These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Awoxing is no more

First post
Author
Solops Crendraven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#261 - 2015-01-16 18:02:02 UTC
Honestly? What is my opinion about this?THis Awoxing issue Its Fine with me does it suck like the OP stated? No it dosnt matter to me because it dosnt really affect me in anyway or Form. The Only person who will be affected by this is the Awoxer Himself because he wont be able to do it. trust me he wont be Missed.

Moving To Las Vegas Watch Me Play Poker! enter link description here

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#262 - 2015-01-16 18:05:42 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:

The issue is how proefficient the deccer corp have become (this is completely to their honor after learning how to do it better) that the corp not looking for that gameplay will be outplayed if he tries so he take the next logical step to protect what he "owns".


Avoiding losses in war is an entirely different style to attempting to cause losses and is much more suited to the skills and abilities of non-PVP corps. They are jus' too lazy t'do it.


Any deccer corp worth it's salt will overwhelm anything the everyday industrial corp can muster and you know it. Undocking a half skilled fail fit caracal won't break anything they face so it's just a few more millions thrown down the drain.
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#263 - 2015-01-16 18:06:07 UTC
Bob is incapable of handling developer intent. Whatever, I live in lowsec anyway. I am going to take it out by awoxing some Bobs that think they are safe because of Standings or whatever.

"Your security standing has been lowered"
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#264 - 2015-01-16 18:08:16 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:

The issue is how proefficient the deccer corp have become (this is completely to their honor after learning how to do it better) that the corp not looking for that gameplay will be outplayed if he tries so he take the next logical step to protect what he "owns".


Avoiding losses in war is an entirely different style to attempting to cause losses and is much more suited to the skills and abilities of non-PVP corps. They are jus' too lazy t'do it.


Any deccer corp worth it's salt will overwhelm anything the everyday industrial corp can muster and you know it. Undocking a half skilled fail fit caracal won't break anything they face so it's just a few more millions thrown down the drain.


Ah know you are smarter than this. In what way would being where the deccers are prevent losses? Where did I mention fightin'?
Commander Spurty
#265 - 2015-01-16 18:08:21 UTC
Experts are calling this a "Seriously sensible setting".

In other news, tears flooded forth from the masses of unwashed alts of super cap pilots who can't log in without permission from their alliance fuhrer.

How is AWOXing good for the game? It's just not.

Leave high sec to the n00bs, go shoot anyone you want, any time you want in low-sec, null-sec, Wormholes.

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP

Solecist Project
#266 - 2015-01-16 18:09:44 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
Bob is incapable of handling developer intent. Whatever, I live in lowsec anyway. I am going to take it out by awoxing some Bobs that think they are safe because of Standings or whatever.

"Your security standing has been lowered"

Your security status ...
... has been lowered.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#267 - 2015-01-16 18:10:33 UTC
Syn Shi wrote:
Killing new players in noob corps is not Awoxing.



The End.


No, that would be griefing.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#268 - 2015-01-16 18:16:02 UTC
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Honestly? What is my opinion about this?THis Awoxing issue Its Fine with me does it suck like the OP stated? No it dosnt matter to me because it dosnt really affect me in anyway or Form. The Only person who will be affected by this is the Awoxer Himself because he wont be able to do it. trust me he wont be Missed.


I will never understand why people think this way. Of course it will have an affect on you in some way, EVE isn't jsut a game, it's an interconnected society, EVERYTHING everyone does affects someone in some way.

This 'awox button' will mean more people will join play corps. Some of those corps will be good experiences, most of them will be bad experiences which could quite possibly accelerate a 'new players' decision to quit.

Some of those corps will be on the up and up, others will simply be 'new player grist mills' for established players to make isk off of instead of having to rat/mission/explore themselves (because the new players won't know any better). Hello "Renting" in high sec, because this change ends up creating the same meta-condition in high sec that lead to vast swaths of null becoming good for nothing but renting.

Those corps will have lower taxes than the npc corps (npc corp taxes are ISK SINKS), meaning more isk in circulation in the game after this change happens. Congratulations, the isk in your wallet is now worth less than it was before because less isk being sunk means devaluation of currently existing isk.

And on and on and on.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#269 - 2015-01-16 18:23:27 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:

The issue is how proefficient the deccer corp have become (this is completely to their honor after learning how to do it better) that the corp not looking for that gameplay will be outplayed if he tries so he take the next logical step to protect what he "owns".


Avoiding losses in war is an entirely different style to attempting to cause losses and is much more suited to the skills and abilities of non-PVP corps. They are jus' too lazy t'do it.


Any deccer corp worth it's salt will overwhelm anything the everyday industrial corp can muster and you know it. Undocking a half skilled fail fit caracal won't break anything they face so it's just a few more millions thrown down the drain.


