These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Antipiratism support for New Eden

First post
Author
Mikhem
Taxisk Unlimited
#1 - 2016-02-28 19:41:49 UTC
Antipiratism was hot word several years back. Some capsuleers tried to create safer New Eden for everyone. This made me thinking about open discussion thread about antipiratism.

1. Would you like to see antipiratism support for New Eden?

2. What would antipiratism support for New Eden mean?

Share your thoughts here!

Here are my thoughts about antipiratism:

- Perhaps capsuleers try to do Concord work in low sec space and make it safer?
- Could it be Concord vs pirate factions warfare? Similar system that faction warfare is now?
- Should capsuleers be allowed to join pirate factions?
- Perhaps capsuleers with very high security rating could receive Concord loyalty points for killing capsuleers with suspect flag or criminal flag in low sec space?
- Should there be the most heinous criminals list kept by Concord about law breaking capsuleers?
- Capsuleers could do maintenance for low sec turrets?
- Capsuleers could do custom work in low sec space since faction military force is not in low sec? This would mean preventing drugs and other illegal stuff coming to faction low sec space.

Mikhem

Link library to EVE music songs.

ISD Buldath
#2 - 2016-02-28 19:44:18 UTC
Topic Moved to Features and Ideas discussion.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.

Johan Civire
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3 - 2016-02-28 20:03:03 UTC
TBH sounds fair and a good idea but getting this in practice well that's a hole other story . People do not care any more about satiety hiding in station is the way to go nowadays. why all the work? when scamming is easier to do?
Dark Lord Trump
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#4 - 2016-02-28 20:41:46 UTC
Mikhem wrote:
Antipiratism was hot word several years back. Some capsuleers tried to create safer New Eden for everyone. This made me thinking about open discussion thread about antipiratism.

1. Would you like to see antipiratism support for New Eden?

2. What would antipiratism support for New Eden mean?

Share your thoughts here!

Here are my thoughts about antipiratism:

- Perhaps capsuleers try to do Concord work in low sec space and make it safer?
- Could it be Concord vs pirate factions warfare? Similar system that faction warfare is now?
- Should capsuleers be allowed to join pirate factions?
- Perhaps capsuleers with very high security rating could receive Concord loyalty points for killing capsuleers with suspect flag or criminal flag in low sec space?
- Should there be the most heinous criminals list kept by Concord about law breaking capsuleers?
- Capsuleers could do maintenance for low sec turrets?
- Capsuleers could do custom work in low sec space since faction military force is not in low sec? This would mean preventing drugs and other illegal stuff coming to faction low sec space.

1. You could always make your own corp and pirate the pirates.
2. Nah, one faction warfare system is plenty.
3. That could be interesting... not sure what it would do without CONCORD vs. pirates, but a potential drawback could be that all empires become hostile to them and shoot them in hisec?
4. That sounds cool, but will be abused. Just get an alt, do a bad thing on your main in a noobship, kill your main with your alt, and enjoy piles and piles of LP.
5. That would be cool. It could be a target list for anti-pirate corps and a leaderboard for pirates.
6. What exactly would the maintainence do? And what would be the reward/point?
7. Again, I'm not sure if that's the sort of thing that CCP will incentivize in-game, but you could always make your own corp and use cargo scanners on people liberally.

I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!

DrysonBennington
Eagle's Talon's
#5 - 2016-02-29 17:51:18 UTC  |  Edited by: DrysonBennington
Pirating in High Sector is lazy. There is no ingenuity behind mass blobbing destroyers and then ganking a Freighter.
Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#6 - 2016-02-29 18:48:05 UTC
Some time ago my CEO wrote something I think the OP might enjoy Smile

Something thought provoking regarding piracy, anti-piracy and the sandbox.

"EVE Unbalanced - The Sandbox is a Lie"
Black Pedro
Mine.
#7 - 2016-02-29 20:56:44 UTC
DrysonBennington wrote:
Pirating in High Sector is lazy. There is no ingenuity behind mass blobbing destroyers and then ganking a Freighter.
Yes, yes, as if AFK freighters autopiloting to and from Jita are bastions of original and compelling gameplay.

