These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Steps to survive Freighter bumping from Mach

First post
Author
Cancel Align NOW
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#261 - 2014-12-04 21:02:50 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


Quote:
EVE is built on the core principle that you are never 100% safe, no matter where you go or what you do. When you interact with another player, you roll the dice on whether they're going to screw you over or not. That's a massive part of the social engineering behind the very basic underpinnings of the EVE Universe.


CCP do not want Eve Online to have safe zones: No where is 100% safe.


It's nice that you link that statement. Here is a clue. EVE IS ALREADY SUPER SAFE FOR COMPETENT PLAYERS.

AFK carrier ratting - Dekklein - super safe. Running L4 missions - super safe.

The only people who aren't safe in highsec are new/casual players. The competent vets already exist in a state of near complete safety. And ditto for sov nul.[/quote]


Anyone can get buddies together and kill carriers in Deklein with no interference from game mechanics designed to make it safer for carrier being ganked. I saw 2 get ganked last week.
Sugar Smacks
Khanid Royal Navy
Khanid.
#262 - 2014-12-04 21:18:44 UTC
First off you have to blame ISBoxer for being able to let 1 guy run 12 accounts to do the ganking.

I am not one to believe there is 12 different people ganking someone for their ship. Although this happens sometimes, this is NOT the case MOST of the time, it is simply 1 person who is overreaching their ability to interact in the game.

Next in general freighters are garbage, not because of capacity but for the reason people will gank them empty. You literally can haul NOTHING and get killed for it, and this happens more often then one would think. Hell even CCP asked the players what they thought of this as they had noticed it was happening.

Third your only chance here is to run multiple accounts, what an option right? Kind of fits into the Devs doing nothing since it makes them money.

Its sad in general, and a waste of training, I could drive one myself but cant find a good reason to even have one. Personally every time I see someone driving the non jump freighter variety I think them a fool.

Also in case you haven't noticed with the rules changing soon to Isboxer there is now round the clock ganking of freighters, or at least its picked up about 100 fold. Chance? Not likely.
Paranoid Loyd
#263 - 2014-12-04 21:39:04 UTC
Sugar Smacks wrote:
Third your only chance here is to run multiple accounts, what an option right? Kind of fits into the Devs doing nothing since it makes them money.
This is a multiplayer game, moving large assets requires multiple people to move them safely, having multiple accounts is not necessary, having multiple players is.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#264 - 2014-12-04 21:58:08 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Just to point out, a few pages back I posted a number of carriers that were killed ratting in dek and one titan in the last few weeks. The very idea that AFK carrier ratting in dek is safe is a total myth. Naturally Veers ignored this and pushed the myth again.
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#265 - 2014-12-04 22:33:54 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Just to point out, a few pages back I posted a number of carriers that were killed ratting in dek and one titan in the last few weeks. The very idea that AFK carrier ratting in dek is safe is a total myth. Naturally Veers ignored this and pushed the myth again.


Just to point out.....what does an afk ratting carrier have to do with the broken mechanic of freighter bumping (the topic)?

Nothing.

Carry on with the trolling.
Violet Hurst
Fedaya Recon
#266 - 2014-12-04 22:38:31 UTC
I used the forum search but didn't find any mention of the higgs anchor rigs in this thread. To me it seemed like those were specifically designed as a counter to bumping. Could anybody enlighten me why they don't fill that role, since nobody suggested using them?
Paranoid Loyd
#267 - 2014-12-04 22:39:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Violet Hurst wrote:
I used the forum search but didn't find any mention of the higgs anchor rigs in this thread. To me it seemed like those were specifically designed as a counter to bumping. Could anybody enlighten me why they don't fill that role, since nobody suggested using them?

Freighters don't have rig slots, ccp wanted to give them to us instead of low slots but the whiners got their way and as usual it has backfired.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Violet Hurst
Fedaya Recon
#268 - 2014-12-04 22:42:42 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Violet Hurst wrote:
I used the forum search but didn't find any mention of the higgs anchor rigs in this thread. To me it seemed like those were specifically designed as a counter to bumping. Could anybody enlighten me why they don't fill that role, since nobody suggested using them?

Freighters don't have rig slots


Oh. Yes, that might be slightly detrimental to the cause. ^^''
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#269 - 2014-12-04 23:00:37 UTC
Why does this thread have 14 fricken pages?

Avoiding a freighter gank is one of the easiest things in eve. Yesterday, on Dec. 3, 2014 a grand total of two freighters died in all of hisec (source). Two measly freighters. In ALL of hisec. Thousands upon thousands of freighters jump in and out of jita alone, Every. Single. Day.

WTF are you people b*tching about?
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#270 - 2014-12-04 23:13:15 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Why does this thread have 14 fricken pages?

Avoiding a freighter gank is one of the easiest things in eve. Yesterday, on Dec. 3, 2014 a grand total of two freighters died in all of hisec (source). Two measly freighters. In ALL of hisec. Thousands upon thousands of freighters jump in and out of jita alone, Every. Single. Day.

