Warfare & Tactics

Hi.

I wonder why caldari militia can station and operate from so many low sec systems in gallente space. Yvangier, Aeschee, Cumemare, Pelile, Alperaute, Oulley, Maut. All of them has stations. Gallente pilots can use only Karjataimon.

It is 7 vs 1. Why is this so unfair?

If some solo gallente pilot wants to operate from non-factional warfare caldari low sec he has only one option. Caldari pilots can use 7 different systems, some are close to local trade hubs.
I mean : if I want to have base of operation, independent from system control and I do not want to build a POS. Where can I go in caldari low sec? Caldari can use Oulley, which is just next to trade hub, and make pressure on Aubenall. Or, like just happened, use Aeschee to flip Ladistier.

"non-factional warfare low sec" systems does not prevent you from docking

...Unless i completely missed the point of question

Go away farmers go through Kehjari so we can kill you efficiently. Stop using your head and basing from Karjataimon and base from Eha instead so we can kill you on the Martoh gate en masse.

Exactly. What if I have -10 sec state and want to settle somewhere close to FW zone, but not directly inside it because of possible soverenity flip? From caldari side of FW area I have just one possibility, and it is not that close to trade hubs or hot zones.

Cal mil can sit in Yvangier and flip Heydeless or sit in Aeschee and flip Ladistier. With only one jump from those hot systems. Oulley is one jump form secondary trade hub (Orvolle) and one jump from FW. Need more examples? Why gal mil is limited to Karjataimon only?

Caldari have complained about things being stacked against them for the longest of times.

Meanwhile, they are native to the largest tradehub in the game 4 jumps from fw space. They have a system with 2 good statepro agents and a good distribution of agents very nearby (if they ever take the stations back). They have, during much of their plight had greater numbers but were unwilling to form them due to squabbles. They have 2 large areas bordering their high or null sec that are both bottle necked by a single gate making them easier to manage. They have the mentioned non FW staging systems in lowsec bordering galmil FW.

But apparently, because we have one low sec agent in Parts (that hardly anyone uses), which is not conquerable and the FDU LP store is perhaps 10% better, mostly due to not being farmed so much, CCP has rigged all of FW in our favor which is the only reason gal mil has been mostly dominant since the inferno fiasco.

Perhaps the one ship no one in their right mind will fight without a couple of friends or more??
Also. Where are the faction ECM mods that would have made the Lp stores a tad more even when the Fed Navy stores got their new shiney mods recently??

Mud slinging makes everyone get dirty. Some dirt is just more difficult to clean off.

I don't know what you just said, but let's make it crystal clear: the griffin navy issue is garbage, end of story.

Killboard statistics are not indicative of whether the ship is good or bad, because even the worst combat ships in the game have good killboard statistics. You must not know how killboards work. It's literally possible to get those same (or better) statistics using nothing but an Ibis. I'm willing to discuss the details, but I'm letting you know right now your post is garbage and those stats are garbage too.

Just look up Ibis on zkillboard. It actually has an 80.2% ISK efficiency, compared to the Griffin Navy Issue's 72.6%. So following Al Nomadi's hilarious line of reasoning, the Ibis isn't bad; some people just know how to use it. Just take a second to appreciate the flabbergasting stupidity of this reasoning - if he actually believed that those statistics he wrote down proved that the GNI isn't terrible, he would also have to believe that the Ibis is a better combat ship than the GNI.

As bad as Griffin Navy Issue is, I don't think that the Ibis is actually better than it.