These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dear CCP my suggestion for cloaky ships

First post
Author
Guillermo Tschieder
EVIL LEGION ARMADA
Fraternity.
#1 - 2016-09-25 21:11:06 UTC
Dear CCP. first all sorry for my bad english.

I suggest that: Cloakiy ships should be scannable since they have mass, maybe a module that can scan them in a timeframe
in a realive short timeframe.....20 min max

I dont know if this is the correct place to post this.. feel free to move where appropriate

Thanks CCP to read my suggestion, and if possible consider it.
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2016-09-25 21:14:44 UTC
No.

Next!
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#3 - 2016-09-25 21:38:32 UTC
Just because you are a Karmafleet member does not mean that you are allowed to turn off your brain when you look over this forum. There is a huge thread aptly named with huge letters where you should post your story about your helplessness: AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals. Since you have the time because you cannot rat at the moment, use your time well and browse that huge thread with the huge letters to get an idea on how many powerless people there were before you.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#4 - 2016-09-25 21:55:26 UTC
Paikis wrote:
This thread comes up on almost a weekly basis. In fact, I'd be surprised if there wasn't a nerf cloaking thread in the first 2 pages on this forum section. Almost every single one of them goes like this:

1. OP posts a post with a new (lol) idea that always boils down to some variation of the following:
- "There's a big meanie who is sitting in my system and not doing anything, but I don't know where he is and I can't ever just go next door. I can't find said meanie and even though I know that he's probably at work and poses no threat at all, I wont do anything in my system that I absolutely can't leave ever because he might not be at work and I might lose a ship. CCP please stop the meanie from being able to do nothing to me because he's probably at work"

2. Thread gets trolled because its been done literally to death. This horse has been beaten so hard and so often that it's little more than a memory of a memory of a red smear on the grass, and yet it STILL WONT DIE! In fact it's been done so many times that this particular horse is now undead; even if it does die, it will still be remembered and parodied.

3. Someone comes along and suggests that AFK cloakers can't hurt you, because they are, by their very definition, AFK. No one ever lost a ship to someone who ISN'T PLAYING THE GAME.

4. Someone else comes along and points out that while the cloaker might be AFK, he might not be, and so we have Schrodinger's Hot Dropper. The cyno pilot who might be AFK... but he might not be as well, and you will only know for sure when he decloaks, points and lights his candle. (Yes, I know this isn't how the cat works)

5. Someone else comes along and suggests that you use bait and setup a TARP. Or have a defence fleet on standby. Heaven forbid you have to actually fight to defend your space.

6. A further person comes along and suggests that the problem isn't cloaking AFK in your system that you can't possibly leave ever, but that you KNOW that the person is AFK in your system... and perhaps local should be removed because free 100% accurate intel is probably not the best thing in the game and if you didn't know that the big meanie was in your system, you wouldn't be worried about leaving the undock/POS.

7. Then another person pokes their head in and complains that local is 100% NEEDED because D-Scan and probing are such bad mechanics, and IF YOU TAKE MY LOCAL AWAY IM QUITTING FOREVER AND NO YOU CAN'T HAVE MY STUFF!

8. Someone asks if they can have 7's stuff.

We end up with another thread which goes on for pages and pages between complains about local, defence fleets, inability to just go next door, people who aren't playing the game but are playing the meta, lots of bickering and in the end nothing gets solved. CCP wont remove cloaking because it would mess with waaay too many things and it creates content (which is a good thing) by removing content (which is a bad thing) but they can't really think of any way to do it without a complete overhaul of the local and scanning systems.

Now that I've had this entire thread's conversation, can we just let it die? Please?
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#5 - 2016-09-25 23:09:09 UTC
Slap thyself.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#6 - 2016-09-25 23:13:29 UTC
Serious question..... do some wonder when people lead off with English is a second language line is it actually the case?

Seems like the majority of bait threads lead off like this. Especially for the cloaky ones.

English is not my first language....don't know if this has ever been presented.....just seems to be dead common leads offs for bait really.

Then there is the cloak lead off....


Also OP mass doesn't enter scanning calcs anyway. Its a ratio of sig radius to sig strength. And mass is not related to radius. Purgers/CDFE and SPR's do not increase mass, they just balloon up the radius as an example. As a flipside...you (over) plate down an armour tanker its sig radius stays the same.

Cloak bypasses this, its an electronic screen.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#7 - 2016-09-26 01:03:33 UTC
If EVE would be a simulator, I would have had an idea for a trans-phasic cloaking device. Now that would be "hard" to scan. Maybe DARPA would be more interested in that kind of technology. Who knows.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#8 - 2016-09-26 04:34:05 UTC
Guillermo Tschieder wrote:
Dear CCP. first all sorry for my bad english.

I suggest that: Cloakiy ships should be scannable since they have mass, maybe a module that can scan them in a timeframe
in a realive short timeframe.....20 min max

I dont know if this is the correct place to post this.. feel free to move where appropriate

Thanks CCP to read my suggestion, and if possible consider it.


Reported because you are objective Bad™. There is a sticky thread for discussing cloaking ships. You should post there.

Reading is fundamental.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Goatman NotMyFault
Lubrication Industries
#9 - 2016-09-26 06:35:31 UTC
Quote:

Also OP mass doesn't enter scanning calcs anyway. Its a ratio of sig radius to sig strength. And mass is not related to radius. Purgers/CDFE and SPR's do not increase mass, they just balloon up the radius as an example. As a flipside...you (over) plate down an armour tanker its sig radius stays the same.

Cloak bypasses this, its an electronic screen.



Mass DO have a signal. A mass will create a slighty change in gravity, ergo it should be scanable.

But on the otherhand, when did CCP care about physics :D
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#10 - 2016-09-26 11:10:23 UTC
Goatman NotMyFault wrote:
Quote:

Also OP mass doesn't enter scanning calcs anyway. Its a ratio of sig radius to sig strength. And mass is not related to radius. Purgers/CDFE and SPR's do not increase mass, they just balloon up the radius as an example. As a flipside...you (over) plate down an armour tanker its sig radius stays the same.

Cloak bypasses this, its an electronic screen.



Mass DO have a signal. A mass will create a slighty change in gravity, ergo it should be scanable.

But on the otherhand, when did CCP care about physics :D



If YOU cared about physics you would slow boat from station to station and system to system. No one who cares about physics would ever use the warp button.
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#11 - 2016-09-26 12:28:50 UTC
No to your idea, cloaked is cloaked so learn to deal with it.


Serendipity Lost wrote:
If YOU cared about physics you would slow boat from station to station and system to system. No one who cares about physics would ever use the warp button.

Actually those who care about physics know that warp drive is possible thanks to physicist Miguel Alcubierre.
The fact that there currently is not a way to make an actual functioning warp drive does not mean that it is not possible. Since our ships have many things that are not currently possible what is one more in the list. Anyone want to guess at the recoil from a shell that is 55" (1400mm) in diameter and how the ships would be able to counter that recoil?


radkid10
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2016-09-26 12:30:28 UTC
another Forum post it needs to be locked

50 million people have suggested this before if you do a search on it you'll find it
ISD Max Trix
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#13 - 2016-09-26 12:48:12 UTC
There is already a Dedicated thread on AFK Cloaking. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6650297#post6650297 its about to hit 7000 post, feel free to post there as this thread will be locked.

ISD Max Trix

Lieutenant

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE mails about forum moderation.