These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Make every pilot count...

Author
Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#1 - 2016-05-03 09:28:48 UTC
aka quality over numbers.
Since CCP is trying to minimize passive incomes - why not to make every active character must have an active sub to be used. Trading/industry/PI alts provide passive income and combat alts provide additional advantage (scouts, cyno, eyes, logistics itc) - leading to people use numbers over quality in both industry/mining/PI and combat.
While it wont remove alts from game - it would lessen its impact and force people to think and get maximum from their alts. Industry/PI alts would not be "passive income" whores with minimum skills required and combat alts would not be dirty cheap to use on every occation. Probably would lead for healthier economics and small scale pvp, better player-to-player interaction.
Feel free to leave your woes and ideas here.
ps: also additional profits for CCP (im sure they like it Twisted)
Lugh Crow-Slave
#2 - 2016-05-03 09:44:58 UTC
All this would do is advantage thighs who could pay for alts even more
Angelique Duchemin
Team Evil
#3 - 2016-05-03 09:51:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Angelique Duchemin
This is kind of how it works already. Which is why we are limited to 3 characters per account in total where other games offer 10 or more per server with hundreds possible in total.

The very sun of heaven seemed distorted when viewed through the polarising miasma welling out from this sea-soaked perversion, and twisted menace and suspense lurked leeringly in those crazily elusive angles of carven rock where a second glance shewed concavity after the first shewed convexity.

Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#4 - 2016-05-03 09:59:15 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
All this would do is advantage thighs who could pay for alts even more

That would lead some alts used for once-a-week scouting and such to die off. And indy alts would require more skillfull usage to be profitable. And lets be fair - people who would mindlessly use number of alts no matter the costs are minority... or big scale pvp/politics as its not a problem for big alliance and it wont hurt them.

Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#5 - 2016-05-03 10:01:03 UTC
Angelique Duchemin wrote:
This is kind of how it works already. Which is why we are limited to 3 characters per account in total where other games offer 10 or more per server with hundreds possible in total.

I propose to make it more hardcore (players of EVE like hardcore right ?) - 1 active character per sub.
The difference 3(now) vs 1 is pretty big - so i would not say its "kind of how it works already".
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#6 - 2016-05-03 10:02:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
You cannot do PI, industry, scouting, cynos, farming, PVP; basically anything without an active subscription.

What you suggest is not "hardcore"; it is a shameless money grab just like SKINS and SP trading is. Suggesting such a thing should be punishable with biomassing upon next login. Would also make the game better and the economy healthier.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Lugh Crow-Slave
#7 - 2016-05-03 10:03:21 UTC
Dienowthxbay wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
All this would do is advantage thighs who could pay for alts even more

That would lead some alts used for once-a-week scouting and such to die off. And indy alts would require more skillfull usage to be profitable. And lets be fair - people who would mindlessly use number of alts no matter the costs are minority... or big scale pvp/politics as its not a problem for big alliance and it wont hurt them.



What about those of us who simply enjoy having a toon for daytripping into fw space for some solo pvp
Lugh Crow-Slave
#8 - 2016-05-03 10:04:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Lugh Crow-Slave
Rivr Luzade wrote:
You cannot do PI, industry, scouting, cynos, farming, PVP; basically anything without an active subscription.


What he means is toy couldn't use planets or industry slots on the other three toons your account has without plexing them

Or rather you couldn't even log into them
Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#9 - 2016-05-03 10:21:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Dienowthxbay
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Dienowthxbay wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
All this would do is advantage thighs who could pay for alts even more

That would lead some alts used for once-a-week scouting and such to die off. And indy alts would require more skillfull usage to be profitable. And lets be fair - people who would mindlessly use number of alts no matter the costs are minority... or big scale pvp/politics as its not a problem for big alliance and it wont hurt them.



What about those of us who simply enjoy having a toon for daytripping into fw space for some solo pvp


Make it proffessional instead of occational blatant pew-pew stuff just for fun. Probably if you would have to pay for your fw alt - you would take it more serious which is good for fw game. Or you would leave it as its not your main activity in which you are actually not intrested in.
Otherwise you underdig the ideas of FW forcing it to be not what it meant to be (dumb pvp arena instead of pvp powerplay around landcontrol).
ps: its not only fw - in any area of activity such approach discredit whole activity.
Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#10 - 2016-05-03 10:23:31 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
You cannot do PI, industry, scouting, cynos, farming, PVP; basically anything without an active subscription.

