These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Closing incursions by killing the Mothership

First post First post
Author
Callous Jade
Dockturnal Bromance
#61 - 2012-01-16 20:51:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Callous Jade
Dzajic wrote:
People without IRL socipathic tendencies would not indulge and enjoy in deeply sociopathic behavior in a virtual environment.



You are so wrong its hilarious. Go cry all the way back to wow.

Edit: Also this - "If what D3 et al are doing keeps mewling gold-farmer parasites like you out of our game, then I am even more for it."
Colonol Mustang
#62 - 2012-01-16 20:54:58 UTC
It's a game. If you don't like the acceptable & legal mechanic's of the game, leave it.
Dzajic
#63 - 2012-01-16 21:03:45 UTC
Callous Jade wrote:
Dzajic wrote:
People without IRL socipathic tendencies would not indulge and enjoy in deeply sociopathic behavior in a virtual environment.



You are so wrong its hilarious. Go cry all the way back to wow.

Edit: Also this - "If what D3 et al are doing keeps mewling gold-farmer parasites like you out of our game, then I am even more for it."


This is 2nd or 3rd time in my 4 year EVE carrier to have over a billion in wallet. And it won't stay that high for long.

Gold farmer? No dear sir. Gold farmer as a term refers to all lovely rating botting ravens around nullsec filling alliance leaders pocets full with RMT money.

Parasite? On whom? What pray tell am I doing bad to EVE or anyone in it?

I farm isk to pay the bills and buy ships.


This is what I do for fun:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12083444
Aisha's Vengence
#64 - 2012-01-16 21:07:36 UTC
Another legendary idea from D3. This is why he gets my votes.
colay Starwolf
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#65 - 2012-01-16 21:10:03 UTC


[/quote]

The bigger picture is this: despite low and 0.0 sec incursions nominally pay out better, low sec and 0.0 players come to hi sec (or jump clone to hi sec) to farm hi sec incursions.

Even former rich WH players abandon WHs to switch into doing hi sec incursions.


Now, the reasons are many but I suppose the main one is this:

Low sec and 0.0 incursions pay more but must be done on far worse ships and T2 fittings .[/quote]

thay dont have to be dont that way thats no one in high secs fault

EvE is a big mmorpg ( Many Men Online Role Playing Girls) game

Dzajic
#66 - 2012-01-16 21:36:06 UTC
Btw. So I'm "all that is wrong with EVE" because I try and separate my isk income from my PVP?

Got bored on weekend due to no WTs around; we gathered 3x tier1 BC gang + blackbird and tried to smash a T3+HIC+iforgotwhat+2xFalcon lowsec entry gatecamp. As soon as 1 our BC and blackbird entered system all pies run for the station and docked up when our two guys showed they would be staying in system.

Risk aversion in someone's isk making much? Thank god I frequent FHC so I know just how (stupidly) much ISK you can earn by shooting fish in a barrel (HIC+T3 entry and pipe gatecamps); otherwise I might actually believe in some of "highsec care-bears are killing EVE" stories.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#67 - 2012-01-16 21:40:23 UTC
It's a shame these things are being done before my usual login times. I'd love to be a part of it...alas, I just get to hear about it on teamspeak.

Also, confirming Darius is a genius...as much for some ideas he hasn't published yet as for what you know about :)

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Lyrrashae
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#68 - 2012-01-16 21:43:44 UTC
Dzajic wrote:


Sooooo, you killed a probably-overconfident-and-sloppy Dramiel pilot (a lot of Drami pilots are like that) in a post-Crucible destroyer.

Big.
*******.
Whoop.

Because kill-mail e-peenzor-waving is a sign of being a real 1337-PvP'er, amirite?



Ni.

Dzajic
#69 - 2012-01-16 21:50:46 UTC
Lyrrashae wrote:
Dzajic wrote:


Sooooo, you killed a probably-overconfident-and-sloppy Dramiel pilot (a lot of Drami pilots are like that) in a post-Crucible destroyer.

Big.
*******.
Whoop.

Because kill-mail e-peenzor-waving is a sign of being a real 1337-PvP'er, amirite?





No. Not at all. If you check my KB stats you will see I'm terrible at PVP and diaf a lot without any gain. Reason I'm posting with my main and linking KB is to prove to you that I have ventured outside of highsec; and that I have engaged in real PVP.
But you can easily just stretch label carebear to anyone who is above -5 and/or has less than 10 (or 100, or 1000) solo kills.
XXSketchxx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#70 - 2012-01-16 22:27:03 UTC
Dzajic wrote:
People without IRL socipathic tendencies would not indulge and enjoy in deeply sociopathic behavior in a virtual environment.


