These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wardec balancing

First post
Author
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#201 - 2016-01-21 03:02:40 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
Joe Risalo wrote:


These results don't surprise me at all.... Full stop...

Though, I like to know the comparison of fleet engagements vs targets of opportunity.


...what fleet engagements?

That's... sort of the point. This whole narrative where the big bad war deccers just pick on tiny newbie corps because the mega alliances would crush them is utter nonsense.

The mega alliances have no fucks to give for a few F1 monkeys getting shot up while running errands. They're not going to mobilize the fleet for 3 guys in HACs/recons in Uedama.

...just like the war deccers aren't going to bring out the locator agents and scour high sec to pop some guy in a Venture mining on a high sec island somewhere.

Yes, Marmite, et al, WOULD certainly be crushed by any of the nullsec mega alliances in a "fleet action". They know this. The mega alliances know it. You know it, I know it, The American People know it, everyone knows it.

What they also know is that Goons, or PL, or TEST, or whomever simply don't have the time or inclination to come camp their ass into a station. :shrug:

This isn't really important, except that it's illustrative of the fact that the OP is arguing completely from a position of ignorance when they speculate about some "larger corp" getting tired of them and giving them what-for. Roll

That is the type of thing that your mother might suggest if you were to briefly describe the situation to her: From a purely speculative standpoint, with limited understanding of the realities of the game, it sounds really reasonable! But anyone with genuine, first-hand experience? No, that is not going to be their expectation.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#202 - 2016-01-21 04:50:19 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:


These results don't surprise me at all.... Full stop...

Though, I like to know the comparison of fleet engagements vs targets of opportunity.


...what fleet engagements?

That's... sort of the point. This whole narrative where the big bad war deccers just pick on tiny newbie corps because the mega alliances would crush them is utter nonsense.

The mega alliances have no fucks to give for a few F1 monkeys getting shot up while running errands. They're not going to mobilize the fleet for 3 guys in HACs/recons in Uedama.

...just like the war deccers aren't going to bring out the locator agents and scour high sec to pop some guy in a Venture mining on a high sec island somewhere.

Yes, Marmite, et al, WOULD certainly be crushed by any of the nullsec mega alliances in a "fleet action". They know this. The mega alliances know it. You know it, I know it, The American People know it, everyone knows it.

What they also know is that Goons, or PL, or TEST, or whomever simply don't have the time or inclination to come camp their ass into a station. :shrug:

This isn't really important, except that it's illustrative of the fact that the OP is arguing completely from a position of ignorance when they speculate about some "larger corp" getting tired of them and giving them what-for. Roll

That is the type of thing that your mother might suggest if you were to briefly describe the situation to her: From a purely speculative standpoint, with limited understanding of the realities of the game, it sounds really reasonable! But anyone with genuine, first-hand experience? No, that is not going to be their expectation.


Oh I agree with you for the most part.
I know decs aren't limited to small targets...
My premise was that decs are used for targets of opportunity without having to put any risks on yourself that cannot be managed...

..but alas, without any statistics from CCP, I agree that the argument is redundant..
Only going to lead to more of the same being said over and over again.
Iain Cariaba
#203 - 2016-01-21 07:06:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Iain Cariaba
Joe Risalo wrote:
My premise was that decs are used for targets of opportunity without having to put any risks on yourself that cannot be managed...

That's just it. EvE is a sandbox, therefore it is up to you, the player, to provide the risk. If you provide the risk they're allegedly so afraid of, then they'll stop coming around.

When you see those "targets of opportunity" types in their HACs and t3s, undock half a dozen t1 cruisers and shoot at them. Sure, you're going to lose a few, but you losing 50mil isk in t1 cruisers is a lot less then them losing 300+mil isk HACs and even more expensive t3s. Do this three or four times, teach your corpmates not to be idiots while flying solo, and you don't have to worry about constant wardecs. You don't even have to be that good at PvP, just the fact that you will fight back is generally going to be enough.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#204 - 2016-01-21 08:57:21 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
My premise was that decs are used for targets of opportunity without having to put any risks on yourself that cannot be managed...

That's just it. EvE is a sandbox, therefore it is up to you, the player, to provide the risk. If you provide the risk they're allegedly so afraid of, then they'll stop coming around.

