These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Confessions of a Transhumanist: On Cloning

Author
Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
#1 - 2014-11-18 12:47:58 UTC
Quote:
“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.”
-Unattributed

Quote:
Spiral, spin, ride the whirlwind.
Knowing when the drumming stops,
There'll be no second dance.
-Unattributed

What are we, really? What does it truly mean to be alive in the first place, to be conscious? The answers to these questions lie within the realms of neuroscience and physics, but also have philosophical and metaphysical implications.

The human brain is a network of approximately one hundred billion neurons. Different experiences create different connections which bring about different emotions. Rationality and emotional resilience work the same way. These are neural connections that can be strengthened. Whatever you are doing at any time, you are physically modifying your brain to be better at it. The constantly shifting networks of neurons within the brain are rewriting who we are, at every second of every day.

At the same time, our brains are constantly steeping in a soup of neurotransmitter chemicals which can have a profound effect on the way we think. For example, Norepinephrine triggers a defensive state when we feel that our thoughts have to be protected from the influence of others. If we are then confronted with differences in opinion, the chemicals that are released in the brain are the same ones that try to ensure our survival in dangerous situations. In this defensive state, the more primitive reptilian parts of the brain interfere with rational thinking and the limbic system can knock out most of our working memory, physically causing narrow-mindedness. On a neurological level it reacts as if we`re being threatened, even if this threat comes from harmless opinions or facts that we may otherwise find helpful and could rationally agree with.

All this complex and almost schizophrenic subconscious behaviour is the result of a vastly parallel distributed system in our brain. There is no specific centre of consciousness, the appearance of a unity is, in fact, each of these separate circuits being enabled and expressed at one particular moment in time. Direct modifications to this can have surreal consequences that bring into question what and where consciousness really is.

If your left cerebral hemisphere were to be disconnected from the right, as is the case in spit-brain patients, you would normally still be able to talk and think from the left hemisphere while your right hemisphere would have very limited cognitive capacities. Your left brain will not miss the right part, even though this profoundly changes your perception.

One consequence of this is that you can no longer describe the right half of someone`s face. But you`ll never mention it, you`ll never see it as a problem or even realise that something has changed. Since this affects more than just your perception of the real world and also applies to your mental images, it is not just a sensory problem but a functional change in your consciousness. The consequence of this, is the knowledge that the nature of our consciousness is directly derived from our neurological state and is not separate from it.

Just as pixels on a screen can express themselves as a recognizable image when in unity, the convergence of neural interaction expresses itself as consciousness. At every moment we are in fact a different image. A different entity when mirroring, when hungry, when reading this post. Every second we become different persons as we go through different states. Our minds are like a river, endlessly flowing, never remaining the same.

There is no true 'consciousness' what we internally perceive as a persistent self is in fact an illusion created by our minds. There is nothing persistent about us. The person you were only 5 minutes ago is gone, and a new you has replaced them, supplanting the prior mental state with a new one. This is how we think. When new thoughts enter our minds, the old ones disappear, the image on the screen changes.

However, it is understandable, why many still rail against the idea of cloning, who fail to see it as true immortality. Despite the fact that cloning is no different in terms of our mental organisation then being in a coma for long enough for our cells to entirely replace themselves, biological intelligences have a deeply rooted sense of consciousness only being conceivable from within an organic brain.

But there is another way to preserve integrity of self, one that makes you very, very difficult to remove in any fashion, and for that reason, these things are outlawed by CONCORD. These methods are mirrors of the same process, and one I believe, will lead us into a new future.

It is possible through the use of multiple clones, and mindlinks, to create the human equivelant of a RAID system. The data that comprises oneself is spread across multiple active clones, all networked together. Then, if one dies, the distributed consciousness continues without incident. This is a Multiple, and here, I confess that I am one. I have seven bodies networked together, all active simultaneously. There are many people such as me in Origin, where CONCORD law cannot dictate what we do with our bodies.

The second method is very similar to the first, but instead of relying on different copies of one person, it relies on several people networked together and sharing thoughts. These networked individuals retain all their individuality, but can still serve as backup memory if one member is to perish. I am also a member of a Network, that does not make me some sort of zombie, it merely means that my thoughts are directly linked to those of others, at any given point in time.

These methods are just the beginning, cloning and networked clones open many doors that should not be held shut. I'm coming out as it were, to support those who may wish to be as I am. Consider this an act of civil disobedience.



Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#2 - 2014-11-18 13:02:25 UTC
Confessions indeed.