WTF are you people b*tching about?




Its not about freighters getting destroyed.

Its about one ship being able to bump another ship with no risk to itself what so ever.


The title states it clearly Freighter bumping, not Freighters being destroyed.


Your welcome.

Amber Lana
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#271 - 2014-12-04 23:14:56 UTC
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.

"And it rained tears for fourty days and fourty nights."

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#272 - 2014-12-04 23:22:35 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Just to point out, a few pages back I posted a number of carriers that were killed ratting in dek and one titan in the last few weeks. The very idea that AFK carrier ratting in dek is safe is a total myth. Naturally Veers ignored this and pushed the myth again.


You can link lots of highsec kills too. The mere existence of the kills doesn't determine how safe or unsafe the space is. The fact that people are willing to AFK multibillion isk ships in Dekklein with no CONCORD around to protect them should tell you that it's pretty darn safe.
Lister Dax
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#273 - 2014-12-04 23:25:46 UTC
Amber Lana wrote:
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.


It's pretty much Veers arguing a point and then ignoring any counter-points that discredit his claims and so he makes up a new point.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#274 - 2014-12-04 23:33:51 UTC
Lister Dax wrote:
Amber Lana wrote:
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.


It's pretty much Veers arguing a point and then ignoring any counter-points that discredit his claims and so he makes up a new point.


What was your point? All I'm seeing is "AFK bad." And I guess I don't really agree. I think mining should require interaction. But just moving around in highsec doesn't seem to me like an activity that should require being at keyboard. Eve shouldn't be so dangerous that moving your empty freighter through Uedama results in bumping in death. A freighter full of goodies? Maybe. But an empty one? No way.
ForTheEmpire2014
Doomheim
#275 - 2014-12-04 23:47:14 UTC
Lister Dax wrote:
Amber Lana wrote:
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.


It's pretty much Veers arguing a point and then ignoring any counter-points that discredit his claims and so he makes up a new point.


He cannot (or will not) ever stay on thread topics. Just his own repetitive, predictable, narcissistic rants.
"Blood and Feathers" Belvar and his moving goalposts.


And if you feel bumping is op, I suggest you get a ship out there and try it yourself. See what people do to avoid you, and apply that knowledge.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#276 - 2014-12-04 23:53:28 UTC
ForTheEmpire2014 wrote:
Lister Dax wrote:
Amber Lana wrote:
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.


It's pretty much Veers arguing a point and then ignoring any counter-points that discredit his claims and so he makes up a new point.


He cannot (or will not) ever stay on thread topics. Just his own repetitive, predictable, narcissistic rants.
"Blood and Feathers" Belvar and his moving goalposts.


And if you feel bumping is op, I suggest you get a ship out there and try it yourself. See what people do to avoid you, and apply that knowledge.


Uh huh. A thread about bumping freighters, which is overwhelmingly done by CODE, and even to empty freighters, relates directly to the safety of highsec. And the fact that CODE is able to do it over and over and over suggests that it ain't all that hard.
ForTheEmpire2014
Doomheim
#277 - 2014-12-05 00:15:01 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
ForTheEmpire2014 wrote:
Lister Dax wrote:
Amber Lana wrote:
Why is this thread still going on? It's impossible to end bumping without a rewrite of the game engine, anyway.


It's pretty much Veers arguing a point and then ignoring any counter-points that discredit his claims and so he makes up a new point.


He cannot (or will not) ever stay on thread topics. Just his own repetitive, predictable, narcissistic rants.
"Blood and Feathers" Belvar and his moving goalposts.


And if you feel bumping is op, I suggest you get a ship out there and try it yourself. See what people do to avoid you, and apply that knowledge.


Uh huh. A thread about bumping freighters, which is overwhelmingly done by CODE, and even to empty freighters, relates directly to the safety of highsec. And the fact that CODE is able to do it over and over and over suggests that it ain't all that hard.


? That made absolutely no sense whatsoever. But at least you tried to talk about the topic... I think...Roll
ForTheEmpire2014
Doomheim
#278 - 2014-12-05 00:18:23 UTC
[_______]
| |

The goalposts are here, Veersie, stop moving them.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#279 - 2014-12-05 00:20:26 UTC
ForTheEmpire2014 wrote:
[_______]
| |

The goalposts are here, Veersie, stop moving them.


LOL. All I will say is that it's crazy that if you warp disrupt someone in highsec, CONCORD turns you into a smear on the wall. But if you bumptrap them for hours on end....nothing happens. Hard to think that anyone in their right mind think that makes sense in highsec.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#280 - 2014-12-05 00:21:53 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

Uh huh. A thread about bumping freighters, which is overwhelmingly done by CODE, and even to empty freighters, relates directly to the safety of highsec. And the fact that CODE is able to do it over and over and over suggests that it ain't all that hard.


Actually, that suggests that most people fail to use the almost 100% effective tactic to avoid being bumped.

What you aren't seeing is all the people who do, and therefore don't get ganked.

So dumb people who won't defend themselves are dying. Working as intended.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.