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#147 - 2016-10-12 18:34:40 UTC
Alan Mathison wrote:
This prevents the horde of Alpha gankers we're all worried about.


Hi Alan, I'm sure you intended to make it clear that you have no idea who's worried about being ganked by an Alpha Clone player, let alone whether it encompasses the entire player base. So I helped you (italics mine).
Oraac Ensor
#148 - 2016-10-12 18:35:42 UTC
Obil Que wrote:

Right now: CCP has the right to terminate your account immediately if you don't pay
After: CCP will notify you 90 days before terminating you if you don't pay
Reality: CCP hasn't ever used this clause

Why people are up in arms about getting 90 days notice to something CCP currently has the right to do immediately is beyond me.

The new EULA wording says nothing about giving notice:
Quote:
CCP may terminate the EULA, close all your Accounts, and cancel all rights granted to you under the EULA if: (i) your account has been inactive for a number of 90 days;

It simply reserves CCP's right to close your accounts if any of them is inactive for 90 days.

What bothers me is the use of the word "all" that I've highlighted. That means that if you have several accounts and any one of them becomes inactive CCP may close ALL of them - even those that are fully subbed.

That may not be the intention, but it's what that wording means.
Geronimo McVain
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#149 - 2016-10-12 18:38:02 UTC
IMHO CCPs PR crew should take a look at the donations some Casinos made and maybe replace it. It would be a shame if things like CZ went down the drain. If you want news sides and other things player sponsored then there must be enough (game)money involved. You don't have to like IWI and Co but they had some positive effects for Eve.
Dex Cordell
EVE University
Ivy League
#150 - 2016-10-12 18:40:12 UTC
Skia Aumer wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...

Why do you think gambling IRL is restricted in many countries?
Because gambling is bad, mkay.


nope, it's because the authorities feel a need to substitute parents that are too stupid to properly teach their kids about things that are unhealthy for life. Why in the world is it, that I don't need anything restricted, and despite not needing it, I know enough about this or that being bad for me, to not end up homeless after having lost everything to gambling, or even dead from drug overdose?

In fact (a little overstretched, just to prove my point), remove any restrictions on anything, you'll leave more breathing and living room for people intelligent enough not to need being told what's wrong for their life.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#151 - 2016-10-12 18:41:12 UTC
Dex Cordell wrote:
Urziel99 wrote:
Of course then you have to prove that there is a minor competing in the tournament. Good luck with that.


sure, and where is the proof that any minors that need protecting are playing on EveBet or similar sites? same thing :)


Don't need it, just needs to be possible. The American compulsion to sue then takes over.

Fat Buddah
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#152 - 2016-10-12 18:42:56 UTC
Here's a question:

Let's say I want a Black Ops BPC, but I have no skill.
Then I talk with some alliance dude on Discord and he's willing to help.
So I give him enough ISK to buy a single run BPC, required data cores, and the job installation fee. Also a bit of ISK for his trouble.
In short, I reach a deal with a dude through an external service, and hand over my ISK for a chance based outcome.
Am I breaking the new EULA?
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#153 - 2016-10-12 18:43:27 UTC
Dex Cordell wrote:
Skia Aumer wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...

Why do you think gambling IRL is restricted in many countries?
Because gambling is bad, mkay.


nope, it's because the authorities feel a need to substitute parents that are too stupid to properly teach their kids about things that are unhealthy for life. Why in the world is it, that I don't need anything restricted, and despite not needing it, I know enough about this or that being bad for me, to not end up homeless after having lost everything to gambling, or even dead from drug overdose?

In fact (a little overstretched, just to prove my point), remove any restrictions on anything, you'll leave more breathing and living room for people intelligent enough not to need being told what's wrong for their life.


Look, I'm pretty sure most people at CCP don't care if you want to gamble with ISK. And they might be fine with some gambling sites in an ideal world.

But we don't live in an ideal world. So CCP just decided to chuck the whole thing into the waste bin to be done with it and avoid any hassles that could involve IRL lawyers and costs.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Momiji Sakora
Omni Galactic
Central Omni Galactic Group
#154 - 2016-10-12 18:43:40 UTC
Fat Buddah wrote:
Here's a question:

Let's say I want a Black Ops BPC, but I have no skill.
Then I talk with some alliance dude on Discord and he's willing to help.
So I give him enough ISK to buy a single run BPC, required data cores, and the job installation fee. Also a bit of ISK for his trouble.
In short, I reach a deal with a dude through an external service, and hand over my ISK for a chance based outcome.
Am I breaking the new EULA?


this is just being pedantic.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#155 - 2016-10-12 18:44:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
CCP Falcon wrote:
Good afternoon capsuleers!

Today we're here to announce some changes to the EVE Online EULA that are coming with the launch of EVE Online: Ascension.

You can read all about them in this Dev Blog, which includes a handy red-lined version of the new EULA that will come into effect on Tuesday, November 8th, 2016.


Updates & Clarifications:

The 90 day clause:

Our policy on inactive accounts has not changed, we have simply shortened the notice period from six months to three months due to a potentially higher volume of account creation.


Not going to read through all this to see if anybody had called you guys out on it but here:

So to be clear, after years of free publicity as these sites sponsored places like EN24, CZ, alllllllll the podcasts that got you attention on twitch and gaming sites, after they carry your tournament this year for the first bit and do an arguably better job than you yourself have this year, after all that, you're just going to take a heaving dump on their chest and outright shut them down because of .........