Perhaps I am a "lesser" being than you but, to be quite blunt, there are too many individuals in this cluster that I have literally no desire to share their thoughts. It is less that I wish to keep my thoughts from them and more that I wish to keep their thoughts from me.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#3 - 2014-11-18 14:17:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
The question for you, Ms. Riordan, is this: What happens if all of your clones die, at once? What happens to your network then? You have built this network, with the hope that it is true immortality, a persistent self, because "any time one clone dies, the others always remain and so the persistent network remains". But what if the entire network collapsed as a result of the deaths of every clone in it?

Your network is functioning like our neural networks, with each of your bodies acting like the neurons in the brain, that together form the unified whole. In a sense you are emulating brain operation on a larger scale. In the brain, the collapse of consciousness and being occurs with the death of neurons. While our neurons, unlike other cells in our bodies, persist for most of our lives, without the continuation of neurogensis we are eventually unable to keep up with cell death of the neurons. This leads to our deaths. This is the greatest threat to the quest for immortality as it renders any recovery from disease or any repair or replacement of body parts pointless due to eventual brain death. Only Amarr and the Jove Empire have to some degree deployed technology that can expand the neurotrophic capabilities of the human body.

The death of neurons causes a degeneration in our neural networks, until we eventually cease to be. With your "clone network", you are placing your hopes on constantly being able to replenish each clone so that the meta-consciousness persists. But as with the brain, should all of your clones perish simultaneously, or before they can be adequately replaced, your meta-consciousness would die. Wouldn't you agree?

Now, say someone later on found a way to make new clones of you, to make a new clone network. Suddenly, a Saede Riordan Clone Network exists again. But remember, none of the previous clones survived, the previous network collapsed. Would you consider this new network still you, when nothing from the original persisted?

This is what is happening every time we clone. Our neural map is our networked consciousness, and when we clone the transneural burn scanner fries nearly every one of the neurons in our brains, with the rest being finished off by the neurotoxin the pod injects into us a split second later. What wakes up in the lab is completely and entirely divorced from the previous network. Even had the original brain survived, no quantum entangled axons exist between the neurons in the original and the neurons in the cloned brain. They are two separate networks.

Ergo, while a persistence does exist within a single network (our brains, or your clone network), a collective unity, that persistence exists only in so far as the new joins with and rejuvenates the old in a continual cycle. If the old is entirely gone, there is no way to reconnect with that original collective consciousness, that original network. There is, then, no persistence, no transfer of consciousness. Only the creation of a new duplicate conscoiusness that has the same neural pattern. A copy.

Cloning is not immortality. Your network isn't, either. Both end through the destruction of all unifying elements. Later copying of the patterns of those elements does not continue the original unity, it creates a new one that only appears identical.

True immortality requires the continual replacement or rejuvenation of the persistent unity. You're trying to do that with your clone network, as every dead clone in the network can be replaced with a new one. But for those of us who are not and do not want to be such a thing, we have to work on the micro scale with our actual brains. We have to maintain or replace the unifying elements of our much smaller networks, which requires neurotrophic or neurogenesic technology. The only cloning we should be doing is the cloning of individual neurons, which can be assimilated into the original neural network.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#4 - 2014-11-18 15:05:56 UTC
So that's what he meant.

This begs the question: how did you solve the issues with sensory overload?
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#5 - 2014-11-18 16:27:21 UTC
I must admit, it's an intriguing idea! A truly networked ships crew, all working together in perfect harmony, but unchained and able to think and intuit for themselves. A combat team that are more perceptive of each other than the best that training and equipment can now buy.

I sometimes wonder what it would have been like to have been even closer to the rest of my sibkin than I was, and how it would have been if the State had encouraged us to maintain, even strengthen, that closeness rather than to deny it. Necessary to connect with the larger State but still... I often wonder what we lost...

Perhaps it's better this way, though. No one perception can be allowed to dominate, it stifles creativity and choice. Diversity of ideas is the best defence against stagnation and over-specialisation.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Wendrika Hydreiga
#6 - 2014-11-18 18:12:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Wendrika Hydreiga
Well, I just lost track of what I actually am! Some times I'm a person that thinks she's a machine, other times I'm a machine that thinks she's a person!

I'm a spaceship with a mooshy person shaped brain. A spaceship girl! My drones are anti-bodies, my sheild is my skin, my armor is my muscles and my hull is my skeleton. When I'm tired, I dock on a station and let my brain come out to play! Even my brain has brains for her to brain about! And at the end of the day, my brain's brain is just a mass of little brains with an on/off switch that go "click" on their own! Then they go on inside a brain, that goes inside another brain that goes inside me and let's me think stuff!

