These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fixing capital warfare. (Was The elephant in the room, tacking titans)

Author
Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#41 - 2012-01-13 14:08:42 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I don't understand this fear of losing ships. Especially capitals. They are T1 ships...insure them. Hell I just barely got into Dreads...haven't even flown mine yet but I can't wait to take it out and sooner or later lose it. I will keep it insured even if it takes me 2 years to lose it...why? Because with that insurance I can pretty much turn around and buy another.

I lost my first carrier a month ago in a WH engagement...it was ******* awesome!

It was also uninsured...did I cry? Hell no...I am in WH space...ill make that money for another in no time.

Point is...people shouldn't be afraid to lose ships. This is why I respect Pandemic Legion for what they are. They go full boar, **** you in the face with their fleets and aren't afraid to risk losing ships to win the fight. If everybody fought like this EvE would be a better place.


Indeed

And it would drive up the prices of minerals. More capital/super cap losses (under the right circumstances mind you), will result in a higher demand for more minerals to replace them.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#42 - 2012-01-13 14:12:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Xtover
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I don't understand this fear of losing ships. Especially capitals. They are T1 ships...insure them. Hell I just barely got into Dreads...haven't even flown mine yet but I can't wait to take it out and sooner or later lose it. I will keep it insured even if it takes me 2 years to lose it...why? Because with that insurance I can pretty much turn around and buy another.

I lost my first carrier a month ago in a WH engagement...it was ******* awesome!

It was also uninsured...did I cry? Hell no...I am in WH space...ill make that money for another in no time.

Point is...people shouldn't be afraid to lose ships. This is why I respect Pandemic Legion for what they are. They go full boar, **** you in the face with their fleets and aren't afraid to risk losing ships to win the fight. If everybody fought like this EvE would be a better place.



Why do people assume it's a fear of losing ships?

It has nothing to do with losing ships, although that was an aspect Grath was talking about but mostly unrelated to the topic- I take that back, as it's an alliance's desire not to risk shiny ships.


There's a difference between not wanting to lose your fleet BS, and losing your super.

I can understand the fear of losing a super if someone is dirt poor, then again the adage "don't fly what you can't afford to lose" has been lost somewhere.

I'm rambling, but my point is that this topic isn't about "omg tracking titans cause too many losses and we don't want to drop them with supers." Tracking titans is just the surface of a lack of fleshing out when it comes to capitals and maybe some needed buffs/new modules.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#43 - 2012-01-13 14:33:10 UTC
Xtover wrote:
Asuka Solo wrote:

Now if we just take it a little further. As they are now, t1 capitals are pretty useless against supers. This is why I would like to see CCP introduce t2 dreads and t2 carriers geared up towards providing enough EHP and DPS to stand up against supers on their own. I even think capital EWAR should be introduced as the only means of holding down supers, while sub cap ewar could hold down caps.


Introducing a capital energy neut, web, damp, painter, disruptor (infinipoint) would change the capital game quite a bit. Being able to TD and damp a tracking titan would encourage more supers and other caps on the field.

Think of a Blood carrier instead- requires Amarr and Minmatar carrier to III (not T2, but takes a lot of skilling) and give it a web+neut bonus. I would fly one no matter the cost.

It might even make the Levi worth flying again Blink


This is actually a pretty boss idea, and I'd like to highlight it, faction caps that had ewar bonuses that ONLY effected supercaps.

So a Gurista caps that could jam

Dark Blood caps that got web

Serpentis that got Damp bonuses

Angels that got TP bonuses

Sansha's that got TD bonuses,


And all of those would work on supers.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#44 - 2012-01-13 14:37:17 UTC
Xtover wrote:


I'm rambling, but my point is that this topic isn't about "omg tracking titans cause too many losses and we don't want to drop them with supers." Tracking titans is just the surface of a lack of fleshing out when it comes to capitals and maybe some needed buffs/new modules.


The point I'm trying to make is that non tracking fit titans are much less of a threat to sub caps, and if people are willing to engage titans, they won't be tracking fit, they'll be tank fit, for fear of dying, so if you give people more tools to use against supers, you don't need to nerf things, you need to add other things/buff things so that people want to engage Titans, then the tracking problem works itself out.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Temmu Guerra
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2012-01-13 14:41:14 UTC
Grath I am curious to hear your opinion on suggestions for spool up timers on cyno's and mass limitations?
Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#46 - 2012-01-13 14:43:55 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:

The point I'm trying to make is that non tracking fit titans are much less of a threat to sub caps, and if people are willing to engage titans, they won't be tracking fit, they'll be tank fit, for fear of dying, so if you give people more tools to use against supers, you don't need to nerf things, you need to add other things/buff things so that people want to engage Titans, then the tracking problem works itself out.


