These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

[Incursions] HS and LS Specific

Author
Alice Doombringer
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2015-04-30 07:08:22 UTC
nice try to dismiss all points. but answer to this: how many people do lowsec incursions?
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#22 - 2015-04-30 07:13:49 UTC
Alice Doombringer wrote:
nice try to dismiss all points. but answer to this: how many people do lowsec incursions?

Not many, but turning highsec into lowsec is not going to solve that anyway. It's just an attempt to kill incursions and get some kills because people don't know it's an incursion today on the other side of the gate.

Lowsec/Nullsec incursions need other solutions, like oh, larger fleet size.
Though it doesn't solve the issue that you still know exactly how large an incursion fleet is so can always outblob them, since you don't care about payout and they do.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2015-04-30 07:19:19 UTC
Unless you're told BEFORE you leap a system that there is an incursion....no. Because highsec blap gate camps would be a thing.
Alice Doombringer
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2015-04-30 07:21:19 UTC
exactly.. we don't need another lowsec incursion.
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#25 - 2015-04-30 07:59:18 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
As far as I know, people run Vanguard sites with 10 people max., 7-8 DPS and 2-3 logi. vOv

Or, you know, 12 DPS and 1 logi being kept up by drones, for the ballsy.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Neutral Haulermeister
The Corporate Raiders
#26 - 2015-04-30 08:42:16 UTC
As much as I do want plex prices to fall... you never read the thing that it says when going into an incursion zone did you?
concord is holding the line per se, the capsuleers are supposed to roll sanshas back

Accepts your stuff if you're quitting EVE, Please mail and contract me your stuff.

FireFrenzy
Cynosural Samurai
#27 - 2015-04-30 08:50:32 UTC
Also then there is the whole fact that without the incursioners grinding out bucketloads of LP the fancy damage mods, tackling gear and all those other sweet sweet LP items would price spike like a boss...

I mean if i am not selling LP by the million and my collegues with me *brofists baboli* i suspect those cool Fed Nav mag field stabs all your morosses love so much and the Cald Nav BCUs for all those leviathans out there would be hella more expensive;)
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#28 - 2015-04-30 09:22:48 UTC
FireFrenzy wrote:
Also then there is the whole fact that without the incursioners grinding out bucketloads of LP the fancy damage mods, tackling gear and all those other sweet sweet LP items would price spike like a boss...

I mean if i am not selling LP by the million and my collegues with me *brofists baboli* i suspect those cool Fed Nav mag field stabs all your morosses love so much and the Cald Nav BCUs for all those leviathans out there would be hella more expensive;)

-dunks the LP ball-
Still working on selling the last 100m LP from when I could box like a bandit.
Which definitely is enough to manipulate the markets.
Lower LP costs are good IMO, because then more people can afford the fun blingy bits.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

bonkerss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2015-04-30 11:03:20 UTC
very good idea!
Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
#30 - 2015-04-30 12:40:31 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
I fail to see what the issue here is. Why should HS and LS system defenses persist through a Sansha attack? Sanshas are Pirates and they take 100% control of a system, if they control it then shouldn't they write the rules?

CONCORD (DED) (and by extension the Empires) pay Capsuleers to then drive Sanshas out so they can regain control of the system. Am I missing something here?

The Sansha control of the system is not direct military control - the reason Sansha Kuvakei lagged the heck out of Yulai before heading out to... (I should be able to remember the system name; but I can't Sad ) was to hack the heck out of CONCORD, he doesn't jump in a mothership because he has effective military control, he jumps it in because he can bypass the CONCORD cyno-jammers and so forth.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#31 - 2015-04-30 12:59:50 UTC
supported, also an idea that high standings to sansha would also be able to assist sansha forces within incursion areas

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#32 - 2015-04-30 13:29:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Donnachadh
Mario Putzo wrote:
Im not sure if you have ever actually tried to kill a faction fit battleship with 8-10 T2 Logi repping it. To claim these are "easy kills" is very naive. Not only do they have sizeable buffer and resist, they are also being fed 36-40 Remote Reps, that is quite a lot of EHP to go through.

I understand the worry, but you folks seem to think having 30 BS and 10Logi is somehow easy pickings, and that is just one fleet of Incursion runners, not including the sizeable community capable of working together to ensure they can all run in peace and quiet. You are grossly misrepresenting mechanics of the game.


I find this very interesting. Both sides of this debate are focusing on the ganking affect this "might" have on incursion runners and totally ignoring the simple fact that this idea would leave all non-incursion pillots at greater risk of being ganked by orders of magnitude. So while I agree that this could be viewed as a possible buff to ganking it is not the incursion runners that would face the majority of that increased risk.

