These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Module tiericide speculation thread. - doomsday preppers

Author
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#1 - 2014-12-31 16:28:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jerry T Pepridge
I Speculate/guess based on the dev blog 1, that particular items will be consolidated/removed with others. some items cost 5k, will be consolidated with items worth 2m each for instance.

The idea is, stock up a reasonable amount of cheap modules now, wait for when they make the patch change, all items regardless of outcome become 'useful', then do a procurer on them and set and forget at a price point.

I speculate further than these items may even level the costs out among the named modules in some cases, where noobs buy compact, and vets buy ample.

This is a GO LONG INVESTMENT not a quick buck. the video was from may 2014, the first module change happened some 6 months later.

Firstly, the reference materiall, to make it easier to find the extracts, after clicking on the link: do CTRL+ F and paste in a keyword.

Dev blog 1
Youtube video (skipped to the module section)

Firstly, I ask you to follow the first link, and read it, there are a few e.g. of what they have changed already. if you do not wish to click the link this is what CCP states about item consolidation:

Quote:
Consolidation
Some modules will have fewer viable specializations, and in these cases we will be consolidating many types of modules into fewer types of modules. When this happens, we will follow the same procedure each time:

All market orders for the affected modules will be removed, the modules and escrow will be returned to the character who created the order.
We will convert every module of one type into modules of another type, everywhere in the database. This includes modules currently fit to ships and modules in containers or contracts.
Any instance where the old obsolete module types are dropping from NPCs will be replaced with the new type.
None of the modules we are consolidating have blueprints, so manufacturing will not be an issue in this case.
You’ll see the exact plans for what modules are being consolidated in Oceanus below.


so any modules being removed, are simply merged with the other item and renamed, so u don;t lose anything by stocking.

Now click on the video (relax it skips to the relevant part), he states, "we want to make sure, like the ships that we give you good choices for the items" which makes sense as most ships now have a role. he also says there will be fewer meta levels for some items. "same power level, in different specializations"

So wtf jerry who cares, well here comes the fun part:

All the slides, and such and all the changes to weapon systems have been to even out the "power level" but make some for instance cap use, CPU usage etc.

So you need to find items that you know will have less meta levels, using the previous module tiericide as the litmus test, lets take a look at the missile launcher bracket.

firstly, the litmus test: (LML)

Quote:
Light Missile Launchers

For the Light Missile Launcher group of modules, we have room for two distinct named specializations. The Compact Light Missile Launcher will specialize in reduced fitting requirements, while the Ample Light Missile Launcher will specialize in extra missile capacity.

The current ‘Limos’ and TE-2100 light missile launchers will become Ample Launchers, and the current ‘Malkuth’ and ‘Arbalest’ launchers will become Compact Launchers.


4 modules become 2.

Both have same Rate of fire, which is basically DPS for missile launchers. The only variables they can change for Missile launchers to effect DPS is rate of fire, to which they have specifically said, they are making them the same power level. lets look at what CCP says about the naming convention:

The “named module” names that will be used in our Oceanus changes are:

Quote:
Upgraded- Used for named modules where no specialization is possible
*Compact- Used for named modules that specialize in reduced fitting cost
Enduring- Used for named modules that specialize in lower cap use or otherwise longer running time
*Ample- Used for named modules that specialize in extra capacity
Scoped- Used for named modules that specialize in longer range
Restrained- Used for named modules that specialize in reduced drawbacks


of the above, the only that apply to Missile launcher groups is 2, which i have a Star next to.

So again, i speculate the following for this missile launcher module group:

*That using the above litmus test, all the launcher groups will follow the same pattern. (4 >>> 2)
*That CCP has shown graphs showing they want the named modules to have the same power level (see LML)
*That they won't change powergrid requirements, rather CPU for where they mention "fitting" (aka branching compact to CPU & powergrid specializations)

Missile launcher are the obvious ones, but this effects all modules, im sure CCP end game is to reduce the amount of entries in the database.

I began stocking a reasonable amount of items about 2 weeks ago in 3 Hubs (Jita, amarr & Dodi) my spend is about 500m across the galaxy for these items, and i have the amount i need now.

TL:DR do a bit of reading, buy cheap modules (10m worth is like 10000 of some items.) wait till they change them, then slowly sell them off.

