These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rhea] Small Beam Lasers

First post
Author
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#81 - 2014-12-02 09:31:55 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
I for one welcome our new soon to be nerfed right after inception Beam Confessor Overlords.








They still did not nerf the even more overpowered mordus ships...

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#82 - 2014-12-02 09:33:53 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I'd wager that the small rails and small arties will get looked at when the other T3 destroyers get released, which may well include turret-wide balances like the Scorch change.


perhaps then missiles will finally get looked at ..
- HAM's and rockets needs -50% range , but with some damage buffs in exchange
- maybe remove the lame rapid launchers gimmick for some proper missile options of appropriate sizes
- new missile tracking mods ,
- nerf cruises range down and slight ROF nerf.. Rise you know you overbuffed them


50% is a bit too much.... Rockets woudl get inti REALLY useles status .. Even hams are not problematic.. the problem is when they are combined with the LOTS of ships with missile velocity bonus. Check hams on a prophecy or Cyclone, they are not overpowered there.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#83 - 2014-12-02 09:35:57 UTC
Lloyd Roses wrote:
With those changes and Aurora S

Confessor: 245dps at 75k optimal
Retribution: 145dps at 50k optimal

Not bad, they'll blend in nicely with other absurdities like sniper cormorants and rail-harpies.


So is the confessor going to have an insane price or what is the reason to make it such a sniperbeast?



They are making the confessor to counter the current interceptor meta. Want to bring a gang of interceptors? great for you.. you will be toasted by confessors at a 5:1 ratio.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#84 - 2014-12-02 14:40:43 UTC
so I tried fitting these, and even after like 3 fitting buffs, they're still impossible
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#85 - 2014-12-02 14:44:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Harvey James
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Harvey James wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I'd wager that the small rails and small arties will get looked at when the other T3 destroyers get released, which may well include turret-wide balances like the Scorch change.


perhaps then missiles will finally get looked at ..
- HAM's and rockets needs -50% range , but with some damage buffs in exchange
- maybe remove the lame rapid launchers gimmick for some proper missile options of appropriate sizes
- new missile tracking mods ,
- nerf cruises range down and slight ROF nerf.. Rise you know you overbuffed them


50% is a bit too much.... Rockets woudl get inti REALLY useles status .. Even hams are not problematic.. the problem is when they are combined with the LOTS of ships with missile velocity bonus. Check hams on a prophecy or Cyclone, they are not overpowered there.


well as with guns and all mods in general as they step up a size the range is always increased substantially 100% often ... now they could buff torp range too achieve this but torps at 40km basic or more is far too much.. 50km with javs i think ..
so the other option is nerfing HAM's and rockets too achieve the normal pattern, (_km) being normal pattern is should be.
rockets - 10km ( 5km)
HAM's - 20km (10km)
Torps - 40km (20km)

another option could be making missiles behave differently too all other modules , with say a 50% increase per size so
rockets - 10km
HAM's - 15km
Torps 20km

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Templar Dane
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#86 - 2014-12-02 15:00:11 UTC
TrouserDeagle wrote:
so I tried fitting these, and even after like 3 fitting buffs, they're still impossible


An old joke from way back mentioned that there is only ONE type of small beam, the dual light beam.

Because of the insane fitting requirements on the focused beam.....
Templar Dane
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#87 - 2014-12-02 15:03:56 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:



They are making the confessor to counter the current interceptor meta. Want to bring a gang of interceptors? great for you.. you will be toasted by confessors at a 5:1 ratio.


I'm not so sure that will be the case, since they lack a tracking bonus.
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#88 - 2014-12-02 16:02:38 UTC  |  Edited by: TrouserDeagle
nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.
Templar Dane
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#89 - 2014-12-02 16:53:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Templar Dane
TrouserDeagle wrote:
nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.


As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in a coercer, a ship with a 50% tracking bonus, I can say that tracking is an issue.

An ab frigate or one with a TD can get under it's guns, even when fitted with pulse lasers, and it has a pretty big bonus the confessor doesn't....
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#90 - 2014-12-02 21:13:04 UTC
Templar Dane wrote:
TrouserDeagle wrote:
nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.


As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in a coercer, a ship with a 50% tracking bonus, I can say that tracking is an issue.

An ab frigate or one with a TD can get under it's guns, even when fitted with pulse lasers, and it has a pretty big bonus the confessor doesn't....


fit a web. +150% tracking speed if you're sitting still, more if you're moving.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#91 - 2014-12-02 21:45:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Harvey James
tracking disruptors need a nerf , mind you most e-war does beside ecm .. especially with drones being so strong atm, makes ecm less useful..

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Goldensaver
Maraque Enterprises
Just let it happen
#92 - 2014-12-03 00:27:19 UTC
TrouserDeagle wrote:
Templar Dane wrote:
TrouserDeagle wrote:
nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.


As someone who has spent quite a bit of time in a coercer, a ship with a 50% tracking bonus, I can say that tracking is an issue.

An ab frigate or one with a TD can get under it's guns, even when fitted with pulse lasers, and it has a pretty big bonus the confessor doesn't....


fit a web. +150% tracking speed if you're sitting still, more if you're moving.

Probably one of my favourite uses of the new mid slot.

Now on the Coercer, that's unfortunately not an option. It's really a shame.
Reynas Arthie
Doomheim
#93 - 2014-12-03 01:05:18 UTC
Every ship setup that I have flown with Small focused pulse lasers can pretty much be fitted with small focussed beam lasers with little to no fitting modification.

And on top of it all the current small beams give me almost identical DPS if the right crystals are selected.

The new beam lasers are going to give so much more it is great!

EAT LASER SCUM!!
Ashlar Vellum
Esquire Armaments
#94 - 2014-12-05 09:25:01 UTC
Fozzie why -10% tracking , is it 'cause of +10% optimal?
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#95 - 2014-12-05 15:25:44 UTC
Schneevva wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I'd wager that the small rails and small arties will get looked at when the other T3 destroyers get released, which may well include turret-wide balances like the Scorch change.


Why exactly would this happen?

Given that the small beam and scorch changes were timed to coincide with the release of the first D3, it seems that CCP is taking their balance rather seriously and will likely tweak other D3 weapon systems accordingly.

Mind you, this is pure speculation.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Flyinghotpocket
Small Focused Memes
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#96 - 2014-12-07 15:58:02 UTC
TrouserDeagle wrote:
nobody cares about tracking. you have no range because tracking disruptors exist, so you cannot shoot kitescum.

yea your right, nobody cares about tracking anymore. since the game has come full circle.

everybody uses drones and missiles now thus condors are not longer using dual tracking disruptors enmass they are using sensor damps now.

Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro

Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#97 - 2014-12-14 13:50:05 UTC
Always used pulse lasers since day 1.
Now would probably be a good idea to check out beams....