These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

How come CCP hasn't simply isolated minerals?

Author
Herateis
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#1 - 2015-04-14 14:19:59 UTC
How come its relatively easy to come up with equal or better sources of minerals for lowsec ores instead of having a progression that only lowsec ores contain certain types of minerals, and nullsec, etc? Wouldn't that encourage more people to mine in low?
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2015-04-14 14:52:56 UTC
Herateis wrote:
How come its relatively easy to come up with equal or better sources of minerals for lowsec ores instead of having a progression that only lowsec ores contain certain types of minerals, and nullsec, etc? Wouldn't that encourage more people to mine in low?


Why must people mine in low?

Barring making certain minerals occur only in lowsec, there's very little that can be done to force people to mine in the wasteland that is lowsec.

And that would be a really messy job, forcing extremely artificial constraints on the system.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#3 - 2015-04-14 14:55:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Good point, Mr. Herateis.

I propose to make Nocxium, and possibly Isogen, exclusive to Lowsecks ores only.

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Ore_values?_ga=1.255394952.1883539901.1421897621

People used to actually mine there before FW took place. There are still non-FW regions out there - Aridia, Derelik, Devoi, Khanid, Genesis and others that are "undeveloped" due to abysmal profitability/risk, and the fact that these two Mid-end minerals can be sourced elsewhere. Smile

Information contained therein this post has been obtained from my personal banker, industrialist, friend.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2015-04-14 15:03:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Good point.

I propose to make Isogen & Nocxium only to be contained in Lowsecks ores.

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Ore_values?_ga=1.255394952.1883539901.1421897621

People used to acutally mine there before FW took place. There are still non-FW regions out there - Aridia, Derelik, Devoi, Khanid, Genesis and others that are "undeveloped" due to abysmal profitability/risk, and the fact that these two Mid-end minerals can be sourced elsewhere. Smile


CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.

This is part of a long term plan to enable self sufficiency in nullsec, to allow for nerfing of JF's and moving the game away from the current situation where it is far easier to import ships and modules from highsec than it is to locally manufacture them. A large portion of t1 and basically all of t2 production consumed in nullsec comes from highsec originally.

To put it bluntly, since the goal is enabling eventual self sufficiency, creating a situation where people are forced to import massive quantities of Isogen from lowsec is not going to happen.
Edwin McAlister
Empire Hooligans
#5 - 2015-04-14 15:04:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Edwin McAlister
i strictly mine in high sec, i do not feel like dealing with the politics and bull **** that happens in low/null sec

as for what you suggest, low sec ore does spawn in high sec space, ive had zero issues acquireing low sec minerals or even null sec minerals. I can run a few missions and then reprocess the junk loot and have more then enough of those rare minerals. to force people to mine in low/null you would need to totally 100% remove those rare ores from being able to be acquired in high sec... no more low sec ore spawns, when reprocessing salvage will only get the common minerals.

then what would happen is folks would just import the rare stuff from low/null sec, you have not changed anything

for my manufactureing purposes, low/null sec minerals are nothing.. my bottleneck is pyrite.. i some times have to spend hours focus'd totaly on mineing scordite in high sec

the proposed changes discussed on the o7 show about null sec ores getting adjusted and doubleing the amount of megacyte and zydrine on all current blueprints will have zero effect on my mass production of stuff. I will always be forced to strip mine scordite.

just some ramblings from a player high on percocet from elbow surgery here
Herateis
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#6 - 2015-04-14 15:09:06 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Herateis wrote:
How come its relatively easy to come up with equal or better sources of minerals for lowsec ores instead of having a progression that only lowsec ores contain certain types of minerals, and nullsec, etc? Wouldn't that encourage more people to mine in low?


Why must people mine in low?

Barring making certain minerals occur only in lowsec, there's very little that can be done to force people to mine in the wasteland that is lowsec.

And that would be a really messy job, forcing extremely artificial constraints on the system.


The idea of having an isk reward progression. More danger and more reward, more activity.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#7 - 2015-04-14 15:10:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Anhenka wrote:
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Good point.

I propose to make Isogen & Nocxium only to be contained in Lowsecks ores.

