These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Petition: Remove Slaves from the SCC Markets.

Author
Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#301 - 2015-08-16 02:47:32 UTC
Aeon Amadii wrote:

Now here's a man with a legitimate argument, one that I appreciate fully except for one consideration. Where does the Empire obtain their umm... 'slaves' as it were..? Is it from within the Empire? And to that extent, where does the Empire's boundaries begin to feather? At what point does it stop being "This is Amarr. The Empire." and the rights and establishments of other sovereign nations who strictly oppose indentured servitude begin to take over?

See, I'm all for cultural diversity. I'm even cool with a bit of slavery, provided it's written into whatever slack-jawed charter or constitution crazy people come up with and it's on their own turf. What I'm not cool with is this sort of hamfisted attempt to exercise that logic as if the Amarr want to go around claiming worlds all nimbly bimbly. You want to own slaves on your own worlds? Fine by me, but when you start to say "This is the Empire" and that feelings, justice, pride, - yadda yadda - don't matter, as if your golden regime overshadows the rest of humanity... Yeah, I might have a problem.



Thank you sir for your...kind words.

And some valid questions.

To be very brief:

The Majority of slaves within the Empire are Minmatar. Most are born into the position. The Empire does make new slaves from prisoners of war and slavery is used as a punishment for criminals. Some Holders buy and sell on the open (SCC) markets. The profession of "Slaver," a person authorized by the Empire to acquire, buy and sell "Controlled Personnel" has waned since the inception of the CONCORD treaties. They still exist and you can still hire them on SCC markets, but mostly these days new Controlled Personnel are taken by the Nobility, high-ranking military figures or high-ranking clergy.

In the interests of your cultural diversity, legal slavery within the Kingdom of Khanid has a few notable differences. First is that we don't border Minmatar space. So we haven't had near as much opportunity to get new stock from the Republic. So, we've had to adapt. That meant taking Controlled Personnel from everywhere else. This has left the Kingdom with a much more diverse slave stock than the Empire. We made many more from prisoners of war or criminals. We use slavers more often and raid into NullSec to acquire new stock.

As in the Empire, Holders are the primary legal owners of slaves. However, the Kingdom is somewhat more liberal with slave ownership, openly allowing non-nobles to own slaves should they be capable of affording them. The SCC treaties helped make this possible. It's rare. Capsuleer ownership is rare too, but gaining popularity.

At what point do the rights of other nations who oppose slavery take over? At the border. CONCORD and local border patrols make sure to levy fines on ships who try to transport Controlled Personnel out of the Empire or in from NullSec.

In the Ammatar Mandate, it's even more weird. Traditionally, the Mandate slave owners were primarily Minmatar. Over the years, especially after more Amarr Holders began living there, it looks a lot more like the Empire proper. There are still Ammatar (Matari) owners, but they are no longer the majority and they've settled into a quiet working relationship with their Amarr neighbors (if you ever want to start a bar fight in Amarr, drop the words "Ammatar Holder" and watch what happens).

Your last point is a can of worms. Amarr Conservatives will tell you exactly that all must be reclaimed. This makes our friends in the State nervous, so they don't usually say it much in mixed company. In that light, the Light of God, Amarr does overshadow the rest of humanity.

The point of it all is that my associates among the Amarr conservatives, those who have argued here the loudest about this petition and how it should be only Holders owning slaves, are correct in their quotations of Scripture, but blind to the realities of the galaxy we live in. Our governments, Amarr and Khanid, signed willingly our treaties with CONCORD, the SCC and the other four (now three) main governments. Traditionally, as much as we follow our Faith and our Scriptures, we should not be questioning the words of our leaders. Especially in public. If they want to go against the Will of the Empire, that's on them. Me? I'll follow my King and my God and the Laws of my People.

"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Shaddam Daphiti
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#302 - 2015-08-16 02:50:21 UTC
Ashlar Vellum wrote:
Scripture does come before all other things.