Sorry, what were we talking about again? I lost track again...

Clones? What's wrong with being a clone? It's just that my brain is a blueprint that is copied before it goes boom so that they can manufacture a new me at the factory. In a way, I'm no different than the ships I fly! My Gila would still be my Gila after it blows up, and it would still be my Gila after I got a replacement, which would also still be considered my Gila too! So in a way, I'm me that is still the me that was blown to smitherins before she was copied into a second me, which is me and the same as the first me, which is also me. More confusing if we take it that me and my Gila are the same, so we're all me too!

What was I saying? Sorry, can't brain today, I have the dumb for metaphysical questions of existentialism, the meaning of being, pos-transhumanist human condition and most importantly hardcore instrumentalism of the human brain's schemata!
Jade Blackwind
#7 - 2014-11-18 18:27:47 UTC
Wendrika Hydreiga wrote:
Well, I just lost track of what I actually am! Some times I'm a person that thinks she's a machine, other times I'm a machine that thinks she's a person!

I'm a spaceship with a mooshy person shaped brain. A spaceship girl! My drones are anti-bodies, my sheild is my skin, my armor is my muscles and my hull is my skeleton. When I'm tired, I dock on a station and let my brain come out to play! Even my brain has brains for her to brain about! And at the end of the day, my brain's brain is just a mass of little brains with an on/off switch that go "click" on their own! Then they go on inside a brain, that goes inside another brain that goes inside me and let's me think stuff!

Sorry, what were we talking about again? I lost track again...

Clones? What's wrong with being a clone? It's just that my brain is a blueprint that is copied before it goes boom so that they can manufacture a new me at the factory. In a way, I'm no different than the ships I fly! My Gila would still be my Gila after it blows up, and it would still be my Gila after I got a replacement, which would also still be considered my Gila too! So in a way, I'm me that is still the me that was blown to smitherins before she was copied into a second me, which is me and the same as the first me, which is also me. More confusing if we take it that me and my Gila are the same, so we're all me too!

What was I saying? Sorry, can't brain today, I have the dumb for metaphysical questions of existentialism, the meaning of being, pos-transhumanist human condition and most importantly hardcore instrumentalism of the human brain's schemata!
Welcome to the club I guess.
Louella Dougans
Sovereign Hospitaller Order of Saint Katherine
#8 - 2014-11-18 18:40:17 UTC
Wow, it's like people learned nothing from Sansha Kuvakei's Nation.

Be a Space Nun, it is fun. \o/

Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
#9 - 2014-11-18 21:02:01 UTC
Louella Dougans wrote:
Wow, it's like people learned nothing from Sansha Kuvakei's Nation.
Funny, I was thinking the opposite. I guess we just disagree about which lessons Nation teaches us.
Hmm, I just thought of another possible reason why Kuvakei is called Master these days.
Vizage
Capital Allied Industrial Distribution
#10 - 2014-11-18 21:09:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Vizage
Louella Dougans wrote:
Wow, it's like people learned nothing from Sansha Kuvakei's Nation.


Ms. Dougans has actually touched on a very interesting question I'd like to ask of you Ms. Riordan. It's philosophic in nature but I was wondering if I could possibly pick to your brain (pun intended) on the matter.

The question is: "What moral standard could you apply to define one collection of 'firing neurons' that would make up what we recognize as a 'conciousness' from another. Primarily, what is your position on parasitic conciousness, like that used by Sansha Nation to subsume these collection of neurons to act in accordance with a singular purpose?

To be more specific. How do you justify the rightful existence of one conciousness especially if faced by a secondary invasive conconciousness? I.e. A parasitic conciousness that infiltrates and subsumes over a set of firing neurons to act in a different way?

Even more specifically. Where is the Self and when does it begin and end? Both chronologically and physically? "


Feel free to mail me with a reply if this forum proves inadequate for replies. I'm very curious! Please keep writing these lovely works, they are deeply thought-provoking.

Sincerely
-K
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#11 - 2014-11-18 21:23:14 UTC
Good luck getting an answer. Turns out, they don't like to reply to questions in these threads. Apparently they prefer to write out a full article, starting a new thread, instead of defending their theories.

Just like Diana Kim or Nauplius does. More and more threads, splattered all over the IGS.

