These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP and the wormhole changes

First post
Author
dhunpael
#1 - 2015-07-10 18:47:25 UTC
So, since some ISD doens't have a great sense of humor and locked my topic:

(i'll start with some text and then link the vid)

Hi CCP, remember us, the people who didn't fit in?
The ones that didn't like to get blobbed or the ones that didn't want all the drama?

The ones that didn't want to loose sec standing and got bored of high sec?

You know who i'm talking about right?

The ones that liked no local, the ones that had to work for their kill by ACTIVELY scanning for their kills, the ones that had to adapt every day because of new wormhole connections?

The ones that you didn't want to settle in wormhole space, but still did?


Well, we're still here and no we don't like where the changes are going!

To sum up (and i'm forgetting stuff)

- Let's change the C6 and C5 stuff and turn it into a farm
- Let's change scanning and make it harder because NULL SEC has a problem
- Let's change warping because NULL SEC has a problem
(and NO, having more alts is NO valid solution or should NOT be used as an option or argument, this is not game of alts!)

And now we are hearing that you're changing the wormhole behavior in null sec because of some NULL SEC CSM member?
So what? You want to make null sec somewhat more safe and allow carriers to start ratting again?

Consider this: High sec ganking is ok, you should not believe in a true very secure place unless it's a station in high
This is more than right and yes, this is how the game should be working.

But now you are making NULL SEC more safe because they can get ganked?
This is just ridiculous!

What's next, local in whole space?
Gates in whole space?
Why not make it null sec all together?


Yes this is just a rant, no you can't have my tears and yes we are adapting.

Still, just a heads up CCP: You're not goingthe right way by only doing stuff for null sec, there are other players and creating solutions for null sec that has impact on other places is NEVER ok.


as for the vid, with warning so the ISD won't lock this again. =D

CCP talking about whole space (funny meme warning)
Paranoid Loyd
#2 - 2015-07-10 18:49:22 UTC
Guess what's coming?

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
#3 - 2015-07-10 18:54:29 UTC
I like Cheese.

Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!!

Random Bacon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4 - 2015-07-10 18:57:39 UTC
dhunpael wrote:


Consider this: High sec ganking is ok, you should not believe in a true very secure place unless it's a station in high
This is more than right and yes, this is how the game should be working.

But now you are making NULL SEC more safe because they can get ganked?
This is just ridiculous!



Truth
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#5 - 2015-07-10 19:03:16 UTC
reported

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#6 - 2015-07-10 19:08:01 UTC
Even the mittani does not like the changes Fozzi is making, and he is the chairman of the CSM!
Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-07-10 19:13:42 UTC

I actually agree with the OP...

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2015-07-10 19:16:15 UTC
You have to understand, my people.

NullSec is just as much filled with carebears like HighSec. Many nullsec players PLAY in highsec, because they are carebears! There's plentyful sites out there not deemed worth enough to run, so nobody runs them. They're carebears. Greedy. Unimaginative. Followers.

They wait for pings to happen, so they can log in, play, and log out again. They don't care about a subscription, because they can easily afford the PLEX via ISK.


The OP is perfectly right. CCP is making nullsec safer and it is because of the carebears there.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Aladar Dangerface
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2015-07-10 19:24:08 UTC
While I agree with you OP and GD is probably the only place a dev might see this since they do not even bother looking at the wh forums. This thread will be locked as it is a rant.

I don't need twitter. I'm already following you.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#10 - 2015-07-10 22:47:43 UTC
Have you tried the feedback thread?

Quote:

Forum rules

3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department