So, my apologies 2nd lieutenant for pointing this out, but there is also a passage in scripture about code of demeanor which states "Be Careful. Be Watchful. Be Respectful". Most obvious question comes to mind, the faithful who are pushing this petition so vigorously are you being careful or watchful or maybe you are being respectful with all of this?



It is careful to see those whose welfare has been given over to Holy Holders are not abused.
It is watchful to see that the intent of The Holy Law is not perverted.
It is respectful to see that though secular law may permit a thing, Divine Law forbids it.

Just because the secular Law says "You may" it does not follow that "You should."

Natheniel
Kurupt.
Sedition.
#303 - 2015-08-16 02:55:12 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:

To be very brief:


You have decieved me for the last time mokk! You hear me? The last time!

"Life is as a storm, one must be prepared for the hardship and scorn. But with in this is a light, one for which we must fight. For hope is our weapon and our dreams are our shield. When fully armed we can not be felled from the field."

Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#304 - 2015-08-16 03:09:28 UTC
Natheniel wrote:
Sinjin Mokk wrote:

To be very brief:


You have decieved me for the last time mokk! You hear me? The last time!



There was no deception. That was the very brief version.

"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

The Leopardess
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#305 - 2015-08-16 03:10:33 UTC  |  Edited by: The Leopardess
Oh for goodness sakes, the Caldari State treats their employees worse than my family treats its slaves. I hardly think they would find the Reclamation that bad. Anyways in my opinion they're already slaves to Amarr. I can't imagine life without Caldari technology. Sometimes micromanaging is not management at all.


As for the scriptures and Holders, it also states that one should obey one's betters. I find that if the Holders or the Heirs want their subjects to own slaves, such as my Mother, God bless her with long life, and His Holiness King Khanid II, Lord of the Marches, may the Lord grant him strength, then who are we lessers to argue with them?

I would like to point out that my family immediately obeyed her Holiness Jamyl Sarum's edict on 9th generation slaves gladly, and provided them with transport to the Republic if they wished or a home and a job in the constellation they grew up in.

So if an edict came down about it, which it has not, then the faithful Holders would bend to that will. I think many more economically minded people above me realize it would be a bureaucratic disaster and stifle progress.

龴ↀ◡ↀ龴

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#306 - 2015-08-16 04:09:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
The Leopardess wrote:
I think many more economically minded people above me realize it would be a bureaucratic disaster and stifle progress.


It is this sort of liberal thinking that Amarr needs less of. Upholding God's will as dictated in Scripture comes before all other concerns. We cannot Reclaim the rest of God's creations if we are unable to first Reclaim our own souls from sin.

Economic interests mean nothing next to spiritual concerns.

"Remember where you came from. Be you a freed slave, a descendant of slaves, a merchant, a Navy officer, a Holder, or even royalty, it is paramount to remember the roots of the faith. All men are created to serve God and do His will. It is not merely time served that shall be rewarded, but the conviction and faith with which you serve."
- His Highness the Heir Yonis Ardishapur
Alizebeth Amalath
Doomheim
#307 - 2015-08-16 04:17:14 UTC
I truly hate that I cannot go on a religious retreat anymore without having to check and see what is happening back home. However, I will say that so far, Samira might as well be posting from my own talking points.
Except the whip not chip slogan. That is not mine. Though, I do feel that all slaves should be treated in such a manner as to reclaim them for God so that one day they, or their descendants will serve God as free subjects of the Empire.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#308 - 2015-08-16 04:23:43 UTC
The Leopardess wrote:
A whole lot of utter tripe and arrogance.


How screwed up do you have to be where you start making Nauplius look sensible and MiniLuv seem like a humanitarian organization?
The Leopardess
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#309 - 2015-08-16 05:40:00 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
The Leopardess wrote:
A whole lot of utter tripe and arrogance.


How screwed up do you have to be where you start making Nauplius look sensible and MiniLuv seem like a humanitarian organization?


