These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Ship Skins, My thoughts.

Author
Optical Illusion
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#1 - 2015-04-30 06:33:41 UTC
Am not here to rant. My affiliation in game has no relevance, and i full expect trolls and negativity.

This is me, my opinion and my thoughts.

There seems to be massive hype for the newly introduced ship skins. I just don't get it.

Let me explain why I, personally, don't get it.

I am fully aware of the current climate in online gaming. Micro transactions are king, and company's in the gaming industry stand to make great money through this concept. In eve online it started with the implementation of clothing etc for our characters which we hardly ever see (thankfully, because walking in stations is really not something I feel the community is that interested in).

Ship skins in my opinion are a pointless. Why? Well personally if I am playing the game, in space, i.e. undocked, I am at least 50% zoomed out, therefore the color scheme of my ship is irrelevant. Further more, one 'skin' is always going to be favored over the rest for a particular ship due to popularity and thus takes away any real sort of customization.

But I guess what I really don't get is why anyone would spend RL money on this type of customization. Paying for a color scheme for your ship?? Just doesn't seem worthwhile to me.

I DO NOT agree with pay to win. And thus this next statement is mute.

Surely the only time you would pay for an 'enhancement' would be when it benefits the game? When it has a profound effect on the ability or performance of the ship? Other than that, why??

Just to reiterate...

I am not suggesting skins should have additional bonuses to the ships they are for.. I am merely saying that other than getting enhanced performance why would you waste money on a completely aesthetic option? An option which doesn't even have the luxury of being 'unique'.

Comments and thoughts welcome, Trolls.. you can comment too.

I need a laugh.
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#2 - 2015-04-30 06:43:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarod Garamonde
Optical Illusion wrote:

I am merely saying that other than getting enhanced performance why would you waste money on a completely aesthetic option? An option which doesn't even have the luxury of being 'unique'.



In 1988, Mazda and Nissan offered monochromatic "special editions" of their flagship USDM sports cars; the RX-7 10th Anniversary Edition, and the 300ZX Shiro, respectively. Only 1500 of each were made.
Both were turbo versions. Both were offered only in manual (thank the gods), and both only came in one color. No sunroof. No options. No upgrades. Just paint and badges and embroidered seats and a special key that neither manufacturer will even offer replacements for.
No performance edge over the common model. Nothing.

Why would I pay over 9000 (couldn't resist) quid for one, when I could have had a regular turbo version for half that price, or less, and just painted it white? Because it's cool. Or at least I think so. And I'm not the only one.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2015-04-30 06:49:17 UTC
Strange thing to ask. It's almost akin to asking why pay for an online game IRL as it serves no tangible function in the real world for the most part. So I guess the strange part to me is that anyone could ask what you are asking while being subbed to this game yet seemingly understanding of expenditure for personal satisfaction.

I can totally get feeling they are meaningless personally, but asking others to explain something you yourself experience for every non-necessity you indulge in seems strange.
McChicken Combo HalfMayo
The Happy Meal
#4 - 2015-04-30 06:57:09 UTC  |  Edited by: McChicken Combo HalfMayo
Optical Illusion wrote:
Well personally if I am playing the game, in space, i.e. undocked, I am at least 50% zoomed out, therefore the color scheme of my ship is irrelevant.

Clearly you are not an experienced gate-to-gate ship spinner. Always spin when warping gate-to-gate.

There are all our dominion

Gate camps: "Its like the lowsec watercooler, just with explosions and boose" - Ralph King-Griffin

Optical Illusion
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#5 - 2015-04-30 07:03:17 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Optical Illusion wrote:

I am merely saying that other than getting enhanced performance why would you waste money on a completely aesthetic option? An option which doesn't even have the luxury of being 'unique'.



