These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Bind PLEX to the first account that buys it on the in-game market

Author
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#1 - 2015-09-16 09:09:34 UTC  |  Edited by: thebarry
We currently have an unfortunate feedback loop with players hoarding and manipulating the price of plex, which imo decreases subscriptions and overall game content. The solution I submit is to bind plex to the first account that purchases it on the in-game market. This would allow for players to convert real money to ISK while eliminating the manipulation and the hoarding. The plex could still be donated to other players or consumed normally, but trading/hauling etc would have to be disallowed in order for this idea to work.

Thanks for reading, and be sure to put a ship in harm's way today :)
Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2015-09-16 09:25:13 UTC
thebarry wrote:
We currently have an unfortunate feedback loop with players hoarding and manipulating the price of plex.


That is the very essence of EVE. It is not CCP's fault that we're increasing the prices on PLEX so dramatically.

Also just because PLEX is around the 990 million isk range, doesn't mean suscription numbers are declining.
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2015-09-16 09:28:54 UTC
But this will limit supply, and thus push prices further and further up...
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#4 - 2015-09-16 09:33:23 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
But this will limit supply, and thus push prices further and further up...


No, it limits demand.
Caleb Seremshur
Bloodhorn
Patchwork Freelancers
#5 - 2015-09-16 09:40:15 UTC
thebarry wrote:
imo


see, this here was your first mistake.

Do you have a single piece of evidence to back this up?
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#6 - 2015-09-16 09:50:33 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
thebarry wrote:
imo


see, this here was your first mistake.

Do you have a single piece of evidence to back this up?


Anecdotally, I have a friend who was very smug about making 40bn off of plex while not playing the game. He logged in to play dress-up with his avatar for 20 minutes or so, and then went back to skill training online. I like my friend, but I wouldn't describe him as someone who creates a lot of content for the game.

Can we agree that lowering the price of plex would make things easier on those who are driving content?
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2015-09-16 09:53:03 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
But this will limit supply, and thus push prices further and further up...


No, it limits demand.


How?

People still need PLEX for all the usual reasons, and preventing the guys who have piles of them from actually servicing that demand is not going to do nice things to the prices.

At all.
thebarry
7-2 Ronin
#8 - 2015-09-16 10:48:55 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
thebarry wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
But this will limit supply, and thus push prices further and further up...


No, it limits demand.


How?

People still need PLEX for all the usual reasons, and preventing the guys who have piles of them from actually servicing that demand is not going to do nice things to the prices.

At all.


The guys who have piles of them are the demand, they invest and hold because it's a hedge against inflation, and this is a feedback loop where the price rises as more and more people hoard them, which results in yet more hoarders. I am saying that this is unhealthy for the game since it artificially inflates the cost of game time(in ISK) which in turn makes things harder on the players who are driving content.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2015-09-16 13:06:47 UTC
thebarry wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
thebarry wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
But this will limit supply, and thus push prices further and further up...


No, it limits demand.


How?

People still need PLEX for all the usual reasons, and preventing the guys who have piles of them from actually servicing that demand is not going to do nice things to the prices.

At all.


The guys who have piles of them are the demand, they invest and hold because it's a hedge against inflation, and this is a feedback loop where the price rises as more and more people hoard them, which results in yet more hoarders. I am saying that this is unhealthy for the game since it artificially inflates the cost of game time(in ISK) which in turn makes things harder on the players who are driving content.


Your friend who made 40 bill off of PLEX sure as hell didn't service the demand right...
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#10 - 2015-09-16 13:08:58 UTC
thebarry wrote:


Can we agree that lowering the price of plex would make things easier on those who are driving content?


How?
by making them pay more for plex they have to rat more and mine more.

this is more content.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#11 - 2015-09-16 13:47:09 UTC
-1 - plex prices are a player issue and we as players are the ones that can and should change it.

Personally I rather enjoy the plex prices I get a lot more in game for my $15.00 than I ever have in the past and that is really nice since my taste in ships has gotten rather expensive in the last few years.

If you are really all that concerned about hoarding and manipulation then you better spread your nets significantly wider.

Nul sec groups hoard and control access to many of the materials needed to produce T2 and T3 ships. By hoarding and controlling these they are manipulating the market and driving prices higher. Same can be said for the WH groups and the sleeper materials that are crucial to some ship productions so we need to get rid of that as well. Why are you only concerned with plex prices?

There is always plex on the market to buy so there is not a supply problem.

Setting all of that aside your idea ignores a fundamental fact of a free market.
Seller will raise prices as high as the markets will bear, so it is those who are buying plex who are driving the costs ever higher. So this brings the EvE market tip of the day, if you want lower plex prices then you need to get as many people as possible to stop buying plex and the prices will drop.
unidenify
Deaf Armada
#12 - 2015-09-16 14:02:13 UTC
Guys guys, he just copy idea from World of Warcraft.