I shot a pod that was afk on a gate today in Amarr.

Guess I'm a sociopath right?
Tian Nu
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#71 - 2012-01-16 22:51:30 UTC
Callous Jade wrote:
Dzajic wrote:
People without IRL socipathic tendencies would not indulge and enjoy in deeply sociopathic behavior in a virtual environment.



You are so wrong its hilarious. Go cry all the way back to wow.

Edit: Also this - "If what D3 et al are doing keeps mewling ISK-farmer parasites like you out of our game, then I am even more for it."


fixed

Father O'Malley about Darius III begging for whelp: “Hows that working out for ya ? I make it 02:21 and all I see is you begging Riverini to get numbers and trying to recruit from the incursion public channel.”

Tian Nu
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#72 - 2012-01-16 22:54:47 UTC
XXSketchxx wrote:
Dzajic wrote:
People without IRL socipathic tendencies would not indulge and enjoy in deeply sociopathic behavior in a virtual environment.


I shot a pod that was afk on a gate today in Amarr.

Guess I'm a sociopath right?


no you are from test 'sociopath' is natural state for you Big smile

Father O'Malley about Darius III begging for whelp: “Hows that working out for ya ? I make it 02:21 and all I see is you begging Riverini to get numbers and trying to recruit from the incursion public channel.”

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#73 - 2012-01-16 23:07:56 UTC
Dzajic wrote:
When you are putting survivability of shiny fits into hands of strangers blacklisting is 100% necessary. Leaders of all Incursion running corps have such absurd amounts of ISK that in the end they will be the ones who can easiest just shrug and go "was nice till it lasted".


If you check the C&P thread, they blacklisted posters who are not even playing EvE, alliances because of 1 guy doing something and similar. That's plain hysteria and also shows how much risk they are willing to take in this risky PvE venture.
Dzajic
#74 - 2012-01-16 23:14:24 UTC
So its not ok to blacklist entire alliance if leader of that alliance is trying to inconvenience you as much as possible?

One again. Why am I a parasite? Of whom and how?
SilentSkills
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2012-01-16 23:15:24 UTC
Darius III wrote:
some bullshit post projecting his rage and anger at the only people his alliance can take on, highsec bears


Bro you sound bitter. Are you mad you got your **** pushed in and kicked out of 0.0?

Oh wait you didn't get kicked, you "re-deployed".....

lol
Hoxothul
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#76 - 2012-01-16 23:29:35 UTC
I absolutely love how Darius and Brick Squad is taking all the heat for this thing Roll
Argus Eritaramis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#77 - 2012-01-16 23:58:15 UTC
No isk without risk, they say....

Ok, how about this then: we stop moon goo in null - sorry, the moons ran out.
Good news: wh space now has good.

Why?

Goo in null is money for nothing.

WH's are much harder to hold, so more risk, and thus there should be more isk.

This way we also get all the petrified powerblocs in null something to live and die for - the challenge to secure strategic wh access instead of the current static ressource allocation and endless isk pumps.

Imagine all the fun and games!
XXSketchxx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#78 - 2012-01-16 23:59:13 UTC
Argus Eritaramis wrote:
No isk without risk, they say....

Ok, how about this then: we stop moon goo in null - sorry, the moons ran out.
Good news: wh space now has good.

Why?

Goo in null is money for nothing.

WH's are much harder to hold, so more risk, and thus there should be more isk.

This way we also get all the petrified powerblocs in null something to live and die for - the challenge to secure strategic wh access instead of the current static ressource allocation and endless isk pumps.

Imagine all the fun and games!


on a scale of 1 to down syndrome, how clueless do you feel?
Aisha's Vengence
#79 - 2012-01-17 00:15:16 UTC
Argus Eritaramis wrote:
No isk without risk, they say....

Ok, how about this then: we stop moon goo in null - sorry, the moons ran out.
Good news: wh space now has good.

Why?

Goo in null is money for nothing.

WH's are much harder to hold, so more risk, and thus there should be more isk.

This way we also get all the petrified powerblocs in null something to live and die for - the challenge to secure strategic wh access instead of the current static ressource allocation and endless isk pumps.

Imagine all the fun and games!


Translated: I don't know how sov works, have never been in a wormhole, and got so mad at the loss of my latest highsec incursion that my roomates (parents) almost threw me out. Please stop this terrible griefing before I loose my home.
Goose99
#80 - 2012-01-17 00:37:09 UTC
Rage is when you make troll thread to whine about other people making internet spaceship moniez.Cool

U MAD BRO?Big smile