Not screwed up enough to deny the Empress and threaten to kill the faithful for not bending to some nullsec tyrant's will.

龴ↀ◡ↀ龴

The Leopardess
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#310 - 2015-08-16 05:56:59 UTC
Alizebeth Amalath wrote:
I truly hate that I cannot go on a religious retreat anymore without having to check and see what is happening back home. However, I will say that so far, Samira might as well be posting from my own talking points.
Except the whip not chip slogan. That is not mine. Though, I do feel that all slaves should be treated in such a manner as to reclaim them for God so that one day they, or their descendants will serve God as free subjects of the Empire.



Oh good I'm glad you are willing to take credit for all of her work, now we all can see who is behind her belligerent anti-slavery and anti-authority behavior instead of blaming the poor creature.

I am grateful that I attend a church where slave whipping techniques are still taught to youngsters at religious lessons and mortification of the flesh is considered to be holy still.

龴ↀ◡ↀ龴

Alizebeth Amalath
Doomheim
#311 - 2015-08-16 06:02:51 UTC
I am neither anti slavery nor anti authority. I believe that slaves should be owned and cared for by holders and duly appointed custodians and not random capsuleers who intend sacrifice them en mass as part of some Sani Sabik ritual.
The Leopardess
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#312 - 2015-08-16 06:19:43 UTC  |  Edited by: The Leopardess
Alizebeth Amalath wrote:
I am neither anti slavery nor anti authority. I believe that slaves should be owned and cared for by holders and duly appointed custodians and not random capsuleers who intend sacrifice them en mass as part of some Sani Sabik ritual.



Yes, yes, always with the deference to Holders. Well I am not a Holder, but I might be someday, and I certainly handle Holder business already, and I am here to say that this petition does not help Holders, slaves or the precious few trained slave handlers we have left.

And it most certainly does not prevent slaves from ending up in the hands of the Blood Raiders. I mean, how do you think taking slaves OUT of the Amarr Empire protects them?

These are matters of sin. It is much worse for a slave to be rescued and sent to battle against us than it is for a Blood Raider to slay them, for then at least they are a martyr to the Lord, innocent of blame.

I think this is an abolitionist movement, and I will not change my mind until I see something that makes sense to me.

龴ↀ◡ↀ龴

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#313 - 2015-08-16 06:26:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
The Leopardess wrote:
anti-slavery


We are not anti-slavery. What we are opposed to are the liberal business practices and free market economies that you promote.

We who are fighting for this are in favor of regulation, restoration of traditional values, and upholding of Scriptural law. We are pro-slavery.

Quote:
I am grateful that I attend a church where slave whipping techniques are still taught to youngsters at religious lessons and mortification of the flesh is considered to be holy still.


I have been whipped and beaten for when I have failed to uphold my obligations. I have scars both overseer- and self-inflicted to prove my faith and punish my transgressions.

I am grateful to have been born in a place where Scriptural law is upheld above all other things. I am blessed to have been born in His Highness the Heir Ardishapur's demesne, where I could be brought up in accordance with God's will.

I am very grateful that I was not raised in a place where material interests are placed above spiritual pursuits.
Alizebeth Amalath
Doomheim
#314 - 2015-08-16 06:36:18 UTC
The Leopardess wrote:

I think this is an abolitionist movement, and I will not change my mind until I see something that makes sense to me.

Then you need to read more closely. The SCC markets are only for capsuleers. Holders have other ways of buying slaves. I will use short sentences to make this clear.
Capsuleers not holders can now buy slaves. Capsuleers can do what they want with slaves. Capsuleers take the slaves to the Republic. Capsuleers sacrifice the slaves to the Sani Sabik God. Capsuleers use slaves for their own sexual gratification. Capsuleers operate outside of God's Light. Capsuleers do not have Theology Council oversight. Slaves should be protected from capsuleers. Only Holders should own slaves. Holders that are capsuleers have other ways of buying slaves.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#315 - 2015-08-16 06:36:20 UTC
The Leopardess wrote:
I mean, how do you think taking slaves OUT of the Amarr Empire protects them?