Ah know you are smarter than this. In what way would being where the deccers are prevent losses? Where did I mention fightin'?


If you go elsewhere, they can just run locators which is something deccers worth their salt will also do. If you don't have the player skill/knowledge to fight, no amount of effort will be better than turtling up.
Joe Starbreaker
Starbreaker and Sons
#270 - 2015-01-16 18:27:03 UTC
Shailagh wrote:
Wtf happened to making bears work to AVOID BEING KILLED.

This is the pinnacle question... when did eve and ccp as a whole go from telling errrybody EVE IS DANGEROUS LOOK OUT! PROTECT YOSELF! ITS DANGER BEHIND THAT DOOR!!

TO.

OK NOW EVRRYONE LISTEN THERES THESE BAD MEAN GUYS OUT THERE BUT DONT YOU WORRY, WE WILL NOT ONLY GIVE YOY THE TOOLDS TO AVOID THE DANGER YOURSELF... WELL HOLD YOUR HAND AND CODDLR YOU AMD TOTALLY PRotect you. Dont worry


I can't speak to CCP's intentions, but don't underestimate the power of reverse psychology. Maybe part of the reason newbies don't leave highsec (but leave the game instead) is that they feel like the game is already too scary and unpredictable.

Let them live in a padded room with everything baby-proofed and bubble-wrapped, and maybe the boredom will awaken in some of them a desire to have a real adventure.
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#271 - 2015-01-16 18:27:21 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:

If you go elsewhere, they can just run locators which is something deccers worth their salt will also do. If you don't have the player skill/knowledge to fight, no amount of effort will be better than turtling up.


Ah'm sorry that your knowledge of Evasive Strategy appears so limited.
Aredontis
Doomheim
#272 - 2015-01-16 18:33:42 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Tim Timpson wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Scenario 2 can only be achieved at the expense of gameplay mechanics that have made EVE what it has been over the past 12 years.
Not really. they could convert 1 region to complete safety for example, reduce the reward given from activity in that region considerably, ban scamming from that region and have the higher end activity encourage people to move out of it. That wouldn't be at the expense of existing gameplay, since the existing gameplay would still exist. It would probably make a bunch of people foam at the mouth at the idea of people being safe, but we get that anyway.


Yea, that totally worked with Trammel, why not here?

Sorry if I exploded any sarcasm meters.


According to the records (yes 'wiki not definitive blah blah') Trammel was successful enough for 5 expansions to follow it and lead to 250K subs, sooo wanna try again?

"Eventually, the Renaissance expansion created large areas of the game in which it was not possible to harm other players. A significant spike in account reactivation was attributed to this aspect of Renaissance." QFT (Renaissance = Trammel)

** Note - I've only read to page 10, but felt like pointing this out.
Aredontis
Doomheim
#273 - 2015-01-16 18:36:07 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Why, because the vast majority of PvE players is completely risk-adverse.
They rather spent twice as long in low paying safety then better ISK for a bit more risk.


Which is their play style, and no more or less valid than yours.
Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#274 - 2015-01-16 18:38:31 UTC
Commander Spurty wrote:
Experts are calling this a "Seriously sensible setting".

In other news, tears flooded forth from the masses of unwashed alts of super cap pilots who can't log in without permission from their alliance fuhrer.

How is AWOXing good for the game? It's just not.

Leave high sec to the n00bs, go shoot anyone you want, any time you want in low-sec, null-sec, Wormholes.

If only it were inhabited by noobs.

"Playing an MMO by yourself is like masturbating in the middle of an orgy." -Jonah Gravenstein

Solops Crendraven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#275 - 2015-01-16 18:41:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Solops Crendraven
Jenn aSide wrote:
Solops Crendraven wrote:
Honestly? What is my opinion about this?THis Awoxing issue Its Fine with me does it suck like the OP stated? No it dosnt matter to me because it dosnt really affect me in anyway or Form. The Only person who will be affected by this is the Awoxer Himself because he wont be able to do it. trust me he wont be Missed.


I will never understand why people think this way. Of course it will have an affect on you in some way, EVE isn't jsut a game, it's an interconnected society, EVERYTHING everyone does affects someone in some way.

This 'awox button' will mean more people will join play corps. Some of those corps will be good experiences, most of them will be bad experiences which could quite possibly accelerate a 'new players' decision to quit.

Some of those corps will be on the up and up, others will simply be 'new player grist mills' for established players to make isk off of instead of having to rat/mission/explore themselves (because the new players won't know any better). Hello "Renting" in high sec, because this change ends up creating the same meta-condition in high sec that lead to vast swaths of null becoming good for nothing but renting.

Those corps will have lower taxes than the npc corps (npc corp taxes are ISK SINKS), meaning more isk in circulation in the game after this change happens. Congratulations, the isk in your wallet is now worth less than it was before because less isk being sunk means devaluation of currently existing isk.

