These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: EULA Changes Coming With EVE Online: Ascension

First post First post
Author
Arrendis
TK Corp
#81 - 2016-10-12 16:26:48 UTC
Brusanan wrote:
Robin Wren wrote:
Games of chance are not games of skill (poker), but as part of poker involves elements of chance where is the line ?

I'm sure Eve Online Hold'Em is covered by this ban on gambling as well.


It is, and they've posted to reddit that they're shutting down on the 7th.
Manella Antollare
African Atomic.
#82 - 2016-10-12 16:28:53 UTC
Toobo wrote:
CCP, I will talk about IWI specifically, that you shut down and disbanded today with immediate effect.

First off, no I don't need my ISK back from my IWI account. After I claimed all the winnings I have about 100b in IWI account and 160m tokens which is roughly 14 billions worth, so probably maximum 120b ISK loss from not being able to withdraw from IWI account any more.

CCP you may not care, but those who played in IWI in recent months will know. Toobo doesn't rage on ISK loss. Toobo doesn't shed a single drop of tear at 120b loss. 120b ISK loss doesn't hurt my in-game financial stability or activities - I am perfectly fine and able to write it off as a loss. And I cashed out over a trillion in September from multiple jackpots and big wins, so no, my RAGE about closing of IWI is not about ISK, in any way, whatsoever.

It's about the fact that CCP has made decision to shut down a players created/run project, and punishing everyone involved in it in a blanket bombing, with no warning or explanations.

I get that CCP must have evidence of some involved RMT-ing, but I have never RMT'ed in my whole eve career, CCP can look through any records of mine and YOU will KNOW that I never RMTed. But yet, I lost my ISK from your shutdown of IWI.

There must be many others. SOME bankers/players who made lots of ISK may have RMTed. Ban them. I don't like RMT tards anyway. Ban them for good. I'm happy with that.

But why should ALL players, and non offending staffs of the site should lose the ISK?

CCP cannot guarantee that our ISK trusted to a third party, especially out of game site, will be safe and will be returned. I understand that too and accept that. But people got screwed not because IWI staff or anyone 'scammed' us or 'stole' our ISK, but because CCP has destroyed all means for them to pay back the players. It is NOT IWI that caused the loss of ISK and no return/reimbursement to players, it is CCP decision to implement a blanket ban and confiscation of all assets and ISK that have caused the loss for the players.

This is unacceptable, because whether it's 1 ISK or 10b ISK or 10t ISK, players have taken loss, not through any failure in game play choices in-game, not because they got 'scammed' or got tricked by a better player, but because DEV made the decision to forcefully disband the IWI corp and take all ISK from bankers wallets - it is the DEV action that caused this loss to the players.

I don't care whether this is fair or not. I don' believe in fair world, neither IRL or in-game. So I'm not raging because CCP has done anything 'unfair'. I'm not happy because the Dev took an action which only Dev/GM can take, with no chance of player response, and no chance of non-RMT involved bankers to pay back the other players. This is not question of 'fair' or not, it's about CCP implementing an action with no warning, to which all players are powerless to and can only suffer from.

CCP could have banned the RMT-ers, bankers or players or whoever, gambling or not. But why do this to everyone?

Especially considering that EVE-Bet has time to 'wind down' and pay out/settle with players in civilised manner?

Has CCP discussed with player-base/CSM about what we think about third party asset/isk transfers and such? Has there been any announcement that CCP is 'reviewing' the situation? Has there been any notice to the sites like IWI that they should stop taking deposits and start paying out the players, in good will, in a civilised manner?

It's not about the ISK, it's not about RMT, it's about CCP carpet bombing quite significant number of players regardless of what they have done, while many people involved (be it a staff or players) have possibly never broken any EULA while that was in effect.

So look, what CCP has done is this.

We, as players, did things which were never banned in EULA, had fun, built community, made some ISK (or lost ISK, for most people), got inspired, and the operation funded the most advertised EVE events in recent years, and all that.

Then suddenly, you change EULA. OK, CCP as a company can do that, any time, to change EULA and TOS, with or without notice. I can even accept that, I have no sense of entitlement on this at all.