The fun part for me is, will people believe me? or dismiss me as a troll, either way, IDC, if ppl beleive me there may be a small spike in prices, if they spike, just wait a month or 2 and buy them then, this is a long long one, who knows what CCP will change next!

Edit: updated title to include doomsday preppers, eve search the thread if you dont beleive me :p

@JerryTPepridge

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#2 - 2014-12-31 16:31:48 UTC
would like pledge 20b

@JerryTPepridge

Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#3 - 2014-12-31 21:15:43 UTC

This is why I criticised investing in meta-4 items as a really bad idea a few weeks ago. It is also the reason I sold off my meta-4 stocks months ago and invested heavily in low meta 1 & 2 items and before the recent drift upwards.

What surprised me, was not the criticism, so much as the fact my cornering apparently went unnoticed or commented on.


Welcome to the club Jerry. :)
HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#4 - 2014-12-31 22:26:23 UTC  |  Edited by: HeXxploiT
I've refrained from making this thread for months but what the hell I probably have a million items stockpiled by now so lets talk about it.
The theory is sound. One of the devs, forget which one, made a key statement. They said that they wanted to bring value to all modules and eliminate worthless modules from the game.
One can quickly deduce from this that either a: worthless modules will be made better or b:they will be combined with another more valuable module. Pretty simple. Luckily there is such a broad spectrum of items to invest in that there is room for all to make profit.
Also builders of many T1 items will make good money over the next year in the face of hundreds of traders attempting to stockpile goods while prices rise. Should be good fun.

Oh, and by the way, I've named my container "Doomsday Preppers" and that should be the name of this thread. Lol
Makhpella
Bad Taste.
#5 - 2015-01-01 00:10:30 UTC
The supply of these items is huge. Most of these items is reprocessed now... or left in space. Demand would have to be big to make them worth more than reprocessed value. Too many ppl runs missions etc.

Maybe some high demand weapons might be worth buying. But I wouldnt buy anything for more than reprocessed value.
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#6 - 2015-01-01 13:53:26 UTC
Makhpella wrote:
The supply of these items is huge. Most of these items is reprocessed now... or left in space. Demand would have to be big to make them worth more than reprocessed value. Too many ppl runs missions etc.

Maybe some high demand weapons might be worth buying. But I wouldnt buy anything for more than reprocessed value.


thats the point, i don't think any of the modules CCP changes / i speculated on are going to be useless & reprocessed. useless is being removed. whether supply gets increased or decreased is another factor. but i doubt the same volume of items will drop in the case of the consolidated ones meaning in the case of the 4>>>2 items, that 2 of the compact will drop in place of arb & malkuth, but thats just me guessing.

i guess we can check if any of the already changed ones are at the repro level, i know LML is going strong for both types. one is 300k other is 900 with huge volume. probs coz flavor of the month.

i didnt buy any cruise missile launchers coz they are terrible.

defo good advice:

1) never listen to anyone here on MD about buying or speculation unless its Akita T
2) never buy beyond your means

my total spend is 500m on this one. i bought items from nullsec fleet doctrines, where demand is bulk & where ill most likely end up dumping my stacks in set and forget style.

supply is huge in every market in eve man :p

@hexxboy wish granted

@JerryTPepridge

Makhpella
Bad Taste.
#7 - 2015-01-01 14:44:33 UTC
Yeah it seems m1 LML was a very good opportunity. I wonder if the drop rates changed? So if drop rates werent merged the supply is lower than I assumed.

Damn, I guess I will buy some.
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#8 - 2015-01-02 11:18:44 UTC
I would very much like to know whether the drop rates on the LML were adjusted. CCP said (can't remember where) that the rates wouldn't change but the prices for the meta 1 are much higher than I expected.

Everything written above is good. Looks to me like there will be considerable speculation before each patch with a module tiericide element. I have already filled my buy orders. :)

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#9 - 2015-01-04 05:13:25 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:

This is why I criticised investing in meta-4 items as a really bad idea a few weeks ago. It is also the reason I sold off my meta-4 stocks months ago and invested heavily in low meta 1 & 2 items and before the recent drift upwards.

What surprised me, was not the criticism, so much as the fact my cornering apparently went unnoticed or commented on.


Welcome to the club Jerry. :)



I have been watching meta 4 markets, and there has been no visible panic selling of the meta 4 modules that are widely used at least, and as such I have seen no reason to panic sell the small amount I hold now. I certainly would not be buying meta 4 modules that are low demand, however, and I expect to lose ISK on the ones of those modules I am holding for alliance logistical reasons.

