These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Poll: Want the ability Carrier with Drones back, or improve Fighters.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Eve Serie7
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2016-05-21 13:41:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Eve Serie7
Im not fine with Fighter changes and guess this is a waste of ISK.
created a poll. with the ability to add answers. Rule and Vote Folks.

Want the ability Carrier with Drones back, or improve Fighters.

for igb copy and paste!: http://www.poll-maker.com/poll695987x9A77488a-28
Hawke Frost
#2 - 2016-05-21 13:52:54 UTC
other: nerf carriers
Eternus8lux8lucis
Guardians of the Gate
RAZOR Alliance
#3 - 2016-05-21 14:15:33 UTC
This thread is gonna go places....Roll

Have you heard anything I've said?

You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?

That's right.

Had to end sometime.
Eve Serie7
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2016-05-21 15:30:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Eve Serie7
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:
This thread is gonna go places....Roll


and we need that :). Also its a constructive Poll. There was a possibility of 10 Drones
1 Fighter/Drone per Level better then just 5% Damage.

Proposal:

Minmatar Carrier Bonus (per skill level):

+1 Fighter in Squad / +1 Drone (Level 1 : 5 Fighter/5 Drones - Level 5 : 9 Fighter/9 Drones)

-

2.5% bonus to Fighter/Drone velocity
5% bonus to Dromi/Electronic Warfare Drone Stasis Webification range
1% bonus to Siege Warfare and Skirmish Warfare Links effectiveness

Role Bonus:

Can fit Networked Sensor Array
Can use 3 Warfare Link modules simultaneously
Can launch Light and Support Fighters, Drones
Can lock at extended ranges
Galaxxis
The Regency
The Monarchy
#5 - 2016-05-21 18:38:30 UTC
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:
This thread is gonna go places....Roll


It's going right in the trash bin where it belongs.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#6 - 2016-05-21 20:43:56 UTC
This poll is not constructive as it doesn't construct anything constructive beyond a whole ocean of salty tears. That is not 'constructive' in any sense that CCP will pay attention to

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2016-05-21 21:02:43 UTC
Bumblefck wrote:
This poll is not constructive as it doesn't construct anything constructive beyond a whole ocean of salty tears. That is not 'constructive' in any sense that CCP will pay attention to


Hey, one of the "other" response tot he pool is "checkbox" suggesting the answers should of been selected by checkboxes instead of those stupid circles. If that is not constructive...
Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#8 - 2016-05-21 21:11:52 UTC
A change should be made because it has a reason to be made, not because it's popular. Give logical reasoning for it first.

The Drake is a Lie
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2016-05-21 21:46:19 UTC
The only change that should be made is removing the instalocking carriers which alpha every cruiser and below from the field.

I'm my own NPC alt.
ISD Buldath
#10 - 2016-05-22 06:04:10 UTC
Topic Moved to player Features and ideas discussion.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.
Iain Cariaba
#11 - 2016-05-22 06:22:33 UTC
ISD Buldath wrote:
Topic Moved to player Features and ideas discussion.

Why? You and I both know OP is simply going to get trolled out F&I. Hell, I was halfway through my own post pointing out all the flaws in his suggestion when I simply decided not to bother, as most people on this forum recognize the likelyhood of the devs actually implementing this idea to be somewhere between none and not gonna happen.
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#12 - 2016-05-22 06:48:44 UTC
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:
This thread is gonna go places....Roll


OMG. YOU WERE RIGHT.

Welcome to F&I. Please propose a well thought-out idea. This isn't it.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#13 - 2016-05-22 07:15:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Lugh Crow-Slave
carriers are fine as is the main issue is dreads are just better now


what we have now is

ppl flying and fitting them like they are the old dps carriers. these ppl say they are UP

and

ppl fighting them like they are the old carriers. these ppl say they are OP


with a support fleet they are arguably stronger than before in the damage role but without they are beyond a doubt weaker. balance working as intended

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Zathra Narazi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2016-05-22 23:36:25 UTC
Hawke Frost wrote:
other: nerf carriers

This.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#15 - 2016-05-23 00:16:40 UTC
Zathra Narazi wrote:
Hawke Frost wrote:
other: nerf carriers

This.


How much more do you want them nerfed? Bring a single Griffin and a carrier is useless.


This is what I mean by people not adapting and using new counters to a new ship

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Hawke Frost
#16 - 2016-05-23 01:39:09 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Zathra Narazi wrote:
Hawke Frost wrote:
other: nerf carriers

This.


How much more do you want them nerfed? Bring a single Griffin and a carrier is useless.


This is what I mean by people not adapting and using new counters to a new ship


A) carriers have hilariously high sensor strength
b) according to your logic the Svipul isn't OP at all, you can just jam it.
darkneko
Come And Get Your Love
#17 - 2016-05-23 03:27:49 UTC  |  Edited by: darkneko
Why should they nerf a ship that takes years for a player to master and costs billions to buy and fit propaply yet can still be taken down by a well fit fleet of frigits? I know a carrier shouldn't be perfect or be able to wipe out a fleet all on its own but how far do you want to nerf something before it becomes pointless and you start complaining about the next ship on the list.
Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication
#18 - 2016-05-23 04:08:21 UTC
I'm sorry, what is the problem with carriers not being able to use drones?

I am enjoying the fighters along with the finer control I have over fighters. So... convince me why drones are better than fighters?

Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.

Support better localization for the Japanese Community.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#19 - 2016-05-23 05:14:44 UTC
Hawke Frost wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Zathra Narazi wrote:
Hawke Frost wrote:
other: nerf carriers

This.


How much more do you want them nerfed? Bring a single Griffin and a carrier is useless.


This is what I mean by people not adapting and using new counters to a new ship


A) carriers have hilariously high sensor strength
b) according to your logic the Svipul isn't OP at all, you can just jam it.



and another great example of you trying to use old tactics on new ships


hers is a hint don't jam the carrier jam the fighters. even an unbounded ship can reliably jam a fighter and any ECM ship will always perma jam any fighter.

a svip can not be 100% jammed 100% of the time fighters can

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Hawke Frost
#20 - 2016-05-23 05:30:29 UTC
Ah, suddenly I realize why you're so stingy, you just lost a carrier. I'm sure you have a totally unbiased view on how balanced they are.
123Next page