These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Vote Xenuria: CSM 11 - Reform The CSM
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Scheulagh Santorine
The Math Department
#181 - 2016-03-05 21:18:05 UTC
Xenuria,

Here's an easy question for you:

Quote:

Assume for a moment that you have infinite optimal range and you have two targets to choose from: The first target has a transverse velocity of 400m/s and a signature radius of 60m. A second target has a transverse velocity of 800m/s and a signature radius of 120m. Which target would you have a greater chance to hit?



S. Santorine

============================== I used to shoot things. Now I do math.

S. Santorine

Writings on some formal methods in EvE-Online: EVE Math & Physics Blog
Xenuria
#182 - 2016-03-06 01:46:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Xenuria
Scheulagh Santorine wrote:
Xenuria,

Here's an easy question for you:

Quote:

Assume for a moment that you have infinite optimal range and you have two targets to choose from: The first target has a transverse velocity of 400m/s and a signature radius of 60m. A second target has a transverse velocity of 800m/s and a signature radius of 120m. Which target would you have a greater chance to hit?



S. Santorine


I am not good at numbers.
I would just use a smartbomb. Since my optimal range is forever I would be able to hit both targets.

CSM 12 Candidate
Scheulagh Santorine
The Math Department
#183 - 2016-03-06 07:04:55 UTC
Xenuria wrote:

I am not good at numbers.
I would just use a smartbomb. Since my optimal range is forever I would be able to hit both targets.


Considering my question is something of a trick, I suppose I get what I deserve when your answer is for a non-turret ship! Oops

============================== I used to shoot things. Now I do math.

S. Santorine

Writings on some formal methods in EvE-Online: EVE Math & Physics Blog
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#184 - 2016-03-06 20:41:45 UTC
Sorry but Obama tried that crap on me twice and I wouldn't fall for .. (yes he won without my vote) what reform? You can't promise change without telling us what you specifically want to change and expect my vote.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Xenuria
#185 - 2016-03-06 20:44:51 UTC
Scheulagh Santorine wrote:
Xenuria wrote:

I am not good at numbers.
I would just use a smartbomb. Since my optimal range is forever I would be able to hit both targets.


Considering my question is something of a trick, I suppose I get what I deserve when your answer is for a non-turret ship! Oops


You also have to consider that I am one of the best PVPers in the game.

CSM 12 Candidate
Leuschen
Riverstone Holdings LLC
#186 - 2016-03-09 21:20:28 UTC
X

Right you are one of the best PVPers and I have a bridge to sell in New York.

https://zkillboard.com/character/1735645598/stats/

I suggest you keep your boasts to something that cannot be verified.
Scheulagh Santorine
The Math Department
#187 - 2016-03-10 02:08:24 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Scheulagh Santorine wrote:
Xenuria wrote:

I am not good at numbers.
I would just use a smartbomb. Since my optimal range is forever I would be able to hit both targets.


Considering my question is something of a trick, I suppose I get what I deserve when your answer is for a non-turret ship! Oops


You also have to consider that I am one of the best PVPers in the game.


If you had left it at the quip about the smartie fit, you'd have fared better in my view.

Good luck with the CSM elections.

S. Santorine

============================== I used to shoot things. Now I do math.

S. Santorine

Writings on some formal methods in EvE-Online: EVE Math & Physics Blog
GOB the Magician
Enlightened Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#188 - 2016-03-11 04:53:02 UTC
I felt Scion was a good CSM who went into it with an open mind. He advocated on behalf of us PAYING CUSTOMERS and was ignored, publicly shamed, and barred from running again by an individual who no longer has her job interfacing with the CSM. Have fun with Xenuria and Aryth. Please remember that you asked for this.

I do have a question for Xenuria: It's clear and obvious that current CSM members are leaking NDA material yet CCP does nothing about it. How do your CSM reform proposals address this?
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#189 - 2016-03-11 11:51:45 UTC
GOB the Magician wrote:
I do have a question for Xenuria: It's clear and obvious that current CSM members are leaking NDA material yet CCP does nothing about it. How do your CSM reform proposals address this?
Why do people always think the CSM members are some super wizards who poop out perfect solutions, CCP would never have thought about. As a CSM member you have the opportunity to let CCP know how players think about issues and where they should put their priorities. That's why you need to be open for discussions, active on social media, etc. And together you try to find the best solution by discussing the problems. For this you need a good Eve background or else you're kid preaching to the teachers.