In 1988, Mazda and Nissan offered monochromatic "special editions" of their flagship USDM sports cars; the RX-7 10th Anniversary Edition, and the 300ZX Shiro, respectively. Only 1500 of each were made.
Both were turbo versions. Both were offered only in manual (thank the gods), and both only came in one color. No sunroof. No options. No upgrades. Just paint and badges and embroidered seats and a special key that neither manufacturer will even offer replacements for.
No performance edge over the common model. Nothing.

Why would I pay over 9000 (couldn't resist) quid for one, when I could have had a regular turbo version for half that price, or less, and just painted it white? Because it's cool. Or at least I think so. And I'm not the only one.



Thank you for your reply. I take some understanding from it, however I have some issue..

I have some experience in the 'special edition' vehicle area. I was the proud owner of a Series 1 Peugeot 106 rallye edition. One of only 1000 imported to the UK in order for Peugeot to enter the vehicle into the 1994 world rally championships, and, although it had a performance upgrade over the standard 1.2 or 1.4 engine types, it was also unique in its aprearence and options.

However..

-There where only 1000 imported to the UK, and from my understanding 2500 built. Making it somewhat unique.
-If it was destroyed, my next 106 wouldn't be 'upgraded' to the same standard, unless I repurchased another of the 1000 imports.

So, Although i can see some relevance in your comparison, my initial thoughts still stand. Why? You are not purchasing something unique. Not purchasing something upgraded. It just seems to me, a waste of money.
Optical Illusion
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#6 - 2015-04-30 07:08:06 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Strange thing to ask. It's almost akin to asking why pay for an online game IRL as it serves no tangible function in the real world for the most part. So I guess the strange part to me is that anyone could ask what you are asking while being subbed to this game yet seemingly understanding of expenditure for personal satisfaction.

I can totally get feeling they are meaningless personally, but asking others to explain something you yourself experience for every non-necessity you indulge in seems strange.



Thank you for your comment.

I will merely state that I purchase a subscription for this game, in RL, as a means to spend some of my spare time. It has no function or enhancement on my RL status, however I really don't see how you can compare me making a subscription to something i enjoy to spend some of my spare time on, to the purchase of ship skins in a game which i am already subscribing to.

It would seem you have taken my OP out of context, and decided to reply in a fashion which has no relevance or benefit. However I thank you for taking the 15 seconds out of your life to type up your reply.

Kind regards.
ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2015-04-30 07:15:56 UTC
... Not everyone plays little dots in space... waiting in fleet, holding on a gate, ganks, mission running, incursions, exploration... to name but a few, all dont require you to be a 10000m from your ship.

It takes about 2seconds to zoom out if needed, so why not appreciate the art of your ships?

No Worries

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#8 - 2015-04-30 07:15:57 UTC
Optical Illusion wrote:
I will merely state that I purchase a subscription for this game, in RL, as a means to spend some of my spare time. It has no function or enhancement on my RL status, however I really don't see how you can compare me making a subscription to something i enjoy to spend some of my spare time on, to the purchase of ship skins in a game which i am already subscribing to.

It's the same thing, just in a different context.

You pay RL money to subscribe to a game for your enjoyment.

Other people, spend RL money in the same game for their own enjoyment. That they might choose to spend more than you, because they spend money on other elements of the game (anything in the NES) doesn't make it a different underlying reason. It's the same reason.

It's simply a vanity item that serves the purpose of helping people enjoy something more.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2015-04-30 07:16:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Optical Illusion wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Strange thing to ask. It's almost akin to asking why pay for an online game IRL as it serves no tangible function in the real world for the most part. So I guess the strange part to me is that anyone could ask what you are asking while being subbed to this game yet seemingly understanding of expenditure for personal satisfaction.

I can totally get feeling they are meaningless personally, but asking others to explain something you yourself experience for every non-necessity you indulge in seems strange.



Thank you for your comment.

I will merely state that I purchase a subscription for this game, in RL, as a means to spend some of my spare time. It has no function or enhancement on my RL status, however I really don't see how you can compare me making a subscription to something i enjoy to spend some of my spare time on, to the purchase of ship skins in a game which i am already subscribing to.