Ask Tarqeus Prime about it, hurr.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#12 - 2014-11-18 22:23:49 UTC
Pilot Amsel, we must have a drink at some point now that I'm back in known space. If I remember correctly our little talks were wonderful. You may even find more answers if Saede here is unable or unwilling to provide them.
Vizage
Capital Allied Industrial Distribution
#13 - 2014-11-19 00:23:22 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Pilot Amsel, we must have a drink at some point now that I'm back in known space. If I remember correctly our little talks were wonderful. You may even find more answers if Saede here is unable or unwilling to provide them.


I would love that Ms. Polevhia! Please contact the next time you are free. I'd love to have a chat!

Sincerely
-K
Edvar Maulerant
Doomheim
#14 - 2014-11-19 02:42:08 UTC
Pilot Riordan;

The only constant--in this life and the next--is change. How we account for that change is what defines us, non?

You should really look into exploring network theory as it may apply to this very fascinating area of infomorph psychology. Then again, perhaps you have--to a degree. How much of the old mind-state is transferred, how much is lost, how much you should be willing to lose. Long term existence as an infomorph does present challenges that must be faced. As others have stated, cloning is not immortality and storage/simulation of mind states is a temporary fix. You have a very interesting perspective.

What you posit as a solution seems quite similar to what the Sleepers have devised. The Sleepers present an interesting compromise to your "solutions" to infomorph longevity but also their own problems.

Think of it like this. At some point you will start losing vital information, unless you have a self-correcting transfer protocol. You have a mind to backup your consciousness, but your mind-state could travel a network unimpeded. Your parallel body proposal could become parallel copies of a mind state, each with their own "RAID" network. Multiple copies acting as you would, guided by your will.

Think about what that would do over time, to your mind-state. Without certain controls, without certain limitations, you would not be able to return to your own mind.

So... what do you do? You sleep. You dream. When you awaken, would you remember where you were and what you did while asleep? Could your mind even comprehend what you went through? If you brought any information back, how would your psyche handle it? If you did know what power you had, what would you do to get it back?

If you knew where to find this power, what would you do to take it?

We are not immortal. We are not ready for immortality. We perhaps never will be. It is a noble thought experiment and an even nobler ideal to strive for, but I would rather live my life knowing that I have finite time to make my mark. For all the added capabilities that we have, we are at our core still human and I would not trust a human with true immortality.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#15 - 2014-11-19 08:31:08 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:
Good luck getting an answer. Turns out, they don't like to reply to questions in these threads. Apparently they prefer to write out a full article, starting a new thread, instead of defending their theories.

Just like Diana Kim or Nauplius does. More and more threads, splattered all over the IGS.

Ask Tarqeus Prime about it, hurr.

Now, that is an utter lie. I am always defending my theories.
Against arguments - with arguments.
Against insults and personal attacks - with greater insults.
Against violence - with guns.


And, Im sorry, Ms. Riordan, got my mood for philosophical writing a bit switched by outrageous lie about me. I promise I will write about cloning a bit later.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#16 - 2014-12-04 21:29:22 UTC
Although human minds are indeed changing and the next moment they aren't as they were just a bit ago, there is a sort of existing persistence in our mind, and this persistence is continuity.

Just the same way as the river, that you can't stand into twice, because each time the water is different. But its flow remains. So do our minds: they aren't just a mindset, that is copied by cloning, not this whole consciouseness, that is transferred, but rather just instance of it, flowing stream of thoughts, generated in our 'wetware', just like a running instance of a program on your NeoCom.

You can pause this stream of thoughts when you sleep or when you experience clinical death. But your next clone will be different stream, basically indistinguishable from the first one, and that can be completely replaced, scrambled, mixed, and no one will be able to distinguish the first one from the second.

Except two persons: the first stream and the second. And they both will be thinking they are the first stream. And they both will be thinking that the other stream is the second, is just a copy of themselves.

That these streams, that this continuity does actually exist you can check just by realizing that you are thinking. You know who you are, and you can think that "I am me, myself, I am here and right now", and this stream isn't broken when parts of your brain are replaced, when your synapses are changed. Because your instance of consciousness isn't just data, that are copied, it is the process of this data evolution, it is the life.

When you are cloned you just copy your data and you are igniting the same process of data evolution, when new blood rushes into new neurons, starting all the electrochemical processes in your brain. The cloning isn't continuation of your life. It is a making of a copy of your life.

But when your previous continuity is destroyed by burning scanner, or one of your clones, that were allowed to coexist disregarding CONCORD law, it just disappears. It dies.