When you see those "targets of opportunity" types in their HACs and t3s, undock half a dozen t1 cruisers and shoot at them. Sure, you're going to lose a few, but you losing 50mil isk in t1 cruisers is a lot less then them losing 300+mil isk HACs and even more expensive t3s. Do this three or four times, teach your corpmates not to be idiots while flying solo, and you don't have to worry about constant wardecs. You don't even have to be that good at PvP, just the fact that you will fight back is generally going to be enough.



And especially when they really never field more than 2 or 3 guys, christ... just... bring a blackbird. Lol

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#205 - 2016-01-21 12:27:16 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
My premise was that decs are used for targets of opportunity without having to put any risks on yourself that cannot be managed...

That's just it. EvE is a sandbox, therefore it is up to you, the player, to provide the risk. If you provide the risk they're allegedly so afraid of, then they'll stop coming around.

When you see those "targets of opportunity" types in their HACs and t3s, undock half a dozen t1 cruisers and shoot at them. Sure, you're going to lose a few, but you losing 50mil isk in t1 cruisers is a lot less then them losing 300+mil isk HACs and even more expensive t3s. Do this three or four times, teach your corpmates not to be idiots while flying solo, and you don't have to worry about constant wardecs. You don't even have to be that good at PvP, just the fact that you will fight back is generally going to be enough.



And especially when they really never field more than 2 or 3 guys, christ... just... bring a blackbird. Lol


Right? This is not exactly hard.

It just requires some tiny deviation from your normal farming routine. Yeesh.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#206 - 2016-01-21 14:01:00 UTC
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp
Iain Cariaba
#207 - 2016-01-21 14:45:18 UTC
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp

Roll

Your premise has way more than two flaws.

1. It doesn't matter if there's two or three of them. If you pose a viable threat, meaning that you can take out one of their much more expensive ships, then they're a lot more likely to leave you alone.
2. If your war target isn't a tactical moron, when you undock half a dozen cheap t1 cruisers to fight him, he'll either dock up or leave the system. This is known as blue balling.
3. If you keep him holed up in station for a week because you try to fight him when he undocks, he's not going to wardec you again. There's no fun it in for him when he's advancing his spin counter.
4. Out of corp alts are a valid tool for you to use as well. Set your war targets red and you'll see them before they see you.
5. As the defender in a war, you are allowed to bring in as many corps as you want as allies on your side. There are many mercenary groups in EvE, some of them even reliable, that you can pay to do this for you. You could even look through the aggressor's war history and discuss teaming up with those they've wardeced before.
6. If you can't take a week out of your busy mining/missioning to defend yourself from being attacked, you shouldn't be in a highsec corp to begin with. If you do take a week out of your mining/missioning, people in wardec groups do talk to each other. Word will get around that you're not a push over, and they'll start to leave you alone.
7. The one in denial here is you. You want to end the wardec, you simply make it unfun and unprofitable for the aggressor to continue the war, and it goes away.

Finally, as long as you maintain the attitude that you're a victim, you always going to be a victim. The day you stand up, throw some punches, and take a few punches in return, to defend your play style is the day that you truly become a capsuleer. Until that day, you're nothing but content.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#208 - 2016-01-21 14:48:01 UTC
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp


I think we've pretty clearly established, at this point, that you have neither a functional understanding, nor any measurable degree of hands-on experience, upon which to base your assorted assertions about how the game works.



"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#209 - 2016-01-21 15:20:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Lann Shahni
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp

Roll

Your premise has way more than two flaws.

1. It doesn't matter if there's two or three of them. If you pose a viable threat, meaning that you can take out one of their much more expensive ships, then they're a lot more likely to leave you alone.
2. If your war target isn't a tactical moron, when you undock half a dozen cheap t1 cruisers to fight him, he'll either dock up or leave the system. This is known as blue balling.
3. If you keep him holed up in station for a week because you try to fight him when he undocks, he's not going to wardec you again. There's no fun it in for him when he's advancing his spin counter.
4. Out of corp alts are a valid tool for you to use as well. Set your war targets red and you'll see them before they see you.
5. As the defender in a war, you are allowed to bring in as many corps as you want as allies on your side. There are many mercenary groups in EvE, some of them even reliable, that you can pay to do this for you. You could even look through the aggressor's war history and discuss teaming up with those they've wardeced before.
6. If you can't take a week out of your busy mining/missioning to defend yourself from being attacked, you shouldn't be in a highsec corp to begin with. If you do take a week out of your mining/missioning, people in wardec groups do talk to each other. Word will get around that you're not a push over, and they'll start to leave you alone.
7. The one in denial here is you. You want to end the wardec, you simply make it unfun and unprofitable for the aggressor to continue the war, and it goes away.

