These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What we grrrrgoons going to do?

First post
Author
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#341 - 2016-04-14 02:06:53 UTC
The Mittani and GSF leadership aren't going this year afaik. I'm sure plenty of goons are going, but they might not be goons by the time it actually goes around.



Since, you know, we're all busy burning them to the ground.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#342 - 2016-04-14 06:34:15 UTC
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
There is ALWAYS an avenue to attack. A function running outside of the game would be starved by cutting off it's in-game funds.
Except there is no way to do this. He's using third party software to make ISK, and there' no way to attack that because it's not in game at all. It's not even like a botter where you can still try to attack the pilots or mess up the market around them, it's untouchable. Like Zappity said, it's funny right now because it's goons, but it's obvious from how many anti-IWI people are suddenly swapping side that it's not always been the opinion before this war. Once it's over there's still the same problem that there's a player being actively allowed to break multiple rules to be in a complete unassailable position in game.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#343 - 2016-04-14 06:57:43 UTC
I guess that makes using TS3 to do, well, ANYTHING in game rule breaking.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#344 - 2016-04-14 07:17:59 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
I guess that makes using TS3 to do, well, ANYTHING in game rule breaking.
Wow, people still try to use reductio ad absurdum in arguments? I tell you what, let's go for it. Sure, let's say that TS3 does convey an in-game advantage (even though clearly it doesn't in anywhere close to the same way). First of there in-game tools to do the exact same thing. Secondly the software to do the exact same thing out of game is freely available so any player is able to leverage the exact same benefit. thirdly, the benefits given by TS3 aren't in-game benefits, they simply allow players to communicate. If logging on to TS3 made my ships tougher or stuck isk in my wallet then I'd fully expect it to be banned.

The thing is I think if you took a step back away from your bias, as what IWI is doing is benefiting you thus allowing you to overlook the reality of it, you'd be able to see how a player being able to use uncounterable out of game tools to collect trillions of isk is game-breakingly bad.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mr Mieyli
Doomheim
#345 - 2016-04-14 07:29:36 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
I guess that makes using TS3 to do, well, ANYTHING in game rule breaking.
Wow, people still try to use reductio ad absurdum in arguments? I tell you what, let's go for it. Sure, let's say that TS3 does convey an in-game advantage (even though clearly it doesn't in anywhere close to the same way). First of there in-game tools to do the exact same thing. Secondly the software to do the exact same thing out of game is freely available so any player is able to leverage the exact same benefit. thirdly, the benefits given by TS3 aren't in-game benefits, they simply allow players to communicate. If logging on to TS3 made my ships tougher or stuck isk in my wallet then I'd fully expect it to be banned.

The thing is I think if you took a step back away from your bias, as what IWI is doing is benefiting you thus allowing you to overlook the reality of it, you'd be able to see how a player being able to use uncounterable out of game tools to collect trillions of isk is game-breakingly bad.


Maybe what we're seeing is just the power a bank style group can have in a game like EvE, money is power after all. IWI was able to generate isk from players from all walks of life, it has skimmed profit from a large market and now has the ability to use that money to pay for war on a massive scale. This ability is too much for an out-of-game entity with no route to attack them so I have to agree with Lucas on this. Though I'd be very interested to see just how much isk IWI have in fact paid out to mercs, I'd wager that they got a big discount for how disliked mittani and goons have become.

This post brought to you by CCP's alpha forum alt initiative. Playing the eve forums has never come cheaper.

Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#346 - 2016-04-14 07:38:02 UTC
Mr Mieyli wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
I guess that makes using TS3 to do, well, ANYTHING in game rule breaking.
Wow, people still try to use reductio ad absurdum in arguments? I tell you what, let's go for it. Sure, let's say that TS3 does convey an in-game advantage (even though clearly it doesn't in anywhere close to the same way). First of there in-game tools to do the exact same thing. Secondly the software to do the exact same thing out of game is freely available so any player is able to leverage the exact same benefit. thirdly, the benefits given by TS3 aren't in-game benefits, they simply allow players to communicate. If logging on to TS3 made my ships tougher or stuck isk in my wallet then I'd fully expect it to be banned.

The thing is I think if you took a step back away from your bias, as what IWI is doing is benefiting you thus allowing you to overlook the reality of it, you'd be able to see how a player being able to use uncounterable out of game tools to collect trillions of isk is game-breakingly bad.


Maybe what we're seeing is just the power a bank style group can have in a game like EvE, money is power after all. IWI was able to generate isk from players from all walks of life, it has skimmed profit from a large market and now has the ability to use that money to pay for war on a massive scale. This ability is too much for an out-of-game entity with no route to attack them so I have to agree with Lucas on this. Though I'd be very interested to see just how much isk IWI have in fact paid out to mercs, I'd wager that they got a big discount for how disliked mittani and goons have become.