But to TAKE AWAY something that has all been done within EULA, by applying the suddenly changed EULA to the previous periods and making any ISK gains from those void? You can say, ok from today, no more, fair enough. But to say, ok, no more from today, and we will take what you earned before too, because we changed the rules today and want to apply it to the time when this rule didn't exist.

Seriously CCP. You are getting something really rare here. I've won trillions and lost trillions. My life time winning is over 117 TRILLIONS. Toobo doesn't shed a drop of tear or rage at ISK loss, especially considering I only lost 120b isk maximum on this as I have habit of cashing out regularly.

But what you've done to IWI, that's just stupid. And you get a single drop of Toobo tear but with no salt in it, but lots of RAGE from Toobo who nobody has ever seen rage in EVE.

You destroyed ISK. Crap but that can happen.

You destroyed community. Sad, but it can be built again through other means.

You destroyed player experience and the trust in the system of game management. That is beyond sad.

That's all. You are beyond sad.


Toobo.






whats up with the talking about yourself in 3rd person?

Confirmed scrublord.

Erika Mizune
Lucifer's Hammer
A Band Apart.
#83 - 2016-10-12 16:31:06 UTC
Obil Que wrote:
Toobo wrote:
snip


TL:DR

I gave billions of my money to a guy and he got banned
*tears*
Why CCP, why?




Did you read his post?

He's talking about the players and how Eve Bet got time to properly honor last minute withdraws until the change goes in full effect but honest players on IWI didn't get the same.

CCP also closed and seized Eve Casino - Which haven't even been open yet! - they haven't accepted ANY ISK yet since it was still in testing, but yet all the bankers there have had their isk seized as well?

There are things that don't make sense here - I understand it's a risk to hand over your isk to these sites in the first place to feed your addiction, but they did give Eve Bet the benefit of the doubt.

Former DJ & Manager of Eve Radio | Blog | Sounds of New Eden | Twitch | Twitter

Urziel99
Multiplex Gaming
Tactical Narcotics Team
#84 - 2016-10-12 16:33:18 UTC
Erika Mizune wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
Toobo wrote:
snip


TL:DR

I gave billions of my money to a guy and he got banned
*tears*
Why CCP, why?




Did you read his post?

He's talking about the players and how Eve Bet got time to properly honor last minute withdraws until the change goes in full effect but honest players on IWI didn't get the same.

CCP also closed and seized Eve Casino - Which haven't even been open yet! - they haven't accepted ANY ISK yet since it was still in testing, but yet all the bankers there have had their isk seized as well?

There are things that don't make sense here - I understand it's a risk to hand over your isk to these sites in the first place to feed your addiction, but they did give Eve Bet the benefit of the doubt.



Probably due to IronBank's involvement with both. Guilt by association.
Vicata Heth
Sensible People
Sigma Grindset
#85 - 2016-10-12 16:34:04 UTC
Janeos wrote:
Momiji Sakora wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...


I think the major bit of this is that it's cost CCP a ton of money and manhours to investigate RMT in the cases named, and others. Time and again isk gambling sites seem to slip into RMT along the way - and CCP have had to investigate. Not to mention accusations true or false on these sites having to be investigated. So why not save time and just cut them out entirely.

Beyond that, it's a form of income that is completely immune to in-game interdiction of any kind. They have no stations to destroy, no logistics to disrupt, no ratters to gank. They were more untouchable by capsuleers than teh HK Fortizar.


Tell us where the bad bankers touched you. Ironic to see a goon posting about untouchable income, of all people. Technetium anyone?
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#86 - 2016-10-12 16:34:15 UTC
Erika Mizune wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
Toobo wrote:
snip


TL:DR

I gave billions of my money to a guy and he got banned
*tears*
Why CCP, why?




Did you read his post?

He's talking about the players and how Eve Bet got time to properly honor last minute withdraws until the change goes in full effect but honest players on IWI didn't get the same.

CCP also closed and seized Eve Casino - Which haven't even been open yet! - they haven't accepted ANY ISK yet since it was still in testing, but yet all the bankers there have had their isk seized as well?

There are things that don't make sense here - I understand it's a risk to hand over your isk to these sites in the first place to feed your addiction, but they did give Eve Bet the benefit of the doubt.


