These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rebalanced modules bullkheads

Author
Fabada Asturiana23
Mistic power
#1 - 2014-12-24 10:31:44 UTC
Well, in the next update to proteus, bullkheads will be rebalanced and downgrade cause they will have got more penalities.

My sugest: Add on a new skill like "advance hull sistems" that work only for this modules to reduce their future penalities.

Hull tanked gallente ships will be more unefective whith the next upgrade.

Lugh Crow-Slave
#2 - 2014-12-24 10:45:16 UTC
could it be they are given these new penalties for balance reasons? and as such a skill like this would simply serve to make the balance attempt pointless...
HiddenPorpoise
Jarlhettur's Drop
United Federation of Conifers
#3 - 2014-12-24 11:08:57 UTC
Bulkheads already do that; they're just stratifying the effect.

As one of the people that does hull tank: yeah whatever.
Fabada Asturiana23
Mistic power
#4 - 2014-12-24 11:20:37 UTC
Balance reasons?????' i hope hull repairs will be boosted cause they are inefective 100%
HiddenPorpoise
Jarlhettur's Drop
United Federation of Conifers
#5 - 2014-12-24 11:29:32 UTC
Welcome to hull tanking. Those reps are for putting yourself back together not repping midfight.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#6 - 2014-12-24 11:31:21 UTC
HiddenPorpoise wrote:
Welcome to hull tanking. Those reps are for putting yourself back together not repping midfight.


this

hull tanking isn't something that was intended but something we did as players so mods aren't balanced around making it viable
Fabada Asturiana23
Mistic power
#7 - 2014-12-24 12:05:43 UTC
And where is the problem? If hull tank is viable ..... is another tank like shiels or armor. whith vendtages and disventages

Why rebalance only one tank type and dont rebalance the other ones?

If hull tank is viable thanks to players....... ! congratulations players!

Me like a player love hull tank but ccp think that i must love armor or shield. No free decision
Lugh Crow-Slave
#8 - 2014-12-24 12:16:49 UTC
because it is intended to be viable for freighters to hull tank as such i'm willing to bet it was being balanced around them and yes intended use generally takes precedence over an unintended one used by a minority of players
Fabada Asturiana23
Mistic power
#9 - 2014-12-24 12:32:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabada Asturiana23
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Tanking

Hull tanking for freighters?

Hull tanking is: " is uncommon because hull repairers have low repair rates and tanking on structure leaves little room for error."

ok is uncommon, ok leaves little room for errror, whatever you want..... but i love it.

When i fight whith a ship hull tanked i know that i go to kill or die "honorable combat" ah and dont forget that any friend boost your terrible hull tank whith links.

Only disventadges why more?
Lugh Crow-Slave
#10 - 2014-12-24 12:36:14 UTC
I'm glad you love it keep on doing it all i'm saying is that your idea to put in skills to undo a balance pass makes the pass irrelevant

and do you know of any other cheap way to tank a freighter?(don't fly them much tbh)
Fabada Asturiana23
Mistic power
#11 - 2014-12-24 12:45:58 UTC
Well if i am disapointed whith this "Rebalanced module" what do you want that i do? i express my disencounter.

Lugh Crow-Slave
#12 - 2014-12-24 12:50:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Lugh Crow-Slave
If they haven't already they will put up a feedback thread put you're dissatisfaction there