These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Assault Frigates -- instead of a "bandaid", change the role

Author
Juana Cavin-Guang
Stryker Industries
Stryker Group
#1 - 2016-01-07 01:59:56 UTC
Here's an idea, instead of giving assault frigs a "bandaid" to better fit into the svipul shaped peg in the meta with the intended fleet role of the ship class, we change up the ship class to fill a niche that won't be better fit and outclassed in almost every way by a tech 3 destroyer.

Rename the Assault Frigate ship class to Reconnaissance Frigate and give them all d-scan immunity.
It would give the ship class something unique, and it should provide a neat little niche for the ship class to excel in.
The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least.
Iyokus Patrouette
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2016-01-07 02:51:59 UTC
Juana Cavin-Guang wrote:

The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least.


not really because a T3D will still beat an assault frig.

---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#3 - 2016-01-07 05:48:38 UTC
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.
ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2016-01-07 08:48:33 UTC
\o/ buff everything else.... dont fix the problem... powercreeps a lie.... double the damage on all other frig size ships and give other destroyers 10x the ehp... that'll fix the problem... right? .... right??

(for those who dont understand, that was sarcasm...)

No Worries

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#5 - 2016-01-07 09:51:39 UTC
If I could have a buff to assault frigates of my choice it would be skill dependent resistance to energy neutralizers.
Mebbe a tiny boost to their base speed too? I mean if we're talking about the brass ring here and stuff.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#6 - 2016-01-07 10:38:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
Riot Girl wrote:
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.

this made me giggle Big smile

i think an ab bonus wouldn't go amiss.
not as sever as the sansa line obviously but enough to allow them to run down the slow-medium slow cruisers
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
#7 - 2016-01-07 12:25:28 UTC
At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot, I still have to wonder what the hell T3D's were meant for if not to completely obsolete every AF in the game. Did CCP really just say, "**** it," and just decide to toss them in for ***** and giggles, or was there some dev blog explaining their actual intended role that I missed? It's all I tend to hear now is that AF's and many other frigs are dead and T3D's killed them, especially in FW Low.

At the same time, I also have to wonder why simply bringing some of your own T3D's along with to counter there own brethren doesn't work just as well. I can't imagine I'm not the first to suggest that, can I? Maybe it's just me; I have very little PvP from long ago, but nothing recent, so that's very possible.

"Tomahawks?"

"----in' A, right?"

"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."

"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."

Leila Meurtrier
Why Am I Not Surprised
#8 - 2016-01-07 13:04:40 UTC
There are two things which should be buffed for Assault Frigates. And it would be adequate even without t3ds being here.
1)Increase the base speeds to either match t1 counterparts or get them in -5/+5 range.
2)Give them about 15 extra CPU and 5 PWG in general.

That way they'll become the same thing to t1 frigs as HAC to t1 cruiser.
Why speed buffs? Because HACs don't have speed penalties like AFs do.
Why fitting buffs? Because, you know, these ships are MEANT to carry MORE plates/shield extenders AND use mwd to their heart's contest. In the current state, it's not a thing.
You barely may fit t2 pulses with damage mods, damage control and MWD on Retribution. You may need overclocking rig just for that. You don't have powergrid for 400mm plate (You probably should), you'll have problem with fitting long point and you can't even touch any weapon system rig.

Then, we may actually consider serious comparison of t3ds and assault frigates. Although, I think they really always meant to have bonus strength and range/overheat damage reduction for warp scramblers, given the "Heavy second tackle" role CCP were mumbling about.
Garrett Osinov
Doomheim
#9 - 2016-01-07 17:17:33 UTC
Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship.
Leila Meurtrier
Why Am I Not Surprised
#10 - 2016-01-07 17:27:51 UTC
Garrett Osinov wrote:
Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship.

Taking price into account in universe being ruled by 8-12 y.o. veterans is just plain silly. Not to mention that 100 mil is a bull. Taking similar grade of blinging, we talk about just 20-25 mil difference.
Arla Sarain
#11 - 2016-01-07 18:19:07 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.

This and an agility buff would be sweet.
Ong
Lumberjack Commandos
#12 - 2016-01-07 19:30:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Ong
T3D's might be the straw that broke the camels back, but AF's have been obsolete since the t1/faction frigate buffs. There was absolutely no reason to fly them already.

