These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Minmatar Militia: Directives

Author
Aldrith Shutaq
Atash e Sarum Vanguard
#41 - 2015-12-10 00:48:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Aldrith Shutaq
And the circle of ignorance and violence surrounding the question of Amarrian slavery continues.

Someone please alert me if any interesting new arguments are made.

Aldrith Ter'neth Shutaq Newelle

Fleet Captain of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade

Lord Consort of Lady Mitara Newelle, Champion of House Sarum and Holder of Damnidios Para'nashu

Ottom Ephesianos
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
Ushra'Khan
#42 - 2015-12-10 02:18:32 UTC
Godliness is the aim of religious studies. The Amarr Empire claims a connection with a higher power. Their people do not reflect the ideology.

Where one perceives one’s self a master an opportunity presents itself. Whether it is filled by admiration, apprenticeship, judgement, or slavery: It is for the master to decide.

Mastering God is an oxymoron.

Let us assume that the Amarrian perception of mastery is pursuant, unattainable.

The contrast of master and slave represent the Amarrian’s relativity to godliness.

Therefore, the master’s slave progresses spiritually and scholastically while being religiously sheltered in a godly regime.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#43 - 2015-12-10 04:26:08 UTC
With all due respect for your traditions, and the sincerity of your beliefs within the Empire - you've yet to offer, in all the time since you first attacked us, a single piece of empirical proof that your deity even exists.

Please excuse me if, in the absence of supporting evidence that there's anything to grow closer to, I find your assertions of spiritual growth hollow, self-serving, and ultimately only fodder and justifications for a system that seeks to continue the dominance and privilege of those already at the top of a highly stratified society.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2015-12-10 05:07:41 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
With all due respect for your traditions, and the sincerity of your beliefs within the Empire - you've yet to offer, in all the time since you first attacked us, a single piece of empirical proof that your deity even exists.

Please excuse me if, in the absence of supporting evidence that there's anything to grow closer to, I find your assertions of spiritual growth hollow, self-serving, and ultimately only fodder and justifications for a system that seeks to continue the dominance and privilege of those already at the top of a highly stratified society.


To be fair, I've not a single empirical piece of evidence in favour of the existence of the Winds. Verin assures me that they aren't real - they're just metaphors or catch-all references to something that lives within the spirit of those that call themselves Caldari. Nonetheless when I stand in the Peaks, strip down to my tunic and try to meditate in the piercing gusts that are habitually found at those elevations, I feel something more than mere hypothermia setting in.

None of us can provide empirical evidence for our beliefs - even those of us who believe nothing, because absence of proof isn't proof of absence.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#45 - 2015-12-10 07:42:15 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
None of us can provide empirical evidence for our beliefs - even those of us who believe nothing, because absence of proof isn't proof of absence.


It certainly isn't. But how many of us are presuming to force our beliefs on others, and justifying it purely on 'because my belief says I should'? I'm not going to tell the Amarr they shouldn't believe in God. I don't have that right. And they don't have the right to enslave others in the name of forcing them to believe in God.
Ottom Ephesianos
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
Ushra'Khan
#46 - 2015-12-10 08:36:03 UTC
For the concept of a good God the slave must forget its own place in the world. When the slave no longer feels like a slave they are closer to God. Even if they still serve a master.
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#47 - 2015-12-10 09:15:52 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
None of us can provide empirical evidence for our beliefs - even those of us who believe nothing, because absence of proof isn't proof of absence.


It certainly isn't. But how many of us are presuming to force our beliefs on others, and justifying it purely on 'because my belief says I should'? I'm not going to tell the Amarr they shouldn't believe in God. I don't have that right. And they don't have the right to enslave others in the name of forcing them to believe in God.


You speak of all these rights, from where do they come? Since you are so keen on this absurd empirical positive evidence standard, can you give me empirical evidence that they exist?

If you chose to look at all the signs of God and call them non-empirical, then that is your choice. It is, after all, your prerogative to continue to make poor choices. Of course, it is also your perogative to suffer the consequences of doing so.

The institution of slavery when properly administered has accomplished great good in the universe. It has redeemed many lost people and given them purpose in the universe. It has brought many back into the sphere of all that is good. It is a great and undeserved gift to those who have squandered the earlier gifts of God.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Arrendis
TK Corp
#48 - 2015-12-10 10:55:00 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
You speak of all these rights, from where do they come? Since you are so keen on this absurd empirical positive evidence standard, can you give me empirical evidence that they exist?


Certainly: I exist. I am capable of doing things. Absent any empirical evidence to the contrary, I have the natural right to do anything I am capable of doing. When forming societies, however, we abrogate our natural rights in favor of cooperative mutual benefit. At this point, it can be said that my right to swing my fist ends at your nose.

Quote:

If you chose to look at all the signs of God and call them non-empirical, then that is your choice. It is, after all, your prerogative to continue to make poor choices. Of course, it is also your perogative to suffer the consequences of doing so.


For evidence to be empirical, it must be testable. Show me your evidence, and then show me a consistent test that is, theoretically, able to return a result that disproves your theory. If you cannot do so, your evidence is not empirical.

Quote:

It has brought many back into the sphere of all that is good.


Because murdering infants is good, right?

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#49 - 2015-12-10 13:50:46 UTC
How did we get to murdering infants? Obviously murdering infants is a bad thing, and I have yet to meet any Amarr that would advocate otherwise.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#50 - 2015-12-10 16:02:12 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
None of us can provide empirical evidence for our beliefs - even those of us who believe nothing, because absence of proof isn't proof of absence.


