Out of Pod Experience

Is the Sun increase in size due to it's previous speed?

Doesn't the Sun speed create more reaction to its core, which increases its size and mass, which increases its inertia?


Also, won't the Sun still increase in size when it will already have started to slow down, due to previous reaction effect?

In other words, there has to be ratio for the Sun's momentum.

Or perhaps , it's size will shrink without delays of reaction, speed and mass, except perhaps to a relatively negligible extent...





I read the relative scale of earth time for this is in the 3 or 5 billions of years.


The higher the energy level, the more risk of reaction, and the greater effect of gravity and so on...

What I meant is that star bodies operate differently than other reaction which occurs in our system.
The stars are more affected from (or by) external forces than the internal forces we are subjected to.

In that sense, since the kinetic energy build-up is so great, for billions of years, the energy changes.
The start of our sun size was smaller, but the energy involved was greater.
The mass that it moved (and there has to be internal forces that keeps those masses together to a certain specific extent) was so great that it reacted from its small size, and as kinetic energy build-up, even after the great energy that moved it from start, caused it to increase in size.
Our sun currently is in expansion, and so that it why that I considered its speed, mass, original speed, original mass, and wondered how it would react in the future.
Would its speed go down before its size, as the previous kinetic energy reaction , which partly causes it to react , would still be in effect, and so , still make the sun expand even though its relative speed would have already slowed down.

Consider that to reach other stars, even the light has to go through other procedures in time, and since time is related to energy, at that scale, the speed of our sun affects and will affect the rate and energy in relation to reaching those other stars.

There is no doubt that it is way easier to reach water on the moons of Jupiter and test jelly fish farms and what not.
Apparently the main problem with living on the Moon and even Mars is the difference in gravity which affect human metabolism, and I don't know how it affects plants or other metabolism.
How would insect adapt, and so on?


1.
"But what i understand is that the reaction does not increase it's mass."
The reaction of the sun does not increase the mass, but the energy change, and the energy is related to the mass of the sun.
If the energy changes, the same as when you open a fire, or burn iron, or even heat it, the energy changes, and so does the mass, albeit on a microscopic scale.
The more energy is created is causing reactions to occur such as gravity and other reactions.


2.
" It creates heavier elements that increases the density of the core elements and when/if the star passes the certain level density in the core (With iron) it potentially collapses in to a singularity. "
The sun is in expansion and will then become smaller once it has reached it's largest size.
Then, its mass will not only change, but it will increase, due to the level of energy, and it will take mercury, venus, and the earth inside of it's core, due to the amount of gravity change.
Those are the celestial mechanics which nobody on earth will know about, because for one thing, it should easier to live elsewhere than inside the sun, and secondly, those that will know about it will not be on earth (which won't exist by then).

We will have to find some way to adapt to other conditions to survive.

By the time the sun gets smaller, it will become a dwarf star or some other form of modified state which I forgot about now.
Those conclusion must have been reached by the current observation in effect and comparing numbers and speed and so on.
I have not looked much into it, but once you understand the calculation, it is no doubt to calculate the outcomes by computer (given that the algorithm or heuristics are right).


3.
"So the speed of the star or the kinetic energy that is in it must come from something and move to something."
Well yes, that there is no doubt about it, and speed also only is in relation to very well defined relation of space and time.
When those relation of space and time changes due to external forces, so does the way that speed is calculated relatively speaking.
Certain speed varies in relation to external factors.
Speed in relation to moving bodies also varies as well.

The speed of the star and the kinetic energy are related but,
a.)
the speed of the star is only related to the movement of the star in relation to other points in space.
Since it is a star, those other points in space can also have other forces affecting them, and they may not be fixed points themselves.

It is quite easy to measure the speed of smaller bodies in relation to the earth.
Even the speed of the moon in relation to the moon is easier to calculate than the speed of the sun.
Smaller bodies in relation to the earth are deemed to be moving in relation to a fixed point in space.
Of course, the earth also moves, and we don't feel it , since the gravity on earth seems constant.
It is pretty constant in fact.
The sun also has gravity.

I don't think we know of any point in space that the sun is attracted to by gravity, and we have no black hole in our path as of yet, so we also are not attracted by gravity or other forces that would make it move towards it or inwards to it.

b.)
"...the kinetic energy of the star that is in it must come from something and move to something."
Yes indeed, although the kinetic energy of the star that is in the star (that kinetic energy is in relation to the movement and the mass of the star) comes from a possible big bang, as the other surrounding stars in our ...

15 Fastest Things Of All Time (Some You May Not Expect)

Published on Aug 23, 2015
From animals that are made for speed to the fastest movement we know of, we count the 15 fastest things known to mankind