These are matters of sin. It is much worse for a slave to be rescued and sent to battle against us than it is for a Blood Raider to slay them, for then at least they are a martyr to the Lord, innocent of blame.


You do realize that the SCC's practices are what allows slaves to be taken out of Amarr and sent to battle against us? Every slave that is purchased by a foreigner is a slave that is taken out of Amarr and into the hands of those who have no right to hold them and no fealty to Amarr or God.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#316 - 2015-08-16 09:12:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Aeon Amadii wrote:

Now here's a man with a legitimate argument, one that I appreciate fully except for one consideration. Where does the Empire obtain their umm... 'slaves' as it were..? Is it from within the Empire? And to that extent, where does the Empire's boundaries begin to feather? At what point does it stop being "This is Amarr. The Empire." and the rights and establishments of other sovereign nations who strictly oppose indentured servitude begin to take over?

See, I'm all for cultural diversity. I'm even cool with a bit of slavery, provided it's written into whatever slack-jawed charter or constitution crazy people come up with and it's on their own turf. What I'm not cool with is this sort of hamfisted attempt to exercise that logic as if the Amarr want to go around claiming worlds all nimbly bimbly. You want to own slaves on your own worlds? Fine by me, but when you start to say "This is the Empire" and that feelings, justice, pride, - yadda yadda - don't matter, as if your golden regime overshadows the rest of humanity... Yeah, I might have a problem.


As far as I know Heideran VII edict on slaver raids outside of Empire borders is still followed. However, enslaving PoW is still legal and that is often what happens to TLF and the Minmatar military fighting in the warzone.

It is a bit unclear on the side of the Khanid Kingdom, which has until recently been in a cold war state with the Empire and never followed that edict... Especially considering the shortage of slaves they had constantly to face. However, I am not sure to what extents the Kingdom can legally pursue slave raids outside of its territory with all the current Yulai regulations in place.

I would be interested to know more!


Sinjin Mokk wrote:

In the Ammatar Mandate, it's even more weird. Traditionally, the Mandate slave owners were primarily Minmatar. Over the years, especially after more Amarr Holders began living there, it looks a lot more like the Empire proper. There are still Ammatar (Matari) owners, but they are no longer the majority and they've settled into a quiet working relationship with their Amarr neighbors (if you ever want to start a bar fight in Amarr, drop the words "Ammatar Holder" and watch what happens).


If I may sir,

The first slave owners in the Ammatar Mandate were True Amarr Holders, most often vassals or lords that got offered opportunities over new lands in Derelik and Heimatar (especially in the Ani constellation, old home and citadel of the Nefantar) when the Empire eventually annexed most of the old Minmatar Empire.

It was an elegant and classic way to get rid of annoying or rival nobles, or to reward the most worthy. It is not unheard of military commoners that took advantage of the social leverage that the Amarr Navy can provide to also be rewarded in this promised land.

Later, the Minmatar Rebellion happened and most Amarr Holders, some of whom where already operating by proxies, panicked and fled the Heimatar and Derelik regions. They still ruled over huge swaths of lands, but de facto, their power was relegated to their Ammatar overseers. Most of the Ammatar Mandate slaves were then ruled by Sanmatari commoners and zealous converts or opportunists that created out of this situation very powerful aristocratic families that still constitute today a great part of the oligarchic social strata of the Mandate.

The fact that they reign over slaves without true Scripture approval is problematic in that their practices remained tolerated by the Empire as proxies for their liege Holders during the Rebellion, and continued to be so after when most links were severed and left them alone in possession of their slave stocks and lands. It is also problematic for them since while they remain acknowledged for their deeds when they remained the sole social stalwarts of the Mandate during the Rebellion, they can not by Scripture law acquire new slaves easily, and some have to resort to black market operations to that goal, or SCC sales. This is incidentally one of the reasons that the Mandate is one of the two entities dealing in slave trade over the SCC.

