EVE General Discussion

I'm happy fighting in ceptors as long as you guys are happy dying in them - personally I don't even fly a super because it looks boring as hell.

But sure, you're denying my content....and the MBC player numbers are suffering as a result

~koolaid~

fwiw a quote from a corpmate earlier today

"300 man ceptor gang with no tidi is the most fun I ever had in eve"

Yeah playerbase is climbing...but goons player count is dropping...and somehow via mittani-esq spin, this is a good thing for you?


lmao

http://evemaps.dotlan.net/corp/movements

I mean if you drag this out for another 23 days...then that's another 1333 ceptor pilots that Horde has :)

Apparently CCP is unwilling to consult Kim Jong....errrr....lolmittens....about the name of the war.

You think your one-man crusade to change game mechanics will draw more attention?

I see your "lol" and raise you a

FYI....sorry for interrupting NED's attempt at mini evac via WH space two nights ago. And HIC's on a WH in losec don't do much either.....

Actually....you guys are not very good at this game.

Probably time to update that statement after your SOTA.

Wait, so you're telling me situations change? Honestly I'm surprised!

Let me ask you this. If you achieve what you want and we move to invulnerable NPC stations then continue to play exactly as we always have from the safety of NPC space, what are you going to do then? Because you won't have your inherent advantage and supposedly you don't want to be blue with 40,000 people forever, but this war won't end just because a few of us have to relocate. You guys are way ahead of yourselves patting yourselves on the back lol

You claim that the only reason I like this is because I’m not a sov holder. That fact is untrue I like the system because you need to occupy all your space and maintain high indexes or the small guy can take a bit of it for however long they can hold onto it. Can a few things be tweaked sure but if you want Rome then you should have to create the armies, the infrastructure, and population of Rome. I think the Russians are over extended as well but that is beside the point. As for wasting your time it's your home if I come to burn it down shouldn't you have to fight me off. If I attack with a single frigate a single frigate can kill me. If people are constantly using the space. If I attack in mass, then a group needs to defend it. IF other people start complaining about that then I fell they are mistaken as well. My opinions are from my knowledge of eve and what I have read about and experienced. I will link my comments to others that complain about sov as well because honestly I think if you live there then defending it should be easy. Horde can live ratting in just a few systems and still make decent isk.

As for mechanics that I do think are broken and are being changed is spider tanking slow cats, and supper caps in their current form. Members of my alliance probably will disagree with me but the idea of complete safety is something I don’t think should exist in eve and I'm happy there chaining it. Wormhole escalations and the amount of isk you can make in almost complete safety that should also be examined and changed because the isk can be amazing when I was doing it. T3 cruisers and t3 destroyers could potentially need to be rebalanced the Svipul in particular is one ship that seems overpowered in most situations. But of course I’m biased so take it with a grain of salt.

I understand your position and that you disagree with what I'm saying and we don’t have to agree to discuss an issue. I honestly want a discussion on the subject. However, when it all comes down to your biased because your attacking of course you like it your attacking it limits the conversation. We are on opposite sides of this conflict but we are both people who play this game as a hobby for fun. If I were to say I would like to only entosis a structure once to flip, it or destroy it that would be c0mpletly unbalanced and biased towards the attacker. If I wanted to say only entosis a tcu to flip the system and the I hub and station flipped with it that would be biased. An honest discussion about the amount of space needed to live, Vulnerability windows, Should the attackers need to commit more and how can that be made better we have discussed. I disagree with some of your points and agree with a few suggestions you made to make sov better.

To put it another perspective I got out played today and lost a cerb fleet to caracals because 1 I made mistakes and 2 I got outplayed. Should I go and ask for cerbs to be buffed because I lost that fleet or should I say I made mistakes and need to improve. I think I need to improve and not make those mistakes. I have enjoyed the discussion you Myself and Rain6637 have been having but lol you’re the attacker or lol your goons does limit the conversation a bit. As i'm sure my forum formatting does as well.

Actually, structures are fine. One have to shoot them and tank them if they want to do something about it.

Complete sov removal as a means to actually achieve occupancy sov? I'm pretty sure people are finally started to see the sandboxey light.


Russians would fold as fast as Imperial fringe should they experience same pressure that people are putting on Imperium. But somehow their strategy works fine for them so far. Guess being mostly neutral, not trying to maintain high profile in EVE-related media while going out of their way to create an image of extremely obnoxious space dictators who own New Eden (and you too!) kinda helps with that. General playerbase being physically incapable to sh*tpost on public forums makes it more convenient to maintain such a policy in practice.

Making sov organic somehow is a nice thought, but you wouldn't get the same satisfaction as long as players could contest sov ownership in forum threads with "yuh huh, nuh uh"

lol