These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

New game feature (Industrial) request.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#21 - 2016-02-11 06:50:15 UTC
TheMaxys wrote:


It is as simple as - how to develop this idea to be good enough to be part of our magnificent game.



Literally impossible. It's a fundamentally bad idea that could only serve to make the game worse.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Amarisen Gream
The.Kin.of.Jupiter
#22 - 2016-02-11 09:03:06 UTC
After reading this thread is needs to be locked like every thread in F&I, then purged and burned.

The primary issue is this - logging in and out of characters? It would be nice if CCP would take the time and fix the logout/login of the game.

If there was some way to be in station - hit escape - click character tab - click character and it would switch characters for you. That would be a milk and honey. Yet, from the impressions I get, CCP has no interest in fixing/redoing the login/character select system as they are to busy developing micro transaction methods for more $$$$

"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger All of his fury and rage. He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels" - The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1

#NPCLivesMatter #Freetheboobs
maxys Prime
Domain Orbital Shipyards
#23 - 2016-02-12 13:17:10 UTC
Still that requires you to login quite a few characters to do the very same stuff. But, by adding this feature we would have even more diversity into industry as a whole part of the game, isn't it?
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#24 - 2016-02-12 20:46:53 UTC
maxys Prime wrote:
Still that requires you to login quite a few characters to do the very same stuff. But, by adding this feature we would have even more diversity into industry as a whole part of the game, isn't it?


No. All it does is promote the idea that high volume multiboxing is a desirable form of gameplay, instead of something that is merely tolerated.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
Takari
Promised Victorious Entropy
#25 - 2016-02-13 01:06:31 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
It would be nice if CCP would take the time and fix the logout/login of the game.


It's not broken.

maxys wrote:
Still that requires you to login quite a few characters to do the very same stuff. But, by adding this feature we would have even more diversity into industry as a whole part of the game, isn't it?


How would this add diversity? Adding multi-account convenience is not diversity. This is a HTFU moment if I ever saw one.

Themaxys wrote:
It is as simple as - how to develop this idea to be good enough to be part of our magnificent game.


Really did you use an alt to post an argument for yourself up there? There is no development of this idea. Allowing multiple characters or multiple accounts to work together without individual effort is a no-go full-stop. People who disagree with you are not trolling.

Think of features on a per-character basis for more intriguing game play. Each of your characters is a separate individual competing with the others for limited resources. This is the way of EvE.

"Roll the dice, don't think twice. This is the way of things. Welcome to EVE." ~ CCP Falcon

"Good luck, shoot straight and don't back down." - Serendipity Lost
Lugh Crow-Slave
#26 - 2016-02-13 01:50:46 UTC
Takari wrote:
Amarisen Gream wrote:
It would be nice if CCP would take the time and fix the logout/login of the game.


It's not broken.




Even ccp acknowledged it's broken. Just not broken enough for it to be worth the 6+months it would take a dedicated team to fix

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#27 - 2016-02-13 03:39:45 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
maxys Prime wrote:
Still that requires you to login quite a few characters to do the very same stuff. But, by adding this feature we would have even more diversity into industry as a whole part of the game, isn't it?


No. All it does is promote the idea that high volume multiboxing is a desirable form of gameplay, instead of something that is merely tolerated.

Agreed.

Alt gameplay is allowed. It gives a single player a non-insignificant boost in gameplay diversity and economic scale. The trade off is the inconvenience of managing it all.

That is more than a fair deal.

How did you Veterans start?
Previous page12