It would seem you have taken my OP out of context, and decided to reply in a fashion which has no relevance or benefit. However I thank you for taking the 15 seconds out of your life to type up your reply.

Kind regards.

Seems entirely relevant as in both cases we're talking about indulging in non-necessities with real world expenses for personal satisfaction of one form or another. I don't see how it becomes less relevant because the money is in addition to the sub. Could you please elaborate?

Also where was the context failure? You stated you didn't see the connection but it was explained, where if anything your division seems a semantic one at best (Comes across as, "if it's not what I would spend money for it can't hold the value of things I would pay money for to someone else." If that's wrong please elaborate).
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2015-04-30 07:22:05 UTC
Oh my, it's almost as if people want to do things for their own reasons instead of conforming to the OP's expectations of what they should do! WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Solecist Project
#11 - 2015-04-30 07:52:43 UTC
Clothes are utilised by those who like to show off ...
... mostly as roleplayers. They absolutely have a point ...
... but I will spare you the intimite details. *snickers xD*

And it's all about identification and immersion.
Besides simply offering diversity.

I too play zoomed out ...
... but during travel it's fine to zoom in or look around!

And many people actually do play zoomed in ...
... and if that's a downside for them matters not. :)

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Laken Starr
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2015-04-30 07:53:07 UTC
PLEX are far more P2W than these will ever be.
Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#13 - 2015-04-30 07:57:24 UTC
Optical Illusion wrote:

But I guess what I really don't get is why anyone would spend RL money on this type of customization. Paying for a color scheme for your ship?? Just doesn't seem worthwhile to me.

Also, worth pointing out that some (I wont bother taking a clueless guess what percentage) wont pay real money for these - I for one will buy any I want off the market like any other ship mod. Granted, they will only appear if players buy them with real money and put them on the market, but from their point of view, thats no different than if they were doing the same with PLEX (buying an in-game item with real money and trading it for isk).

Granted, I'm only likely to bother skinning my capital ships so maybe my perception of the isk cost/value is coloured by that perspective (dropping 1-2bil is an acceptable cost when skinning my Aeon than if I was my Rifter).
Kailen Thorn
I.N.V.A.S.I.O.N.
Apocalypse Now.
#14 - 2015-04-30 08:45:32 UTC
Optical Illusion wrote:


Surely the only time you would pay for an 'enhancement' would be when it benefits the game? When it has a profound effect on the ability or performance of the ship? Other than that, why??




In Games Design Theory, there are different groups of people with different mentalities when it comes to playing games; social being a quite obvisous one, amoing others. These are not hard fixed groups and people wax and wane between each and share qualities that fit into each group.

SKINS are geared towards the collector type, those who preform the actions required in order to have something. Why? Because they have it and you dont. That mentality makes the game fun for them, the privilege of owning something others do not.

An example i was taught from another game: There was a rare nut that fell from a tree, but in order to get it a player had to stand under the tree for a few hours. After said hours, a nut would fall and the player would gain this nut. The nut was useless and so why would anyone was such time preforming this redundant action?

Because they would be one of the few with the nut, with its rare status, while a lot of other people would not have it.
Wendrika Hydreiga
#15 - 2015-04-30 08:49:19 UTC
It's like you guys are deliberately ignoring the fact that the SKIN system was a compromise for better server and database performance since it was getting to a point that each individual ship variation needed it's own item ID and was making adding new ship cosmetic variations harder and harder.

Now thanks to SKINs the way a ship looks is just an attribute in the ship's stats, and the way it looks is now client side as opposed to forcing the server to keep track of those shennenigans.

As for the NES Store? Well, in a couple of months every SKIN will probably get a -60% price cut, so I wouldn't be that bothered. And even if you ignore the "cash store money grab", which you are free to do so, the SKINs system will make possible for skins like the Quafe Tristan to be gifted and more often distributed in special events like Fanfest, but not at the expense of server stability.