Finally, as long as you maintain the attitude that you're a victim, you always going to be a victim. The day you stand up, throw some punches, and take a few punches in return, to defend your play style is the day that you truly become a capsuleer. Until that day, you're nothing but content.


using more then toon for a war of denial seems a waste unless you doing large corps/alli
yes if you can convince your corp memmber, who is not playing eve of to PVP content primerly, or they would be on other the side of this, to sit houres on end for week watching a station, to keep one guy docked!
yes he would probaly chose another target!
If the defender brings in mercenary, that most likely cost a hell lot more then a wardec, i would leave the war corp, and put and alt in place, wait while, repeat the wardec
and i think most mining/indu/mission corp would like to spent time deffending there corp against a wardec, the hole point is they can't, since the attacker solo controls the duration of war!
and watching each other through a station window for weeks on end until some one tires of the staring contest, is not figthing i my book
Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#210 - 2016-01-21 15:34:23 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp


I think we've pretty clearly established, at this point, that you have neither a functional understanding, nor any measurable degree of hands-on experience, upon which to base your assorted assertions about how the game works.





Again her SurrenderMonkey adds new information and perspective to the debate,
not saying the samme thing over and over again like a broken record! Roll
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#211 - 2016-01-21 15:38:54 UTC
Lann Shahni wrote:
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp


I think we've pretty clearly established, at this point, that you have neither a functional understanding, nor any measurable degree of hands-on experience, upon which to base your assorted assertions about how the game works.





Again her SurrenderMonkey adds new information and perspective to the debate,
not saying the samme thing over and over again like a broken record! Roll


But you demonstrably don't. Your entire position is based on how you imagine PvP works.

I doubt you've ever undocked in anything with a scram fit. Roll

I figured for sure that, now that you are aware that all of the war data is, in fact, publicly available, you would start using it to actually provide some support for your position, but here you are again, just making **** up. Lol

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#212 - 2016-01-21 16:03:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Lann Shahni
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp


I think we've pretty clearly established, at this point, that you have neither a functional understanding, nor any measurable degree of hands-on experience, upon which to base your assorted assertions about how the game works.





Again her SurrenderMonkey adds new information and perspective to the debate,
not saying the samme thing over and over again like a broken record! Roll


But you demonstrably don't. Your entire position is based on how you imagine PvP works.

I doubt you've ever undocked in anything with a scram fit. Roll

I figured for sure that, now that you are aware that all of the war data is, in fact, publicly available, you would start using it to actually provide some support for your position, but here you are again, just making **** up. Lol


ROFL, i could repeat it again, but im not!

I do get that you completely disagree with that wardec system needs change, you think it's fine as is!
hence disagree with everything under this thread!
i also understand, that you don't think that I have any ide what im talking about, and just need to quit EVE
you have clearly given your reasons early on!
since then you have more less with different wording been repeating your self!

I did get it the first time, i disagree then, i do now, and now matter how much you repeat the same thing, i would still disagree!
i respect you opinion, i just don't need to hear over again!
all that said you are offcouse allowed restate it now and again to keep any new up on the debate, and it sides,
just don't do it every second post plz!
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#213 - 2016-01-21 16:07:40 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
Lann Shahni wrote:


ROFL, i could repeat it again, but im not!

I do get that you completely disagree with that wardec system needs change, you think it's fine as is!
hence disagree with everything under this thread!


I never said it's fine as is. In fact, I said it could use an overhaul - just that what's broken about it has little to do with this laughable concept of "fairness". This is not Honorable Internet Spaceship Duels Online.



Quote:
i also understand, that you don't think that I have any ide what im talking about, and just need to quit EVE
you have clearly given your reasons early on!