And on and on and on.

Your Right! Im happy they have the awox button and more people will join corps i m for it. However its not my Cup of tea i prefer not to join a corp or a alliance its to restricting . Of course i will connect and build relationships with others and making friends or form fleet s im already working on that In My New Home Thera. These things take Time and effort.

Moving To Las Vegas Watch Me Play Poker! enter link description here

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#276 - 2015-01-16 18:43:02 UTC
Joe Starbreaker wrote:
Shailagh wrote:
Wtf happened to making bears work to AVOID BEING KILLED.

This is the pinnacle question... when did eve and ccp as a whole go from telling errrybody EVE IS DANGEROUS LOOK OUT! PROTECT YOSELF! ITS DANGER BEHIND THAT DOOR!!

TO.

OK NOW EVRRYONE LISTEN THERES THESE BAD MEAN GUYS OUT THERE BUT DONT YOU WORRY, WE WILL NOT ONLY GIVE YOY THE TOOLDS TO AVOID THE DANGER YOURSELF... WELL HOLD YOUR HAND AND CODDLR YOU AMD TOTALLY PRotect you. Dont worry


I can't speak to CCP's intentions, but don't underestimate the power of reverse psychology. Maybe part of the reason newbies don't leave highsec (but leave the game instead) is that they feel like the game is already too scary and unpredictable.

Let them live in a padded room with everything baby-proofed and bubble-wrapped, and maybe the boredom will awaken in some of them a desire to have a real adventure.


And the fun part.

Nothing will change. Do you think someone will Awox a shitfit venture or a L1 fitted frigate.

Awoxers go after the pimp fits.


I think that ganking is more of an issue to new players then awoxing.

And to reply in advance to all the retards with just half a braincell.

A proper new player friendly corp is already that even without a change.
If the corp now doesnt accept cause they arw too affraid, after the change they still wont (aah you are a spy / thief) and if they do. They let new players in, this doesnt automatically means they are a new player friendly corp.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#277 - 2015-01-16 18:44:38 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Aredontis wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Why, because the vast majority of PvE players is completely risk-adverse.
They rather spent twice as long in low paying safety then better ISK for a bit more risk.


Which is their play style, and no more or less valid than yours.


Never said that it isnt their right.

But CCP should stop just making the game safer and safer to suit the whiners.

By your own definition. Awoxers are as much allowed to play the game that way as a carebear is allowed to bear.

Dont go...everybody should be allowed to play the game they like and then...but CCP should prevent people who want to kill corp-mates to do that.

It is like pick any color pencil that you want, as long as it is not black.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Tim Timpson
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#278 - 2015-01-16 18:55:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Tim Timpson
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Removing awoxing isn't really a major change. Do you really think there wouldn't be mass unsubs from the pvp sector if for example either ganking or wars were done away with?
That's a purely hypthetical question since they never would do away with it, at most they would reduce it some, but yes, I believe that there would be threats of quitting but very few actually following through. That's always been the way in EVE, for the older players it's like crack, you might want to quit, but you won't.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I'm sure we can come together and think of a system that would be superior to what we have right now.
If we did, I'm sure there would be a bunch of people arguing over it being too safe or too unsafe and not much would ever get done. What they're doing is a simple change whihc should encourage people to recruit others out of the NPC corps a bit earlier, which I think is a good start.

Badman Lasermouse wrote:
Don't ******* touch my wars though.
I imagine 2015 won't be nice to you.
Aredontis
Doomheim
#279 - 2015-01-16 19:00:17 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
They can fix that by removing the NPC corporation mechanic.


So in your mind, removing a mechanic that you don't use, but allows "tears to be gathered" (awoxing) is bad, but removing a mechanic, that you don't use, that allows people to avoid shedding tears (NPC corps) is okay??

pot <> kettle?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#280 - 2015-01-16 19:02:27 UTC
Tim Timpson wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Removing awoxing isn't really a major change. Do you really think there wouldn't be mass unsubs from the pvp sector if for example either ganking or wars were done away with?
That's a purely hypthetical question since they never would do away with it, at most they would reduce it some, but yes, I believe that there would be threats of quitting but very few actually following through. That's always been the way in EVE, for the older players it's like crack, you might want to quit, but you won't.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I'm sure we can come together and think of a system that would be superior to what we have right now.
If we did, I'm sure there would be a bunch of people arguing over it being too safe or too unsafe and not much would ever get done. What they're doing is a simple change whihc should encourage people to recruit others out of the NPC corps a bit earlier, which I think is a good start.

Badman Lasermouse wrote:
Don't ******* touch my wars though.
I imagine 2015 won't be nice to you.


Plenty of corps already recruit people as new as 5 minutes.

It is **** corps that dont.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club