These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Taking the fight to CODE

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#81 - 2016-08-16 01:52:33 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
I read post #29 - you lied about how you used to gank people, and said they complained that they couldn't retaliate...


But see, against CODE. - You can't make the complaint that you can't retaliate. Because the painfully simple fact is that you *can* retaliate. They have lots of expensive destroyable assets anchored out in space for *anybody* who wants to retaliate against them.

Seriously, look at the killboard of "Nitshe Razvedka" who posted earlier in this thread. He destroyed *5 billion isk* of CODE. owned assets - and that is just his *alt*.

If people want revenge, they can take revenge. The assets are there, waiting to be destroyed.

The only excuse for not retaliating is that *you don't want to badly enough*. But you *have the option*. Which makes it *your choice* not to retaliate.


Which makes it all the more ridiculously transparent when you demand that CCP remove ganking from the game, because for all your talk you are too pathetic to even attempt any direct retaliation on your own, you want CCP to lead the charge with major mechanics changes to kill them all for you.


Well earlier you said the mechanics changes would have no effect, so why are you saying it would now? are you confused like this about day to day life as well? hahaha

How did I lie about ganking?

Thats great that he is killing there customs offices, and yes those are their assets, however, I want to dismantle CODE, we are not going to dismantle CODE by killing customs offices. All i want are some mechanics changes that you said would have no effect hahahaha
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#82 - 2016-08-16 01:59:22 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
I mean look man - I don't like CODE. all that much. Their role-play is annoying, and their profit margin makes me jealous.

I sincerely hoped you wanted the retaliation you claimed to want - because I'm happy to help you get that...

But all you want is for CCP to retaliate for you and remove ganking....And well...I can't support that. Deal with it.



You are CODE haha

The changes I think should be made have no effect on suicide ganking, it just makes it easier for the victims to retaliate, but of course thats why you are up in arms. You see how these changes would allow the player base to destroy you and your boyfriends hahhaha
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#83 - 2016-08-16 02:16:15 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
You are CODE haha

The changes I think should be made have no effect on suicide ganking, it just makes it easier for the victims to retaliate, but of course thats why you are up in arms. You see how these changes would allow the player base to destroy you and your boyfriends hahhaha

Once again back to this "retaliation" concept...

How exaclty are you going to retaliate if they aren't allowed to own anything for you to retaliate against?


And now *you* claim the changes will have no effect? I don't think I'm the one confused here...Why are *you* demanding changes that won't affect anything *in your own opinion*?

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#84 - 2016-08-16 02:20:56 UTC
Alrighty, time for me to call it.

You are either a CODE. alt or an imbecile...possibly both.

Also a lousy troll.

4/10 for persistence though

Adios o7

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#85 - 2016-08-16 02:23:39 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
You are CODE haha

The changes I think should be made have no effect on suicide ganking, it just makes it easier for the victims to retaliate, but of course thats why you are up in arms. You see how these changes would allow the player base to destroy you and your boyfriends hahhaha

Once again back to this "retaliation" concept...

How exaclty are you going to retaliate if they aren't allowed to own anything for you to retaliate against?


And now *you* claim the changes will have no effect? I don't think I'm the one confused here...Why are *you* demanding changes that won't affect anything *in your own opinion*?


I'm mocking you, you are the one who is flip flopping on the issue hahaha

What are you talking about? them not owning anything, im starting to think im talking to a completely incoherent idiot who cant maintain his argument.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#86 - 2016-08-16 02:30:04 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Alrighty, time for me to call it.

You are either a CODE. alt or an imbecile...possibly both.

Also a lousy troll.

4/10 for persistence though

Adios o7



Lol, now you are repeating what I said to you back to me?! Hahahahaha dude, you get worked up way too easy. Dont worry eventually everyone will forget about this thread and you being a CODE alt hahaha

Lets hope CCP does the right thing, and makes these changes soon, I'm really looking forward to demolishing you and all of your boyfriends.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#87 - 2016-08-16 02:49:56 UTC
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#88 - 2016-08-16 02:59:27 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged


So nothing constructive to add?
Nitshe Razvedka
#89 - 2016-08-16 03:05:02 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged




He used to say the same thing to his baby sister when he could not win an argument with reason or logic. Smile

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#90 - 2016-08-16 03:09:45 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged



Eventually I'll take it to the Player Features and Ideas Discussion Forum in the hopes CCP will fast track making some changes so we can close the chapter on CODE haha
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#91 - 2016-08-16 03:13:32 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged



Eventually I'll take it to the Player Features and Ideas Discussion Forum in the hopes CCP will fast track making some changes so we can close the chapter on CODE haha

You can't kill an idea.
As long as there are people supporting the idea (CCP amongst them), the idea will live on.
Have fun succeding in your failures Cool

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Nitshe Razvedka
#92 - 2016-08-16 03:17:46 UTC
Dom said the same to his little sister, before trying to arm wrestle to win.






Needless to say, his sister beats him in arm wrestles.