Thank you. What I wanted to say in more succinct manner.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Urziel99
Multiplex Gaming
Tactical Narcotics Team
#87 - 2016-10-12 16:38:24 UTC
Vicata Heth wrote:
Janeos wrote:
Momiji Sakora wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...


I think the major bit of this is that it's cost CCP a ton of money and manhours to investigate RMT in the cases named, and others. Time and again isk gambling sites seem to slip into RMT along the way - and CCP have had to investigate. Not to mention accusations true or false on these sites having to be investigated. So why not save time and just cut them out entirely.

Beyond that, it's a form of income that is completely immune to in-game interdiction of any kind. They have no stations to destroy, no logistics to disrupt, no ratters to gank. They were more untouchable by capsuleers than teh HK Fortizar.


Tell us where the bad bankers touched you. Ironic to see a goon posting about untouchable income, of all people. Technetium anyone?



You mean the towers that could be reinforced to stop the moon mining? Apples meet oranges.
Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#88 - 2016-10-12 16:41:58 UTC
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...

Why do you think gambling IRL is restricted in many countries?
Because gambling is bad, mkay.
Skyler Hawk
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#89 - 2016-10-12 16:42:04 UTC
Real shame to see Eve-Bet go - they were apparently clean, and added a lot to the Alliance Tournament as well as providing very generous financial support to various player-run endeavours.
Erika Mizune
Lucifer's Hammer
A Band Apart.
#90 - 2016-10-12 16:42:30 UTC
Manella Antollare wrote:
Toobo wrote:
snip


whats up with the talking about yourself in 3rd person?


Toobo does what Toobo does. Cool

Former DJ & Manager of Eve Radio | Blog | Sounds of New Eden | Twitch | Twitter

Xylem Viliana
homeless bum
#91 - 2016-10-12 16:44:19 UTC
Im rather curious how much ISK assets have been removed from the game by this.

Would CCP be willing to shed a little light on what kind of figure we would be looking at?
Obil Que
Star Explorers
Solis Tenebris
#92 - 2016-10-12 16:48:19 UTC
Erika Mizune wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
Toobo wrote:
snip


TL:DR

I gave billions of my money to a guy and he got banned
*tears*
Why CCP, why?




Did you read his post?

He's talking about the players and how Eve Bet got time to properly honor last minute withdraws until the change goes in full effect but honest players on IWI didn't get the same.

CCP also closed and seized Eve Casino - Which haven't even been open yet! - they haven't accepted ANY ISK yet since it was still in testing, but yet all the bankers there have had their isk seized as well?

There are things that don't make sense here - I understand it's a risk to hand over your isk to these sites in the first place to feed your addiction, but they did give Eve Bet the benefit of the doubt.


EVEbet wasn't banned for RMT.
IWI was banned for RMT
EVE Casino was banned for other violations
He, and everyone else, gave money to an RMTer who got banned
So yeah, they lost their money because it wasn't their money the moment they gave it to someone else

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#93 - 2016-10-12 16:54:22 UTC
Xylem Viliana wrote:
Im rather curious how much ISK assets have been removed from the game by this.

Would CCP be willing to shed a little light on what kind of figure we would be looking at?

We shall see it in the next economic report.
Vicata Heth
Sensible People
Sigma Grindset
#94 - 2016-10-12 16:56:15 UTC
Urziel99 wrote:
Vicata Heth wrote:
Janeos wrote:
Momiji Sakora wrote:
Dex Cordell wrote:
so if I read this correctly, me playing Hold'em with and for ISK is going to be shut down as well? I'm somehow failing to catch the drift here. Why would RMT require this kind of harsh measures against everyone in general, instead of applying the rules already in place to those caught breaking them, as it was till now? That's just gross...


I think the major bit of this is that it's cost CCP a ton of money and manhours to investigate RMT in the cases named, and others. Time and again isk gambling sites seem to slip into RMT along the way - and CCP have had to investigate. Not to mention accusations true or false on these sites having to be investigated. So why not save time and just cut them out entirely.

