These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SUZY for CSM!!

Author
Filthy Neutral
4 Way Santa
#21 - 2014-12-19 16:41:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Filthy Neutral
oh ya!
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2014-12-19 16:42:47 UTC
That is a crap ton of votes! Rock!

Banirtal Cadelanne wrote:
You get all 43 my votes!

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Black Pedro
Mine.
#23 - 2014-12-19 16:51:01 UTC
Suzy RC Mudstone wrote:
So i'm going to run. At the encouragement of few but i think it's a good idea.

Ok, I have no clue what you represent so I will just throw out a random question.

Many say that Eve is built on the idea of risk vs. reward. Do you agree with this, and if so, what do you think is the most pressing issue facing the game from this view. What is the biggest current problem resulting from an imbalance of risk vs. reward, and what would you suggest to fix it?
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2014-12-19 17:45:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6637
That's a nice tryhard politics type of question, but this isn't about that. In fact it's the opposite. I thought that was obvious.

Here's what I think Suzy is good for. Breaking things down like I'm five, and if you can't do that, you probably don't understand it well enough. What Suzy needs to do is keep an inquisitive attitude and hear people out when they want to communicate.

It's fresh and not a gimmick. You, me, and everyone else qualified to answer your question thoroughly is already experience-heavy, and probably too opinionated to reach an honest conclusion.

Suzy is sacrificing their love of EVE for the good of us all. I think it's something we need, and that's why I'm voting un-ironically.

You'd be planting a rookie into CSM discussions, which is otherwise impossible due to NDA.

Ask Suzy what their personal and education background is. You'll be impressed.
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-12-19 19:26:17 UTC
In response let me offer a bit of clarification hopefully. I have in no way been hardened or corrupted by this game. I honestly wish that we had a better retention rate for newer players. Not because i'm some new bro sympathizer but because more players is more things to shoot at or with. That will always be a good thing.

People argue that CCP need to "fix" the game before devoting resources to other things. The game isn't broken. It's brilliant fun. There are some mechanics that need repair or rebuild as anything aging will need from time to time. POSes (in the pipe), Corp managment (in the pipe). The tutorial missions. They get minor little barely improvements.

Most players don't even remember when they ran theirs. Others just don't care because the community will scoop up these players and push them down one path or another. I tend not to refer to this as the "new player experience" because it's not an experience. It isn't epic. It should be. The tutorial missions should introduce mechanics in a story/lore driven way. Make it an exciting introduction to this world we call eve. Then they get plopped into the main shard in their starter system.


Here's the absolute of my campaign. Eek this almost sounds like serious space business... :( The CSM is meant to represent the everyone of eve. Sure every one on these panels has their own interests and passions. The diversity in those is important. Representing the players of the game is just as important. Not just the Space Celebrities and those that are in leadership positions but everyone. No i can't talk to everyone but i do try to talk to anyone who will talk to me. Ask anyone who's interacted with me... I love to talk to people friends and space enemies alike.



Black Pedro wrote:
Suzy RC Mudstone wrote:
So i'm going to run. At the encouragement of few but i think it's a good idea.

Ok, I have no clue what you represent so I will just throw out a random question.

Many say that Eve is built on the idea of risk vs. reward. Do you agree with this, and if so, what do you think is the most pressing issue facing the game from this view. What is the biggest current problem resulting from an imbalance of risk vs. reward, and what would you suggest to fix it?

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#26 - 2014-12-19 19:29:36 UTC
boosh. putting the quote at the end of the post... that's what fresh feels like.

sorry Suzy I'm trying really hard to be quiet but this thread is just way too awesome. (sorry)
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2014-12-19 19:33:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Suzy RC Mudstone
Rain6637 wrote:
boosh. putting the quote at the end of the post... that's what fresh feels like.

sorry Suzy I'm trying really hard to be quiet but this thread is just way too awesome. (sorry)


That better? haha It's like i almost know what i'm doing.

No worries. But i need to be exposed to the more traditional questions because i kind of do need to answer them. If i'm going to represent the playersi have to be willing to interact with anyone and answer questions and i will as best i can.

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#28 - 2014-12-19 22:51:58 UTC
I love your enthusiasm, and I've always been happy to support new players running for CSM.

Have you seen this presentation on the direction that CCP is investigating for a completely different New Player Experience? It seems somewhat different from your idea, though the two could go together. Thoughts?