Or rather you couldn't even log into them

This ^
Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#11 - 2016-05-03 15:14:57 UTC
So you want to drive even more people out of the game? neat. You don't happen to work for one of CCP's competitors, do you?
Lugh Crow-Slave
#12 - 2016-05-03 15:37:51 UTC
Dienowthxbay wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Dienowthxbay wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
All this would do is advantage thighs who could pay for alts even more

That would lead some alts used for once-a-week scouting and such to die off. And indy alts would require more skillfull usage to be profitable. And lets be fair - people who would mindlessly use number of alts no matter the costs are minority... or big scale pvp/politics as its not a problem for big alliance and it wont hurt them.



What about those of us who simply enjoy having a toon for daytripping into fw space for some solo pvp


Make it proffessional instead of occational blatant pew-pew stuff just for fun. Probably if you would have to pay for your fw alt - you would take it more serious which is good for fw game. Or you would leave it as its not your main activity in which you are actually not intrested in.
Otherwise you underdig the ideas of FW forcing it to be not what it meant to be (dumb pvp arena instead of pvp powerplay around landcontrol).
ps: its not only fw - in any area of activity such approach discredit whole activity.


it's not a fw alt that's just the best space to get fights. the idea of FW was to help ppl get more frequent fights in an organic way noting i do undermines that.

the ability to swap up play styles is what keeps ppl from burning out
Lugh Crow-Slave
#13 - 2016-05-03 15:38:45 UTC
Isaac Armer wrote:
So you want to drive even more people out of the game? neat. You don't happen to work for one of CCP's competitors, do you?


lol what do you mean competitors

this is something that would make CCP more $ fast and drive more players away in the long run sounds like CCPs MO
Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#14 - 2016-05-03 16:03:15 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
lol what do you mean competitors

this is something that would make CCP more $ fast and drive more players away in the long run sounds like CCPs MO


You're honestly claiming people would simply sub more accounts/buy more plex instead of just not using the extra characters they have?

This idea is a giant middle finger to people who have invested time into training alts on the same account. I have one account and use all three characters. If this idea was put into place, I'd simply extract the skill points from two of the characters and stop using them.

And do you really not know there are more games than EVE on the market?
Lugh Crow-Slave
#15 - 2016-05-03 16:05:37 UTC
Isaac Armer wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
lol what do you mean competitors

this is something that would make CCP more $ fast and drive more players away in the long run sounds like CCPs MO


You're honestly claiming people would simply sub more accounts/buy more plex instead of just not using the extra characters they have?

This idea is a giant middle finger to people who have invested time into training alts on the same account. I have one account and use all three characters. If this idea was put into place, I'd simply extract the skill points from two of the characters and stop using them.

And do you really not know there are more games than EVE on the market?


lol some ppl would and they would do it b4 other ppls subs ended hence more $ in the short term but fking them over long term. something ccp seems to be keen on
Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#16 - 2016-05-03 16:06:24 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
lol some ppl would and they would do it b4 other ppls subs ended hence more $ in the short term but fking them over long term. something ccp seems to be keen on


Waiting for you to respond rationally instead of with your salty bittervet tears.
Dienowthxbay
HC - Voo-Doo Witch
#17 - 2016-05-04 08:09:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Dienowthxbay
The ideas was simple
- make players value their assets more as they have to pay per character (less pvp for lulz, less items sold below its production costs by occational indie alts - overall more professional and deep approach by players)
- reduce impact of alts (wont eleminate it but people stop having 6+ alts for every occation - would lead to better interplayer interaction)
- CCP profits Twisted
- and yes, call it hardcore just because one need to think smart with limited assets.

Most of people cant accept this because they used to make profits or small wars with numbers over quality.
Like why have scouts or another pilot flying capital when one have 4-6 alts. Why bother with PI layouts or smart production when you have 3 low sp alts and having same profits with little skill involved (and im about player skills not ingame character skills)
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#18 - 2016-05-04 08:34:06 UTC
Isaac Armer wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
lol some ppl would and they would do it b4 other ppls subs ended hence more $ in the short term but fking them over long term. something ccp seems to be keen on


Waiting for you to respond rationally instead of with your salty bittervet tears.

Considering recent developments of shameless money grabs from CCP, this is a very likely outcome and a very rational response.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Professor Humbert
Project Fruit House
#19 - 2016-05-04 08:36:46 UTC
In what way are the incomes from Trading, Industry, and PI passive?
I mean if you are talking about something like POCO tax I'd get it...but these?
Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#20 - 2016-05-04 14:37:03 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Considering recent developments of shameless money grabs from CCP, this is a very likely outcome and a very rational response.


So by 'shameless money grabs' you mean 'ways to entice new players to join a game that heavily favors vets from a skill standpoint'?
123Next page