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#93 - 2016-08-16 03:19:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Cockchaos
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This troll thread needs to go.. Nothing has been achieved except the sperging of nonsense from op (who never was a ganker to be fair)
#gmbatphoneengaged



Eventually I'll take it to the Player Features and Ideas Discussion Forum in the hopes CCP will fast track making some changes so we can close the chapter on CODE haha

You can't kill an idea.
As long as there are people supporting the idea (CCP amongst them), the idea will live on.
Have fun succeding in your failures Cool


Just want to level the playing field, thats all. These changes would not kill the idea, they would just make fighting CODE feasible. Then the war between those who support CODE and those who oppose CODE can finally begin. CCP help us create some content.
Origo Lim
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#94 - 2016-08-16 03:27:23 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
CCP help us create some content.

They can start by removing faction police.
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#95 - 2016-08-16 03:31:32 UTC
Origo Lim wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
CCP help us create some content.

They can start by removing faction police.



I'm for this if -10s cant dock at NPC stations in high sec
Nitshe Razvedka
#96 - 2016-08-16 03:33:45 UTC
Origo Lim wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
CCP help us create some content.

They can start by removing faction police.



Without his masters brain the poor codie can't communicate.

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#97 - 2016-08-16 18:31:05 UTC
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Now that you are not freaking out like a little girl, I dont even want to talk hahahaha

Clearly you have never seen anybody freak out before - once again proving you lied about ever being a ganker.

Also you are then admitting you started this thread purely to troll, in clear violation of forum rules?


Now that is a stretch hahaha, I started this thread for feedback on what can be done to combat you and your boyfriends, since it seems to me that yall are protected by current game mechanics, and now it is even more clear that is the case.

Clearly i struck a nerve because earlier you were freaking out like a teenaged girl, I know I know, the thought of the Eve community being able to retaliate against you guys is frightening, I dont blame you, if the game mechanics changed you guys would literally be decimated, and decimated quickly lol.

I have forgotten more about ganking than most of yall will ever know. The tens billions of isk I made years ago doing it was not worth the players I drove away, I regret it. Especailly now, seeing the EVE player base shrink. That is why when it is feasible to cause real damage to CODE, I will be heavily involved, like not getting laid for weeks involved, just playing EVE and doing nothing else... for at least a month straight.

So until then, I have to war game disruption Ops, maybe ill follow through maybe I wont.

But at least one thing is clear now, Its current mechanics that allow CODE flourish, and that is it.



CCP has taken CODE's side and until that problem is fixed the mechanics will not change.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Cockchaos
Doomheim
#98 - 2016-08-16 20:13:39 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Cockchaos wrote:
Now that you are not freaking out like a little girl, I dont even want to talk hahahaha

Clearly you have never seen anybody freak out before - once again proving you lied about ever being a ganker.

Also you are then admitting you started this thread purely to troll, in clear violation of forum rules?


Now that is a stretch hahaha, I started this thread for feedback on what can be done to combat you and your boyfriends, since it seems to me that yall are protected by current game mechanics, and now it is even more clear that is the case.

Clearly i struck a nerve because earlier you were freaking out like a teenaged girl, I know I know, the thought of the Eve community being able to retaliate against you guys is frightening, I dont blame you, if the game mechanics changed you guys would literally be decimated, and decimated quickly lol.

I have forgotten more about ganking than most of yall will ever know. The tens billions of isk I made years ago doing it was not worth the players I drove away, I regret it. Especailly now, seeing the EVE player base shrink. That is why when it is feasible to cause real damage to CODE, I will be heavily involved, like not getting laid for weeks involved, just playing EVE and doing nothing else... for at least a month straight.

So until then, I have to war game disruption Ops, maybe ill follow through maybe I wont.

But at least one thing is clear now, Its current mechanics that allow CODE flourish, and that is it.



CCP has taken CODE's side and until that problem is fixed the mechanics will not change.



How so?
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#99 - 2016-08-17 05:27:12 UTC
Ahhhh there you go! Was looking for a CODE related thread and as I suspected, I didn't have to look far.

Storytime.

As I were delivering a load of isotopes, I happened to see a Fenrir sitting 70km off the gate. Weird. And a bumping Mach. Using #brain I quickly added 1 and 1 together; I was however already in warp when I decided to help the poor sod out of his misery. No big deal; warped my blockade runner back to the gate in question and started counterbumping until I saw the Fenrir warp off.

It was not the machariel nor the blackbird that creeped me out though: it was the bystanders. Did none of them have a MWD? Were they all in such a hurry to go places they couldn't be arsed for a lousy minute to help a buddy out? Were they afraid interfering would get themselves ganked in the process?

The whole thing left a foul taste in my mouth. It happens because You let it happen. Ye who stand there and do nothing. Ye who forumwhine but did not lift a finger to aid a random stranger. You don't need any kind of organisation at all to beat them. No intel channels, no corporation, no nothing. Just shoot them/jam them/bump them... it's so damn easy you know?

Night night kiddoes. Storytime's over.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#100 - 2016-08-17 06:04:49 UTC
Addendum. I think --and I could be mistaken--, but I think CODE would love nothing more than some uncertainty; than people trying to thwart their attempts. Gives them something exciting to play with. They'd more likely than not welcome the challenge.