These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Mining probes and planet ring mining.

First post
Author
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#21 - 2015-05-21 08:27:15 UTC
Deep Nine wrote:


There was no offense intended, I was thanking you for backing me up. .


Oh! Sorry for misunderstanding than. And bump the idea.
Deep Nine
Vigilante Carebears
#22 - 2015-05-22 00:46:42 UTC
Bump.
Null Infinity
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2015-05-22 12:02:31 UTC
Thank you all for input!

New mining menthods: interactive mining and comet mining

Navy Jackal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2015-05-25 12:04:11 UTC
Bump !
Deep Nine
Vigilante Carebears
#25 - 2015-05-25 22:13:00 UTC
+2.

This needs examination.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#26 - 2015-05-26 15:11:48 UTC
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#27 - 2015-05-26 15:29:04 UTC
Quote:
15. Bumping outside the EVE Marketplace and Alliance & Corporation Recruitment channels is prohibited.

The bumping of posts to alter the order of the thread listing on a forum is prohibited outside the EVE Marketplace and Alliance & Corporation Recruitment forum channels. Within the EVE Marketplace section of the forums, each forum category has its own rules regarding acceptable bumping for sales threads clearly listed in the stickies.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Navy Jackal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2015-05-26 21:13:00 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
For this sort of idea to work, mining barges need at least true cruiser level fittings, depending on if they are cruiser or bc sized vessels, so they can actually fit real fits rather than the current laughable fits. For regular forum posters I've posted enough on this topic, for less regular posters
TLDR
Only one type of barge, 14 slots, hard cap on strip miners, some turret/launcher options, some drones, cruiser level PG/CPU. Other current barges get re-purposed to true ore combat cruiser and true ore hauler, but both get ability to fit unbonused strip miner or 2 so as to not be totally useless when nothing is happening while escorting mining fleets.


I think we should keep this idea simple, or CCP never will start even concidering it.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#29 - 2015-05-27 07:51:43 UTC
Navy Jackal wrote:


I think we should keep this idea simple, or CCP never will start even concidering it.


Well, this "Strategic industrial" suggestion hints me, that there are more reasons to think about new mining ship.
Navy Jackal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2015-05-27 14:44:22 UTC
Deep Nine wrote:
it doesent mean a barge cannot be oriented towards speed although this is unlikely as they are usually considered too bulky to be agile.



We do not need barge, I think. Yes, barge offers better yield, but the whole idea seems to me to be aligned toward more effective mining, so even frigate would do, IMHO.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#31 - 2015-05-28 15:05:31 UTC
I think CCP will not have a problem with making new mining ship for rings. It will have a problem making ring themself. Hundrets of moving objects, each of different shape and properties. Interracting, colliding, making new objects etc... That will be the problem, not the new ship.
Deep Nine
Vigilante Carebears
#32 - 2015-05-30 09:24:56 UTC
erg cz wrote:
I think CCP will not have a problem with making new mining ship for rings. It will have a problem making ring themself. Hundrets of moving objects, each of different shape and properties. Interracting, colliding, making new objects etc... That will be the problem, not the new ship.


It would also create an entirely new industry and aspect to eve online, a very enticing one.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#33 - 2015-06-02 14:00:46 UTC
Deep Nine wrote:


It would also create an entirely new industry and aspect to eve online, a very enticing one.


This is good, isn't it? ;)
Navy Jackal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2015-06-03 15:23:38 UTC
Deep Nine wrote:
erg cz wrote:
I think CCP will not have a problem with making new mining ship for rings. It will have a problem making ring themself. Hundrets of moving objects, each of different shape and properties. Interracting, colliding, making new objects etc... That will be the problem, not the new ship.


It would also create an entirely new industry and aspect to eve online, a very enticing one.


So we should a kind of support this idea somehow !
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#35 - 2015-06-04 10:12:48 UTC
I think it is time to make one special thread about mining future. Make it sticky and put all interesting ideas in it. Like this one or comet mining. Ideas like "buff mining barge" or "give us another (better) ship for afk mining" are not interesting IMHO. New Mining Mechanics: Multi Ore, Multi Methods IS interesting.
Deep Nine
Vigilante Carebears
#36 - 2015-06-04 12:48:18 UTC
It really does need another look.
Navy Jackal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2015-06-04 15:52:27 UTC
erg cz wrote:
I think it is time to make one special thread about mining future. Make it sticky and put all interesting ideas in it. Like this one or comet mining. Ideas like "buff mining barge" or "give us another (better) ship for afk mining" are not interesting IMHO. New Mining Mechanics: Multi Ore, Multi Methods IS interesting.


Two of threads mentioned has over 10 000 views. I think we do not have enough sticky threads in this forum section, lets make sticky every thread, that has over 10 000 views.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#38 - 2015-06-09 08:50:52 UTC
Navy Jackal wrote:
I think we do not have enough sticky threads in this forum section, lets make sticky every thread, that has over 10 000 views.


Mad... or sarcastic? Lets stay on topic, should we?
Previous page12