-1 to a lousy idea.
Just like the calls to return to the rat AI of old this is a request to remove some of the restrictions CCP has seen fit to place on ganking, and like that return to the rat AI of old they try to hide it in some crazy scheme of how it fits with some lore or even worse they try to justify it based on how things would happen in real life.

Suggest going back and reading the incursion info more carefully, as noted earlier the Concord have the Sanaha's forces at a stalemate, neither side has the military power to overtake the other. In an effort to retake TOTAL control of the affected area Concord calls capsuleers to the front lines to break that stalemate.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#33 - 2015-04-30 13:41:24 UTC
@Donnachadh

I didn't deem it necessary to state the most obvious effects of this. Mining won't be affect much by that as you cannot mine in an incursion anyways. Mission running is impossible as well because all NPC are now Sansha NPCs. Hauling, on the other hand, especially in freighters will be madness.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Mario Putzo
#34 - 2015-04-30 14:33:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
Neutral Haulermeister wrote:
As much as I do want plex prices to fall... you never read the thing that it says when going into an incursion zone did you?
concord is holding the line per se, the capsuleers are supposed to roll sanshas back



I don't think hold the line means what you think it does.

Holding the line means CONCORD (and Empires by association) have given up control of a particular area and have relocated their forces to containing it. Capsuleers are boots on the ground, CONCORD is "running gate camps" on access systems outside the zone of conflict to ensure Sansha can not encroach any further into HS.
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#35 - 2015-04-30 22:38:06 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
Neutral Haulermeister wrote:
As much as I do want plex prices to fall... you never read the thing that it says when going into an incursion zone did you?
concord is holding the line per se, the capsuleers are supposed to roll sanshas back



I don't think hold the line means what you think it does.

Holding the line means CONCORD (and Empires by association) have given up control of a particular area and have relocated their forces to containing it. Capsuleers are boots on the ground, CONCORD is "running gate camps" on access systems outside the zone of conflict to ensure Sansha can not encroach any further into HS.


Or they are fighting off the general mass of ships, allowing capsuleers to strike at the more vulnerable spots, and maintaining as much order as possible.

But on a more serious note, like all idea involving variable sec status, it needs to be a hell of a lot more convincing of an argument.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#36 - 2015-04-30 22:55:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Mario Putzo wrote:
Incursions should disrupt security features within the areas they have control.
CONCORD

I wasn't clear on how your proposal would affect CONCORD. Is CONCORD effectively disabled during incursions, or does CONCORD's response time vary depending on Sansha control? ie: 100% control = no CONCORD, 50% control = 50% increased CONCORD response time. Thanks.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#37 - 2015-04-30 23:18:48 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
Incursions should disrupt security features within the areas they have control.
CONCORD

I wasn't clear on how your proposal would affect CONCORD. Is CONCORD effectively disabled during incursions, or does CONCORD's response time vary depending on Sansha control? ie: 100% control = no CONCORD, 50% control = 50% increased CONCORD response time. Thanks.

Flat -0.2 to sec status, making it slower concord and some systems into low or null sec from high or lowsec.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Eldwinn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#38 - 2015-04-30 23:19:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Eldwinn
There was a couple mentions I saw in this thread about how low security incursion groups are not willing to "risk" billions of isk. I can say now, how horribly wrong you are. Shadow Cartel runs incursions all the time in rattlesnakes and nightmares. We also understand there is a potential for us to encounter PVP while doing the incursion at the same. In fact this happens all the time. We properly plan and prepare for this.

As for the high security incursion groups, the risk associated to running these incursions is nearly zero. Which is easily reflected by your bling fits and carelessness when you guys FC. You have become over saturated from your easy isk making sources and fear losing it. If you are going to trash a thread at least be constructive while doing it.

I support this idea. I also have read through a lot of the people's complaints about how this would effect the market and how current high security incursions are ran. Of course the markets will be effected. You will find prices will drop and increase in other areas, which is completely normal. The other complaint I saw throughout the thread was how high security incursion groups will have to adapt and change their tactics on how to run the incursion (assuming the changes go though). Alternatively completely stop running incursion. I for one do not see the problem with this at all. Welcome to eve my good friend, adapt or get out. I will however note on OP's thread some of the suggestions possibly need to be tweaked and worked on. Just to to adhere to all groups involved.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#39 - 2015-04-30 23:38:05 UTC
Have Sansha control a increase concord response times.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#40 - 2015-04-30 23:49:06 UTC
Not having a dog in this fight, it seems like a reasonable proposal (especially if wrestling control from Sansha gradually returns the system to 0.5 or higher).

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Previous page123Next page