These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why Afk is fine in highsec

Author
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2015-01-11 13:24:43 UTC
this may come as a shock but ccp really has no problem with players "going afk".. it's not against any rules. it's when they try to use external software methods to "bot" their gaming sessions that there is a problem. this isn't even an issue for the intellectually honest.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#42 - 2015-01-11 13:36:12 UTC
Provence Tristram wrote:
Perhaps, but that is not the kind of combat I would be out for
No-one cares. Don't bother saying "it takes xyz before you can fight in EVE" just because there is only one thing you have in mind. That is spectacularly shortsighted.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#43 - 2015-01-11 13:54:59 UTC
Steppa Musana wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
I think OP may have confused the New Order's in-game playstyle which attempts to punish AFKing in highsec, and (some) anti-gankers metagame style of whining about ganking in the hopes it will be removed from the game.

If gankers operated by the same 'logic' as carebears, they would be on here petitioning CCP to make it impossible to AFK mine without exploding or something, i.e. trying to get a playstyle they dislike removed from the game. Then a post like OP's might have a purpose.

Of course, they don't. Gankers love AFK miners because they provide targets. While requests to "fix" ganking are a dime a dozen, requests to 'fix' mining usually take the form of "I mine and it's too boring".

I think the OPs point is that going AFK in high-sec is not always a bad thing as long as you accept the risk. The ganking community loves to ridicule AFK miners like they've done something wrong, when they haven't. They've been AFK like that for months before you killed them. The idiotic thing to do would be to stay ATK all that time because you're afraid of having to write off a loss that amounts to 1% of your total profit.

The idiotic thing is if you lose your temper over that 1% loss an say stupid stuff, make RL threads against the gankers or come to the forums and whine to CCP to get the game changed.

If you go way back and read the Manifesto and Manifesto II of James 315 you will notice that the real purpose for our crusade is not the AFK miner, but the whiny carebear who tries to change this unique competitive sandbox game into a shadow of itself where he can AFK mine in perfect isolation without interference from other players. Well we also like to just blow up stuff, but who says a crusade shouldn't be fun.

It is my believe and that the carebears destruction of EVE can only be stopped if their real agenda is exposed, and that is a great part of what the minerbumping blog is about. It is also about fun and treating eve like a game (which it actually is). It is written in a very obvious self ironic tone, which some people seam to still not understand, this are usually the "rebel leaders", and it's probably no accident that they aren't usually the brightest lights in New Eden.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#44 - 2015-01-11 15:20:20 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
this may come as a shock but ccp really has no problem with players "going afk".. it's not against any rules. it's when they try to use external software methods to "bot" their gaming sessions that there is a problem. this isn't even an issue for the intellectually honest.


While "going afk" isn't against any rules of CCP, it is definitely against The New Halaima Code of Conduct, a very important rulebook in highsec. Therefore, unless you want to risk an enforcement action from an Agent of the New Order, I would suggest you confine your AFKing to places in New Eden where the Code doesn't apply - like wormhole space or nullsec.

But to your main point, I have seen no-one be as intellectually dishonest to suggest that going AFK is against the EULA or anything. In fact, CCP built the 'Autopilot' button into the game, one of the major tools facilitating AFKing and a leading cause of bot-aspirancy. However, that doesn't mean it is not against the rules of certain player groups or organizations.

Why AFKers? While I actually believe that putting risk back into highsec makes for a better game for everyone, since Eve is all about conflict and exploding spaceships you don't have to look further than the "gotta nuke something" explanation.
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
#45 - 2015-01-11 16:00:13 UTC
Well, GD has seen worse threads (a lot worse, actually), so calling this one overly redundant is a bit of a stretch at this point. As far as the topic, it is what it is. AFK is no less acceptable than ganking someone who is AFK.

"Tomahawks?"

"----in' A, right?"

"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."

"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#46 - 2015-01-11 16:38:46 UTC
Go AFK, see what you get.

The OP seems to believe that there are some inherent rules where doing one thing is "right" and doing another is "wrong".

Im afraid he is mistaken. The only rules are the ones you make for yourself.

Go AFK, God doesn't care.

God was cast out of New Eden for being a troll.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

V1P3RR
Amarr Empire
#47 - 2015-01-11 17:30:36 UTC
highsec definately needs a larger CODE presence...
Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#48 - 2015-01-11 18:10:59 UTC
There can be consequences to going AFK, if you're not willing to accept those consequences you shouldn't go AFK.

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.

Sylveria Relden
#49 - 2015-01-11 19:19:54 UTC
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:
There can be consequences to going AFK, if you're not willing to accept those consequences you shouldn't go AFK.


This. And it doesn't matter what security status the region, either. You go AFK and it's your a**.