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Ore_values?_ga=1.255394952.1883539901.1421897621

People used to acutally mine there before FW took place. There are still non-FW regions out there - Aridia, Derelik, Devoi, Khanid, Genesis and others that are "undeveloped" due to abysmal profitability/risk, and the fact that these two Mid-end minerals can be sourced elsewhere. Smile


CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.


Yes, indeed.

Quote:
To put it bluntly, since the goal is enabling eventual self sufficiency, creating a situation where people are forced to import massive quantities of Isogen from lowsec is not going to happen.


Yes, on second thought, limiting Nocx and/or Isogen to Lowsecks exclusively with the number of LS systems that we have would lead to a broken economy with an unsurmountable bottleneck - http://www.eveonline.com/ccp/img/misc/starmap_worldofeve.jpg

Still, I think rebalancing Lowsecks ores in favour of more Nocx/Isogen is warranted.

The new Null ore changes don't have to be balanced in such a way as to satisfy 101% of total Nocx demand.

A ten percent export from Lowsecks of the total universal Nocx supply, to both Null & Empire, would lead to a good synergy and revitalise LS mining. Smile
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#8 - 2015-04-14 15:13:28 UTC
-1.

Low sec is where you lose ISK, not produce it. Game is made like this. By both CCP and so-called pirates. I count Zydrine containing OREs as true low sec ores. And it is not that easy to get them in high sec. Anomalies are often chery picked very quick.
Edwin McAlister
Empire Hooligans
#9 - 2015-04-14 15:13:35 UTC
Anhenka wrote:


CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.

This is part of a long term plan to enable self sufficiency in nullsec, to allow for nerfing of JF's and moving the game away from the current situation where it is far easier to import ships and modules from highsec than it is to locally manufacture them. A large portion of t1 and basically all of t2 production consumed in nullsec comes from highsec originally.

.[/b]



its safer to just build in high sec and export then it is to build in null sec according to quite a few friends o mine that live play fight in null

remove the safe factor from high sec might cause more production to be done in null sec, but we will never see high sec loose the safe factor that it provides
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2015-04-14 15:29:23 UTC
Edwin McAlister wrote:
Anhenka wrote:


CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.

This is part of a long term plan to enable self sufficiency in nullsec, to allow for nerfing of JF's and moving the game away from the current situation where it is far easier to import ships and modules from highsec than it is to locally manufacture them. A large portion of t1 and basically all of t2 production consumed in nullsec comes from highsec originally.



its safer to just build in high sec and export then it is to build in null sec according to quite a few friends o mine that live play fight in null

remove the safe factor from high sec might cause more production to be done in null sec, but we will never see high sec loose the safe factor that it provides

Currently, People mine highends in nullsec and import lowends from highsec, because it takes only a short while to mine enough highends to build basically anything.

This dynamic keeps the prices of highec ores (primarily Trit, Pyerite, and Megacyte) artificially high.

By rebalancing the mineral compositions of nullsec anomalies to roughly equate to the composition required for production, you remove nullsecs reliance on highsec lowends, remove the massive surplus of highends. and solve issues with large scale nullsec mining needing to export your highends back to highsec before realizing a profit.

As a result, in highsec the value of lowends falls like a rock, the value of highends spike since there is not much excess nullsec highends being exported anymore, and mining income in highsec drops rapidly, while the value of nullsec miners goes up since they can now easily build ships in bulk without importing trit.

And then there's the massive reduction in base trit demand due to the lesser importance of capitals and supercapitals in fozziesov warfare.

TLDR: It will still be safer to mine in highsec, but the demand for ore in highsec will be low enough that there will be far far more incentive to have miners move to nullsec than there currently is. And when CCP inevitably nerfs the JF range down to 5LY, it will basically hammer the nail in the coffin of highsec exporters.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#11 - 2015-04-14 15:35:19 UTC
Anhenka wrote:

And then there's the massive reduction in base trit demand due to the lesser importance of capitals and supercapitals in fozziesov warfare.


Still in the works. They've promised something awesome™ on capitals this Summer. Blink
Herateis
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#12 - 2015-04-14 16:10:35 UTC
Wouldnt reducing jumps to 5LY simply make a supply chain out of jump freighters instead of a single one for a trip? So Jump distance is reduced, hand off cargo to another to keep going with it.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2015-04-14 16:18:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Herateis wrote:
Wouldnt reducing jumps to 5LY simply make a supply chain out of jump freighters instead of a single one for a trip? So Jump distance is reduced, hand off cargo to another to keep going with it.