While Ammatar Overseers are called to eventually disappear with the new Ardishapur rule over the Mandate, appointing new Holders among other things, they still remain a strong reality that have to be beckoned with. Their intricate power over the nation here is still consequential. My own family is just an example of those Overseers that did not have the backbone to survive those changing times.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#317 - 2015-08-16 14:04:21 UTC
The Leopardess wrote:

Not screwed up enough to deny the Empress and threaten to kill the faithful for not bending to some nullsec tyrant's will.


Silly nutbar. We haven't done either of those.

Deny the Empress? No no, she's the Empress. We've just said she shouldn't be.

Threaten to kill the faithful? Faugh. We haven't threatened to kill anyone.

We've just made an offer. An offer not to kill you if you bend the knee. I mean, you don't threaten to clean up the refuse or use the latrine. But you might offer not to make a mess when you do it.

A threat would indicate there's something else we want, that you can offer. The offer makes it pretty clear it's simply something we're willing to indulge in.
Sinjin Mokk
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#318 - 2015-08-16 15:32:17 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:


As far as I know Heideran VII edict on slaver raids outside of Empire borders is still followed. However, enslaving PoW is still legal and that is often what happens to TLF and the Minmatar military fighting in the warzone.

It is a bit unclear on the side of the Khanid Kingdom, which has until recently been in a cold war state with the Empire and never followed that edict... Especially considering the shortage of slaves they had constantly to face. However, I am not sure to what extents the Kingdom can legally pursue slave raids outside of its territory with all the current Yulai regulations in place.

I would be interested to know more!


An excellent question.

Khanid is bordered on its Trailing and Coreward sides by Kor-Azor and Tash Murkon. While raiding our cousins there is very illegal, we do trade quite a bit with these two holdings.

Looking Rimward, we are bordered by Catch and Querious. These NullSec systems present a greater danger, but greater profit for those Slavers who are brave enough to venture there.

At the end of our Spinward Marches is the Nav Pipe to Aridia. This is probably my favorite. Khanid leads to Aridia which leads to Delve and the home of Bloody Omir. It's all LowSec and easy to find Bloodraiders.

Slavers, especially those who attach themselves to Capsuleers have even more options. Many Khanid Capsuleers do terms of service for either the 24thIC or the State Protectorate. This gives us the opportunity to raid along the war fronts. While the State frowns on enslavement within it's borders, it isn't unusual for Khanid ships to be allowed to secure their own prisoners of war for transport to the Kingdom.

Wormholes and Thera provide new and exciting opportunities for the truly adventurous.

I hope that sheds more light on how we do things here.

And thanks for the expansion on slavery in the Mandate. As I said, I was trying to be brief. But yes, Matari/Nefantar/Ammatar citizens have been owning and producing their own slaves alongside traditional Holders for quite some time.

"Angels live, they never die, Apart from us, behind the sky. They're fading souls who've turned to ice, So ashen white in paradise."

Aeon Amadii
#319 - 2015-08-16 16:27:47 UTC
Sinjin Mokk wrote:
Aeon Amadii wrote:

Now here's a man with a legitimate argument, one that I appreciate fully except for one consideration. Where does the Empire obtain their umm... 'slaves' as it were..? Is it from within the Empire? And to that extent, where does the Empire's boundaries begin to feather? At what point does it stop being "This is Amarr. The Empire." and the rights and establishments of other sovereign nations who strictly oppose indentured servitude begin to take over?

See, I'm all for cultural diversity. I'm even cool with a bit of slavery, provided it's written into whatever slack-jawed charter or constitution crazy people come up with and it's on their own turf. What I'm not cool with is this sort of hamfisted attempt to exercise that logic as if the Amarr want to go around claiming worlds all nimbly bimbly. You want to own slaves on your own worlds? Fine by me, but when you start to say "This is the Empire" and that feelings, justice, pride, - yadda yadda - don't matter, as if your golden regime overshadows the rest of humanity... Yeah, I might have a problem.



