Intergalactic Summit

I commend your decision to propose instead of petition. Well played. And good luck.

To further assist my good friends in PIE, as they are aware of the recent re-opening of recruitment of Battlemonks here is the state of our current promotional material.

AMONK Recruitment Poster

To my taste it is a little sad that things such as PIE's negative view of us are actually seen as a recruiting asset. Please, let us talk and clear the air.

I was struck by this uncharacteristically reasonable and mature approach to matters of theological and diplomatic difficulty coming from Local is Primary. Could I have mislabeled them due to their approach in... well, Local? May I have dismissed them as mere lunatics taunting the actual loyalists with their presence in error? Perhaps some of their numbers are actual believes in a cause, rather than merely in it for the bloodsport? Perhaps this is...



My sides. I may mourn the lack of Matari principles and ways on our side, but at least I can take some small comfort in how Aldieboo and his ilk must go through a set of dentures on a weekly basis, gritting their teeth at their side's strongest fighters.

As you wish. The invitation was extended.

Upon consideration, this might be a good idea.

There are many of the Faith, Amarr and Saninst living in NullSec.

How does one support Faith when separated from the Empire?

Coming to the table for discussion is not weakness. It shows maturity. What's the worst that could happen?

(don't answer that)

I will attend.

I also recommend you extend an invitation to Max Singularity.

Sabik are heretics to the Orthodox, this is fact.

Blooders are the very worst of the Sabik, and go out of their way to cause great harm to many innocents for their blood lust. This is also fact.

The Amarr do not intend to destroy outright, but to Reclaim.



If a Minmatar were to convert Nauplius, it is not your place to destroy them for they are HIS and HIS alone, and it should have been your task to bring them into HIS grace.

The Amarr do not listen to the whispers of temptation of the Sabik.



The way of the Sabik is the easy path, the selfish path. Blooders most especially look to seek power and become Chosen through the sacrifice of the blood of others. They know naught the right path, the way of hardship and self sacrifice, they only know to bring glory through the ruination of others for their debauched Red God.



This is the true path that you deny, this is the only way to redemption that you seek to avoid. You deny HIS Will, and through it damn yourselves. This is why this debate will never take place, and why this will be my final post.

"Theological discussion"? I only see an attempt at a charade, aiming to give blooder/sabik activities a veneer of legitimacy.
But yes, no one in her right mind would miss the opportunity to skip that!

It is sad that no intelligent response from the so-called orthodox Amarr side has been forthcoming.

I say so-called because while the loyalists may cite Scripture, they fail to realize that Scripture has been altered by a wayward and liberal Theology Council. In the crises of a Empire that will soon have its fourth Emperor in fifteen years should be seen God's Judgement upon a wayward, liberal, slave-loving, Scripture-altering Empire: the end of the Golden Age and the dawn of the Blood Age.

Even so, may the Blood Age come quickly. Amen. Amarr Victor.

Well, Mr. Mokk,

I expected... well, actually, no, I didn't expect better of you than to side in this as a partisan with Blooders and other heretics of the Sani Sabik!

Don't try to play the part of the impartial outsider and expect anyone to swallow it:
It is obvious that you, being a criminal - if not heretic(?), would benefit in this endeavour of striving for legitimacy. After all, if heretics get some legitimacy, then criminals would as well, no?

The Peace Summit of Dr. Sarain was quite a different animal than the herein proposed conference. You do him a disvavour by associating one with the other, too. The Peace Summit might have included criminals and heretics (though not as delegates, as Cpt. Onzo points out rightfully in his post further down) - yet it was not a summit between one lawful entity and entities outlawed by that one entity: And nowhere was the aim of the Peace Summit to legitimize outlaws, be that criminals or heretics.

How the rest of the Galaxy views the Amarr Faith and the Sani Sabik heresy is of little concern. The Empire has no difference to prove in this regard: Any outsiders who dedicate themselves to study this will see the difference and quite clearly so. That much has been the experience of Aria Jenneth as well as others. Those who don't want to see the difference won't be convinced by the farce proposed here, either.

Also, the claim that the Empire is the steward of the one true Faith is not a matter of "factual historic documentation". No historical document can prove that. After all, the true Faith is faithful to God, not some historical document: Just as true obedience means to follow the command according to it's intent, not to the letter.

Lastly, no one is refusing to send a representative. We simply deny that there is anything worthwhile to which a representative could be sent. The situation is easy to understand: Sani Sabikism has no theology because it has no place for reasoned discourse qua being Sani Sabikism. The only place 'reasoned discourse' has for those heretics is as a word used in decieving others about their true intentions - or outside of their identity as Sani Sabik. It is hypocritical, though, to suggest that their identity as heretics will be left out in a discourse about their heresy and it's status. It'd also be wrong to ignore this.

If any of those heretics want legitimacy, then they are free to renounce their heresies, repent and lay their lives down to be decided upon by imperial authorities.

Mokk, you have forced me to post here again by your blatant slander. As a delegate to the Conference you would damn well know Sansha and Blooders were disbarred from Delegacy. They were never a part of the Conference and The Faith was never a point of discussion or debate.

Don't spin Sarain's legacy of political peace for your twisted attempt to appear as a theological 'peace maker'.