That is essence what Blizzard do with their counterpart of PLEX
Barubary Evans
Doomheim
#13 - 2015-09-16 14:15:58 UTC
Celthric Kanerian wrote:

Also just because PLEX is around the 990 million isk range, doesn't mean suscription numbers are declining.

For what it's worth, PLEX are 1.25 bil. They haven't been 990 mil in ~4-5 months.
Tabyll Altol
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2015-09-16 15:44:43 UTC
thebarry wrote:
We currently have an unfortunate feedback loop with players hoarding and manipulating the price of plex, which imo decreases subscriptions and overall game content. The solution I submit is to bind plex to the first account that purchases it on the in-game market. This would allow for players to convert real money to ISK while eliminating the manipulation and the hoarding. The plex could still be donated to other players or consumed normally, but trading/hauling etc would have to be disallowed in order for this idea to work.

Thanks for reading, and be sure to put a ship in harm's way today :)


Hell no, its a item to traide you wanna play eve to pay for eve just play longer, or pay for your account.
The ability to traide nearly everything in eve is kind of part of the sandbox.

-1
Aerasia
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2015-09-16 15:54:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Aerasia
thebarry wrote:
Anecdotally, I have a friend who was very smug about making 40bn off of plex while not playing the game.
Your friend is exactly why we let PLEX be bought and sold amongst players.

If you want to see what happens to raw market manipulation, you can still see last November's selloff in the market history. Your friend will probably be less smug when he watches 20% of his PLEX hoard's value vanish in the space of 72 hours.

Your accusations of manipulation are missing the actual piece of information that lets us know whether or not there is an imbalance in PLEX consumption.

In general, we need to know:
A) How many PLEX are being created: bought for $, through subscription links and hacked into existence by rogue CCP employees.
B) How many PLEX are being destroyed: converted to game time, Aurum, multiple training and PLEX tanking.

From that we can say:
If A > B then prices go down.
If A = B then prices stay the same.
If A < B then prices go up.

If those rules aren't being followed, then it's market manipulation and somebody's in for a bad day when the market corrects.

--Edited!
Also, actually profiting 40B ISK off flipping PLEX requires selling hundreds of them, as they've only gone up something like 100-120M over the last 4 months. More likely their actual profit per unit is less than that, so that's going to be 500+ PLEX held. I'm not going to begrudge somebody who would otherwise be liquid to the tune of 500B ISK a profit of ~8% in 6 months on their investment.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#16 - 2015-09-16 18:36:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
The Plex is way too cheap, I'm hoping it hits a reasonable 2 billion soon.

Even if it hits 8 billion, it would still be a no.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#17 - 2015-09-16 18:53:48 UTC
You realize that this would utterly destroy the PLEX market and make it all but impossible for the players who keep their subscriptions going by paying ISK for PLEX to keep playing, right?


Not just no, but hell no. Market manipulation is part of the game.

-1

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Shallanna Yassavi
qwertz corp
#18 - 2015-09-16 21:23:45 UTC
With this change, the hoarders would be able to sell their plex. Once, because the plex wouldn't be bound until after this change happened and it got sold again.

There are other ways to bet against inflation, which don't involve Plex. We'll always need the stuff we actually use to build things and blow them up-and if it's sitting in an NPC station, nobody's going to take it away unless the usual foolishness happens.

A signature :o

Zimmer Jones
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2015-09-16 21:49:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Zimmer Jones
Not supported. I buy plex in game on occasion when I don't feel like going through alt reactivation by cc, however I use a purchasing alt account because I'm paranoid, then trade them in game to sit in inventory until needed. Sometimes hrs for plex gets you in the game and fleeted up a lot faster than entering info and going through the buggy cc verification.

I don't want that particular purchase in my main account history, for my own reasons.

Use the force without consent and the court wont acquit you even if you are a card carryin', robe wearin' Jedi.

Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#20 - 2015-09-16 21:59:18 UTC
thebarry wrote:
We currently have an unfortunate feedback loop with players hoarding and manipulating the price of plex, which imo decreases subscriptions and overall game content.



A)Cannot by definition directly decrease subscriptions. If you were paying by subscription, you wouldn't need PLEX.

B)If you understand the hoarders' secrets, why aren't you profiteering of this 'gold rush' of sorts? Extremely valuable PLEX clouds have been discovered in the....

C)More people grinding out the ISK means more people to hunt, means more content seeds.

D)Actually subscribing to the game is extremely cheap.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

12Next page