What a great way to thank your playerbase for its years of service keeping your company afloat.


So your own media is sparse, who do you suggest pays the writers that generate interest in your game now? Who pays the streamers that give newer players a glimpse of a game they might get hooked on?

Your community held you up when you were down, and your response to that is to purposely gut everything that currently generates content from the player base.


EDIT: Not to mention, prohibition has literally never worked, people will still gamble.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Dex Cordell
EVE University
Ivy League
#156 - 2016-10-12 18:45:06 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
Urziel99 wrote:
Of course then you have to prove that there is a minor competing in the tournament. Good luck with that.


sure, and where is the proof that any minors that need protecting are playing on EveBet or similar sites? same thing :)


Don't need it, just needs to be possible. The American compulsion to sue then takes over.



yeah I know, like that old lady that dried her pet dog in the microwave oven and then sued Whirlpool for not warning people that they're not supposed to do that, and got millions out of it. In America, everything is possible.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#157 - 2016-10-12 18:46:03 UTC
Fat Buddah wrote:
Here's a question:

Let's say I want a Black Ops BPC, but I have no skill.
Then I talk with some alliance dude on Discord and he's willing to help.
So I give him enough ISK to buy a single run BPC, required data cores, and the job installation fee. Also a bit of ISK for his trouble.
In short, I reach a deal with a dude through an external service, and hand over my ISK for a chance based outcome.
Am I breaking the new EULA?


No.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#158 - 2016-10-12 18:47:32 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Good afternoon capsuleers!

Today we're here to announce some changes to the EVE Online EULA that are coming with the launch of EVE Online: Ascension.

You can read all about them in this Dev Blog, which includes a handy red-lined version of the new EULA that will come into effect on Tuesday, November 8th, 2016.


Updates & Clarifications:

The 90 day clause:

Our policy on inactive accounts has not changed, we have simply shortened the notice period from six months to three months due to a potentially higher volume of account creation.


Not going to read through all this to see if anybody had called you guys out on it but here:

So to be clear, after years of free publicity as these sites sponsored places like EN24, CZ, alllllllll the podcasts that got you attention on twitch and gaming sites, after they carry your tournament this year for the first bit and do an arguably better job than you yourself have this year, after all that, you're just going to take a heaving dump on their chest and outright shut them down because of .........

What a great way to thank your playerbase for its years of service keeping your company afloat.


So your own media is sparse, who do you suggest pays the writers that generate interest in your game now? Who pays the streamers that give newer players a glimpse of a game they might get hooked on?

Your community held you up when you were down, and your response to that is to purposely gut everything that currently generates content from the player base.


EDIT: Not to mention, prohibition has literally never worked, people will still gamble.


So how much ISK was taken out of your wallet? P

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#159 - 2016-10-12 18:47:43 UTC
I never denied raffle is gambling. It's normal in gambling that you increase your bet either your winning chance increases or the potential winning amount increases.

Yes I'm unhappy that my favourite toy got called back, because some people can choke from it, and there were some dodgy people working in the toy factory, and some dodgy dealers selling these toys.

But I have never choked from the toy, I never broke any laws in buying this toy, and this toy was perfectly legal to purchase, and I purchased it with money I earned in legitimate ways that can be audited and accounted for, and now they are closing down the toy factory, confiscating everything from the dealers who may not have broken any law effective at the time, and taking my own freaking away too while at it.

RMT was always bannable offense and I never did it, and I support strictest action on those who RMT. But again, I stress the point, surely not EVERYONE in the whole process of IWI committed, unless CCP has evidences proving that ALL of them did. I trust some of the bankers I got to know decently through the community, but obviously I cannot say for a fact they RMT or not. but I know I never RMTed, and I know other players that they never RMTed (because I know them out of game/IRL too and we been gaming togther for more than 2 decades), and yet EVERYONE is affected in a negative way.

Again, I stress again. I'm not protesting against punishing anyone who did wrong. I'm not supporting any RMTer. I support ban and confiscation and punishment to those who broke the rules. But the fact is that thousands of players have been effected negatively. Such blanket treatment is just negative way to manage the game world/system, and makes me lose faith in CCP to manage the game in reliable manner. I'm not even commenting in a 'good way' or 'bad way', but this immediate enforcement of negative action just makes CCP and the game so unreliable to put long term trust and commitment on it, and I have always stuck by CCP through thick and thin and even applauded them for :effort: during Incarna.

What they are doing now is just sick.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#160 - 2016-10-12 18:50:08 UTC
I didn't do the gambling thing save a couple times I tried Somer Blink,so no big loss for me. And I think I lean towards the opinion that CCP should have never allowed it in the 1st place (same with ISBoxer). The legal implications shore up that belief for me.

All that said I will offer this one bit of Devil's Advocacy. CCP has a tendency to shoot it's self in the foot when making changes like this. Like with the whole skill que changes that lead to a decrease in logins. Or how the Sov changes almost guarantee there won't be another Asakai or B-R (ie huge battle that generates PR that leads to subs)

There will be negative unintended consequences behind this, because some people used the stuff the got from these gambling sites to create content, whether it's the guy who won that Cynabal that one time (and that led him to try solo pvp now he's doing it every day) or the shadowy "Broker-like" figure starting massive New Eden changing warsm (that generate real life news and thus subs) because some dude ticked him off.