I believe the opportunities for profit from tiericide are not to be found primarily in buying today's high supply, low demand items and selling them slowly after they become high supply, medium demand. I am watching like a hawk any changes announced to low supply, low demand items that might turn them into low supply, medium demand items.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#10 - 2015-01-04 05:16:03 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

I have been watching meta 4 markets, and there has been no visible panic selling of the meta 4 modules that are widely used at least, and as such I have seen no reason to panic sell the small amount I hold now. I certainly would not be buying meta 4 modules that are low demand, however, and I expect to lose ISK on the ones of those modules I am holding for alliance logistical reasons.

I believe the opportunities for profit from tiericide are not to be found primarily in buying today's high supply, low demand items and selling them slowly after they become high supply, medium demand. I am watching like a hawk any changes announced to low supply, low demand items that might turn them into low supply, medium demand items.


you have no idea what you are talking about do you?

@JerryTPepridge

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#11 - 2015-01-04 06:31:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Zappity
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

I have been watching meta 4 markets, and there has been no visible panic selling of the meta 4 modules that are widely used at least, and as such I have seen no reason to panic sell the small amount I hold now. I certainly would not be buying meta 4 modules that are low demand, however, and I expect to lose ISK on the ones of those modules I am holding for alliance logistical reasons.

I believe the opportunities for profit from tiericide are not to be found primarily in buying today's high supply, low demand items and selling them slowly after they become high supply, medium demand. I am watching like a hawk any changes announced to low supply, low demand items that might turn them into low supply, medium demand items.


you have no idea what you are talking about do you?

Why? Sabriz' logic is good. There is no immediate threat to meta 4 modules although I certainly wouldn't be buying them up right now. The best opportunities will definitely be in the low supply items which get buffed. I do think there is also good opportunity in the higher volume items, albeit not as great.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#12 - 2015-01-04 06:43:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Sabriz Adoudel
Zappity wrote:

Why? Sabriz' logic is good. There is no immediate threat to meta 4 modules although I certainly wouldn't be buying them up right now. The best opportunities will definitely be in the low supply items get buffed. I do think there is also good opportunity in the higher volume items, albeit not as great.



Jerry doesn't like me at all (I suspect he lost a freighter to my alliance at some point), and forum PVP - via condescending posts - is his primary weapon in our conflict. I take nothing personally.

I'm quite open to being proven wrong on the high supply, potential medium demand items like meta 1 warp scrams and webs. I have made an informed decision not to invest in that market, and time will tell if I have missed the opportunity of a lifetime as Jerry believes, or if I have merely missed an opportunity to make a few billion for a lot of babysitting of orders and 0.01 wars.

I'll lose a couple hundred million on the meta 4 stock I am currently holding for alliance logistics (mainly thousands of meta ECCM modules as a way to deal with any serious attempts to disrupt alliance operations in Uedama by vigilantes in ECM boats) but that's an expense I have made willingly.



To clarify - I'm not buying up meta 4 modules but I am still trading some of them and I still advise newbies to trading to consider doing so too.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#13 - 2015-01-04 06:48:27 UTC
Zappity wrote:

Why? Sabriz' logic is good. There is no immediate threat to meta 4 modules although I certainly wouldn't be buying them up right now. The best opportunities will definitely be in the low supply items get buffed. I do think there is also good opportunity in the higher volume items, albeit not as great.


re-read his post.

"I believe the opportunities for profit from tiericde are not to be found from high supply.... low demand items."

"and selling them slowly after they become medium demand, high supply"

OP is regards to buying modules that are to be consolidated. nothing to do with the current meta level / supply of any items.

remember after the tiericide hits, the market is wiped and the ones with the stock set the prices, the current low demand, is due to bad itemization, nothing more, shouldn't even be a factor in considering what to buy.

things to look for are what fits into the naming convention, i.e. lowest CPU use, lowest cap use, etc. nothing more.

tl:Dr current demand is irrelevant.

@JerryTPepridge

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#14 - 2015-01-04 07:00:37 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

Jerry doesn't like me at all (I suspect he lost a freighter to my alliance at some point), and forum PVP - via condescending posts - is his primary weapon in our conflict. I take nothing personally.


correct, i don't like dickriders, im p sure you are only in that alliance to get into the CSM.

Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

I'm quite open to being proven wrong on the high supply, potential medium demand items like meta 1 warp scrams and webs. I have made an informed decision not to invest in that market, and time will tell if I have missed the opportunity of a lifetime as Jerry believes, or if I have merely missed an opportunity to make a few billion for a lot of babysitting of orders and 0.01 wars..


you are only looking at meta levels, did you read the OP?
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

I'll lose a couple hundred million on the meta 4 stock I am currently holding for alliance logistics (mainly thousands of meta ECCM modules as a way to deal with any serious attempts to disrupt alliance operations in Uedama by CONCORD in ECM boats) but that's an expense I have made willingly..


fixed, & bolded.

Sabriz Adoudel wrote:

To clarify - I'm not buying up meta 4 modules but I am still trading some of them and I still advise newbies to trading to consider doing so too.


me too, im my quickbar is several meta 4 modules i trade daily, in jita. remember CCP is only changing a handful at a time.

the demand you & your guys create is a blip.

ignore the meta levels & demand and actually do some research b4 sperging in this thread pls.

@JerryTPepridge

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#15 - 2015-01-04 07:06:18 UTC
The supply will still be extremely high.

Let's assume the meta 2 gravimetric ECCM becomes very good after the tiericide, so good that most people that want to fit a gravimetric ECCM module gravitate to it over the tech 2 alternative. Best case scenario for this module.

There will still be dozens of this module in the hangar of every inefficient mission runner, and if they spike at all in price, these people will sell. There will also be tens of thousands in the hangars of a few speculators. And the demand for such a niche item will still be narrow.

Meantime a small number of these modules will sell in a price war, and mission runners will keep getting more and more and more and more of them in. The mission runners will probably more than meet demand alone on a niche item like this.

If the next patch made Charred Micro Circuit (a T1 salvage item that is not a limiting reagant for any widely used rig) popular, its price would remain suppressed for a very, very long time due to people like me having literally thousands of them in their hangars. (I have 3746 of that in Dodi 9-20 from my carebear days). They won't go up noticeably until that supply is exhausted, which may be 5+ years.




TLDR: Post-tiericide supply will be high on any module that becomes good, because there are so damn many of them in circulation right now. High supply, medium demand = not the world's highest prices.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#16 - 2015-01-04 07:11:45 UTC
Meta levels matter because they (indirectly) dictate present day demand, and influence present day supply. Meta 4 webs are currently the best webs below 50m ISK, and the rarest. Post Tiericide this will change, and the present Meta 2 web might turn out better despite being very cheap now. But on day 1 after tiericide, the present meta 4 one will have the lowest supply below faction.


Markets are about supply, price-influenced demand and price-insensitive demand. Adjusting any of these factors will impact future prices.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#17 - 2015-01-04 07:15:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jerry T Pepridge
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Meta levels matter because they (indirectly) dictate present day demand, and influence present day supply. Meta 4 webs are currently the best webs below 50m ISK, and the rarest. Post Tiericide this will change, and the present Meta 2 web might turn out better despite being very cheap now. But on day 1 after tiericide, the present meta 4 one will have the lowest supply below faction.


Markets are about supply, price-influenced demand and price-insensitive demand. Adjusting any of these factors will impact future prices.


you still don't get it, im not going to get into an argument with about it. ill stick to my original "you have no idea"

E: well maybe one more, seeing as you are still not seeing it.

@JerryTPepridge

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#18 - 2015-01-04 07:54:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Jerry T Pepridge
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Meta levels matter because they (indirectly) dictate present day demand, and influence present day supply. Meta 4 webs are currently the best webs below 50m ISK, and the rarest. Post Tiericide this will change, and the present Meta 2 web might turn out better despite being very cheap now. But on day 1 after tiericide, the present meta 4 one will have the lowest supply below faction.


Markets are about supply, price-influenced demand and price-insensitive demand. Adjusting any of these factors will impact future prices.


ok lets talk webs, pay attention you may learn something.

known naming conventions after tiericide:

Quote:
Upgraded- Used for named modules where no specialization is possible
*Compact- Used for named modules that specialize in reduced fitting cost
**Enduring- Used for named modules that specialize in lower cap use or otherwise longer running time
Ample- Used for named modules that specialize in extra capacity
**Scoped- Used for named modules that specialize in longer range
Restrained- Used for named modules that specialize in reduced drawbacks


I put a double star on the possible outcome after tiericide.