I completely agree.

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#47 - 2012-01-13 14:49:13 UTC
Temmu Guerra wrote:
Grath I am curious to hear your opinion on suggestions for spool up timers on cyno's and mass limitations?


Mass limitations I'm not a fan of, but spool up timers I'm a 100% behind , I think they would add a dynamic to the game thats missing from cap ship combat.

Its far to easy to move as it is right now, the fact that a PL fleet can cross all of EVE in under 9 minutes is pretty sick, and it also makes jumping into and out of combat ridiculously easy, spool up timers would make commitment much more of a done deal when engaging in caps and supers, and it would make running a much harder prospect.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#48 - 2012-01-13 14:49:26 UTC
Temmu Guerra wrote:
Grath I am curious to hear your opinion on suggestions for spool up timers on cyno's and mass limitations?


Cyno spooling is fail imo. Its the exact same mechanic as limiting the amount of sub caps that can jump on a gate. And there are many a ghetto baiting corp with gangs who would rage quit if we even entertained that idea...

Infact, I say allow supers to jump without cynos. Introduce a new skill like "Jumpdrive pinpointing" and add a new super cap only module for low or mid slots that would allow fitted supers to jump without cynos.

But I'm probably amongst the 5% of big ship pilots amogst the 95% of small ship eve players who would love to see that.

Mass limitations should stay where they were introduced, with whs.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

WarFireV
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2012-01-13 14:57:55 UTC
Trying to apply the psychology of fleet warfare to super capitals is good and all, but it still doesn't change the fact that titans are a flawed ship that where added into the game because ccp though it would be "kewl".


Like other people have said there are different ways of going about it.

The most up front way of dealing with them is just to nerf their damage ability. Not the most elegant way of going about it, but it would get the job done like it or not.

Adding in capital ewar mods or giving the EAF the ability to get around the supercaps ewar immunity overall is one of the more fascinating ideas and is something that should be looked into.

Overall though I do believe even if you could use ewar against supercaps an up front nerf would still be needed against the Titan, either some kind of tracking, locking, or EHP nerf.

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#50 - 2012-01-13 14:59:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Asuka Solo wrote:


Infact, I say allow supers to jump without cynos. Introduce a new skill like "Jumpdrive pinpointing" and add a new super cap only module for low or mid slots that would allow fitted supers to jump without cynos.



Holy mother of god you just made half of PL get wood. This would be so awesome, but would compound the problem so much, you would need to introduce this WITH jump spooling or it would be so over powered that your worst nightmares can't possibly come close to what the reality would be.


I do like the idea with spooling though, it would be pretty sweet actually, but how you figured where you land in system would be pretty odd I think.


WarFireV wrote:


Overall though I do believe even if you could use ewar against supercaps an up front nerf would still be needed against the Titan, either some kind of tracking, locking, or EHP nerf.



Dude their HP literally JUST got nerfed, by 20%, thats pretty damn heavy.

The constant nerfing is getting old, expand the game instead of contracting it for once.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#51 - 2012-01-13 15:08:02 UTC
Grath, if you ever come down to the D.C. area I'm buying you a drink.

Updating the initial post/title to reflect what's been brought up so far, bear with me a sec.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#52 - 2012-01-13 15:10:52 UTC
Xtover wrote:
Grath, if you ever come down to the D.C. area I'm buying you a drink.

Updating the initial post/title to reflect what's been brought up so far, bear with me a sec.


I live in Baltimore, we have a PL meet in the general area once a year.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2012-01-13 15:15:33 UTC
Xtover wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I don't understand this fear of losing ships. Especially capitals. They are T1 ships...insure them. Hell I just barely got into Dreads...haven't even flown mine yet but I can't wait to take it out and sooner or later lose it. I will keep it insured even if it takes me 2 years to lose it...why? Because with that insurance I can pretty much turn around and buy another.

I lost my first carrier a month ago in a WH engagement...it was ******* awesome!