If you can't beat them, join them? Make a Goonambling site.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#347 - 2016-04-14 08:32:43 UTC
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
If you can't beat them, join them? Make a Goonambling site.
That doesn't fix the problem though does it? Imagine if they resolved botting by saying "OK, well everyone else can just bot then".

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#348 - 2016-04-14 08:34:27 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
The Mittani and GSF leadership aren't going this year afaik. I'm sure plenty of goons are going, but they might not be goons by the time it actually goes around.



Since, you know, we're all busy burning them to the ground.

to "fight" Fozzie-sov you don't need other players Big smile

So nope... They freely can go to Fanfest and you will sit at home and orbit beacons "burning them to the ground"

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#349 - 2016-04-14 08:40:51 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Chewytowel Haklar wrote:
If you can't beat them, join them? Make a Goonambling site.
That doesn't fix the problem though does it? Imagine if they resolved botting by saying "OK, well everyone else can just bot then".




Two things, one, The Mittani DID launch a gambling site, it failed miserably. Because even his own membership didn't like it. So complaining that its not fair that somebody else did a gambling site better than you is just lame. Two, you literally JUST SAID that TS3 is indeed available to anybody. Just like a website is. Which you can put gambling stuff on. You're just bad at it.



Not to mention IM clients, private forums, and all of the cloak and dagger tools that spies and counterspies in EVE use every day to try and gain in game advantages. All of which the emporium uses, and STILL can't seem to do anything but lose space and moons.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#350 - 2016-04-14 10:37:16 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
Two things, one, The Mittani DID launch a gambling site, it failed miserably. Because even his own membership didn't like it. So complaining that its not fair that somebody else did a gambling site better than you is just lame. Two, you literally JUST SAID that TS3 is indeed available to anybody. Just like a website is. Which you can put gambling stuff on. You're just bad at it.

Not to mention IM clients, private forums, and all of the cloak and dagger tools that spies and counterspies in EVE use every day to try and gain in game advantages. All of which the emporium uses, and STILL can't seem to do anything but lose space and moons.
Except they aren't available to anyone since you'd have to be able to write them. I could write a bot for EVE, and I could sit around using the excuse "anyone could write it so it's fine" but that doesn't make it true. Again, the only reason you support it is that it benefits you. If you take a step back and look at it objectively (which I doubt very much you are capable of doing), a player being able to use an uncounterable third party application to generate income is completely unbalanced.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Starrakatt
Empire Assault Corp
Dead Terrorists
#351 - 2016-04-14 12:29:54 UTC
What is the diffrence betweem IWI and some random ultra rich NPC corp margin trader sitting in Jita?

Both are 'intouchable' by in-game means, especially since a multi trillionaire trader would and will use an alt to anounce financing a war.

Complaining about one or the other is pointless, both are invulnerable to in-game retaliation.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#352 - 2016-04-14 12:39:19 UTC
Starrakatt wrote:
What is the diffrence betweem IWI and some random ultra rich NPC corp margin trader sitting in Jita?

Both are 'intouchable' by in-game means, especially since a multi trillionaire trader would and will use an alt to anounce financing a war.

Complaining about one or the other is pointless, both are invulnerable to in-game retaliation.
Well for starters an NPC corp margin trader is using in-game mechanics to generate his income. Secondly, margin traders can be and are affected, either by finding out what they trade and affecting that directly or by affecting the economy around them. Thirdly they can be directly competed with by other players, meaning that in order to beat the enemy they have to be better at generating that income than their enemy using the same mechanics. That's the whole point of competitive games. But when someone uses a third party tool to gain a direct advantage, it breaks the balance. This is why botters aren't allowed.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#353 - 2016-04-14 14:55:51 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
There is ALWAYS an avenue to attack. A function running outside of the game would be starved by cutting off it's in-game funds.
Except there is no way to do this. He's using third party software to make ISK, and there' no way to attack that because it's not in game at all. It's not even like a botter where you can still try to attack the pilots or mess up the market around them, it's untouchable. Like Zappity said, it's funny right now because it's goons, but it's obvious from how many anti-IWI people are suddenly swapping side that it's not always been the opinion before this war. Once it's over there's still the same problem that there's a player being actively allowed to break multiple rules to be in a complete unassailable position in game.


I understand what you are trying to say but I think you missed what I was saying. He has a hard time attacking that stream of funds because of his own status in the game. He appears to have made something of a tactical blunder by trying to take the fight outside of the game and take down IWI with RL legalish mechanisms and complaints to CCP. This was a non-winner from the get go and while I understand his frustration, he's actually fighting himself here since there would be no lasting war without him being whom he is.