It certainly isn't. But how many of us are presuming to force our beliefs on others, and justifying it purely on 'because my belief says I should'? I'm not going to tell the Amarr they shouldn't believe in God. I don't have that right. And they don't have the right to enslave others in the name of forcing them to believe in God.

Preaching cultural non-interference to the Caldari? Of course I agree with you.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#51 - 2015-12-10 16:55:16 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
How did we get to murdering infants? Obviously murdering infants is a bad thing, and I have yet to meet any Amarr that would advocate otherwise.


Tell that to the children of Starkman Prime.
Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#52 - 2015-12-10 17:51:27 UTC
I have yet to meet an Amarr that has anything good to say about that event. I think most of them recognize that it was a failure of the highest magnitude-an atrocity never to be repeated.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#53 - 2015-12-10 18:23:37 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
You speak of all these rights, from where do they come? Since you are so keen on this absurd empirical positive evidence standard, can you give me empirical evidence that they exist?


Certainly: I exist. I am capable of doing things. Absent any empirical evidence to the contrary, I have the natural right to do anything I am capable of doing. When forming societies, however, we abrogate our natural rights in favor of cooperative mutual benefit. At this point, it can be said that my right to swing my fist ends at your nose.



Crude.

How can you possibly make pronouncements about what rights Amarr has or does not have using this definition? It would seem by your own barbaric definition that if we are capable of doing something we have the right to do so.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Arrendis
TK Corp
#54 - 2015-12-10 18:46:09 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
How can you possibly make pronouncements about what rights Amarr has or does not have using this definition? It would seem by your own barbaric definition that if we are capable of doing something we have the right to do so.


Only if you are expressly saying that you place your personal interests over the interests of society. That you, personally, and what you want, are more important than everyone else.

Are you? Are you personally more important than what's best for trillions of people?
Arrendis
TK Corp
#55 - 2015-12-10 18:52:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
I have yet to meet an Amarr that has anything good to say about that event. I think most of them recognize that it was a failure of the highest magnitude-an atrocity never to be repeated.


Until it is. An entire world killed, because Idonis Ardishapur sought revenge on one man for the killing of another. Was there ever any fallout? Oh, everyone says it was bad, but billions were sentenced to death because of one murder. Was Ardishapur even slapped on the shiny metal wrist for billions of them?

Who is it that runs the Ammatar Mandate these days?

That's the sort of atrocity that's enabled by slavery. That's the sort of atrocity that happens when a savage, warlike people initiate unprovoked violence upon people who have been at peace for a thousand years. Who can't fight back. Who take centuries just to re-learn what 'fighting back' is.

The longest period of peace among any group in New Eden's history.

Cheering in the streets when the Empress and thousands of crew members were murdered in cold blood by Drifters.

Ask yourself: What do you have to do to turn the first event into the second. Who taught us to hate like that?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#56 - 2015-12-10 19:31:11 UTC
Not to support any faction squabbles but I am afraid that most of mankind civilizations initiate attacks upon weaker opponents throughout History.

The Amarr of course, and then, the Caldari State and their forced client states, or even the Federation when it comes to serve its hypercapitalistic needs or the Minmatar now indeed, but also in their own past history.

Most of them find justifications and ideals under which it can be deemed as acceptable, or even claimed with fervor by their own denizens out of nationalistic pride, or else.

Naturally, what is acceptable, justified, is merely a matter of debate. Even under the guise of humanism.
Kador Ouryon
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2015-12-10 20:14:23 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
With all due respect for your traditions, and the sincerity of your beliefs within the Empire - you've yet to offer, in all the time since you first attacked us, a single piece of empirical proof that your deity even exists.

Please excuse me if, in the absence of supporting evidence that there's anything to grow closer to, I find your assertions of spiritual growth hollow, self-serving, and ultimately only fodder and justifications for a system that seeks to continue the dominance and privilege of those already at the top of a highly stratified society.


To be fair to our previous discussion I am not aware having made any statements that indicated whether I found the practice of slavery moral or ethical, for the most part I have attempted to avoid it as best possible so as not to remark on the sad ironies of our peoples historical conflicts. All I believe I added to this discussion was an opinion that I believe will prove the most expedient road to emancipation on a large scale.

You make a great many presumptions about assertions I haven't even made without even considering the great many political opinions surrounding the issue of slavery within the Empire or which I personally support. Moreover you oppose the Minmatar being judged for the sins of their ancestors and judge me for those of mine, an irony that is both saddening and yet amusing.

What fills the soul? Something that guides a lost child back to it's parents arms. Or waves that dye the shores of the heart gold. A blessed breath to nurture life in a land of wheat. Or the path the Sef descend drawn in ash. In the wake of fire.

morion
Lighting Build
#58 - 2015-12-10 22:10:22 UTC  |  Edited by: morion
Ottom Ephesianos wrote:
For the concept of a good God the slave must forget its own place in the world. When the slave no longer feels like a slave they are closer to God. Even if they still serve a master.



privy ?
Ottom Ephesianos
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
Ushra'Khan
#59 - 2015-12-10 22:17:13 UTC
I will still win at black jack.
morion
Lighting Build
#60 - 2015-12-10 22:23:58 UTC
Ottom Ephesianos wrote:
I will still win at black jack.

the pot was ZERO :congregation