CSM Campaigns

1) I'm not sure you actually read it, because nowhere did I claim this is a conspiracy. IF CFC decides to endorse you, there are a limited number of reasons, and I don't know which one, but it's clearly not a conspiracy. Like when they flew drakes into Titans gunfire, or when they cabalised moons, or the like, it was sold (During or after) as a plan to put pressure on CCP. What will happen here, we don't know.
2) Do feel free to link to or cite your rebuttal.
3) Unless, that is, it's just your word against someone elses. Someone might claim conspiracy based on conjecture, but a known liar can't address that with words alone. You lie (Or self-delude, let's be honest, it's a valid option), continually, and there's no reason to trust your word.

All the other times you've asked me to prove it I have done so, and you have ignored it each time. Is it going to be any different this time? No, of course not. A worthless messiah-complex (Or troll) candidate like you won't, because reading enough of it to comprehend it might ruin your bubble of self-delusion (Or not be fun, if you're just a troll).
I'll still give a list of links (Not quotes, though, since closed threads, character limits and quote limits makes such an effort too much work), so that anyone who follows along can see what a dishonest, megalomaniacal career-politician you are.

IN THIS (YOUR CURRENT) CSM11 THREAD:
I ask a question about your last CSM11 thread, that you then do not answer though you quote parts of it and the following discussion, but when I call you out on it, you ask if I have any specific questions. I repeat those questions (And Seraph also asks for a reply to his questions), but you ignore that and instead answer a potential voter with one of the blandest answers I've seen in a long time (Mind you, politics is what I do and study, I've seen a lot of politician-talk, and yours takes the cake). I call you out on your refusal to answer my questions, and you ask for proof that you're lying (See a pattern?), at which point I repeat that I quoted that exact evidence earlier, but you never addressed it. You admit that you have no clue, or, as Seraph puts it, "We have to vote the bill in before we know what it says". As Neuntausend astutely points out, we have to believe that a person that can't put together a platform shall, once elected, be able to produce a reform (And let's remind ourselves that your earlier attempt at that feat was to literally define reform - we might as well elect a dictionary!) that will work and improve the CSM and be agreeable to CCP. That's a tall order even for a master diplomat, and an impossible one for someone with your qualifications.
You also claim that you don't think your CFC membership can influence you (And clarify it at length later), and that you will call out any CFC wrongdoing. This is contradicted by your earlier "campaigns", as we shall note later.
You claim that you have prioritised legitimate questions, but as we have seen, you don't even answer easy questions by potential voters, and classify any hard question as not legitimate.

IN YOUR EARLIER CSM11 THREAD:
First, I like how you posted your CSM11 thread directly after losing the CSM10 election, and with a one of the least relevant platforms in a long time, but still manage to make it probably your best CSM OP/platform posts (As Malcanis also notes on first page). However, there were still a number of questions unanswered from your last CSM campaign thread, so I quote the relevant parts, but like we're all used to, you refuse to answer even easy questions (And those would have been easy unless you were a lying sack of fill-in-the-blanks).
As is your MO, you try to deflect any questions with allegations that others can't stay on topic, and then promptly fails at your own platform and basic understanding of microtransactions, EVE and the meaning of words (Again, a dictionary would be better than you). I have made this point before. It shouldn't be hard, but apparently for you, it is, since people posting in the thread had to explain the effects of your platform to you (Just one of several examples, this one sums up your misunderstanding well when you include the quotes).
Like what we've come to expect of you, you either troll, lie or misunderstand (Even to the point where you misunderstand yourself, amazingly enough), and if that doesn't work, claim "conspiracy".

IN YOUR CSM10 THREAD:
I'm down to 90 characters, so I'll just link it and see if you can figure it out yourself. There might be an election coming up in my home country tonight and I'm a candidate for Parliament: I'm going to participate in it. That means I might be occupied elsewhere, so an expansion on this point might have to wait, "sorry" about that.

OK Xenuria.

Whilst you've been a member of Karmafleet, 1) what problems have you had with Goonswarm? and 2) what criticisms of Goonswarm and Karmafleet do you have?

Finally, I'm looking for a in depth enumeration of your reform plan. Apart from the OP, what else do you have planned, and where else have you mentioned your plans?

And, as predicted, you won't face the reality that you're the very problem you claim to desire removed.
You're a worthless, mindless (And yet egomaniacal) tool, whose only problem is that Xenuria is not on CSM, and the only fix is to join the only group who can get you elected despite your "qualifications" and your "platform".

And now you've shown that we both know.
Election is at least postponed until Wednesday, so until then I can enjoy your antics. Please do continue.

Tbh, what do you expect?
Of course he is not answering! That guy hasn't the slightest clue and is nothing more than Mittens court jester.
To be brutally frank, if that guy is elected into the CSM, i really hope it doesn't take long until he's removed by CCP.
Otoh, after the shyteshow that has been CSM X, CCP should just disband it and be done with it.

oh ye of little faith.

And yet you still don't respond to my quite civil and interested questions, and choose instead to issue a one liner to another person, thereby reinforcing what others have said about you to be apparently quite true. Lovely.

I think many of the problems sion, sugar, sort and others faced were the result of mismanagement on part of CCP, couple that with communication break downs and have you a recipe for disaster. CCP appears legitimately interesting in salvaging relations as they have put new people in charge of the CSM and made assurances of civility.

If by some misfortune remnants of these problems exist, I am a very enduring and persistent individual. I can handle being berated and insulted by people I look up too. I won't be a better CSM than sion or anybody. I will be a different kind of CSM.


I think even my worst detractors would agree that different~ is preferred at this juncture.

Saying it was CCP's fault and not failures by all parties involved is just shifting blame. The CSM's and the general population of EVE are just as much to blame as CCP.

Voted for Xenuria.


watch the...er...feel the burn!