Being a 'bank' or 'out of game' is something of irrelevancy. They function entirely off an in-game ISK stream. Without players adding to that stream, there is no money or will to fight. So, what causes that ISK stream is where you 'attack' them. Player perception of this is everything.

If the Goonswarm looses this fight, it's not because they didn't try to defend their Imperium, or try to put out 'propaganda', it will be because their leader has made enough enemies of other players with just his personality/actions that it painted a target on him. I'm not saying this is right or wrong, it's just an observation from a 3rd party stance. I'm a neutral.

I could offer him some advice on how to stop this war in a matter of days and come out looking like the better person for it, but I'm not certain he'd be willing to listen.

I do know people though, and how they react to things. My view of this is that the way the war was done on the avenue of attack that would actually WORK against the IWI was done so poorly as to make things worse.

This is an asymmetrical war, it's unlike any other that has happened in EVE prior to this point (at least that I have been able to research). The ship to ship combat is actually a side show to the real war that is the EVE player base perception of the two sides. If you compare the IWI CEO's letter (which is actually a tidy, smart bit of propaganda in and of itself) to the 'leaked' logs of the chat's within the Imperium's leadership, you can see the entire player base perception of the war in just two documents. The IWI appears to not be hiding anything, is open about their role and why they are in it. The Imperium leadership is coming across as well... you can read it clearly for yourself.

I'm not certain the Imperium's leadership is equipped with the tools to fight back on this avenue, thus, it looks like they "can't" fight back, but that's not true, it would just require something of them that is not easily reachable by those personalities.

I find it completely amazing that a 'game' like EVE has now reached an even new dimension of complexity. It now showcases how singular personalities can dominate a battlefield. History is rife with stories of these larger than life people in war, but to see it happen in a video game is... awesome.

I'm not certain any other MMO is capable of this dimension of play.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#354 - 2016-04-14 15:31:55 UTC
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
I understand what you are trying to say but I think you missed what I was saying. He has a hard time attacking that stream of funds because of his own status in the game. He appears to have made something of a tactical blunder by trying to take the fight outside of the game and take down IWI with RL legalish mechanisms and complaints to CCP. This was a non-winner from the get go and while I understand his frustration, he's actually fighting himself here since there would be no lasting war without him being whom he is.

Being a 'bank' or 'out of game' is something of irrelevancy. They function entirely off an in-game ISK stream. Without players adding to that stream, there is no money or will to fight. So, what causes that ISK stream is where you 'attack' them. Player perception of this is everything.
How exactly do you stop players adding to that stream in game though? Impersonation rules mean you can't set up scam corps of a similar name to gain isk, and I doubt flying around saying "don't do that" is going to do much, so the only way is to go after their reputation.

And the truth is that what they've been saying isn't really wrong. IWI does have a much higher rate of confirmed RMT cases, there have been multiple independent claims that they are using shills and weighted odds, and there are clear EULA violations that do seem to be ignored (operating an account as a business as an example).

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
If the Goonswarm looses this fight, it's not because they didn't try to defend their Imperium, or try to put out 'propaganda', it will be because their leader has made enough enemies of other players with just his personality/actions that it painted a target on him. I'm not saying this is right or wrong, it's just an observation from a 3rd party stance. I'm a neutral.
When the Imperium loses this fight - and I say when, not if - it will be because they have no ability to fight against a third party application. It may take a long time but Imperium income is in-game, using legitimate mechanics which means it can be attacked, a core part of EVE, while IWI income cannot. The inevitability of this is that IWI will simply outlast the Imperium.

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
I could offer him some advice on how to stop this war in a matter of days and come out looking like the better person for it, but I'm not certain he'd be willing to listen.
I sincerely doubt that. I'm sure you have ideas and believe they would really work on paper but reality is that there's no real winning solution. Survive and hope they get bored is pretty much the only viable solution.

Pandora Carrollon wrote:
If you compare the IWI CEO's letter (which is actually a tidy, smart bit of propaganda in and of itself) to the 'leaked' logs of the chat's within the Imperium's leadership, you can see the entire player base perception of the war in just two documents.

The IWI appears to not be hiding anything, is open about their role and why they are in it. The Imperium leadership is coming across as well... you can read it clearly for yourself.
Of course, because you're taking unedited IWI propaganda straight from IWI and comparing it to a reddit posters hack job of leaks specifically cut to maximize anti-goon impact. You're not comparing pro-MBC and pro-Goon material there, you are comparing pro-MBC and anti-goon material, both of which have the goal of putting goons in a bad light. Of course if you look at only things with an anti-goon bias you are going to see it that way.

I do read it for myself and I don't just limit myself to looking at what MBC wants me to. For example, I look at the fact that the vast majority of the times where people have claimed Mittani is spinning, what he has said has been verifiably true.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Cidanel Afuran
Grant Village
#355 - 2016-04-14 15:56:59 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
When the Imperium loses this fight - and I say when, not if - it will be because they have no ability to fight against a third party application. It may take a long time but Imperium income is in-game, using legitimate mechanics which means it can be attacked, a core part of EVE, while IWI income cannot. The inevitability of this is that IWI will simply outlast the Imperium.


