Player Features and Ideas Discussion

This could be the text for a new EVE song about blobbing and that poor little ship with his 8256347569276571345678 logi buddies that couldn't..

Allow your logi pilots to fly by themselves, instead of orbiting an anchor.

The way I see it is this: you've got to ask yourself one question. You've got to decide if you want your logi group to stay on top of the fleet, or separated in a satellite group. You've got to ask yourself: "do I feel safe?"

It would just be easier to only allow one to run when turn on. In other words, once a ship turns it's MJU on other one could not be turn on next to it. You would need to space out a bit more in order to use yours or wait for near by unit one to jump away to run yours.


Yes it's built to break fleets which are 0 on each other. If you don't like it Im not sure what to tell you.. enjoy the sand box mate...

Command destroyers are great in smaller gang. I am not sure how I feel about them in larger gang yet. They DO seem to carry quite a bit higher of a force multiplier value than just about any other single ship. A falcon has a maximum number of people it can jam. A Huginn a maximum it can web, a dread a finite limit to how many it can lock and apply damage to in relative quick succession, an archon an upper limit on how much it can rep.


These things do not. They are very small, light ships that's only upper limit is how many people are in range, not scrammed. The argument of 'just scram it,' again, works in smaller scale. But even getting into 10-15, it becomes untenable. I would be more in favor to an upper mass limit or number of entities sort of upper limit imposed on them.

I know this is an odd concept, so bear with me, but some people actually play Eve to play Eve; not everyone spends half their time shedding braincells on reddit. Niraia's thread is titled command destroyers, which does not implicitly imply their RMJD functionality. Without reading the thread, it is easy to see how someone(s), as multiple people have responded to this thread, did not look at that thread because it did not grab our attention as being about RMJD's.


I'm sure the concept of playing Eve will be foreign to you, so I don't expect you to understand. Thank you for trying though.

Optimal + falloff is actually better than before. You just don't get as much raw rep power at that range.

What's in your wallet?


Bad ideas, apparently...

Yeah, there is that. I hadn't specifically thought of that. But it's still a numbers game. In the example fight this is referring to(Ikoskio or however it's spelled), the vast fleet size differences still made these things extremely powerful for the larger side, and not a viable option for the smaller side.

There are about a billion and one other arguments that can be had between point A and point Z, including Legion logi, slippery petes, min/maxed mach fleets, Grr Goons, supers, titans, slow cats, fighting, not fighting...... I'm not going to bog discussion down in any of those, reddit has that covered I'm sure.

At the end of all of it, we still get down to the vast swathes of much larger, in fact some of the largest non-capital ships in the game, these things can just whisk away en masse. I agree their 'impact' range is rather small, but within that, it's ability to force multiply is unparalleled. I do think the RMJD/G should have an upper limit, be it locked targets, mass, number of entities, something. That goes for both disrupting an enemy fleet and trying to save one of your own. A single Falcon is annoying, but still largely ineffective, in larger fleets. One of these things can still be brutally effective. Yes, I know Ikoskio used a wing of 10 or something. That was just good planning. In no way do I want these removed, just some sort of upper limit imposed.

The counter you ate looking for is a hic several 37km scrams will turn off most mjfg long enough to kill them





However ffs the command dessies need a speed nerf