So yeah, saying the SKIN system is pointless is a silly and uninformed opinnion. Just saying!

Falken Falcon
#16 - 2015-04-30 08:53:23 UTC
ChromeStriker wrote:
... Not everyone plays little dots in space... waiting in fleet, holding on a gate, ganks, mission running, incursions, exploration... to name but a few, all dont require you to be a 10000m from your ship.

It takes about 2seconds to zoom out if needed, so why not appreciate the art of your ships?
This so much!
You don't have to spend any RL isk for the skins or even subs.

Aye, Sea Turtles

Otso Bakarti
Doomheim
#17 - 2015-04-30 09:15:10 UTC
Statistical knowledge of promotional programs hardly counts for experience, neither does buying one of the promotional items, regardless of how much you spent, and how much the other one was. It is experience, however, in psychologically accommodating yourself to being ripped off. Being robbed with a smile must be some sort of spectacular advance in mental harmony whilst living in the midst of capitalism. As capitalism is the only acceptable motivation for any effort or innovation, naturally saying one can make money from it has to justify it. Woo hoo. Welcome to the land of the heavily indoctrinated.

My view? I'll sell you my view. Just mail me 10,000,000 ISK and I'll send you a note telling you what I think of ship skins.

There just isn't anything that can be said!

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#18 - 2015-04-30 10:03:47 UTC
OP made me feel very good about knowing how to think and write. Thank you.
Optical Illusion
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#19 - 2015-04-30 12:54:14 UTC
I just want to reiterate that I am not saying you are wrong for liking ship skins, each to there own. I am just trying to understand the reasoning behind spending RL monies on something purely aesthetic. Something which I don't believe has worth.

I was looking to be informed and educated at other peoples opinions on this topic, but it seems I mostly riled people up.

And before you come back with 'I buy mine with isk so not spending RL money'... someone spent money on that plex.
Trajan Unknown
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2015-04-30 13:12:51 UTC
Optical Illusion wrote:
Am not here to rant. My affiliation in game has no relevance, and i full expect trolls and negativity.

This is me, my opinion and my thoughts.

There seems to be massive hype for the newly introduced ship skins. I just don't get it.

Let me explain why I, personally, don't get it.

I am fully aware of the current climate in online gaming. Micro transactions are king, and company's in the gaming industry stand to make great money through this concept. In eve online it started with the implementation of clothing etc for our characters which we hardly ever see (thankfully, because walking in stations is really not something I feel the community is that interested in).

Ship skins in my opinion are a pointless. Why? Well personally if I am playing the game, in space, i.e. undocked, I am at least 50% zoomed out, therefore the color scheme of my ship is irrelevant. Further more, one 'skin' is always going to be favored over the rest for a particular ship due to popularity and thus takes away any real sort of customization.

But I guess what I really don't get is why anyone would spend RL money on this type of customization. Paying for a color scheme for your ship?? Just doesn't seem worthwhile to me.

I DO NOT agree with pay to win. And thus this next statement is mute.

Surely the only time you would pay for an 'enhancement' would be when it benefits the game? When it has a profound effect on the ability or performance of the ship? Other than that, why??

Just to reiterate...

I am not suggesting skins should have additional bonuses to the ships they are for.. I am merely saying that other than getting enhanced performance why would you waste money on a completely aesthetic option? An option which doesn't even have the luxury of being 'unique'.

Comments and thoughts welcome, Trolls.. you can comment too.

I need a laugh.



See, there comes personal opinion into place - once more. For you it´s a waste of money for me it is a nice way to support one of my favourite game developers and getting something in return. I can´t donate money to CCP or sth like that but I can buy skins, plex, collectors editions and whatnot to "donate" money towards them. In my personal opinion it is not a waste to spend money on something you like, enjoy and want to support. You on the other might think paying your subscription - if you do - is enough money to pay and that´s perfectly fine.
12Next page