And yes, I would also vote for Xenuria.... well I did already Lol

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#190 - 2016-03-12 01:22:27 UTC
Xenuria, despite being a little odd, despite people ridiculing you, you still stand up to be in CSM and the more I see of your posts, there seems to be a bit of sharp dry wit.
Keep on trucking.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Xenuria
#191 - 2016-03-12 02:44:16 UTC
GOB the Magician wrote:
I felt Scion was a good CSM who went into it with an open mind. He advocated on behalf of us PAYING CUSTOMERS and was ignored, publicly shamed, and barred from running again by an individual who no longer has her job interfacing with the CSM. Have fun with Xenuria and Aryth. Please remember that you asked for this.

I do have a question for Xenuria: It's clear and obvious that current CSM members are leaking NDA material yet CCP does nothing about it. How do your CSM reform proposals address this?


Since I can't force CCP to reprimand people for leaking, I can only change systems in such a way that the leaker is more obvious. I'd have to see how they have all their stuff configured but it's easy enough to put something like that in place.

I think re-tooling is part of reform just as much as drawing up new ways of doing things is.

CSM 12 Candidate
Seraph IX Basarab
Outer Path
Seraphim Division
#192 - 2016-03-12 19:42:27 UTC
Constant none-answers. Meaningless, no content, just blatant attention seeking. Roll
Scheulagh Santorine
The Math Department
#193 - 2016-03-12 23:49:10 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Scheulagh Santorine wrote:
Xenuria,

Here's an easy question for you:

Quote:

Assume for a moment that you have infinite optimal range and you have two targets to choose from, both at the same distance from your turret-fitted ship: The first target has a transverse velocity of 400m/s and a signature radius of 60m. A second target has a transverse velocity of 800m/s and a signature radius of 120m. Which target would you have a greater chance to hit?



S. Santorine


I am not good at numbers.
I would just use a smartbomb. Since my optimal range is forever I would be able to hit both targets.


Xenuria,

What if I gave you another clue to make it easier. You can assume that both targets are at the same distance. I have revised the wording of the question above. Good luck.


Regards,

S. Santorine

============================== I used to shoot things. Now I do math.

S. Santorine

Writings on some formal methods in EvE-Online: EVE Math & Physics Blog
Jenshae Chiroptera
#194 - 2016-03-15 03:15:34 UTC
Scheulagh Santorine wrote:
Which target would you have a greater chance to hit?
Both are pretty slow and easy for a web + target painter + tracking enhanced Huginn to hit. P

http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Gunnery_Guide

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Tech3ZH
Doomheim
#195 - 2016-03-17 01:34:01 UTC
Xenuria, I wasn't able to find a CSM11 interview you have done, only older irrelevant ones from previous CSM campaigns. Did you do a CSM11 interview somewhere and I just didn't find it? I did find your youtube channel, though. Cool that you fight for Vanu!
Xenuria
#196 - 2016-03-19 00:21:34 UTC
Tech3ZH wrote:
Xenuria, I wasn't able to find a CSM11 interview you have done, only older irrelevant ones from previous CSM campaigns. Did you do a CSM11 interview somewhere and I just didn't find it? I did find your youtube channel, though. Cool that you fight for Vanu!






I did text interviews with eve NT and I did the vote match thing. If you are looking for video I was on the most recent meta shoe.
https://www.twitch.tv/themittanidotcom/v/54050354

CSM 12 Candidate
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#197 - 2016-03-22 20:20:19 UTC
I've always tossed you a few votes because, who doesn't love the village idiot?

This year will be no different.

Mr Epeen Cool
Moac Tor
Cyber Core
Immediate Destruction
#198 - 2016-03-24 00:16:33 UTC
Is a vote for Xenuria still a vote for highly textured shoes? Because this is what people really care about.
Xenuria
#199 - 2016-04-26 19:03:10 UTC
Look upon my great works all ye mighty and despair!

CSM 12 Candidate
Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
#200 - 2016-04-27 21:01:15 UTC
Joining the biggest organised voting bloc in the game and sucking enough up to the leaders of said bloc (Or being exploitable enough for their purposes) to be put on the ballot isn't really your work, though.
Someone else did that work for you.

As you obviously are too deluded to realise (Messiah-complex and all), you didn't win because of your causes. You don't have any. You won because you can be a tool for the CFC leadership, and if one should make a bet, it would be that getting you on the CSM will close that institution down, either de facto or de jure, since it has ceased to be a meaningful platform for the CFC.
Despite your personality, your (lack of) qualifications, your insanity and your self-absorption, you got elected.

Someone in the CFC hierarchy decided to remake you, from a joke to a weapon. What made you the joke candidate everyone enjoyed before, has now become a joke on us. The question is, who will wield you, and who will you be pointed at?