Thank you sir for your...kind words.

And some valid questions.

To be very brief:

The Majority of slaves within the Empire are Minmatar. Most are born into the position. The Empire does make new slaves from prisoners of war and slavery is used as a punishment for criminals. Some Holders buy and sell on the open (SCC) markets. The profession of "Slaver," a person authorized by the Empire to acquire, buy and sell "Controlled Personnel" has waned since the inception of the CONCORD treaties. They still exist and you can still hire them on SCC markets, but mostly these days new Controlled Personnel are taken by the Nobility, high-ranking military figures or high-ranking clergy.

In the interests of your cultural diversity, legal slavery within the Kingdom of Khanid has a few notable differences. First is that we don't border Minmatar space. So we haven't had near as much opportunity to get new stock from the Republic. So, we've had to adapt. That meant taking Controlled Personnel from everywhere else. This has left the Kingdom with a much more diverse slave stock than the Empire. We made many more from prisoners of war or criminals. We use slavers more often and raid into NullSec to acquire new stock.

As in the Empire, Holders are the primary legal owners of slaves. However, the Kingdom is somewhat more liberal with slave ownership, openly allowing non-nobles to own slaves should they be capable of affording them. The SCC treaties helped make this possible. It's rare. Capsuleer ownership is rare too, but gaining popularity.

At what point do the rights of other nations who oppose slavery take over? At the border. CONCORD and local border patrols make sure to levy fines on ships who try to transport Controlled Personnel out of the Empire or in from NullSec.

In the Ammatar Mandate, it's even more weird. Traditionally, the Mandate slave owners were primarily Minmatar. Over the years, especially after more Amarr Holders began living there, it looks a lot more like the Empire proper. There are still Ammatar (Matari) owners, but they are no longer the majority and they've settled into a quiet working relationship with their Amarr neighbors (if you ever want to start a bar fight in Amarr, drop the words "Ammatar Holder" and watch what happens).

Your last point is a can of worms. Amarr Conservatives will tell you exactly that all must be reclaimed. This makes our friends in the State nervous, so they don't usually say it much in mixed company. In that light, the Light of God, Amarr does overshadow the rest of humanity.

The point of it all is that my associates among the Amarr conservatives, those who have argued here the loudest about this petition and how it should be only Holders owning slaves, are correct in their quotations of Scripture, but blind to the realities of the galaxy we live in. Our governments, Amarr and Khanid, signed willingly our treaties with CONCORD, the SCC and the other four (now three) main governments. Traditionally, as much as we follow our Faith and our Scriptures, we should not be questioning the words of our leaders. Especially in public. If they want to go against the Will of the Empire, that's on them. Me? I'll follow my King and my God and the Laws of my People.


Fair enough. I can respect that - you keep to yours, I'll keep to mine. I don't particularly like slavery, seems like a cop-out to me. I'm a particular fan of Caldari Meritocracy so, 'Reclaiming' or not the concept of ownership of another human being to do my dirty work is a bit paltry. Don't get me wrong, my value and compassion for other individuals has waned over the years (dying a few thousand times does that to a person) so that's not at all the reasonings behind my views. I'm just not a fan of laziness, really.

But, I also respect boundaries. You want to enslave your own people, be my guest, but let's just say that if I catch you or yours in Molden Heath trying to pull that number on our worlds... that pod won't save you from what I'll do.

(This character is the Eve version of Aeon Amadi since there is no cross-forum support)

Member of CPM 2

Arrendis
TK Corp
#320 - 2015-08-16 19:00:45 UTC
Aeon Amadii wrote:
You want to enslave your own people, be my guest, but let's just say that if I catch you or yours in Molden Heath trying to pull that number on our worlds... that pod won't save you from what I'll do.


Just remember, grounder, you've got to get to the pod.