They aren't fighting against a third party application. They are fighting, in reality, against thousands upon thousands of players who used a gambling service that they enjoy. There is a way to fight against IWI, and that's to discourage the playerbase from using it in the first place.

Is that hard? Hell yes it is, but complaining about it is akin to grr goons. Don't complain about not being able to fight someone just because you haven't figured out how to do it successfully yet.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#356 - 2016-04-14 16:43:28 UTC
Cidanel Afuran wrote:
They aren't fighting against a third party application. They are fighting, in reality, against thousands upon thousands of players who used a gambling service that they enjoy. There is a way to fight against IWI, and that's to discourage the playerbase from using it in the first place.

Is that hard? Hell yes it is, but complaining about it is akin to grr goons. Don't complain about not being able to fight someone just because you haven't figured out how to do it successfully yet.
By hard you really mean impossible. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I'm pretty sure convincing the entire EVE playerbase to not do something isn't actually possible. I'm not complaining about IWI just because of this war, feel free to check my posting history on IWI in the past.

The fact remains that ignoring the parties involved, looking at this objectively, having one side using a third party application to gain isk with no counter and the other using legitimate game mechanics that can be countered, there's a clear balance issue there. One that evidently shouldn't exist, since gaining an unfair benefit through the use of a third party application is already against the EULA.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Cidanel Afuran
Grant Village
#357 - 2016-04-14 16:51:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Cidanel Afuran
Lucas Kell wrote:
By hard you really mean impossible. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I'm pretty sure convincing the entire EVE playerbase to not do something isn't actually possible. I'm not complaining about IWI just because of this war, feel free to check my posting history on IWI in the past.

The fact remains that ignoring the parties involved, looking at this objectively, having one side using a third party application to gain isk with no counter and the other using legitimate game mechanics that can be countered, there's a clear balance issue there. One that evidently shouldn't exist, since gaining an unfair benefit through the use of a third party application is already against the EULA.


I see you're being as ridiculous as usual. IWI found a way to gain ISK from players by playing the social/politician side of EVE. You do realize that the game is about more than simply flying spaceships, right? Fight him the same way he earns isk, by playing the social, political side by use of propaganda. Don't resort to whining and cry about BSbreaches of the EULA because someone found a way to make ISK faster than the rest of us.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#358 - 2016-04-14 16:57:11 UTC
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#359 - 2016-04-14 17:03:29 UTC
Cidanel Afuran wrote:
I see you're being as ridiculous as usual. IWI found a way to gain ISK from players by playing the social/politician side of EVE. You do realize that the game is about more than simply flying spaceships, right? Fight him the same way he earns isk, by playing the social, political side by use of propaganda. Don't resort to whining and cry about BSbreaches of the EULA because someone found a way to make ISK faster than the rest of us.
Ridiculous in what what? Yes, IWI found a way to gain isk from players using a third party application. That is undeniable. You can't claim that the IWI site is not a third party application nor can you deny that without that application he'd not have been able to get all of the isk. If he were sitting around in game saying "if you give me isk I'll pay to kill the goons" there's absolutely no way he'd make trillions, and you know that full well.

I love how you're calling me ridiculous then you're going off to deny basic facts about how he makes his isk. Further you're then going down the "the tears" route. I'm not whining or crying about the breaches of the EULA, I'm calmly, rationally and logically pointing out the very real breaches of the EULA that exists and questioning why CCP chooses to ignore it.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#360 - 2016-04-14 17:05:02 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Cidanel Afuran wrote:
I see you're being as ridiculous as usual. IWI found a way to gain ISK from players by playing the social/politician side of EVE. You do realize that the game is about more than simply flying spaceships, right? Fight him the same way he earns isk, by playing the social, political side by use of propaganda. Don't resort to whining and cry about BSbreaches of the EULA because someone found a way to make ISK faster than the rest of us.
Ridiculous in what what? Yes, IWI found a way to gain isk from players using a third party application. That is undeniable. You can't claim that the IWI site is not a third party application nor can you deny that without that application he'd not have been able to get all of the isk. If he were sitting around in game saying "if you give me isk I'll pay to kill the goons" there's absolutely no way he'd make trillions, and you know that full well.

I love how you're calling me ridiculous then you're going off to deny basic facts about how he makes his isk. Further you're then going down the "the tears" route. I'm not whining or crying about the breaches of the EULA, I'm calmly, rationally and logically pointing out the very real breaches of the EULA that exists and questioning why CCP chooses to ignore it.




Let go, Lucas.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!