No, I don't think you need to quit. On the contrary, I think you need to undock and actually acquire some first-hand experience playing the game and, hopefully, spare us any more of your theorycrafting based on your own imaginary Bizarro-Eve.

Quote:


I did get it the first time, i disagree then, i do now, and now matter how much you repeat the same thing, i would still disagree!
i respect you opinion, i just don't need to hear over again!
all that said you are offcouse allowed restate it now and again to keep any new up on the debate, and it sides,
just don't do it every second post plz!


Too bad? I'm going to call you out on every unsubstantiated claim you make. In your case, this is effectively everything you post. If you don't like that, feel free to support your assertions instead of expecting people to accept your feelings as if they were facts.

You blamed your laughable rhetorical style on a lack of data. I've now shown you that the data is readily available via the API, so you no longer have an excuse.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Iain Cariaba
#214 - 2016-01-21 16:09:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Iain Cariaba
Lann Shahni wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:
Again, you premises has 2 flaws, you asume the attacker is a single ship, and that he is a tactical moron, normal pvp'er that wardec some single handed, use a scout, most likely on another account!
and only undock when there is an easy target,
and since smaller corps can't keep up half dossen pll online looking at a station for long!
you are into a war of denial, where the defender currently has no way to end it, except dismantling their corp

Roll

Your premise has way more than two flaws.

1. It doesn't matter if there's two or three of them. If you pose a viable threat, meaning that you can take out one of their much more expensive ships, then they're a lot more likely to leave you alone.
2. If your war target isn't a tactical moron, when you undock half a dozen cheap t1 cruisers to fight him, he'll either dock up or leave the system. This is known as blue balling.
3. If you keep him holed up in station for a week because you try to fight him when he undocks, he's not going to wardec you again. There's no fun it in for him when he's advancing his spin counter.
4. Out of corp alts are a valid tool for you to use as well. Set your war targets red and you'll see them before they see you.
5. As the defender in a war, you are allowed to bring in as many corps as you want as allies on your side. There are many mercenary groups in EvE, some of them even reliable, that you can pay to do this for you. You could even look through the aggressor's war history and discuss teaming up with those they've wardeced before.
6. If you can't take a week out of your busy mining/missioning to defend yourself from being attacked, you shouldn't be in a highsec corp to begin with. If you do take a week out of your mining/missioning, people in wardec groups do talk to each other. Word will get around that you're not a push over, and they'll start to leave you alone.
7. The one in denial here is you. You want to end the wardec, you simply make it unfun and unprofitable for the aggressor to continue the war, and it goes away.

Finally, as long as you maintain the attitude that you're a victim, you always going to be a victim. The day you stand up, throw some punches, and take a few punches in return, to defend your play style is the day that you truly become a capsuleer. Until that day, you're nothing but content.


using more then toon for a war of denial seems a waste unless you doing large corps/alli
yes if you can convince your corp memmber, who is not playing eve of to PVP content primerly, or they would be on other the side of this, to sit houres on end for week watching a station, to keep one guy docked!
yes he would probaly chose another target!
If the defender brings in mercenary, that most likely cost a hell lot more then a wardec, i would leave the war corp, and put and alt in place, wait while, repeat the wardec
and i think most mining/indu/mission corp would like to spent time deffending there corp against a wardec, the hole point is they can't, since the attacker solo controls the duration of war!
and watching each other through a station window for weeks on end until some one tires of the staring contest, is not figthing i my book

Well, you obviously didn't get a single point I was trying to make. Perhaps I used too many multi-syllabic words?

You don't need a large corp. You don't need more kills than the aggressor. You don't even need a single kill.

ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS MAKE THE WAR UN-FUN FOR THE AGGRESSOR AND HE WILL END THE WARDEC

How can this possibly be so hard for you to figure out. Why don't you stop being a victim? Instead of trying to figure out all the multitude of was you can't do this, why don't you stop being one step above an NPC and figure out what you can do about it. You've been given multiple was in this thread you can do that, but you simply refuse to even try them. Congratulations, you've lost at EvE.

Edit: You claim the wardecers only wardec those who can't fight back, that they're scared of risk. You, on the other hand, are so afraid of risk that you won't even undock a ship in your own defense. Cowardice is not rewarded in EvE.
Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#215 - 2016-01-21 16:16:44 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:


ROFL, i could repeat it again, but im not!