It was also uninsured...did I cry? Hell no...I am in WH space...ill make that money for another in no time.

Point is...people shouldn't be afraid to lose ships. This is why I respect Pandemic Legion for what they are. They go full boar, **** you in the face with their fleets and aren't afraid to risk losing ships to win the fight. If everybody fought like this EvE would be a better place.



Why do people assume it's a fear of losing ships?

It has nothing to do with losing ships, although that was an aspect Grath was talking about but mostly unrelated to the topic- I take that back, as it's an alliance's desire not to risk shiny ships.


There's a difference between not wanting to lose your fleet BS, and losing your super.

I can understand the fear of losing a super if someone is dirt poor, then again the adage "don't fly what you can't afford to lose" has been lost somewhere.

I'm rambling, but my point is that this topic isn't about "omg tracking titans cause too many losses and we don't want to drop them with supers." Tracking titans is just the surface of a lack of fleshing out when it comes to capitals and maybe some needed buffs/new modules.

One of you guys brought it up...lol

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#54 - 2012-01-13 15:27:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Xtover
Grath Telkin wrote:

I live in Baltimore, we have a PL meet in the general area once a year.


If non-PL are welcome, I hope to come.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#55 - 2012-01-13 15:30:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Xtover wrote:


If non-PL are welcome, I hope to come.



Yea we had a Black Legion guy there last year, we'll just call you spy all night while we get plastered.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#56 - 2012-01-13 15:34:46 UTC
So far ideas that have come across (did I miss any?):

1) Capital EWAR modules that work against capitals and supercapitals (possibly not against subcapitals?)
- Nos, neut, TD, damp, web, scram (equiv to focused)

2) Faction capitals with specific EWAR bonuses:
- Guristas jam
- Blood neut (and/or web)
- Serpentis (damp)
- Angel (TP)
- Give the Revanant a TD bonus

3) Cyno spool timer or mass limits.

4) removing cynos and allowing unfocused jumps (what drawback?)

5) Either adding a Tier 2 dread with the ability to track out of siege, or boosting a current dread's tracking

6) possible boost to dread EHP?

All of these seem to encourage capital use, at least in my eyes.

I really would like to see fleets of dreads and carriers returning and throwing themselves at supers.

even if you lost 10 dreads or carriers to a single super, it is still an even battle.
Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
#57 - 2012-01-13 15:41:22 UTC
It pains me to say this, but what needs to be reviewed is the tracking formula in general. Sig radius should play a far larger role in it, like it does in the missile formula.

That not only balances tracking titans (think about it, you never see rigor leviathans, do you?), but lots of other situations involving smaller ships.

What happens in lowsec, stays in lowsec, lowering the barrier to entry to lowsec PVP: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=476644&#post476644

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#58 - 2012-01-13 15:43:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Theres another thread about boosting the combat effectiveness of dreads, I suggest in that one that we add more turrents to dreads, to up their DPS considerably (more than doubling the current output).

I think that would go a long way to helping dreads back onto the field of battle.



My suggestion was either 8 and a siege mod (*making them have the most high slots in EVE) or 7 weapon points and a siege.


Let me show you my 7 torp launching Phoenix, or my 7 blaster Moros.



Jack Dant wrote:


(think about it, you never see rigor leviathans, do you?)


Actually, you might be shocked at what a rigor fit Levi is capable of, we went over this when deciding what to do with our Levis, who now carry both torp and cruise launchers, cruise to deal with support ships, torps to deal actual damage to structures/caps/supers.

I mean the CDFE rigs aren't really that needed since you have the strongest tank of the titans already.


EDIT: Also rigor fit Levis can fit a full tank, they have no need to drop tank for damage, and while their damage isn't quite as strong against sub caps, the power of the boosted cruise against a webbed/painted target is staggering.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#59 - 2012-01-13 15:55:32 UTC
I'd like to see thread, as bumping the number of weapons on a dread would drastically improve its desirability, 3 launchers out of siege just isn't enough.

Did the range of citadel torps get bumped? I remember switching to cruise back in Apoc and never looked back because torps couldn't reach large towers.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#60 - 2012-01-13 16:01:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
No clue, but they can definitely hit towers now pretty easy, in fact having Daddy doo's Levi on the field makes doing pos shoots so much easier.



Dread thread:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=56536&find=unread

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.