Crime & Punishment

The small amount of isk should be a larger amount of isk imo. Along with many other changes but that is defiantly one of them that should tie in with the social corp setup

Maybe we need corp fatigue ? Every time you close down a corp, it takes longer for you to recreate one.

I do dig that you cant read 2 sentences. Ok so why should a 1 man corp get all the advantages of a 50 man corp with none of the risk a 50 man corp has? (highsec based of course). The start up cost for a corp is laughable. The start up cost for an alliance is staggering in comparison. forming your own player corp should be something for a brand new player to work towards and something that isn't laughable for an established player. Other changes need to come in (and very well may with the way the wind is blowing) but the establishing of a proper player corp with all the bells and whistles should be a milestone and not cost less then basic fit frigate.

I have no issues personally with any 1 man corps so saying I get upset is a bit presumptuous. It would be like me saying your butt hurt over not being able to use highsec. The actual issue I have with it is I can stick my ALT's in one, as other mercs do, and set my standings, have all the corp benefits and should anybody decide that they have had enough of my ALT corp providing me with assistance I just reform it and go again. I should no more be allowed to dodge decs this way (which I do) then anybody else's ALT corp does. I want the risk/cost ratio to be more on par yes.

You don't have all the benefits. For starters you have 49 less players contributing. Most benefits you do use (such as putting up a POS or using corp wallets for trading) will make it a considerably larger and more costly task to reform. Changing the startup cost won't make people fight, they'll still just use alts to evade.

Then why are you whining about a change that would primarily affect 1 man corps?

If you couldn't do this you'd just find another way to do the same. Your talking about a corp you're specifically setting up to be disposable.

Highsec has a policeforce that gives a consequence for PvP, it doesn't prevent it.

how long have you been playing EVE and you still can't grasp this?



Unfortunately, no, it wasn't you. I got what was coming not being more careful with so many wardecs right now.

Actually a lot of people use wars to get POCOs however because everything about the war system is so heavily biased in favor of the defender that 90% of the time they hire mercs to do it for them. Moons are less common because frankly they're an abundant resource and the difficulty of destroying a properly set up tower as well as the nuisance of POS reinforcement timers makes contracts to destroy them incredibly expensive.

War fatigue timers would be enormously detrimental to mercenaries as they'd place a hard mechanical limit on your ability to take contracts, it would also be incompatible with the way corporations leaving alliances generates new wars. I also don't see how imposing limits on aggression would in any way improve highsec gameplay, which is already becoming increasingly devoid of ways for people to initiate conflicts.

Similarly restrictions on people doing what they want regarding their corporation membership just prevents people from being part of the group they want to be in and ultimately if someone doesn't want to be at war and has nothing invested in their corporation they wouldn't be heavily impacted by being in an NPC corp anyway.

The way to approach collapsing and reforming corporations as well as the ridiculous levels of passiveness of players in highsec corporations is to make corp membership and a corp being well established more valuable to players and worth defending.

Adding punishments to running away and arbitrary limits on aggression would just annoy everyone involved.

That doesn't even make sense.

Next up we ensure that every fight in eve is completely consensual. We could even take this idea a step further and make all aggression in all space duel based so that you or your fc have to accept a duel to actually fight the opponents. Then we can take it a step further and close eve down and just play wow

The moment you undock you have consented to PvP. As for the rest if you follow my f&I thread you would know I propose a whole new approach to the wars system. I could turn this into a lengthy debate but let's leave it at rolling corps is a broken mechanic due to its complete lack of risk and no consequences. Mass wars isn't a good mechanic either but they will and need to exist until a conflict driver in high sec emerges. Pocos and pos's are not an answer. Nor are citadels. A whole new approach is needed I think

This thread was ok until the heaviest user of Anusol in known space, second only to Veers arrived.

Hi Lucas. Still furiously defending your low hanging fruit I see. Have you tried coughing?