EVE General Discussion

Funny how everyone has a blinkered view of how they want the game to be played without taking into consideration of how others wish to play the game.

Funny that some people believe that the sandbox format should only entail one type of playing style instead of all types, forcing their belief of their playing style as being the only one, true ideal for the game to follow.

To me all styles are relevant, based upon the way that the person wishes to play it, whether it being a carebearing miner or drooling homicidal ganker.

Unfortunately Sabriz only sees the ganker view of mining and because he finds it dull and boring believes that it should be changed to suit a viewpoint that only he believes should be right.

Simply put, there are more important matters in this game than worrying over the boredom levels that miners accept. It is the battles that we all read about in Nullsec between the massive alliances, the massive wars that result from opposing ideals clashing. This is what makes people within and outside the game take notice. Those changes which encourage this, is more important to be focused on and improved.

Improve Nullsec and i believe you improve the health of the game.

The miners' CSM candidate would like to answer, but he's AFK.

OP, Sugar Kyle knows something about mining. She's the next best thing, so vote for her.

Sure, there are CSM candidates for miner-gankers, lots of them.

Tbh, miners take a lot of flak for "afkness" and all the CSM line up against them, when what they should really be doing is revamping mining so it's no longer an afk activity.