(As I've said in other candidate threads, I'm less interested in getting ~answers~ and more interested in seeing how people think.)

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2014-12-19 23:39:48 UTC
Dersen Lowery wrote:
I love your enthusiasm, and I've always been happy to support new players running for CSM.

Have you seen this presentation on the direction that CCP is investigating for a completely different New Player Experience? It seems somewhat different from your idea, though the two could go together. Thoughts?

(As I've said in other candidate threads, I'm less interested in getting ~answers~ and more interested in seeing how people think.)



i think it can go hand and hand and it was mentioned they are looking at how to motivate and reward. I think that a narrative based coupling with all the tooltips and popups would be great. Concern would be with streamlining the popups and tool tips so we aren't doing internet in 1996

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Andail Chanter
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2014-12-20 08:13:20 UTC
Will you provide a voice for the voiceless in New Eden? Will you smack talk reds in every system you find them in, and call them 'bitches'?!
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2014-12-20 08:18:11 UTC
Andail Chanter wrote:
Will you provide a voice for the voiceless in New Eden? Will you smack talk reds in every system you find them in, and call them 'bitches'?!



That's kind of my ultimate goal. I think there's a lot of concerns that people have that are going unnoticed because they are being talked over because they don't have much voice muscle in the universe. I think that identifying and addressing some of those would be beneficial to everyone at all levels of play.

Also a little bit of smack talk in jest is always good. though sometimes individuals and groups get a bit carried away i think it goes along with the theme of eve being a bit harsh and lawless.

To those abusing reporting mechanics with the sole intention of getting people banned i'd suggest they watch this video on CCP's youtube channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

JetJon
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#32 - 2014-12-21 08:24:32 UTC
ok, so one thing that has bothered me ever since the new deployables came out is that there is no way to deploy them for corp, or better yet passworded so that you can use it between alts and corp members.

as a member of the CSM what is your stance on the multiplayer aspect of EVE and how the new deployables ignore this.
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2014-12-21 08:36:18 UTC
JetJon wrote:
ok, so one thing that has bothered me ever since the new deployables came out is that there is no way to deploy them for corp, or better yet passworded so that you can use it between alts and corp members.

as a member of the CSM what is your stance on the multiplayer aspect of EVE and how the new deployables ignore this.



Yes.


Ok i'll embellish. Something i really believe in is the social nature of this game. For me i come on after work and i want to talk to the people i play with. I want to do things together as well.

I think that Mobile Tractor Units certainly pose a minor barrier to this. As do ESS.

The MTU needs to be anchorable for corp. If you trust your corp mates you should be able to set something up so that they can scoop the unit.

ESS also needs some rework because in their current state they seem to be more of a drama generator as much as they are an LP and isk generator.

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#34 - 2014-12-21 16:02:25 UTC
As CSM, will you still make an effort to continue taking us out on fleets from time to time? Your fleets represent everything that is fun about dying in a fire.

XOXO
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2014-12-21 19:29:22 UTC
Absolutely! This game is so fun even losing is awesome sometimes.

The seriousness of this thread is a bit troubling but it's for the greater good i hope.

Something we talked about last night was cloaky camping and the upcoming recon changes. It was really interesting.

Check out last nights Podside Podcast http://podcasts.mpxmirror.com/podside/PodsideEp266.mp3

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#36 - 2014-12-21 19:42:10 UTC
hah. NSFW

About what time in the recording are you? (the thing is 2 hours long Shocked )
Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2014-12-21 19:48:51 UTC
It's honestly worth a listen in the backround while you do other things. We get pretty into it around 20 min. Put it on like you would the radio while you're ratting :)

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2014-12-21 21:11:33 UTC

Does the RC stand for Radio Controlled, Release Candidate, or is it a reference to a type of electrical filter circuit?

Or are you just a fan of RC Cola like I am? If so, please specify which flavor.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Suzy RC Mudstone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2014-12-21 21:17:58 UTC
RC cola is good but if you're from the north east Stop and shop brand is on point as well though i'm unsure if they still make it.

http://i.imgur.com/qEhiI1H.jpg

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2014-12-21 21:41:21 UTC
Suzy RC Mudstone wrote:
It's honestly worth a listen in the backround while you do other things. We get pretty into it around 20 min. Put it on like you would the radio while you're ratting :)

what the **** did you just accuse me of