If we pretend that JF's have a 5LY range, then where I live to a lowsec system adjoining high is a mere 9 cynos.

Oh wait, that's 9 cynos if I'm willing to cyno into system without stations in my 7 bil isk JF with probably 10 billion in the cargo.

Let's swap that to stations only why don't we and see how it looks.

14 Cyno midpoints! Yay!

Oh but wait! My coalition only controls most of them! 5 cyno midpoints out of the 14 land me in non-allied territories.

It's a good thing my alliance members are willing to pay 500% markups on everything to compensate for the insane risk that accompanies this trip and the use of 5 accounts worth of characters purely comprised of cyno alts and JF alts.

JK. Feythbolis is totally ******.

So is Period Basis, Paragon Soul, Esoteria, Impass, Omnist, Tenerferis, Wicked Creek, Detorid, Insmother, The Spire, Outer Passage, Malpais, Perrigen Falls, Oasa, and the Cobalt Edge.

CCP Greyscale wrote:
No part of EVE is sufficiently self-sufficient to justify nerfing JFs yet. That's a thing we'd have to change before any further JF adjustments.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#14 - 2015-04-14 17:55:44 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
...JK. Feythbolis is totally ******.

So is Period Basis, Paragon Soul, Esoteria, Impass, Omnist, Tenerferis, Wicked Creek, Detorid, Insmother, The Spire, Outer Passage, Malpais, Perrigen Falls, Oasa, and the Cobalt Edge.

CCP Greyscale wrote:
No part of EVE is sufficiently self-sufficient to justify nerfing JFs yet. That's a thing we'd have to change before any further JF adjustments.


Hey I have an idea how to improve on that a little. Some of those regions have Rogue Drones as local NPCs and they never drop anything.

How about they would drop some sort of alloy that you could refine into minerals? They would look like some crystals and have a low vomlume, so that you can collect enough of those.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2015-04-14 18:27:14 UTC
elitatwo wrote:
Anhenka wrote:
...JK. Feythbolis is totally ******.

So is Period Basis, Paragon Soul, Esoteria, Impass, Omnist, Tenerferis, Wicked Creek, Detorid, Insmother, The Spire, Outer Passage, Malpais, Perrigen Falls, Oasa, and the Cobalt Edge.

CCP Greyscale wrote:
No part of EVE is sufficiently self-sufficient to justify nerfing JFs yet. That's a thing we'd have to change before any further JF adjustments.


Hey I have an idea how to improve on that a little. Some of those regions have Rogue Drones as local NPCs and they never drop anything.

How about they would drop some sort of alloy that you could refine into minerals? They would look like some crystals and have a low vomlume, so that you can collect enough of those.

because gun mining invalidated miners entirely, which is why it was removed, and reprocessing amounts from loot were reduced
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2015-04-14 18:28:35 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Herateis wrote:
Wouldnt reducing jumps to 5LY simply make a supply chain out of jump freighters instead of a single one for a trip? So Jump distance is reduced, hand off cargo to another to keep going with it.


If we pretend that JF's have a 5LY range, then where I live to a lowsec system adjoining high is a mere 9 cynos.

Oh wait, that's 9 cynos if I'm willing to cyno into system without stations in my 7 bil isk JF with probably 10 billion in the cargo.

Let's swap that to stations only why don't we and see how it looks.

14 Cyno midpoints! Yay!

Oh but wait! My coalition only controls most of them! 5 cyno midpoints out of the 14 land me in non-allied territories.

It's a good thing my alliance members are willing to pay 500% markups on everything to compensate for the insane risk that accompanies this trip and the use of 5 accounts worth of characters purely comprised of cyno alts and JF alts.

JK. Feythbolis is totally ******.

So is Period Basis, Paragon Soul, Esoteria, Impass, Omnist, Tenerferis, Wicked Creek, Detorid, Insmother, The Spire, Outer Passage, Malpais, Perrigen Falls, Oasa, and the Cobalt Edge.

