These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Crucis Cassiopeiae
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1701 - 2011-12-26 11:21:31 UTC
CCP?
throw us a word here, please?

Vote Issler Dainze for CSM7! http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470 
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1702 - 2011-12-26 12:23:49 UTC
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:
CCP?
throw us a word here, please?


a bone, it's throw us a bone :P
This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.  Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1703 - 2011-12-26 14:46:25 UTC
J3ssica Alba wrote:
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:
CCP?
throw us a word here, please?


a bone, it's throw us a bone :P





throw us something

R.S.I2014
Taiwanistan
#1704 - 2011-12-26 14:52:30 UTC
all this unseemly begging,
it's like petitions, making a big deal on the forums will not help one bit

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Disdaine
#1705 - 2011-12-26 14:57:39 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
all this unseemly begging,
it's like petitions, making a big deal on the forums will not help one bit


CCP just likes to know we care.
Kuronaga
The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.
The Chicken Coop
#1706 - 2011-12-26 15:43:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Kuronaga
Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.

Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1707 - 2011-12-26 16:05:47 UTC
Kuronaga wrote:
Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.

Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.




ccp: they are freaking out lets abandon WIS and give them FIS we are already working 18 months on it ,but tell them 6 weeks
players : ???????
ccp: **** they still want WIS ,but we just sacked the team for it,and they don,t believe the 6 week fairytale?
players:????????
ccp:lets keep silent and hide

R.S.I2014
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#1708 - 2011-12-27 04:31:38 UTC
Kuronaga wrote:
Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.

Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.


Well stated
robbyx
#1709 - 2011-12-27 08:09:23 UTC  |  Edited by: robbyx
They have already given you the only answer you're going to get..." on the back burner and maybe re-visited some time in the future "......deal with it.


Kuronaga wrote:
Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.

Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.



CCP understand perfectly well....that the majority of players want FiS over WiS.......they now understand that neglecting FiS can seriously hurt the game....whereas WiS seems to be nothing more than a few drama queens who are not willing to do anything more than have a little cry on the forums.

Ive said before, if you feel so strongly, quit and tell CCP why you are quitting...or organise a protest to show your displeasure....but my guess is that you wont do jack sh*t.
Disdaine
#1710 - 2011-12-27 08:33:30 UTC
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.
robbyx
#1711 - 2011-12-27 08:38:53 UTC
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.
Disdaine
#1712 - 2011-12-27 08:43:04 UTC
robbyx wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.


Maybe we can unsub and come slinkin back later after CCP has laid off some more people then let the CSM take all the credit for effecting change.

That seems like the mature thing to do, rather than make a few complaints in a single forum thread which WiS haters still can't stay away from.
Lexmana
#1713 - 2011-12-27 08:56:27 UTC
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.


Maybe we can unsub and come slinkin back later after CCP has laid off some more people then let the CSM take all the credit for effecting change.

That seems like the mature thing to do, rather than make a few complaints in a single forum thread which WiS haters still can't stay away from.


You know, focusing on FiS never made players to unsub and CCP never had to lay off people because of FiS. It was focusing on WiS that did that.
robbyx
#1714 - 2011-12-27 08:56:52 UTC  |  Edited by: robbyx
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.


Maybe we can unsub and come slinkin back later after CCP has laid off some more people then let the CSM take all the credit for effecting change.

That seems like the mature thing to do, rather than make a few complaints in a single forum thread which WiS haters still can't stay away from.



Anyone with even half a brain knows it was the unsubbing players who effected the most change.....and we didnt come slinkin back, we came back proudly victorious...im actually pretty proud of myself that i denied myself the game and was prepared to quit permanently to stop, at least in this game, the ridiculous notion MMO producers seem to have gotten into their heads that what players want doesnt matter.

As for this thread...truth be told i cant stay away...its like American idol auditions...you know they are gonna fail, you know they arent going anywhere, but its damn hilarious watching them try.
Taiwanistan
#1715 - 2011-12-27 11:12:40 UTC
Kuronaga wrote:
Unfortunately as much as this means to some of us, I believe the job description of an eve community manager is to "pass along relevant information", not to necessarily care.

Besides that, it is clear they are set in their current direction. They are likely prohibited from saying ANYTHING validating possible work on WIS in this thread, because the higher ups are scared to death it might cause dissent. This is the kind of irrational fear you get from management not properly understanding a situation.

oh do tell more

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Hikaru Kuroda
Extheria
#1716 - 2011-12-27 11:49:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Hikaru Kuroda
Lexmana wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.


Maybe we can unsub and come slinkin back later after CCP has laid off some more people then let the CSM take all the credit for effecting change.

That seems like the mature thing to do, rather than make a few complaints in a single forum thread which WiS haters still can't stay away from.


You know, focusing on FiS never made players to unsub and CCP never had to lay off people because of FiS. It was focusing on WiS that did that.


If you say that, then you don't know what really happened this summer.

A hint: it wasn't the focusing on WiS.
TheBig Bukowsky
High Safety
#1717 - 2011-12-27 12:01:48 UTC
robbyx wrote:
Disdaine wrote:
robbyx wrote:
drama queens.....cry....protest


Lets go shoot a statue, spam CCP investors email, get banned raging at GM's, make spergy blog posts...

That'll show em who the drama queens are.



Thats called protest, taking a stand for something you believe in strongly enough.....seriously, you guys just come across as whiny little 12 year old girls having a little foot stomping tantrum.


The difference between Crying and Protest is clearly robbyx's beliefs.
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1718 - 2011-12-27 12:04:05 UTC
guess what their focus is now FIS ? no WIS? no Consolecrap? yes

R.S.I2014
Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1719 - 2011-12-27 12:46:50 UTC
To all anti WiS ppl:

When you organize protests and ppl un-sub because WiS then you can say that ppl don't want WiS.

Now you only look stupid and only show that you dont understand what happened this summer.

HINT: protests and un-subbing was because of "golden ammo leak".
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1720 - 2011-12-27 14:00:56 UTC
It's amazing to me how completely greedy the FiS crowd is. Seems to me the WiS crowd wants to see work done on both FiS and WiS while the FiS crowd wants nothing but FiS to be worked on...

My vote has always been to let CCP do what they want and make the game they want to make. I say we shut the whiny little fucks up who *****, protest and shoot at statues.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821