These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ryan Farmern, Needs Your Vote
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ryan Farmern
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2015-02-25 04:22:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Ryan Farmern
Hello I'm Ryan Farmern, the correct person for you to vote for in CSM X.

I'm not much for running a campaign, but I am running this year because I feel CCP has made too many big changes too fast.

I think we need to look at fixing some of the game mechanics:

  • need more useful deployables
  • Wormholes need Ice belts, possibly not the exact same.
  • Ice belts need to be an ihub upgrade, not a lucky geo location
  • better ewar balance
  • reevaluate T2 production,
  • CCP to actually ask the community about big changes
  • Capital Mining ships (More risk for more ISK, comparable to what a ratting toon can make/hour)
  • Dock-able capitals in High Sec
  • Better interface for Corp roles
  • Same thing for POS roles, anchoring, timers
  • PI Overhaul
  • Reevaluate multiboxing policy to be strict on combat and not on industry
  • Cloaking ships need bubble nullified, but for cloaking devices to use fuel of isos or LO, also add a fuel bay and skill that effects fuel consumption.
  • New players need better tutorials, and something pointing them to verified new player corps other than EveU.



I could sit here for hours thinking of changes/balances I think Eve needs. Couldn't we all?

Vote for Ryan Farmern. The CSM everyone needs to fix Eve, not just one area of space.
EaTCarbS
Snowpity Inc
Memento Moriendo
#2 - 2015-02-25 05:16:00 UTC
this makes me moist
Eve Atlus
Eve Atlus Tools
#3 - 2015-02-25 07:05:10 UTC
I support most of these changes, good luck, you have my vote.
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
#4 - 2015-02-26 07:21:21 UTC
Hi Ryan

I've been told you are supportive of Multiboxing

Could you respond either privately or publicly (your choice) to these questions?

http://pastebin.com/yubTB4sR

Legacy - An EVE Online Blog

Legacy of a Capsuleer Podcast

EVEServers.info - One stop API Solution for Corps/Alliances
Ryan Farmern
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2015-02-26 13:21:51 UTC
ShadowandLight wrote:
Hi Ryan

I've been told you are supportive of Multiboxing

Could you respond either privately or publicly (your choice) to these questions?

http://pastebin.com/yubTB4sR



Yes I do support multiboxing.

However, the broken part of multiboxing is overuse of combat.

If you want a mining fleet, you should be able to jetcan, assist drones, dock/undock without worrying about a ban.

But doing bombing runs (or any other pvp) or breaking the economy running incursions should be not allowed when using IS Boxer, everything else I think is fine.
Alan Mathison
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2015-02-26 19:51:36 UTC
Ryan:

Don't you realize that using multiboxing for a mining fleet is breaking the economy as much, if not more, than running incursions?

What is the difference between using multiboxing to run incursions and using multiboxing to run mining fleets?

-- Alan Mathison, Explorer & Industrialist, Star Tide Industries
Ryan Farmern
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2015-02-26 19:57:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Ryan Farmern
Alan Mathison wrote:
Ryan:

Don't you realize that using multiboxing for a mining fleet is breaking the economy as much, if not more, than running incursions?

What is the difference between using multiboxing to run incursions and using multiboxing to run mining fleets?


The difference is that the mining fleet will still be able to mine with or without broadcasting, just makes it easier to be able to jetcan and move around with broadcasting.

However, it is nearly impossible to run an incursion fleet without IS Boxer and the features it comes with.

Also, the incursion boxers can bring in 1b/hour or more, whereas the miners can only bring in 1/4th that with the same plex responsibilities.

Let's not get hung up over one point though. There's plenty more to Eve.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#8 - 2015-02-27 03:44:43 UTC
Ryan Farmern wrote:
However, it is nearly impossible to run an incursion fleet without IS Boxer and the features it comes with.
Strangely enough, people manage to do Incursions with other players.

How do you propose to bring about all those changes you list in your original post?

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.