Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

What did I not noticed in this one? I am confused

i love this portion of the game, but whenever you add incentive, you add incentive to cut corners and cheat. i know spend the vast majority of my time, if i am not running a fleet for 4's, solving these.

because i am new to protein identification, every problem takes me a very long time. upwards of 20 minutes. you REALLY have to look closely to see if what your looking at is cellular variation, or if it happens to be caused by variations in something i dont understand, like differences in space. i also see mitochondria EVERYWHERE! after getting it wrong twice, im sure ill come across it someday!

the majority of people can/will/do not have the time or patience to dedicate 20-30 minutes to properly identifying something, if they are just beginning to learn it. in fact, in missions chat and corp chat, when i asked for advice, i was simply told "just check cytoplasm, eventually youll get level 10". that, to me, was heartbreaking. it showed that those people had no appreciation for what they were participating in, and even worse, were purposefully providing false examples for the possibility of intangible recreational electronic fiscal advancement.

when you motivate someone to do something, with profit, you motivate them to do it in the most profitable way, regardless of repercussions or consequences.

in reality, the best thing ccp could do would be remove all incentives, and leave it to only the people who want to contribute in honesty and appropriateness. of course, then very few people would participate, but all the results would be reliable, and would actually contribute to this project.

as is right now, the main thing i see to be contributed thus far, is a bunch of quick, rapid, multiple "guesses" by people who dont care about the possible damage they may be doing, or complications they may be causing, to something that is actually very serious and important.

if anything, after i get better at identifying these, accurately and quickly, i will probably move to the website so the information i submit is actually analyzed and respected, instead of being lost in a meta data bank of what is mainly people "clicking for isk, not information". seeing some of the "community census", was very disappointing

*people of earth... this is why you cant have nice things*

One would have to look at a green-only view to be able to tell

I fully agree with you, I have looked at samples, analysed it, picked where it should go.

Only to be told it's wrong, even though it doesn't look remotely like the answer they say it should be, some couldn't look more wrong.

I'm not sure if it's a programming error or what, but it's bloody annoying.

CCP Wonderboy needs to learn how to spell. Should be "its".

/lesson

I'm no scientist, but how am I wrong on this?

consensus wins again:

http://imgur.com/fVuUqjH

I'd suggest having a look at players' past results, and use that to determine which types of samples most players are getting wrong.
I would then modify and expand the descriptions in order to clarify the situation in future. Like many ppl are split over whether it's Cytoplasm or Vesicles often

Also, 4 examples per category simply isn't enough - make it 8 and include 'unusual' examples maybe?

I appreciate it's a work in progress, but there's room for improvement. Fantastic idea though...

I find this change questionable at best.
It's really simple to just click random answers for everything except test questions (10000000XXX) and hit 90% accuracy in 3 hours or so.
I expect your results quality to get much worse in nearest future.

Give that man a cookie!!!! Great idea!!