These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Maybe been looking at it the wrong way..
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Cathablia Sarain
Broke-Ass Agency
#1 - 2016-01-20 21:27:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Cathablia Sarain
Been thinking we might have needed a T3 battleship or whatever..
But as T3 does.. they are hard to balance..
So what about a smallter size Bastion Module I for normal battleships ?
A other kind of module that would not buff resist and rep on armor/shield modules.. but one that granted some kind of movement and damage application.. like 10% in warpspeed or more agile.. and a bit of a scan improvement..
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#2 - 2016-01-20 21:29:12 UTC
Yes, it's about time the denizens of Carebearville were given a huge boost

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#3 - 2016-01-21 10:03:37 UTC
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
Azazel The Misanthrope
Oblivion's Pendulum
Top Tier
#4 - 2016-01-21 16:01:34 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.


Seriously, why aren't you on ISD? You patrol these forums for badposting like it is nobodies business.
Iain Cariaba
#5 - 2016-01-21 18:52:15 UTC
Azazel The Misanthrope wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.


Seriously, why aren't you on ISD? You patrol these forums for badposting like it is nobodies business.

Why don't you realize it's a valid point?

This thread is super redundant, not to mention the whole t3 ship idea wasn't a good idea in the first place. Go through the back pages of the forums and find all the ships in the last few years that had the most people whining about OPness. Outside of the Ishtar, most whining has been about t3s, whether cruiser or destroyer.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#6 - 2016-01-22 05:52:41 UTC
Azazel The Misanthrope wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.


Seriously, why aren't you on ISD? You patrol these forums for badposting like it is nobodies business.


It should be very clear that the ISD is not allowed to talk about why or who. And we already had an extensive discussion about this topic, over and over again.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#7 - 2016-01-22 14:50:09 UTC
Azazel The Misanthrope wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.


Seriously, why aren't you on ISD? You patrol these forums for badposting like it is nobodies business.



He applied, but it was just to hard to understand him.

In this example I think he meant to say VET YOUR IDEAS, but instead put VENT YOUR IDEAS. As a lifetime English user I can read between the lines and discern this particular faux pas, but for the English as a second language crowd - most of what he says is probably baffling. Unless of course he really does want their ideas to be vented, then I'm baffled to.

He's got the drive and the time, he just doesn't have the skill.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#8 - 2016-01-22 15:30:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Azazel The Misanthrope wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Would you please stop posting redundant threads about T3 battleships? Use your existing threads to vent your ideas.


Seriously, why aren't you on ISD? You patrol these forums for badposting like it is nobodies business.



He applied, but it was just to hard to understand him.

In this example I think he meant to say VET YOUR IDEAS, but instead put VENT YOUR IDEAS. As a lifetime English user I can read between the lines and discern this particular faux pas, but for the English as a second language crowd - most of what he says is probably baffling. Unless of course he really does want their ideas to be vented, then I'm baffled to.

He's got the drive and the time, he just doesn't have the skill.

You should go back to school then or improve your mind's read-between-the-lines subroutines as they are clearly not working as well as they should for a "lifetime English user". Roll I meant to write vent, not vet. She's already failed to vet her idea in the first thread to the exact same topic that I linked, so she opens another thread to the same topic to vent her "new" ideas or insights into her thought processes in the sense of "to vent one's anger" (see point 2 under noun as well as 1 under verb).

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#9 - 2016-01-22 19:15:09 UTC
venting ideas isn't venting one's anger

in the terms your are describing you would just say 'vent' and leave the ideas off of it. You can't have 'vent' implying 'one's anger' if you follow it directly with a literal non implied object - in this case 'ideas'


You see why he got turned down now. His explanation for his baffling statement is also baffling. It just spirals around and around.

There is a short or an open somewhere in the circuit.