These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I'm a miner, and I like CODE.

First post
Author
Amarrchecko
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2015-03-21 13:22:34 UTC
I'm bummed. Catalyst training actually is a bigger time investment than I thought it would be to get to respectable DPS levels. I think I'm closing in on 2 days spent on them now and I still need about 3 more before I'm content with the skills to actually go try some ganks... and it'll be another 4 or 5 to get into T2 weapons it looks like.

I could be finishing veldspar processing V on my miners instead! Blink
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#42 - 2015-03-21 20:11:35 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
5. Trolling is prohibited.


How can CCP tell if people are doing this. Well they can monitor your computer for programs which allow these modifications but almost every computer will have some sort of program that can do it.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Zed Zipper
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2015-03-21 20:23:36 UTC
I'm a creep, and I like Ezwal.

<3
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#44 - 2015-03-22 09:11:26 UTC
Yeah., some killmails are pretty funny. I already got two mackinaws with tripple civilian shield booster fit. Still looking for the one with four. I am sure some day I will find it :-)
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#45 - 2015-03-22 09:23:10 UTC
Avellean wrote:
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Avellean wrote:
malcovas Henderson wrote:

Im calling BS on this. A "Code" guy in an NPC corp. One He cannot be a Code guy in a an NPC corp. Two if is an alt of a Code, how would you know. Again Clueless carebears spewing BS.



A lot of their agents are in npc corps so they don't have to worry about wardecs. Also don't assume people are carebears.


315th Circuit Court Declares War Against Evil Young Flesh [Avellean's previous corp]

I see you created a new corp as soon as the wardec hit. malcovas Henderson is spot on about you.


LoL i just station spin in HS now days anyway so the wardec is kinda pointless. You assume im some HS player but im not, just hanging out in HS for a bit before i go back to null. I see you are a CODE alt alliance though, good to know.

Lol, talks about others hidding in NPC corps from wardecs, switches corps when wardect. Of course only after he hinted that he is the PvP specialist around here... and now he is even just in transit to his powerful friends in nullsec and not really a highsec carebear...

Typical highsec miner...
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#46 - 2015-03-22 09:43:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Lol, talks about others hidding in NPC corps from wardecs, switches corps when wardect. Of course only after he hinted that he is the PvP specialist around here... and now he is even just in transit to his powerful friends in nullsec and not really a highsec carebear...

Typical highsec miner...
People who know about these things are calling it a bingo.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Arden Elenduil
Unlimited Bear Works
#47 - 2015-03-22 15:14:17 UTC
Shiptoasting experts are calling this a fully completed bingo sheet
I am providence
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2015-03-22 15:37:04 UTC  |  Edited by: I am providence
Supporters of shiptoasting approve the bingo sheet and congratulate with a fully fittet Catalyst for "Ima Wreckyou" to bring peace and prosperity to highsec.

My Blog (german): http://theevevirus.wordpress.com/

All about trading, some PvP, some politics... whatever i want to write about

Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#49 - 2015-03-23 15:37:06 UTC
I hate code because I really don't like their risk-averse playstyle, and I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE, but I support 100% their right to do what they do.
malcovas Henderson
THoF
#50 - 2015-03-23 15:41:38 UTC
Petre en Thielles wrote:
I hate code because I really don't like their risk-averse playstyle, and I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE, but I support 100% their right to do what they do.


Risk averse? Pray tell me, how is flying flashy red risk averse?
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#51 - 2015-03-23 15:44:56 UTC
Petre en Thielles wrote:
I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE


Your ignorance is showing.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#52 - 2015-03-23 15:48:26 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Petre en Thielles wrote:
I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE


Your ignorance is showing.


gotcha. *wink
Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#53 - 2015-03-23 16:01:41 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Petre en Thielles wrote:
I hate code because I really don't like their risk-averse playstyle, and I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE, but I support 100% their right to do what they do.


Risk averse? Pray tell me, how is flying flashy red risk averse?


fighting those terrible freighters, miners, and afk mission runners. so l33t
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#54 - 2015-03-23 16:08:50 UTC
Petre en Thielles wrote:
so l33t


Says the NPC with no killboard.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#55 - 2015-03-23 16:28:00 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Petre en Thielles wrote:
so l33t


Says the NPC with no killboard.


Letting people on the forums know who I am, what I fly, where I fly? No thank you.
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2015-03-23 16:36:10 UTC
Nice risk-averse playstyle you got there then.

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#57 - 2015-03-23 16:47:53 UTC
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
Nice risk-averse playstyle you got there then.



Ssshhhh....Go back to shooting people who don't fight back.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#58 - 2015-03-23 17:00:20 UTC
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
Nice risk-averse playstyle you got there then.



BOOM! Headshot!

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Steppa Musana
Doomheim
#59 - 2015-03-23 17:37:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Steppa Musana
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
Nice risk-averse playstyle you got there then.


You mean like Kaarous and the countless highsec "content" supporters that dont post with their main? Or am I to assume their killboards really are that pathetic?

malcovas Henderson wrote:
Petre en Thielles wrote:
I hate code because I really don't like their risk-averse playstyle, and I am fairly anti the CFC idiots who run CODE, but I support 100% their right to do what they do.


Risk averse? Pray tell me, how is flying flashy red risk averse?

Theyve written off everything as a loss already so they dont feel they are risking anything. Thats why career gankers rarely go to lowsec, or do much of anything in the highsec wars besides jumping a mining fleet. Ive seen what happens when CODE gets dunked in a war... they disappear. The idea of committing a ship to a fight with a real chance of unintended loss scares them, like a carebear. Career highsec criminals are the carebears of the player combat world.

The army of shiptoasters here are the worst of the bunch, though. They sperge all day about how risk averse carebears are and chestbeat about how much they love "emergent gameplay"... meanwhile there killboards show nothing but risk aversion. All that rage towards carebears and ends up its all just projection. Lol
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#60 - 2015-03-23 17:59:49 UTC
Steppa Musana wrote:
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
Nice risk-averse playstyle you got there then.


You mean like Kaarous and the countless highsec "content" supporters that dont post with their main? Or am I to assume their killboards really are that pathetic?


You're an NPC with no killboard, too. Pot, meet kettle.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff