These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Which Ship Hull Should be next in line for the makeover train?

First post First post
Author
Arla Sarain
#41 - 2015-03-15 02:28:46 UTC
CCP Darwin wrote:
The Dominix is still coming! It got delayed to make space for other projects, including the T3 tactical destroyers and our various shading and texturing updates, but nobody's forgotten it. Other redesigns are also in progress.

ATRON ATRON ATRON ATRON




Is the slasher, griffin, bantam, buzzard, helios, getting redesigned too?
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#42 - 2015-03-15 03:14:03 UTC
for the love of god please make over the aeon soon ... also i have to question the order alot of these ships are getting remade, alot of the stuff recently seems unnecessary, i mean the incursus was remade not to long ago already and already was a pretty nice looking ship then got remade again, while there are plenty of other frigates that could really have done with the make over...for example the imicus >_>
Colette Kassia
Kassia Industrial Supply
#43 - 2015-03-15 03:36:39 UTC
CCP Darwin wrote:
The Dominix is still coming! It got delayed to make space for other projects, including the T3 tactical destroyers and our various shading and texturing updates, but nobody's forgotten it. Other redesigns are also in progress.

Maybe you should farmout some of the work to the community.

I'm sure there are plenty of 3D artist who play EVE and have an abundance of of ideas for new looks. There have been a couple posted in this thread already. You could:

- Describe the exact technical details for file formats, multiple texture resolutions, approximate polygon counts, texture layers, and LOD levels of what you need to make interchange easy.
- Release the existing design files (Maya, 3D Max, or whatever you use in-house) for existing ships that are in need of a redesign. These would serve as a starting point and as a practical example of the technical details.
- Let community members model their ideas and submit them. (Maybe accept designs without the multiple levels of details at this stage. Don't make them do the high-detail work until after the first round of Yes/No.)
- Evaluate the submissions and pick a winner by fiat, or pick a few of the best and let players vote.
- Polish and tweak the resulting design to bring it in-line with your technical and aesthetic standards, and to maintain the consistent look/feel of a faction. Place weapon mount points, engine particle-emitters, blinkin' lights, etc.
- Compensate the winner with a generous amount of PLEX (and one or two for the runner-ups).

- Profit!!!
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2015-03-15 06:58:51 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Reina Xyaer wrote:
WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE NEW SHIPS.

What's that you say? MORE NEW SHIPS! +1 YES!

I like new ships... especially when there is a new role or new area of play that they are designed to fit.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#45 - 2015-03-15 07:11:56 UTC
ITTigerClawIK wrote:
for the love of god please make over the aeon soon

Leave. The. Aeon. Alone! Evil

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#46 - 2015-03-15 07:14:03 UTC
Lienzo wrote:


Since all the main lines have two attack frigates now, it'd be nice if we could divvy up the T2 AFs amongst them. The retribution should really be based on the tormentor, the hawk should be based on the kestrel, the ishkur should be based on the tristan and the jaguar probably needs to be put through a compactor until it some kind of usable missile boat emerges.


Good god no. The Tormentor is UG. LY. It used to be a mining ship remember, and it looks it. It needs a complete revamp. Meanwhile, retty is based on the single sexiest hull in the entire game. Don't touch it.
Starrakatt
Empire Assault Corp
Dead Terrorists
#47 - 2015-03-15 08:25:20 UTC
The Rupture is horrible to look at.
Murkar Omaristos
The Alabaster Albatross
Unreasonable Bastards
#48 - 2015-03-15 11:03:54 UTC
Starrakatt wrote:
The Rupture is horrible to look at.


Hey man, just 'cus it's shaped like a glue gun doesn't make it........er......ok yeah it's super ugly.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#49 - 2015-03-15 13:05:56 UTC
FireFrenzy wrote:
DOMINIX

God the potatoeshoe needs some serious love...


Leave the domi as is.

potatoeshoe it may be, but its a potatoeshoe on steroids!

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Stitch Kaneland
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#50 - 2015-03-15 13:22:18 UTC
Bellicose redesign would be nice. To me it looks like a rifle on a bipod. Not to mention the "H" at the front looks poorly supported and would just snap off the moment it experienced gravity.

Rupture - looks like a pirate ship hull.. even has the "captains quarters" at the rear. Just needs a balconey to complete it. Not to mention, its textures look horrible.

Breacher - horrid textures and very blocky looking

After PBR the typhoon hulls need another look. Especially the gray areas at the back engines. Textures are very muddy and almost non-existant.

If any of those got some love, id be happy. Amarr/minny should be next race to get another updated ship model. Seems like gal/cal getting all the love. To be fair though, some of those ships looked terrible.

Tusker Crazinski
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2015-03-15 13:34:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Tusker Crazinski
Honestly I'd have to say the Cynabal and the Mach

The Dram is fine, it's regarded as one of the best looking ships in the game, and I agree with this point. I do however miss how the old gun models looked on it, and more importantly I miss their location, now they're kind taped the arms.

the Cyna however looks like a pringles chip with booster growing out of it, and the mach looks like a shoe.

I my eyes these ships (especially when fit with arty) are the epitome of a space pirateship. I wish their guns were oriented like the decks of old Galleons and Man O'wars such as the tempest and maelstrom.

also I think they should get the exposed warp rings the SOE ships got, seeing how their the only hulls that actively buff warp speed in any way.
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#52 - 2015-03-15 17:54:35 UTC
I really hope ccp ignores all the bad taste bads in this thread. there's nothing wrong with most of these ships.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#53 - 2015-03-15 17:59:49 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:

I like new ships... Only when there is a new role or new area of play that they are designed to fit.


fixed that
Murkar Omaristos
The Alabaster Albatross
Unreasonable Bastards
#54 - 2015-03-15 19:40:55 UTC
Tusker Crazinski wrote:
Honestly I'd have to say the Cynabal and the Mach


That's prbly the first time I've heard someone say they dislike the cynabal (although the new paint job is not as good as the old one)
Tusker Crazinski
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2015-03-15 20:25:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Tusker Crazinski
Murkar Omaristos wrote:
Tusker Crazinski wrote:
Honestly I'd have to say the Cynabal and the Mach


That's prbly the first time I've heard someone say they dislike the cynabal (although the new paint job is not as good as the old one)


idk, when I think space pirate ship the tempest and rupture fit the bill really well.

the dram is gorgeous, and somewhat befitting of it's piraty nature, I just can't say no to the cylon raider to be perfectly honest. the mach and cyna though just don't hit the mark aesthetically. I just want to see gun decks and radiator sails.

BTW the "sails" on minmatar ships are not solar sails or solar panels, they're radiations and therefore the most sensible ships in the game..... heat is actually a ***** to get rid of in space.
Wylde Kardde
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2015-03-15 21:56:09 UTC
I believe that an update with nothing except a new Bantam model would somehow be a major milestone In all of EvE. As much as people may like a new sleek bantam, I'm sure there will be some that miss the current contraption.

The Origional Intention of Pirate BS's... pvp

Nightmare X-type Burn out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyajGLoe0Kc

Alpha model
D4RK M00N
#57 - 2015-04-06 00:28:14 UTC
Armageddon..

Because who wants to fly mutated genitalia.
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#58 - 2015-04-06 00:45:03 UTC
Archon, Scythe, Vexor, Rupture. Caracal and Slasher look great and should keep their shapes.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Cade Windstalker
#59 - 2015-04-06 01:25:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Cade Windstalker
CCP Darwin wrote:
The Dominix is still coming! It got delayed to make space for other projects, including the T3 tactical destroyers and our various shading and texturing updates, but nobody's forgotten it. Other redesigns are also in progress.


So.... who do we need to go pod and feed to the Sleepers to get concept art on this? Big smile



My suggestion, the Celestis and the two Recons based off of it. Oh, and the Osprey and its T2 Logistics counterpart. After the Blackbird and the Moa I can't wait to see what you do with the old lumpy-suitcase.
Wylde Kardde
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2015-04-06 02:13:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Wylde Kardde
Quote:
So.... who do we need to go pod and feed to the Sleepers to get concept art on this? Big smile.


in my origional postis where you could have found it..

Dominix Concept:

http://www.evemanufacturing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/dominix-fanfest-redesign.png

The Origional Intention of Pirate BS's... pvp

Nightmare X-type Burn out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyajGLoe0Kc