Pirates are not there to impress you with their creativity (although some do on occasion). They are there to serve as risk so you have to demonstrate some modicum of ingenuity and be proactive to protect yourself.

But OP, there already are people who fight pirates. Seek them out and join them if you want to make New Eden a safer place.
Beldantazar
Empyrean Acolytes
#8 - 2016-02-29 21:05:48 UTC
If i understand the OP correctly, he's not talking about ganking and player piratism, but actions against and for the npc pirate factions in a way similar to the factional warfare between the empires.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#9 - 2016-02-29 21:10:53 UTC
Beldantazar wrote:
If i understand the OP correctly, he's not talking about ganking and player piratism, but actions against and for the npc pirate factions in a way similar to the factional warfare between the empires.

As far as I can tell he drifts back and forth between CONCORD and player pirates (eg. heinous criminal list) and NPC pirates. But you can also go fight NPC pirates right now - Incursions runners earn boat loads of CONCORD LP fighting them.

But if he has some more concrete ideas for players interacting with, or even joining the NPC pirate factions I would be eager to hear it. That might be an interesting way for the criminal/pirate vs. law enforcement dynamic to be expanded on.
Corvald Tyrska
Valknetra
#10 - 2016-02-29 22:50:29 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Beldantazar wrote:
If i understand the OP correctly, he's not talking about ganking and player piratism, but actions against and for the npc pirate factions in a way similar to the factional warfare between the empires.

As far as I can tell he drifts back and forth between CONCORD and player pirates (eg. heinous criminal list) and NPC pirates. But you can also go fight NPC pirates right now - Incursions runners earn boat loads of CONCORD LP fighting them.

But if he has some more concrete ideas for players interacting with, or even joining the NPC pirate factions I would be eager to hear it. That might be an interesting way for the criminal/pirate vs. law enforcement dynamic to be expanded on.


I suppose at its simplest you could have the option to join the pirate faction in the Faction Warfare window whilst docked at one of their stations and have that switch pirate rats to blue and all empire NPCs to red. Probably would instantly drop your sec standing to -10 too.

Beyond that, the Faction Warfare system could be expanded to add pirate vs empire control and plexes, either in the existing Faction Warfare lowsec areas as a three-way war system or in the lowsec areas not currently used for Faction Warfare.

Potentially it could be set in NPC null sec instead and have either pirates vs empire/CONCORD Faction Warfare or pirate faction vs pirate faction warfare. Could be an interesting way to get a lot more people into NPC null sec.
Darth Squeemus
Doomheim
#11 - 2016-02-29 22:51:18 UTC
DrysonBennington wrote:
Pirating in High Sector is lazy. There is no ingenuity behind mass blobbing destroyers and then ganking a Freighter.


If there's no ingenuity to it, then why do people cry about it all the time? Why do we have endless redundant threads demanding that CCP take action against the mean, mean gankers?
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2016-03-08 08:43:09 UTC
Here's my two cents.

Anti-piracy -- and by that I assume you mean cleaning up CODE/CONDI ganksquads? -- is a dead born child. You lack the most important bit of all: REWARD!

When a ganker pops a freighter, he gets loot.
When a bully sells a mining permit and you're dumb enough to buy one, he gets ISK.

Pray tell ... what do You get out of shooting a handful of 2 million ISK catalysts?

How long are you willing to wait for that Anti-gank to happen, and what meaningful assistance do you think you can render in the 20-30 seconds a gank takes to complete? I'd wager you're still in warp to the killzone, just in time to whore on Concord's killmail. Not to mention the kind of fleet you'd need to ward off said gankalysts; for anybody who can shoot a freighter in 30 sec can surely pop a sizable portion of your fleet in 30 sec too! And last but not least: groups like CODE and their ilk excel at staying docked until called upon. I expect your anti-gank efforts to be excruciatingly boring.

So, there you are: with no loot, no killmails worth speaking off; yet taking all the risk of becoming a prime target yourself. U mad bro?


One thing that *might* work, is offering Freighter escorts to take care of pesky bumpers and ganksquads; provide some intel and all that ... except I can't imagine anyone willing to put their trust in a player-run service like this. It'd be like buying a hauling permit all over again: paying for protection.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#13 - 2016-03-08 08:59:20 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
One thing that *might* work, is offering Freighter escorts to take care of pesky bumpers and ganksquads; provide some intel and all that ... except I can't imagine anyone willing to put their trust in a player-run service like this. It'd be like buying a hauling permit all over again: paying for protection.
Well that is the point of CCP enabling criminals and pirates to operate in highsec: to force players to organize and/or protect themselves from the risk of piracy. It is literally one of the founding ideas of the game.

You are not entitled to free passage. Whether that means you hire someone for protection, or take those extra precautions yourself, you are expected to pay for your safety in one way or another. Or not, and take the chance someone will take your stuff. This is not a problem with the game, it is core game play.

Your reward for doing this is getting to keep your stuff. Your cost for not doing this is the risk of losing your stuff. Simple as that.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2016-03-08 09:04:45 UTC
What I meant is: I wouldn't entrust the survival of my investment to ANY third party. And if I have to pay for it, I might as well get a hauling permit and take the gankers word for it they won't pop me -- not even on an alt whilst pocketing the protection money.

Unless you can make a Protection contract with proper collateral....... but again, I see so many ways to abuse it it isn't even funny anymore.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#15 - 2016-03-08 10:10:29 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
What I meant is: I wouldn't entrust the survival of my investment to ANY third party. And if I have to pay for it, I might as well get a hauling permit and take the gankers word for it they won't pop me -- not even on an alt whilst pocketing the protection money.

Unless you can make a Protection contract with proper collateral....... but again, I see so many ways to abuse it it isn't even funny anymore.
Fair enough. Eve is also a social game where trust is precious and the other players can screw you over.

Still, there is no reason why a group of players could not start a freighter escort service and build a reputation. It might be boring and not very profitable since hauling is so safe and the risk of a gank is so low (thus no one would pay much). Probably though, such an organization with a passion for hauling would evolve into a corporation like Red Frog (who manage to deliver contracts with almost 99.9% success) and just haul themselves. Maybe Red Frog should leverage the trust in their brand and branch out to have an escort service?
7helix3
Perkone
Caldari State
#16 - 2016-03-08 10:22:16 UTC
There is an anti pirate guy trying to whip up some AG activities on the Amarr-Jita pipe. He seems like a good guy that gets the game and is having some success at creating an AG movement. He's getting folks to work together to counter freighter ganking.

So the player vs gankers stuff is already working as intended. He's gotten miles further than anyone else as far as organizing the AG folks. Check out the various AG threads in crime and punishment.


You can also aid NPC pirates, it just comes w/ a flashy red price tag. This also is working as intended.


You can also join in and help out concord, but you have to wait (just like concord) until after a concordable crime has been committed.



The game already provides all you seek. Your ideas aren't new. What keeps them from becoming a thing is there has never been a strong enough player driving them into being on a large or lasting scale.
Iain Cariaba
#17 - 2016-03-08 11:58:01 UTC
Anti-piracy features already exist in New Eden.

1. Fit weapons to combat ship.
2. Undock combat ship.
3. Shoot weapons at pirates.

You don't need a fancy new mechanic to enable you to shoot what are already valid targets, just the balls to actually shoot them.

/thread
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#18 - 2016-03-08 13:56:35 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
When a bully


You were doing so well and then you screwed the pooch.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2016-03-08 15:31:07 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
When a bully


You were doing so well and then you screwed the pooch.


Ahahaha ... poor choice of words, I admit. Point still stands: gankers gank for a reason, the reason being profit. Now unless you charge haulers a protection fee, what does the Anti-Pirat get out of it?
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#20 - 2016-03-08 16:48:30 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Point still stands: gankers gank for a reason, the reason being profit.


Some do, but not all. One of MiniLuv's purposes, particularly during an Imperium campaign, is to disrupt enemy logistics. Others gank because asploding internet spaceships look pretty.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

12Next page