I do get that you completely disagree with that wardec system needs change, you think it's fine as is!
hence disagree with everything under this thread!


I never said it's fine as is. In fact, I said it could use an overhaul - just that what's broken about it has little to do with this laughable concept of "fairness". This is not Honorable Internet Spaceship Duels Online.



Quote:
i also understand, that you don't think that I have any ide what im talking about, and just need to quit EVE
you have clearly given your reasons early on!


No, I don't think you need to quit. On the contrary, I think you need to undock and actually acquire some first-hand experience playing the game and, hopefully, spare us any more of your theorycrafting based on your own imaginary Bizarro-Eve.

Quote:


I did get it the first time, i disagree then, i do now, and now matter how much you repeat the same thing, i would still disagree!
i respect you opinion, i just don't need to hear over again!
all that said you are offcouse allowed restate it now and again to keep any new up on the debate, and it sides,
just don't do it every second post plz!


Too bad? I'm going to call you out on every unsubstantiated claim you make. In your case, this is effectively everything you post. If you don't like that, feel free to support your assertions instead of expecting people to accept your feelings as if they were facts.

You blamed your laughable rhetorical style on a lack of data. I've now shown you that the data is readily available via the API, so you no longer have an excuse.


okay will bite,
you postet this https://public-crest.eveonline.com/wars/
it's not realy in fomat easy to read, do you have a link to traslator or reader?
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#216 - 2016-01-21 16:17:47 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:


ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS MAKE THE WAR UN-FUN FOR THE AGGRESSOR AND HE WILL END THE WARDEC


Or - heaven forbid - just try to have fun yourself.

Like you're playing a game, or something. Lol

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#217 - 2016-01-21 16:20:14 UTC
Lann Shahni wrote:


okay will bite,
you postet this https://public-crest.eveonline.com/wars/
it's not realy in fomat easy to read, do you have a link to traslator or reader?



It's in JSON format. which is a fairly common standard for data exchange (kind of like XML).

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#218 - 2016-01-21 16:23:10 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:


ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS MAKE THE WAR UN-FUN FOR THE AGGRESSOR AND HE WILL END THE WARDEC


Or - heaven forbid - just try to have fun yourself.

Like you're playing a game, or something. Lol


To be fair, any time i've attempted to have fun by fighting back, it's typically resulted in me spending a couple hours try to bait/gate camp them with no results.

I've tried log in traps, insta-lock gate camps, bait miners, bait missioners, and everything in between.
Unfortunately, the only thing that has ever working was a spankinaw, and only because a guy we kicked out of corp (for making crude racists comments) tried to kill it with a frig... He was a really REALLY dumb person.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#219 - 2016-01-21 16:35:55 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:


ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS MAKE THE WAR UN-FUN FOR THE AGGRESSOR AND HE WILL END THE WARDEC


Or - heaven forbid - just try to have fun yourself.

Like you're playing a game, or something. Lol


To be fair, any time i've attempted to have fun by fighting back, it's typically resulted in me spending a couple hours try to bait/gate camp them with no results.


I wasn't limiting it to having fun by fighting back.

You can have fun doing whatever you normally do, with a small (very small, if you exercise the LEAST bit of caution) degree of additional danger. You can have fun fighting back. You can have fun taunting them in local. You can have fun trying something different for a change. Fit a covops, go try null relic sites. Day trip into a wormhole, huff some gas (or gank the locals).

These, "ehrmagerd war dec unfair" complaints always seem to boil down to someone basically claiming that if they can't AFK mine in a hulk in Uedama, then autopilot their haul to Jita, their gameplay is literally ruined.

Every solution, no matter how simple, no matter how effective, no matter how little disruption it causes, is met with some tediously lame excuse which generally doesn't even mesh with the reality of the game.

It's a complaint about bogeymen, and the monsters under the bed.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Lann Shahni
The Happy Grasshoppers
#220 - 2016-01-21 16:36:16 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Lann Shahni wrote:


okay will bite,
you postet this https://public-crest.eveonline.com/wars/
it's not realy in fomat easy to read, do you have a link to traslator or reader?



It's in JSON format. which is a fairly common standard for data exchange (kind of like XML).


Having som problems finding a reader that works, you woulded by any chance have link for one? plz