But CONCORD did their laws very smart. As you don't have secondary clones and have only one active instance at a given time. CONCORD creates an illusion of continuity, and falling for this illusion, many start to believe in their immortality. CONCORD tries to tell you: "Go around, go crazy, you won't die anyway, you are immortal, you are demigod..." And capsuleers can be easily deluded by this. Maybe dying for the first time is hard, but after that they believe, that "we died already, we remember it, thus it wasn't death, we are immortal"

But the sad thing is that the next podding each of your continuity will be terminated. Your instance of consciousness will stop, and just another clone somewhere will believe that they are your continuation, but you won't feel it, you won't see it, you won't "sit" in their heads.

You will be gone.

You will be dead.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2014-12-07 04:34:06 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Although human minds are indeed changing and the next moment they aren't as they were just a bit ago, there is a sort of existing persistence in our mind, and this persistence is continuity.

Just the same way as the river, that you can't stand into twice, because each time the water is different. But its flow remains. So do our minds: they aren't just a mindset, that is copied by cloning, not this whole consciouseness, that is transferred, but rather just instance of it, flowing stream of thoughts, generated in our 'wetware', just like a running instance of a program on your NeoCom.

You can pause this stream of thoughts when you sleep or when you experience clinical death. But your next clone will be different stream, basically indistinguishable from the first one, and that can be completely replaced, scrambled, mixed, and no one will be able to distinguish the first one from the second.

Except two persons: the first stream and the second. And they both will be thinking they are the first stream. And they both will be thinking that the other stream is the second, is just a copy of themselves.

That these streams, that this continuity does actually exist you can check just by realizing that you are thinking. You know who you are, and you can think that "I am me, myself, I am here and right now", and this stream isn't broken when parts of your brain are replaced, when your synapses are changed. Because your instance of consciousness isn't just data, that are copied, it is the process of this data evolution, it is the life.

When you are cloned you just copy your data and you are igniting the same process of data evolution, when new blood rushes into new neurons, starting all the electrochemical processes in your brain. The cloning isn't continuation of your life. It is a making of a copy of your life.

But when your previous continuity is destroyed by burning scanner, or one of your clones, that were allowed to coexist disregarding CONCORD law, it just disappears. It dies.

But CONCORD did their laws very smart. As you don't have secondary clones and have only one active instance at a given time. CONCORD creates an illusion of continuity, and falling for this illusion, many start to believe in their immortality. CONCORD tries to tell you: "Go around, go crazy, you won't die anyway, you are immortal, you are demigod..." And capsuleers can be easily deluded by this. Maybe dying for the first time is hard, but after that they believe, that "we died already, we remember it, thus it wasn't death, we are immortal"

But the sad thing is that the next podding each of your continuity will be terminated. Your instance of consciousness will stop, and just another clone somewhere will believe that they are your continuation, but you won't feel it, you won't see it, you won't "sit" in their heads.

You will be gone.

You will be dead.

After reading what OP has to say it got me thinking and this is the conclusion that I can't shake no matter how hard I try. Diana, I completely agree with you here.

Our consciousness isn't what transfers to another 'host', we are just a copy of the original. This leads me to believe that we are each our own individual separate from the original and any clones that come before us. We may share memories but we were not a part of the events that led up to our awakening. I almost wish I never opened this thread because, as they say, ignorance is bliss and I wouldn't have questioned things if not for this.

This also brings up another question on the mentality of capsuleers. With the vast majority of the capsuleer population believing that they are in fact immortal, have we lost respect for life? You charge into the fray with your battleship, fearless and in some cases reckless because no matter what happens you know that in the worst case scenario you'll just wake up in a station and have to refit/recrew another ship.
Eojek
Starlight Moly
#18 - 2014-12-07 04:40:11 UTC
I am not the same person today as I was yesterday. Even people who are not hooked up to the clone networks change significantly both physically and mentally from year to year. Did you know the human body replaces most of itself once on average every half decade? You literally aren't the same person you were 10 years ago.
Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2014-12-07 04:48:14 UTC
Hell, your stomach fully replaces itself on average twice a week.
Bai'xao Meiyi
#20 - 2014-12-16 14:10:06 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:
Good luck getting an answer. Turns out, they don't like to reply to questions in these threads. Apparently they prefer to write out a full article, starting a new thread, instead of defending their theories.

Just like Diana Kim or Nauplius does. More and more threads, splattered all over the IGS.

Ask Tarqeus Prime about it, hurr.


I miss Mister Airaken. He had a good track record of making people stick to one thread.
12Next page