CCP Greyscale wrote:
No part of EVE is sufficiently self-sufficient to justify nerfing JFs yet. That's a thing we'd have to change before any further JF adjustments.

yeah one thing i hope to NEVER see though on the map, that alot of people are asking for, is for "extra stargates" either size-locked or not, to let people jump from lowsec right out to the farthest sections of nullsec, cause IMO the far regions of nullsec unreachable by lowsec have a purpose, and will continue to have a purpose, plus i *HATE* fast travel mechanics of any kind
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#17 - 2015-04-14 19:37:18 UTC
Anhenka wrote:

CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.

This is part of a long term plan to enable self sufficiency in nullsec, to allow for nerfing of JF's and moving the game away from the current situation where it is far easier to import ships and modules from highsec than it is to locally manufacture them. A large portion of t1 and basically all of t2 production consumed in nullsec comes from highsec originally.

To put it bluntly, since the goal is enabling eventual self sufficiency, creating a situation where people are forced to import massive quantities of Isogen from lowsec is not going to happen.

And is a huge pity that CCP gave into the whining of Null about the anoms. Because Null already could mine in the right proportions if they bothered using their static belts. Which are better than High sec to start with, and contain all the ores.
Also a huge pity CCP have turned their back on their policy of interdependency, instead making Null self sufficient while still making every other area of space dependant on Null.

HTFU CCP and stop giving into Nullbears.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2015-04-14 19:55:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Anhenka wrote:

CCP has already stated that null sec anomalies will contain all the ores in roughly the right proportion to build ships. That will include Isogen and Nocxium.

This is part of a long term plan to enable self sufficiency in nullsec, to allow for nerfing of JF's and moving the game away from the current situation where it is far easier to import ships and modules from highsec than it is to locally manufacture them. A large portion of t1 and basically all of t2 production consumed in nullsec comes from highsec originally.

To put it bluntly, since the goal is enabling eventual self sufficiency, creating a situation where people are forced to import massive quantities of Isogen from lowsec is not going to happen.

And is a huge pity that CCP gave into the whining of Null about the anoms. Because Null already could mine in the right proportions if they bothered using their static belts. Which are better than High sec to start with, and contain all the ores.
Also a huge pity CCP have turned their back on their policy of interdependency, instead making Null self sufficient while still making every other area of space dependant on Null.

HTFU CCP and stop giving into Nullbears.

Interdependency is all cool and well up until the point where it rationalizes massive sprawling empires and importing everything you use. And we are way past that.

You cannot break up said massive empires and yet permit mechanics that force people to import everything they use, because with coalitions fracturing, it becomes progressively more difficult to import things.

If you want to break up said coalitions and encourage smaller, more compact space where people live in the space they own, you must do so in a way that does not reduce all the space out of jump range of lowsec to uselessness, and the only way to do that is to remove the mechanics that prohibit local production.

That means removing the two primary offenders. 1: The only source of raw t2 material being static sources of moongoo where the variety is far out of proportion to the requirements of production, and 2: Mineral ratios that result in requiring people to grind through many hours of veldspar and scordite for each hour of any of the nullsec ores.

So you can take your offended butthurt over CCP's changes for improving the long term health of the game. and choke on it.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#19 - 2015-04-14 21:17:54 UTC
If you want Null to not be interdependent, then the same should apply to ALL area's of space. Null should not get to be special snowflakes who don't have the same rules as the rest of EVE.

As for mining ratios. And? Who cares? There is Veld and Scordite in Null, and it's just as valuable.

Making Null into special snowflakes who get to be the exception while everyone else must be interdependent is not improving the long term health of the game, it's wrecking the long term health because it means Null can grief the other zones all it wants. And yes, I do mean the term grief there. Since they no longer have to care about their own supply lines at that point.
Cade Windstalker
#20 - 2015-04-14 21:50:59 UTC
You would end up creating a bottle-neck on those minerals due to relative scarcity and prices would shoot up. CCP has tried, previously, having low-sec ores provide more of certain minerals than high sec and null ores and the result was still no one mining in Low and the cost of those minerals went up.

Unless people found a way to mitigate the risk of mining these minerals significantly then you'd likely simply see a mass market shortage of them, rather than an influx of miners to low-sec, miners tending to be a fairly risk-averse crowd all things considered.
123Next page