But yeah w/e hurf derf T3D's took ma job!!
Ong
Lumberjack Commandos
#13 - 2016-01-07 19:37:55 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.


Because that wouldn't be power creep at all, there is already very little reasons to fly larger ships as it is!!

Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
#14 - 2016-01-07 23:04:51 UTC
Give them a +200% bonus to the effectiveness of;

  • TCs and TEs (and the missile ones),
  • SeBos and SigAmps,
  • ECCM and Backup Sensors,
  • Cap Batteries.


This means AFs can be fit to be mega resistant to ewar, but have little extra bite unless they specifcally fit for it. This is a new niche that doesn't exist in the game yet.
Valkin Mordirc
#15 - 2016-01-08 00:56:19 UTC
Garrett Osinov wrote:
Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship.



I'll just take out my officer fit Ibis and go wreck if price is obviously a balance factor
#DeleteTheWeak
Kamahl Daikun
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2016-01-08 03:58:25 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Garrett Osinov wrote:
Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship.



I'll just take out my officer fit Ibis and go wreck if price is obviously a balance factor


I'm betting isk that my Deadspace Luxury Yacht will destroy your Ibis.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#17 - 2016-01-08 05:27:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
Ong wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.


Because that wouldn't be power creep at all, there is already very little reasons to fly larger ships as it is!!


Because there's totally a reason to fly AFs, but yeah, it's not really a legit suggestion. They need something though, preferably something that can be carried up to HACs too.
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#18 - 2016-01-08 08:00:10 UTC
I don't know about them being completely obsolete so much as having much more niche applications than they used to.
For my high sex nogoodery I still use the Ishkur as my go-to ship due to it having two separate weapons platforms that can work well together or independently.

It doesn't output damage like a T3D, certainly, nor is it as fast, but in the case where I'm having a nice close slow dance with a much larger vessel it's very handy to have the drones that I can divert in case a white knight arrives intent on saving the princess. I've sent a handful of catalysts and coercers scurrying off in flames this way in the past, so the versatility aspect has much appeal to me.

Would I put my trusty AF up against a T3D with reasonable expectation of victory? Of course not. Barring the pilot being far worse at EVE than me, I'm gonna lose. They are possessed of a different form of versatility, and have strengths of their own that are quite potent.

I do think the AF does need a bit of love in comparison, because as folks have stated it's now competing with a class of ship that does pretty much everything it used to do but only better.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Hochopepa
Creative Research and Production Services
#19 - 2016-01-08 19:36:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Hochopepa
Juana Cavin-Guang wrote:
Here's an idea, instead of giving assault frigs a "bandaid" to better fit into the svipul shaped peg in the meta with the intended fleet role of the ship class, we change up the ship class to fill a niche that won't be better fit and outclassed in almost every way by a tech 3 destroyer.

Rename the Assault Frigate ship class to Reconnaissance Frigate and give them all d-scan immunity.
It would give the ship class something unique, and it should provide a neat little niche for the ship class to excel in.
The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least.


These are called covert ops frigates.


Maybe we take AF's and turn them into the Attack Battlecruiser of the frigate world. If can fit cruiser class guns/launchers.
Alaric Faelen
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2016-01-11 02:04:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Alaric Faelen
It's the same problem with their larger cousins, but in reverse.

The HACs are so much better than the next larger class of ships- the battlecruiser- that BC fleets have become rare animals. This was called Ishtars Online for awhile, not Oracles Online.
AFs suffer from being inferior to the next larger class of ships, Destroyers. Especially now with T3 and Command variants in the meta.

CCP could boost the mobility of the AF to make the frigate hull more nimble than a larger destroyer- but given the extreme focus on mobility blessed upon the T3 destroyers, this begins to make an AF look like a 'Heavy Ceptor' in application- a role I don't think is really compelling.

I think the immunity to D-Scan idea has merit. The AF could become like a 'combat' recon, reduced cloak targeting penalty, D-Scan immune, but unable to warp cloaked.



Or just troll everyone and make Bastion Module AF's.
123Next pageLast page