Beyond that, it's a form of income that is completely immune to in-game interdiction of any kind. They have no stations to destroy, no logistics to disrupt, no ratters to gank. They were more untouchable by capsuleers than teh HK Fortizar.


Tell us where the bad bankers touched you. Ironic to see a goon posting about untouchable income, of all people. Technetium anyone?



You mean the towers that could be reinforced to stop the moon mining? Apples meet oranges.


Clearly they were feasible to reinforce. That's why OTEC was taken down by players, and not nerfed by CCP themselves. I'm not denying that it's a valid method of gameplay, because if the mechanics are there and it's not against the EULA, it's valid. I'm pointing out the irony of a goon crying about untouchable income.

And let's be honest here, gambling websites aren't the only form of "untouchable" income in EVE. Station traders are another form. But in reality, all forms of income can be broken. Station traders can be broken by market PvP, and a gambling site can be broken by a good smear campaign. OTEC could have been broken as well, but the reality was it was never going to be, because it was more profitable for everyone involved to keep the status quo.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#95 - 2016-10-12 16:56:27 UTC
I said clearly ISK loss is not the major issue. RMTers deserve to get banned and their stuff confiscated, and any ISK given to RMTers can be removed from the game. I totally agree with that. Although I cashed out trillions from IWI, my ISK are safe as they are mine and in my hand and I have never RMTed.

But it seems you don't know how banking system worked in IWI. Bankers banked with their own ISK, within the limit they can afford with their personal ISK gained through legitimate means. But CCP confiscated all ISK from all bankers. It was a blanket punishment and players and bankers who may not have been involved with RMT suffered loss. The amount is not the issue here. It's about whether such blanket punishment is justifiable.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Oraac Ensor
#96 - 2016-10-12 17:02:44 UTC
Robin Wren wrote:
Brusanan wrote:
Robin Wren wrote:
Games of chance are not games of skill (poker), but as part of poker involves elements of chance where is the line ?

I'm sure Eve Online Hold'Em is covered by this ban on gambling as well.

I't doesn't say gambling games, it says games of chance.

Quote:
gamble
(ˈgæm bəl)

v. -bled, -bling,
n. v.i.
1. to play at a game of chance for money or other stakes.
2. to stake or risk something of value, as money, on the outcome of something involving chance.
Christopher Nolm
Malevelon Roe Industries
Convocation of Empyreans
#97 - 2016-10-12 17:06:44 UTC
Oraac Ensor wrote:
Robin Wren wrote:
Brusanan wrote:
Robin Wren wrote:
Games of chance are not games of skill (poker), but as part of poker involves elements of chance where is the line ?

I'm sure Eve Online Hold'Em is covered by this ban on gambling as well.

I't doesn't say gambling games, it says games of chance.

Quote:
gamble
(ˈgæm bəl)

v. -bled, -bling,
n. v.i.
1. to play at a game of chance for money or other stakes.
2. to stake or risk something of value, as money, on the outcome of something involving chance.



They have just used that terminology to mirror how the law defines things.
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#98 - 2016-10-12 17:06:54 UTC
I'm interpreting this as running external sites that deals with ISK/items etc is prohibited.

Is me securing supercap trades against the rules?

Is running a lottery for a titan, using the "Sell Orders" forum against the rules?

Is running an auction for a titan, using the "Sell Orders" forum against the rules?

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#99 - 2016-10-12 17:07:33 UTC
I'll put it in simple terms to make things clear.

Let's say you sold a titan for 100b to some dude, using third party as well in the process. All seemed legit and you got ISK.

CCP says the guy who paid for your Titan bought ISK from RMT to pay for it. So CCP confiscates your 100b. Now you don't have Titan and you are minus 100b. Is that right? Shouldn't CCP return you the Titan at least?

Or reverse. You ratted your way or traded or whatever to make 100b ISK. With that you bought a Titan, using a third party again. CCP finds that the guy who sold you Titan built it with RMT bought minerals. Then confiscates your Titan, and remove the 100b you paid to the builder as it is in possession of RMTer. Is that right?

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#100 - 2016-10-12 17:09:01 UTC
Chribba's onto something here. There are many 'services' people pay for with ISK, such as TS hosting and websites, etc. What's up with all those?

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!