Quote:

*Compact- Used for named modules that specialize in reduced fitting cost (definitely will happen)

**Enduring- Used for named modules that specialize in lower cap use or otherwise longer running time (possible~)
**Scoped- Used for named modules that specialize in longer range (Less possible)


CCP stated they are leveling out the "power levels" so current strength of them is irrelevant i.e. (your bad meta 4 example)

Range(scoped) on a web is a power level (IMO). so assume your meta 4 webs being "the best" will be leveled, and post changes the "demand" will be gone. so all those holding those webs will be mad (lol) coza they are merged & renamed.

so of the possible naming conventions, only 1 is definite (compact), 1 is probable ( enduring) probs less cap use, higher CPU perhaps), 1 is less likely (scoped, range) coz if it came about the whole point of it would be useless, as everyone would just get the biggest range one right, as the power levels are the same.

see the logic?

so assume 4 >>> 2

of the current named modules there is, which fits into this naming convention already?

meta 4 - Fleeting propulsion inhibitor cost 4 GJ (enduring)
meta 2 - Languor drive disruptor - lowest CPU of the meta modules. (compact)

which will have the highest demand post patch? and is currently p cheap? remember post patch power levels are even.

that is what it takes to impress me, sabriz abutthurtdel, not some BS sperg with no facts . numbers or at least a theory to back it up.

now haven't u got some other thread to post in to make ppl more aware you are going for CSM?

@JerryTPepridge

Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#19 - 2015-01-08 16:10:59 UTC
Feel the burn.

On the example of webs, the lower level webs are 50% webs, and the upper level ones are 60% webs. So I wonder whether webs will all get dropped to 50% or all webs upped to 60%.

I seem to recall that CCP stated metas 2 and 4 will be merged, and metas 3 and 1 will be merged. But looking back at the part 2 devblog, it seems this will not always be the case for every item type. In this case, I would say Jerry is probably right.

imo, people will always want a reduced fitting module. Some bonus is better than none, after all.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#20 - 2015-01-14 19:45:39 UTC  |  Edited by: HeXxploiT
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
The supply will still be extremely high.

Let's assume the meta 2 gravimetric ECCM becomes very good after the tiericide, so good that most people that want to fit a gravimetric ECCM module gravitate to it over the tech 2 alternative. Best case scenario for this module.

There will still be dozens of this module in the hangar of every inefficient mission runner, and if they spike at all in price, these people will sell. There will also be tens of thousands in the hangars of a few speculators. And the demand for such a niche item will still be narrow.

Meantime a small number of these modules will sell in a price war, and mission runners will keep getting more and more and more and more of them in. The mission runners will probably more than meet demand alone on a niche item like this.

If the next patch made Charred Micro Circuit (a T1 salvage item that is not a limiting reagant for any widely used rig) popular, its price would remain suppressed for a very, very long time due to people like me having literally thousands of them in their hangars. (I have 3746 of that in Dodi 9-20 from my carebear days). They won't go up noticeably until that supply is exhausted, which may be 5+ years.




TLDR: Post-tiericide supply will be high on any module that becomes good, because there are so damn many of them in circulation right now. High supply, medium demand = not the world's highest prices.


Sabriz one point that you've missed is that that meta 2 is now going to be merged with half a dozen other versions so essentially that niche item is no longer niche as anyone who was using any of the other half dozen modules is now using that one module.
Therein lies one of the most important aspects of this speculation. Historically there have been a great deal of these niche items. Niche meaning basically that they are good for a specific task and so not necessarily highly sought after.
Because of the relatively high supply / low demand there has been a large spread on many T1 items sometimes hundreds of %.
The merging of items pretty much destroys niche items by both increasing demand and simultaneously removing the number of choices a pilot has to make. These actions will close the gap on the spread of many items and this is where huge profits are to be made as prices find middle ground in the spread.
Now this is only a portion of the opportunities to be had with Tiericide but I think one of the most significant.
You are correct it stating that it will take awhile for prices to find their natural floor but my personal projection has been 4-6 months MInimum and perhaps up to a year but not as long as 5 years.
It is a long term investment but I am happy to report that many investors do not understand the nature of this investment and are already liquidating their positions when we haven't even reached the four month mark from the first round.
As far as profits go my projection are profits of up to 1000% with a just few already coming to fruition at this early date.
12Next page