TL;DR If you didn't read the entire post perhaps you're probably ADHD. (seek help)

Michael Ruckert
Hohere Kavallerie-Kommando
#50 - 2015-01-12 04:31:07 UTC
AFK mining in a tanked and rigged Procurer in high sec. Fine. Very fine indeed. Big smile

"No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

Jur Tissant
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2015-01-12 04:56:31 UTC
I honestly couldn't care less how you play. If you want to go AFK on a belt or autopilot go for it, it's a game not a test of character. Just, don't whine about the play choices other players make which may involve AFK players and guns.
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2015-01-12 05:11:54 UTC
With regard to the PLEXing, I actually earn roughly 3 to 4 months subs in one hour in real life.

I do however PLEX my accounts purely because I personally feel if you can't PLEX out of spare change ISK floating about you are not organizing your game well.

That said I have never AFK hauled or mined. The ISK just seems to turn up and build up all by itself. its not my fault if it keeps turning up.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#53 - 2015-01-12 09:49:38 UTC
Michael Ruckert wrote:
rigged Procurer


Now there's a waste of isk if I ever heard of one

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Vector Symian
0 Fear
#54 - 2015-01-12 11:14:13 UTC
I was noticing a great deal of confusion and rage among highsec gamers and thought a little bit of simple clarity would assist and it seems most posters are in agreement which is nice to see

and i suppose a final point to make would be...

*just relax its a game, have some fun and remember....Game of Thrones is highly distracting*
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#55 - 2015-01-12 11:30:11 UTC
Vector Symian wrote:
Hello it may shock you but I am a pretty active pilot and I don't care about going A.F.K (away from keyboard)
.... snip ...
please discuss freely


No.

There are plenty of other threads about this topic - one more random opinion wasn't a good reason for a new thread.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Velicitia
XS Tech
#56 - 2015-01-12 12:19:23 UTC
Vector Symian wrote:


Scipio - I have been on said anti-ganking channel and seen the condensation and oftentimes cruel attack on people who were in fact following the "code" and were still attacked...



With the assumption (incorrect as it might be) that CODE pilots follow their own rules, it's likely that these other pilots generally "do" follow the code ... but happened to pull one of the typical things of hisec -- "Oh, buzzer for [laundry|food|door|etc.] has gone off, I'll just be a minute. What could possibly go wrong if I stay in space?"

Code or no, that thinking is what got them killed.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#57 - 2015-01-12 14:59:23 UTC
yes im guilty of using plex to play the game because with out it I wouldn't, but I can get a plex in 1 day sothat leaves me the rest of the month to do what I please including shooting gankers when the opportunity presents itself

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Solecist Project
#58 - 2015-01-12 15:02:46 UTC
Agondray wrote:
yes im guilty of using plex to play the game because with out it I wouldn't, but I can get a plex in 1 day sothat leaves me the rest of the month to do what I please including shooting gankers when the opportunity presents itself

That made me laugh! XD

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#59 - 2015-01-12 16:18:23 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Vector Symian wrote:


Scipio - I have been on said anti-ganking channel and seen the condensation and oftentimes cruel attack on people who were in fact following the "code" and were still attacked...



With the assumption (incorrect as it might be) that CODE pilots follow their own rules, it's likely that these other pilots generally "do" follow the code ... but happened to pull one of the typical things of hisec -- "Oh, buzzer for [laundry|food|door|etc.] has gone off, I'll just be a minute. What could possibly go wrong if I stay in space?"

Code or no, that thinking is what got them killed.

They're always innocent, of course.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#60 - 2015-01-12 19:57:51 UTC
The New Halaima Code of Conduct and James 315's associated manifesto's clearly explain why mining, or hauling, or autopiloting while AFK is bad for Eve. Players who do this are trying to gain something, either assets or time, while expending no effort on their part. This tendency to maximize gain while minimizing effort is the heart of botting.

So, its clear that players who AFK WOULD bot if only the rules allowed it. It is the logical conclusion of someone who wants to make more while doing less. If CCP were to institute some loosening of the rules regarding botting some of those who now just AFK would move towards automation. A little more loosening and more would start down this dark path. Soon the fledgling AFKer has become a hardened, exploitive botter. AFKing is BAD, mkay?

And, with the emergence of the New Order of Highsec, its stupid.

Only an idiot or a completely uneducated newbie OR a highsec miner (but I repeat myself) would think its perfectly OK to undock an expensive but untanked ship, siddle up next to an asteroid or ice block in a public space, start the lasers... and then go do the laundry. And yet they do it ALL DAY LONG. Then, to top things off, when they are educated about their bad decision making process they get hostile and refuse to accept that, "What?!? Someone can shoot my ship? GRIEFER!".

Players need to learn that highsec is as dangerous and as full of killers as any low-sec or null-sec system. In fact, there are probably more in a typical highsec ice belt system than in some random low-sec system. If you AFK in highsec, you WILL be shot. Just because some players have avoided it until now doesn't mean it won't happen tonight... or tomorrow. Look at the CODE. killboard. Its filled with plenty of players who thought they could AFK and get away with it.

Well, they didn't. And neither can you.

BBB

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com